Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Children’s Well-Being

Prof. Asher Ben-Arieh


Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The Haruv Institute, Jerusalem
benarieh@mail.huji.ac.il
Background

We often use the term Well-Being in Social Science


but…
How do you define Well-being in different languages?

Dictionary Definition:
Well-being is the desirable situation in which a person is happy,
healthy and prosperous
Background

We often use the term Well-Being in Social Science


but…
How do you define Well-being in different languages?

Not only for researchers


Now-a-days, the term ‘well-being’ provides us a wide conceptual
framework to examine, change and develop services, therapeutic
interventions and relevant policies.
Well-being is a broad term

It replaces the limited perspective of earlier terms used


Welfare Standard of living GDP
What does WELL-BEING include?
Subjective feelings Happiness Life conditions Self-fulfillment
Opportunities for growth Balance between pleasure and pain

World Health Organization:


“Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-
being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”
The special place of Subjective Well-Being

Most researchers now-a-days agree that well-being includes a subjective factor -


this factor has an affective part which is related to “happiness” and a cognitive
part which is related to “life satisfactory”.

Although the meaning of “improvement of objective life conditions” is clear to


everyone in the research field, the improvement of subjective life conditions is
still vague.

The most important question today is: Do countries need to develop policy aimed
towards rising the subjective well-being of their citizens? If so, what kind of policy
will it be?
Today’s questions…

A WHY
B HOW
C WHAT
is learning from did the view towards can we learn
children important? children changed? from children?
A
Why is learning from children
important?
The importance of
involving
children in
research The Justifications are:
about their lives is 1 Incorporating children’s rights
embedded in four
justifications 2 Changes in the perspective on children

3 The changing context of child welfare

4 Children know the most about their lives


1 Incorporating children’s rights
Normative-Legislative justification

The major change in the status of children is


reflected in the RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE and to
be actively involved in the decision-making
process regarding their lives.

These self-determination rights are legal rights


and must be the norm in our society.
2 Changes in the perspective on children
Theoretical justification

 Criticism on developmental psychology and socialization


theory that view children as “UNFINISHED PERSONS”.

 The shifting perspective of children and childhood from


passive beings to ACTIVE PERSONS in their lives.

We need the children’s SUBJECIVE POINT OF VIEW of their lives.


3 The changing context of child welfare
Theoretical justification

Recent shifts in our understanding of children’s well-being:

From survival and basic needs Development and well-being

From negative Positive

From well-becoming Well-being

From what is desired Legally established minimums


From survival and basic needs
To development and well-being 1st shift

Much attention has been paid to children’s physical survival


and basic needs – and for good reasons. The result was the focus
on saving children.

Now the definition of well being moved


from supplying minimums, as in saving a life,
to a focus on quality of life.
From negative
To positive 2nd shift

 The absence of problems or failures does not necessarily


indicate proper growth and success.

 Therefore, we want to also focus on protective factors or


positive behaviors.

The challenge is to develop a concept that holds societies


accountable for more than the safe warehousing of children and
youth.
From well-becoming
To well-being 3rd shift
Two axels- Well-becoming describes future focusing on preparing children for
happy and productive adulthood life,
as opposed to the immediacy well-being, focusing on the well-being of the
child in the present.

Focusing on the child’s well-being in the present doesn’t abolish the relevance
of the development of the child towards his adulthood. Even so, focusing on
preparing the children towards their citizenship means that they aren’t citizens
during childhood.

Anyone interested in children and childhood should also be interested in the


present as well as future childhood.
From what is desired
To Legally established minimums
4th shift
 Although inspired and to some extent guided by the child rights
movement, the new concept of well being goes beyond the
concept of rights.

 Perhaps the most crucial difference is the standard used to


measure children’s status. Children’s well-being is normally
focused on what is desired, but rights monitoring addresses
legally established minimums.
4 Children know the most about their lives
Practical-Methodological justification

 Children’s experiences are different from the adults’


perceptions (or “knowledge”) about them.

 The adults cannot serve as a valid proxy measure for children


or childhood.

ONLY DIRECT ANSWERS FROM CHILDREN can reveal to us their


true perceptions, experiences, thoughts and feelings.
B
How did the view towards
children changed?
I would argue that
this change in
context is the
consequence of two major sources:

Normative-legislative and theoretical


advancements

Changes in the technical and


methodological research abilities
“New” normative and theoretical approaches
Theories and normative approaches to children’s welfare abound.
Many have contributed to the changing context and many more
continue to do so.
The most influencing approaches on the changing child welfare
context:
 The Ecological Theories of child development
 The normative concept of Children’s Rights
 The New Sociology of Childhood as a stage in and of itself
New methodological and technical abilities
Just as new theories contributed to the new context of
children's well being,
three methodological perspectives have done the same:
• The call for using the child as the Unit of Observation
• The emerging importance of Subjective Perspectives
• The expanded use of Administrative Data and the growing
variety of data sources
From an adult to a child perspective

Any attempt made by a grown-up to decide what “quality of


life” is for a child, transgresses to the term’s basic definition:
Quality of life is a subjective perception.

Children should take part of the conversations regarding their


well-being and quality of life. The research field should learn
from their unique perspective.
From an adult to a child perspective

With these changes, efforts to study children’s well-being


had to ask the following questions:
What are children doing? What do children contribute?
What do children need? What do children have?
What do children think and feel?
To whom or what are children connected and related?
Answering such questions demanded a better picture of children as human
beings in their present life including the positive aspects of it. To better
answer such questions, the field had to focus on children’s daily lives, which
is something children know most about.
C
What can we learn from children?

Will be discussed in the next lecture


What is important to children?
We should ask ourselves,
and mostly ask the children… This kind of research would
▪ What do they want to talk about? reveal how do children
▪ What do they want to tell us? experience their everyday lives
▪ How do they describe their Therefore…
narratives? ▪ It would make a difference in our
▪ What are they interested in or understanding of their interests,
concerned for? concerns and priorities.
▪ It would provide new insights into the
children’s capabilities.
Dhal, 2014; Hart & Tyrer, 2006; Pascal & Bertram, 2009; Rasmussen, 2014
Children’s self-reported Well-Being

Well-being

Psychological Subjective

Affective Cognitive
Positive/Negative Life Satisfaction

The Good Childhood Report 2013


Children’s subjective well-being
The Children’s Worlds Project – Self report via structured questionnaires
Home & Family Friends School

Money & economic circumstances Time Use Local Area

Children’s rights Self Overall subjective well-being


The Children’s Worlds Project
Israeli 8-year-old’s satisfaction of…
Scale 0 to 4
0= =4
The people you live with
4

The home you live in The area where you live


3

Jews 2

Arabs Your friends The things you have


Girls

Boys

General Your life as a student Your free time


population
Domains of children's well-being
Derived from children’s interviews
1 Positive sense of self
Fundamental 2 Agency [controlling everyday life]
Themes 3 Security and safety

4 Activities [freedom, competence and fun]


5 Adversity [dealing with difficulties]
Other 6 Material and economic resources [of the family]
Domains 7 Physical environment
8 Physical health [care, food, activities]
9 Social responsibility and moral agency [being a “good person”]

Fattore, Mason & Watson, 2008


Children’s Rights
Children are mostly
concerned with their wish
to be heard and have a
say in decision making;
be respected and trusted;
be regarded as people.

Yet, they do not wish to


have full control, and
accept and respect the
adult’s power and
control.
Melton & Limber, 1992
Morrow, 1999
Thank you
for listening!

Prof. Asher Ben-Arieh


Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
The Haruv Institute, Jerusalem
benarieh@mail.huji.ac.il

You might also like