A LoRa 868MHz Collinear Antenna

12/2/2020 A LoRa 868MHz Collinear antenna | Projects by Keptenkurk
Projects by Keptenkurk
Electronics DIY projects
A LoRa 868MHz Collinear antenna

Posted on 26/03/2018
A warning ahead: the following is a YMMV project. Coax collinears have come in very different flavours and it is
very hard to find at least two sources which agree on a reproducible design. Ok, they all consist of a number of
halve wave segments corrected for the velocity factor of the coax used. But that’s about where the similarity ends.
Variations come in:
Top section
just end with a halve wave part,
left open,
shorted or even
ended with 50 ohm resistor
A quarter wave coax top section with a quater wave whip
Bottom section
Quarter wave coax section
Decoupling with
Radials
Sleeve
Ferrite core
Realizing this could well end in a frustration (i did some collinears for ADSB with mixed results) i started off with
what i thought was a proper design. However, while building i didn’t put the bottom part together in the way it
was planned.
While measuring the SWR with a N1201SA antenna tester it was impossible to tune the SWR by cutting the whip.
Only after removing the complete quarterwave top end, the SWR got right. Tuned it a little more by cutting the top
halve wave with a cm or so.
This is what the final design became:
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Close and accept
https://keptenkurk.wordpress.com/2018/03/26/a-lora-868mhz-collinear-antenna/ 1/8
I used a N-connector pigtail cable (so the blue part is a little piece of RG174 coax).
Some pictures:
Close and accept
Having having done the tests and shooting the pictures the whole thing was glued together to prevent water from
getting in.
Results and field tests
The most exciting part! As mentioned the SWR results were disappointing until the top quarterwave part was
taken off (probably as a result of not building the bottom part as designed). When the antenna was properly tuned
the SWR was stable even when moving or touching the coax feed: the radials do their job! Also detuning caused by
the PVC tube was neglectable.
A temporarely gateway was setup to compare the field strength to two whip antenna’s (which tested to be nicely
resonant at 868 MHz). A quick comparison showed the collinear to outperfom the whips. Promising!
Close and accept
Reference Long and Short whip
Later that day i did some more tests at 530m from my gateway and 7.2km from the gateway at Eindhoven airport
(FFFEB827EB75534E). My LoPy LoRa tracker was used as signal source. I used 3 types of antenna’s: Small whip,
large whip and collinear. I left the tracker running for a few minutes to have a number of observations). At home
the results were analyzed from the datafile Node-Red creates. RSSI values varied +/- 4 dB without touching
anything. For each antenna the average of the RSSI values was calculated, resulting in:
Distance to gateway Eindhoven airport: 7.2 km
Short whip avagage RSSI -118 dBm (11 packets)

Long whip avagage RSSI -115 dBm (20 packets)
Collinear avagage RSSI -110 dBm (14 packets)
Distance
To find out to home
more, including gateway:
how to control 530.
cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Close and accept
Short whip avagage RSSI -113 dBm (13 packets)

Long whip avagage RSSI -108 dBm (26 packets)
Collinear avagage RSSI -98 dBm (16 packets)
Still promising and about what to be expected of this configuration! This weekend the gateway and the antenna
will move to the rooftop. Results will be shared here!
Share this:
 Twitter  Facebook
Like
4 bloggers like this.
Related
ADS-B Collinear antenna LoRa 868 MHz collinear results ADS-B performance upgrade
In "ADS-B" In "LoRa" In "ADS-B"
This entry was posted in LoRa and tagged Antenna, Coco, collinear, LoRa. Bookmark the permalink.
11 Responses to A LoRa 868MHz Collinear antenna
Rob says:
04/04/2018 at 08:14
Nicely
To find out built and
more, including congratulations
how with
to control cookies, see the
here: results.
Cookie Policy
I have built a lot of types of antennas (GP, yagi, J-pole, colinear and others) for different frequencies (144 up to 1800 MHz) in
Close and accept
the past 20 or-so years.
Colinear antennas are not that easy to build, it all comes down to precise measurements and equal spacing between the
elements. Wrapping the copper wire around the braided sleeve is a nice way of making this easier.
Have you ever checked the content of the long and short whip antenna you use?
I had some short and long whips with the only difference in the plastic housing …
 Like
Reply
keptenkurk says:
04/04/2018 at 08:57
Rob, thanks for the comment and compliments! I never checked the interior of those whips but was surprised how
well they were tuned for 868 MHz (a lot of crap is being sold). I suspect the short one to be a helical and the long
one to be a 1/4 wave. I’ll try to find the source of the long one.(it was a gift). My LoPy with this antenne inside the
car was picked up by a gateway at 82 km the other day!
 Like
Reply
coste says:
18/04/2018 at 02:08
Hi ,
I believe getting a good VSWR with this type of collineair is very difficult.
You measured with a N1201SA, what was the VSWR ?
A screenshot of a sweep of the analyser would be very nice.
I am thinking of building something like this with Aircell7 coax.
I must be experimenting with the 1/4 wave at the bottom, as this is the impedance transforming part.
Costo
 Like
Reply
keptenkurk says:
19/04/2018 at 08:52
@costo I have acces to my laptop tomorrow and will respond in more depth then…
 Like
Reply
keptenkurk says:
21/04/2018 at 10:39
@Costo.
Privacy & Cookies: I’muses
This site back home
cookies. again… to use this website, you agree to their use.
By continuing
I didincluding
To find out more, measure howthe VSWR
to control but see
cookies, didhere:
notCookie
take aPolicy
picture. It was close to
1.1 after adjusting. But here’s the full story:
Originally the design was different. I don’t recall the sources (there are so many) but it was with top shorted and with
Close and accept
quarter wave whip added. Also the bottom end had the core of the feedline connected to the radials, which in retrospect
doesn’t seem to be very clever… When measuring VSWR the resonance was nowhere (600Mhz or so). So i started cutting
the whip: surprisingly with hardly any change! Lacking time (and about to give up on yet another coco disaster) i removed
the whole top end which showed a big improvement. But it resonated still too low in frequency (820 MHz). I then cut the
top halve wave by one or two cm until it was on 868 MHz (the amount can be seen on the picture, taken after
modification). By that time i was in doubt if the antenna would work at all as designed but was delighted by the field tests
which confirmed the extra gain to be expected.
I think the radials do a good job and contribute to the good VSWR. Most designs use a copper quarter wave tube (probably
to fit it into a tube). while measuring i could not change the VSWR by moving or touching the feedline so it is well
decoupled. Another worry was the radiation pattern in the vertical plane. Phasing errors can lead to an elevated main lobe.
But up- or down tilting the antenna gave worse results in the field test showing the main lobe is horizontal.
Lessons learned:
1. I still don’t understand the coax collinear by theory
2. Don’t start this if there is there is no VNA (or N1201SA) available.
3. Wraping copper wire around the shielding ends provides a solid construction and well defined length.
4. radials provide a good decoupling and don’t get in the way that much.
 Like
Reply
richardwenner says:
14/05/2018 at 12:08
Radials are a vital element involved in terminating your transmission line. Use 4 at least and watch the stabilising
effect on the VNA.
 Liked by 1 person
Reply
Geert GF says:
22/08/2018 at 18:10
With these kind of constructions one needs to pay attention: PVC tubes come in flavors and some will actually have a fairly
big influence on your antenna. Simply putting a well tuned antenna in free space inside a PVC tube can effect the VSWR
dramatically. The effect in itself is to be expected however one wouldn’t expected this effect to be this large! More importantly
there seems to be a fairly big difference between the typical grey PVC tubes and less common white versions. ( Don’t know
the exact chemical difference between the two) So always tune the antenne inside the housing you’re planning to use. This
can explain the difficulties in tuning the antenna in the previous comments
 Like
Reply
keptenkurk says:
24/08/2018 at 06:58
Geert, that’s absolutely true. I have been playing with the grey type of tubing which contains carbon. Any
conductivity of the tubing can be tested by putting it in the microwave. It should not become hot. The white one i
used now (brand Martens) did not affect the tuning at all.
 Like
Reply
Close and accept
Cristina says:
17/06/2019 at 21:19
Dear Keptenkurk, I am studing the collinear antenn that you developed.I coud not understood the connection with the
connector. Could you please tell more how do you did it?
 Liked by 1 person
Reply
keptenkurk says:
17/06/2019 at 21:53
Christina, the N Connector i used was a pigtail. It had a short piece of coax attached to it. So the blue curved line in the
drawing is a short piece of 50ohm coax. You could as well fit the N connector right at the bottom section of the collinear.
The idea is that the impedance at the bottom is 50 ohms.
 Like
Reply
Igor DF4AE says:

17/12/2019 at 01:27
Hi keptenkurk,
i think that one mistake of your design is that the first 1/4 lambda cable length should be calculated without the shortening
factor. The reason is that the next radiating element has its voltage antinode at the end of the 1/4 cable, so that a piece of
lam/4 shield in the air together with the radials will effectively block the wave travelling outside. Inside the lam/4 cable the
electrical length is not critical, because the cable is loaded by a matched load on both its ends.
 Like
Reply
Projects by Keptenkurk
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Close and accept

A LoRa 868MHz Collinear Antenna - Projects by Keptenkurk

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A LoRa 868MHz Collinear Antenna - Projects by Keptenkurk

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

12/2/2020 A LoRa 868MHz Collinear antenna | Projects by Keptenkurk

Variations come in:

This is what the final design became:

Close and accept

Close and accept

Results and field tests

Close and accept

Reference Long and Short whip

Distance to gateway Eindhoven airport: 7.2 km

Short whip avagage RSSI -118 dBm (11 packets)

Close and accept

Short whip avagage RSSI -113 dBm (13 packets)

11 Responses to A LoRa 868MHz Collinear antenna

Close and accept

Igor DF4AE says:

Close and accept

You might also like