10/21/2015

BUILDING ENGINEERING INSTITUTE

DESIGN  OF 
CONCRETE  STRUCTRES
Dr. Toe Toe Win
Fellow MES; A.C.P.E., P.E
Visiting Associate Professor
Visiting Associate Professor
Civil Engineering Department
Yangon Technological 
University

25‐10‐2015 1

OUTLINE
• INTRODUTION
• MEMBER DESIGN
MEMBER DESIGN
– SLAB
– BEAM
– COLUMN
• CONCLUSION

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
2

1
 10/21/2015

1. INTRODUTION

From design aspect, a structure may fall under one of the 
following categories:
following categories:
1. Undesigned structures
2. Underdesigned structures
3. Overdesigned structures
4. Optimally designed structures

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
3

Undesinged Structures

• The undesigned structures are those built without being

designed following any of the well
well‐established
established analysis and
design procedures.
• Both the proportioning of members and the actual
construction are done entirely based on rules of thumb or
past experiences.
• The structure may thus be overstrong in one part while
inadequate in another.
another

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
4

2
 10/21/2015

Underdesigned structures

• The underdesigned structures are those designed by

engineers but are deficient in strength for using undersized
members reinforcement too lightly. This is mainly due to a
deliberate effort to get most profit out of the project, without
regard for the consequences of structural failure in case of
overloads or accidental understrength of members.
• The margin of safety is less than the internationally accepted
norms.

Losses of life and property are at stake!!!

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
5

Overdesigned structures

• The overdesigned structures are those designed by engineers

who are too eager to avoid making a bad name in their carrier
through possible structural mishap caused by factors which
are beyond their control.
• Another reason for overdesign is that the designer has no
control over the quality of materials and construction.

Practice without theory is BLIND!!!

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
6

3
 10/21/2015

Optimally designed structures
• The optimally designed structures are those analyzed and
designed according to logical and scientific concepts,
principles and methods, with due consideration given to
peculiarities of individual sites.
sites
• The designer may often be called upon to make reasonable
assumptions in analysis and design, to take calculated risk,
to exercise judgement and to make decisions based on
sound engineering principles in order to meet the
requirements of safety, serviceability and economy.
• The
Th designer
d i under
d this
hi category will
ill always
l try to “trim
“ i the
h
fat” from all parts of the structure in order to achieve
economy without affecting safety and serviceability
requirements.

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
7

CONCRETE
• High compressive strength,  like that  of natural stones,
• Members that are continuously supported by soil,
• Members for which arch action provides compression under 
Members for which arch action provides compression under
all conditions of loading,
• The use of structural plain concrete columns and structural 
plain concrete footings on piles is not permitted.
• Walls and pedestals.

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
8

4
 10/21/2015

REINFORCED CONCRETE
• the relatively low cost,
• the high tensile strength,
• good weather and fire resistance,
• much greater ductility and toughness of steel
• good compressive strength, and excellent formability of
concrete

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
9

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

• to  use  steels  and  concretes of very  high strength  in 
combination
• under  high tension  that  is  held in equilibrium by compressive  
d hi h t i th t i h ld i ilib i b i
stresses
• Prestressing greatly reduces  both the  deflections  and  the  
tensile  cracks
• Prestressed  concrete  has  extended, to  a  very significant  
extent,  the  range  of spans  of structural concrete

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
10

5
 10/21/2015

LOADS
• DEAD  LOADS
– Weight of materials and construction
– Weight of fixed service equipment
– Soil loads and hydrostatic pressure
• LIVE LOADS
LIVE  LOADS
– Roof live load
– Fixed ladder
– Grab bar system
– Guardrail system
– Handrail
– Vehicle barrier system
– Rain loads
• Environmental LOADS
– Wind loads
– Seismic loads

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
11

LOAD COMBINATIONS

Basic Load Combinations according to Basic Load Combinations according to
ACI 318‐05 MNBC ‐ 2012
• 1.4 ( D + F )  • 1.4 ( D + F ) 
( )
• 1.2 ( D + F + T ) + 1.6 ( L + H ) + 0.5 (Lr or R ) • 1.2 ( D + F + T ) + 1.6 ( L + H ) + 0.5 ( Lr or R )
• 1.2 D + 1.6 (Lr or R ) + ( L or 0.8W) • 1.2 D + 1.6( Lr or R ) + 0.8 ( L or 0.8W)
• 1.2 D + 1.6 W + L + 0.5 (Lr or R ) • 1.2 D + 1.6 W + L + 0.5 ( Lr or R )
• 1.2 D + 1.0 E + L • 1.2 D + 1.0 E + L
• 0.9 D + 1.6 W + 1.6 H • 0.9 D + 1.6 W + 1.6 H
• 0.9 D + 1.0 E + 1.6 H • 0.9 D + 1.0 E + 1.6 H
( L.R.F.D or Strength Design ) ( L.R.F.D or Strength Design )

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
12

6
 10/21/2015

DESIGN BASIC

• 5S for structural designer
– STRENGTH
– SERVICEABILITY
– STABILITY
– STRUCTURAL SAFETY
– SUSTAINABLITY

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
13

Material Strength  ( MNBC – 2012 )
Concrete
The compressive strength ( fc’) of concrete at stage ages:
fc’ shall not less than 2500 psi.
’ shall not less than 2500 psi
fc’ shall not less than 3000 psi for seismic‐resistant design.  

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
14

7
 10/21/2015

Material Strength
Reinforcing Steel
– The yield strength ( fy ) of reinforcing steel
– Tensile strength ( f
Tensile strength ( fult ) and percentage elongation
) and percentage elongation

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
15

Concrete Cover  (MNBC – 2012) 
Cast‐in‐place concrete ( nonprestressed )

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
16

8
 10/21/2015

Details of Reinforcement (MNBC – 2012)

Minimum diameters of bend for standard hooks
Minimum diameters of bend for standard hooks
Bar Size  Minimum Diameter
Nos. 3 through 8 (Nos. 10 through 25)  6 x bar diameters
Nos. 9,10, and 11 (Nos. 29, 32, and 36) 8 x bar diameters
Nos. 14 and 18 (Nos. 43 and 57)           10 x bar diameters
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
17

CODE  OF  PRACTICE  FOR  CONCRETE  DESIGN
Two types of codes:
1. Structural Code
• originated and controlled by specialists
• proper use of a specific material 
proper use of a specific material
• the safe design of a particular class of structures

The Myanmar National Building Code : MNBC – 2012,
The American Concrete Institute: ACI‐318‐05, 
The Uniform Building Code: UBC 97,
The American Society of Civil Engineers: ASCE7‐05,. Etc.

2 Building Code
2. Building Code
• to cover construction in a given region
• accounting for the influence of local environmental conditions or 
construction

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
18

9
 10/21/2015

Some Structural Safety Considerations
1. Actual loads may differ from those assumed in the design.
2. Actual loads may be distributed in a manner different from that
assumed in the design.
3. The assumptions and simplications inherent in any analysis may
result in calculated load effects – moments, shear, etc. different
from those that in fact act in the structure.
4. The actual structural behavior may differ from that assumed,
owing to imperfect knowledge.
5. Actual member dimensions may differ from those specified by the
designer.
6 Reinforcement
6. R i f t may nott be
b in
i its
it proper position.
iti
7. Actual material strength may be different from that specified by
the designer.

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
19

2. MEMBER DESIGN
Design Strength ≥ Required Strength
φ ( Nominal Strength ) ≥ Required Strength

The purposes of the strength reduction factor φ are 
(1) To allow for the probability of under‐strength members 
due to variations in material strengths and dimensions,
(2) To allow for inaccuracies in the design equations,
(3) To reflect the degree of ductility and required reliability of 
To reflect the degree of ductility and required reliability of
the member under the load effects being considered, and
(4) To reflect the importance of the member in the structure.

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
20

10
 10/21/2015

MODIFICATION  TO  ACI 318‐05
Strength reduction factor φ values
ACI MNBC‐
318‐05 2012
Tension‐controlled section 0.90 0.80
Compression‐controlled section
• members with spiral reinforcement 0.7 0.67
conforming
• other reinforced members 0.65 0.62
Shear and torsion 0.75 0.75
Bearing on concrete 0.65 0.6
Post‐tensioned anchorage zones 0.85 0.8
Strut‐and‐ties models 0.75 0.70
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
21

MODIFICATION  TO  ACI 318‐05

ACI 318‐05

Spiral φ = 0.67 + 0.2 [ (1/c/dt ) – (5/3)] MNBC ‐ 2012

Other φ = 0.62 + 0.25 [ (1/c/dt) – (5/3)]
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
22

11
 10/21/2015

23

ONE WAY SLAB
1. Slab thickness
2. Tensile reinforcement
3. Temperature and 
shrinkage reinforcement
4.  Deflection

1. Minimum thickness of nonprestressed one‐way slabs
Simply supported l/20
One end continuous
One end continuous l/24
Both ends continuous l/28
Cantilever l/10

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
24

12
 10/21/2015

ONE WAY SLAB
2. Tensile Reinforcement
Tensile reinforcement ratio ρ = 0.005  ( maximum practical value)
Typically,     0.004 ≤ ρ < 0.008  

3. Temperature and Shrinkage reinforcement in slabs based on
gross concrete area

( ACI 318‐05 & MNBC 2012 )
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
25

TWO WAY SLAB
• at any point the slab is curved in both principal directions
• bending moments are proportional to curvatures
• moments also exist in both directions
• th l b
the slab must be reinforced in both directions, by at least 
tb i f d i b th di ti b tl t
two layers of bars perpendicular

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
26

13
 10/21/2015

TWO WAY SLAB

Deflection

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
27

DESIGN OF BEAMS
1. Flexural Strength 
2. Thrust Strength
3. Shear Strength
g
4. Torsional Strength

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
28

14
 10/21/2015

DESIGN OF BEAMS
• Rectangular Beam
• T‐ Beam
• Deep Beam
p

Tension Reinforced Beam

Tension and compression Reinforced Beam

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
29

DESIGN OF BEAMS
• Minimum reinforcement ratio, ρmin
• Maximum reinforcement  ratio, ρmax
• Balanced reinforcement ratio ρb
Balanced reinforcement ratio, ρ
• Deflection limitation,
• Minimum beam depth, 

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
30

15
 10/21/2015

ρmin < ρact ≤ ρmax < ρb 

The upper limit on ρ
pp ρ should be below ρ ρb for the following reasons:
g
(1) ρ = ρb , without significant yielding before failure;
(2) material properties are never known precisely;
(3) strain‐hardening of the reinforcing steel may lead to a brittle 
concrete compression failure even though ρ < ρb ;
(4) the actual steel area provided, tending toward 
overreinforcement; and
(5) the extra ductility provided by beams with lower values of ρ
increases the deflection capability substantially and thus 
provides warning prior to failure.
31

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win

Typical Stress Distributions on Beams

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
32

16
 10/21/2015

Doubly Reinforced Beam

 For beams with less than the minimum depth, the compression 
b i hl h h i i d h h i
reinforcement cannot yield unless the tensile reinforcement 
exceeds ρmax∙

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
33

Tension and Compression Steel Both at Yield Stress

φ = 0.8 (tension‐controlled)

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
34

17
 10/21/2015

Compression Steel below Yield Stress

φ = 0.8 (tension‐controlled)

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
35

Shear strength in Beam Design

φ = 0.75

Nominal shear stress:

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
36

18
 10/21/2015

Torsional strength in Beam Design

φ = 0.75

• Nominal torsional strength :

• Required cross‐sectional are of one stirrup leg for torsion:

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
37

Minimum web reinforcement for shear and torsion

• Minimum area of closed stirrups:

• Spacing for vertical stirrups:

• Maximum spacing for vertical stirrups, the smallest is preferred:

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
38

19
 10/21/2015

Maximum Allowable Deflection 
(MNBC ‐ 2012)

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
39

COMPRESSION  MEMBERS
Three types of reinforced concrete compression members:
1. Members reinforced with longitudinal bars and lateral ties.
2. Members reinforced with longitudinal bars and continuous spirals.
3 Composite compression members reinforced longitudinally with 
3. Composite compression members reinforced longitudinally with
structural steel shapes , pipe, or tubing, with or without additional 
longitudinal bars, and various types of lateral reinforcement

0.01 < longitudinal steel ratio ≤ 0.08

Most columns are design with ratio below 0 04

Most columns are design with ratio below 0.04.

A beam failure would normally affect only a local region, whereas a column 
failure could result in the collapse of the entire structure.
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
40

20
 10/21/2015

COLUMN
SHORT COLUMNS SLENDER COLUMNS
• the strength is governed by the   • the strength may be significantly 
strength of the materials and the  reduced by lateral deflections
geometry of the cross section
t f th ti

ACI‐ASCE survey indicated  that 90 percent of columns braced  
against sidesway and 40 percent of unbraced  columns could 
be designed as short columns. 

A beam failure would normally affect only a local region, whereas 
a column failure could result in the collapse of the entire structure.

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
41

COLUMN  DESIGN

MNBC ‐2012

Ties:  φ = 0.62
Spirals: φ = 0.67

42
ACI PROVISIONS FOR COLUMN DESIGN

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win

21
 10/21/2015

CONCENTRICALLY LOADED COLUMN  DESIGN

The nominal strength,

Considering accidental eccentricities of loading:
For spirally reinforced columns,

For tied columns,

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
43

ECCENTRICALLY LOADED COLUMN  DESIGN

The nominal strength,

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
44

22
 10/21/2015

STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTOR FOR 
COLUMN DESIGN

MNBC ‐2012
Ties:  φ = 0.62
S i l φ = 0.67
Spirals: φ 0 67

MNBC ‐2012
φ = 0.8

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
45

ACI 318‐05 MNBC‐2012

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
46

23
 10/21/2015

3. CONCLUSION

• For the entire society, engineer must eager to 
design and built optimally designed structures
design and built optimally designed structures.
• Engineer takes responsibility for all conquesences 
of his creations.
• The MNBC‐2012 is based on the ACI and the ASCE 
codes and some modifications have made to suit 
for our country.
• The changes on strength reduction factor for 
strength design is totally aiming to public safety.
Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
47

References

• Arthur H. Nilson, David Darwin and Charles W. 
D l “D i
Dolan, “Design of Concrete Structures”, 
fC t St t ”
Fourteenth Edition, McGraw‐Hill, 2010.
• Nyi Hla Nge. U, “Design of Concrete 
Structures”, 2010.
• Myanmar National Building Code 2012.
Myanmar National Building Code 2012

Design of Concrete Structure Dr. Toe Toe Win
48

24
 10/21/2015

PART ‐ II

49

For 
2 Basement + 12 & Half Storeyed R.C.C  Building

Presented  by
Dr. Toe 
Dr. Toe Toe
Toe Win
Associate Professor
YANGON TECHNOLIGICAL UNIVERSITY
50

25
 10/21/2015

Basic Preparation for Structural

Design Process
1. Collection of relevant data, such as architectural 
drawings soil investigation report material test
drawings, soil investigation report, material test 
results, building codes & specification, by laws, 
guidelines issued by YCDC, CQHP, drainages, water 
table, existing structures, etc.
2. Preparation of structural specifications and input 
parameters such as material strength concrete
parameters, such as material strength, concrete 
cover, bars spacing, development length, splice 
length, standard bars hook, etc.

51

Basic Preparation for Structural

Design Process
3. Architectural requirement, such as intended purpose, 
opening in floors, level different,  presence of water tank, 
lift ware, roof‐top garden, M&E requirements, etc.
4. Selection of appropriate Structural framing system.
5. Selection of appropriate software.
6. Observing software outputs.
7. Design detailing and sketching for structural elements.
8. Supplementary design such as slabs, stairs, basement 
retaining walls, etc.
9. Preparation for structural detail drawings, 
documentation, submission, etc.

52

26
 10/21/2015

SEISMIC DESIGN PROCEDURE

Step                               description
1. Identify appropriate structural system.

2. Classify occupancy category of the structure.

3. Determine the components of seismic base shear 
coefficient.
coefficient

4. Identify structural system limitations and 
irregularities.
53

SEISMIC DESIGN PROCEDURE

(continued)
Step                              description
5. Select appropriate lateral‐force procedure.

6. Determine the total design base shear.

7. Distribution the design base shear over the 
structure’s height
structure’s height.

8. Analyze P‐∆ effects for the structure.

54

27
 10/21/2015

SEISMIC DESIGN PROCEDURE

(continued)
Step                              description
9. Examine overturning effects caused by earthquake 
forces.
10. Evaluate torsional effects for the structure.
11. Study story drift limitations.
y y
12. Consider redundancy of lateral‐force resisting 
system.

55

SEISMIC DESIGN PROCEDURE

(continued)
Step                              description

13. Evaluate overstrength of lateral force resisting 

system.

14. Design elements of the structure

15 Confirm seismic detailing  requirements with the 
15. C fi i i d ili i ih h
UBC‐97.

16. Verify structure’s continuous load path completion.
56

28
 10/21/2015

Foundation Checking
Base on Soil Investigation

57

Soil Investigation
1. Bore Holes Location
2. Number of Bore Holes
3 Depth off Bore Holes
3.
4. Calculation of Soil Types
5. Bearing Capacity
6. Lateral Sub-grade Reaction, Pile Base Reaction &
Skin Friction
7. Liquefaction

58

29
 10/21/2015

NUMBER OF BORE HOLE

According to CQHP Guideline

Up to 10,000 ft² Area One bore hole for 2,500 ft² area (minimum)
≥Two bore holes

More than10,000 ft² Area One bore hole for 2,500 ft² (up to 10,000 ft²)
+
One bore hole for 5,000 ft² (additional bore hole)
DEPTH OF BORE HOLE

I. Shallow Foundations

1.5 x lesser dimension of project area ≥ 30 ft

II. Deep Foundations

Z  15 S0.7 (ft)

S = Number of stories including basement 59

Table 16-J- Soil Profile Type (UBC 97)

AVERAGE SOIL PROPERTIES FOR 100 FEET (30,480 mm) OF SOIL PROFILE

SOIL  SOIL PROFILE  Shear Wave 

PROFILE  NAME/GENERIC Velocity,Vs
TYPE DESCRIPTION

feet/second (m/s)
feet/second (m/s) 

Hard Rock > 5,000
SA (1,500)

Rock 2,500 to 5,000
_ _
SB (760 to 1,500)

Very Dense Soil 1,200 to 2,500 > 2,000

> 50 (100)
SC and Soft Rock (360 to 760)

15 to 50 1,000 to 2,000

600 to 1,200
Stiff Soil Profile (50 to 100)
SD (180 to 360)

< 600 < 1,000
SE Soft Soil Profile
(180)
< 15 (50)

SF Soil Requiring Site‐specific Evaluation,  See Section 1629.3.1
60

30
 10/21/2015

Bearing Capacity

Pile in Sand
I. Based on Soil Report () By Tomlinson
II. Based on SPT “N” By Meyerhof in Rules of Thumb
III Based
III. B d on SPT “N” BBy MMeyerhof
h f iin R
R.F
FC i 7th Edition
Craig Editi

Pile in Clay
I. Based on Cohesion of Soil from Soil Report By Tomlinson
II. Based on Cohesion of Soil from Soil Report By Meyerhof in Rules of
Thumb
III. Based on Cohesion of Soil from Soil Report By Meyerhof in R.F Craig
7th Edition

61

2 Basement + 12 & Half Storeyed R.C.C  Building
Reinforced Concrete  Structure 
Analysis & Design (Superstructure)

Presented  by 
Dr. Toe Toe Win 62

31
 10/21/2015

Structural analysis
y and design
g
According to proposed structural
system

63

64

32
 10/21/2015

65

66

33
 10/21/2015

67

Structural System
Frame System :  
Frame System :  Intermediate Moment Resisting
Intermediate Moment Resisting
Frame + Shear Wall
F Sh W ll
Analysis            :  
Analysis            :  Static Analysis
Static Analysis

Code of practice : ACI 318
ACI 318‐‐99, UBC 
99, UBC 9797
Guides line
Guides line        :   
: Y.C.D.C , CQHP
Y C D C CQHP
Material Specification : f′c =  = 3,000 
3,000 psi 
psi 
fy = 
= 50,000 
50,000 psi ; 
psi ; 
fys = 
= 40,000 
40,000 psi
psi
68

34
 10/21/2015

Gravity Load
Frame Line Load
Material  weights
Material  weights
 4.5
4.5" thick brick wall  
" thick brick wall   =   50   
=   50   psf
psf
 9" thick brick wall      =   =  100  
100  psf
psf
 Lift Weight                   =  6720 lbs
Floor Area Load
Floor Area Load
Live  Loads
Live  Loads
 Residential                      =    40   psf
Residential                      =    40   psf
 Staircases                        =  100  
Staircases                        =   100   psf
 Roof                                =    20   psf
Roof                                =    20   psf
 Car Parking                      =    60   
Car Parking                      =    60   psf psf
 Water Tank                      =   250  psf
Water Tank                      =   250  psf
Super  Dead  Loads
Super  Dead  Loads
 Floor  
Floor  finishing              
finishing               =    20   
=    20   psf
psf
 Staircases                         
Staircases                         =  
=   20    
20    psf
psf
69

Lateral load
Seismic Load according to UBC 97
Seismic  Zone factor   =  0.2 (2B)
Soil Profile Type          =  SD
Ct                                   =  0.03
Overstrength factor,R =  5.5
Important Factor , I     =  1
Wind Load according  to  UBC 97
Basic Wind Speed       =  120 mph
Exposure Type             =   C
Important Factor , I    =  1

70

35
 10/21/2015

Design Load combination

No Combinations No Combinations
F1 DL CQHP1 1.4 DL
F2 DL + LL CQHP2 1.4 DL + 1.7 LL
F3 DL + WX CQHP3 1.05 DL +1.275 LL+ 1.275 WX
F4 DL ‐ WX CQHP4 1.05 DL +1.275 LL ‐ 1.275 WX
F5 DL + WY CQHP5 1.05 DL +1.275 LL+ 1.275 WY
F6 DL ‐WY CQHP6 1 05 DL 1 275 LL 1.275 WY
1.05 DL +1.275 LL ‐ 1 275 WY
CQHP7 0.9 DL + 1.3 WX
F7 DL + 0.714 EQX
CQHP8 0.9 DL ‐ 1.3 WX
F8 DL ‐ 0.714 EQX
CQHP9 0.9 DL + 1.3 WY
F9 DL + 0.714 EQY 
CQHP10 0.9 DL ‐ 1.3 WY
F10 DL ‐ 0.714 EQY
CQHP11 1.05 DL + 1.28 LL + 1 EQX
F11 0.9 DL + 0.714 EQX
CQHP12 1.05 DL + 1.28 LL ‐ 1  EQX
F12 0.9 DL ‐ 0.714 EQX CQHP13 1.05 DL + 1.28 LL + 1 EQY
F13 0.9 DL + 0.714 EQY  CQHP14 1.05 DL + 1.28 LL ‐ 1  EQY
F14 0.9 DL ‐ 0.714 EQY  CQHP15 0.9 DL + 1.02 EQX
F15 DL + 0.75 LL + 0.75 WX CQHP16
CQHP 6 0.9 DL ‐ 1.02  EQX
0.9 .0 QX
F16 DL + 0.75 LL ‐ 0.75 WX CQHP17 0.9 DL + 1.02 EQY
F17 DL + 0.75 LL + 0.75 WY CQHP18 0.9 DL ‐ 1.02  EQY
F18 DL + 0.75 LL ‐ 0.75 WY CQHP19 1.16 DL + 1.28 LL + 1 EQX
F19 DL + 0.75 LL + 0.54 EQX CQHP20 1.16 DL + 1.28 LL ‐ 1 EQX
F20 DL + 0.75 LL ‐ 0.54 EQX CQHP21 1.16 DL + 1.28 LL + 1 EQY
F21 DL + 0.75 LL + 0.54 EQY  CQHP22 1.16DL + 1.28 LL ‐ 1 EQY
F22 DL + 0.75 LL ‐ 0.54  EQY  CQHP23 0.79 DL + 1.02 EQX
CQHP24 0.79 DL ‐ 1.02  EQX
CQHP25 0.79 DL + 1.02 EQY 71
CQHP26 0.79 DL ‐ 1.02  EQY

3D VIEW

72

36
 10/21/2015

First Floor Level (Live Load)

73

First Floor Level (Finish Load)

74

37
 10/21/2015

First Floor Level (Wall Load)

75

Column Layout Plan

76

38
 10/21/2015

Column Schedule

77

3D View for UPPATA SANTI ZEDITAW

Uppata Santi Pagoda Dr. Toe Toe Win 78

39
 10/21/2015

MAHABODHI Pagoda Dr. Toe Toe Win 79

MUNIMAHARMUNI  STATUE Dr. Toe Toe Win 80

40
 10/21/2015

MUNIMAHARMUNI  STATUE Dr. Toe Toe Win 81

WORLD  BIGGEST  SITTING  BUDDHA  IMAGE   Dr. Toe Toe Win

82

41
 10/21/2015

WORLD  BIGGEST  SITTING  BUDDHA  IMAGE  Dr. Toe Toe Win

83

42
10/21/2015

43
10/21/2015

44
10/21/2015

45
10/21/2015

46
10/21/2015

47
10/21/2015

48
10/21/2015

49
10/21/2015

50
10/21/2015

51
10/21/2015

52
10/21/2015

53
10/21/2015

54
10/21/2015

55
10/21/2015

56
10/21/2015

57
10/21/2015

58
10/21/2015

59
10/21/2015

60
10/21/2015

61
 10/21/2015

Thank You for Your 
Attention.

Dr. Toe Toe
Dr. Toe Toe Win
toetoewin.civil@gmail.com
123

62