Numerical Analysis of Steady-State Groundwater in Ow Into Tabriz Line 2 Metro Tunnel, Northwestern Iran, With Special Consideration of Model Dimensions
4) Hardening Soil model with Small-Strain Stiffness
CWS Small)
csls Hardening soil model (Hs) En A oh past 5
ped) te Shffness (E) <8 bl Hb) Bob AN Cm
» IL pe Brel
At bw stron levels, most Sail exhibit a Wighr
stiffness than af engineering strain levels,
oud tWis stiffness varies Non ~\inearly with strain.
MS small model ques dels of Bho oF Hod) 128
This is by using an additional Strain-Wistory
Parameters omd two additional material Payameters
ref
(a § 8).
co t- Small-Strain Shear modulus,
1- The Strain level at which the shear
Modulus has veduced ty about To of
the small - Strain Shear modulus,
3)7 ‘oy, bo Sad
(HS meclel omd WS- Small) 227 phd ee Jad
HS- Small model 3S bs 555) vial vias
boxe ov} Cup es SLE | & bo co ob
pe ST veliahle displacement o2v
(NS model )
r- The incre ment of Stiffness / unit of }
depth |
r- We depth of stiffness morement
x E-
inc
* Ze
(Aap) ee et EY Galled eA WW ot Fn
eso li Gee stiffness (E) alo zi j
BOS ee MS eee
(25) Goby poet fie BANS [gs Woof ai
(S.) wel ack Cohesion factr (C) 257
ine
Considered nw Wook’s law
* Elasticity
Tk e 3» oT =AC.LE
* Plasticity : Considered I Mohr- Coulomb
Failure Criterion
ee eres
(v4)[ONO
{Tsetraeie ond Anisotropic}
AE eee
| Isotropic AB G2 Sb) Nui Chas Call v P fat
cs eels a lal sf ojos) Sb, 1G
let) apse Ged Sb a5 bye sil
- 1 Aaa
cys bipst ii "J ow sfob ped ede pF by | ue ow ¢
EE Gs oll AL nt pd bed WS 5G i Ce
~~
forty) op) ell 209!
Cre Wa) pee (EF) e@ Jb oP ILS Bll os yest
| fe ~ aa oe
Bb Bene EN gay oa BE Siok Su
Tee p of Tat ofaai tai 5 fey
Moy mal :
TE (T)
208d) Ss bs shear medulus —: (G)
er lye (vy) C La psy (GSE) ne ce SYS Sb wos
Poisson’s Ratio 29
E (4%) %
apt
Ly a
4S 4g G( *
SS Sy ( %y) Fe
7; Ss
i el
*
(15)
- &
Ty
a
%CYBY lee Snd)) gbay poet | yi Cie
ol ly a i es bls ov) wl
oled lay lis Gey [ASR ca pcy esl] _peiss\a
&% Ce)
mH “fJ- oy (E)
- ene
2 (E2) psf a alae ool What ce wf
wets CYL) Cab chew pes se
SAH Ws ep Je _8 i uly a lA pho Joi bes
@® Anisotropic
(Alo8 ae KE) op los) poe ne 91 Ce nF 20
PEA Se es SLI 5 aJ0 I) poe dy BAI BS Yel!
SPW SE pe SMe bs (E) Was] _ples 6
CWP nests Wop pls cby obs )y
(% E78) £ (% SESE) oes Judy
@)) ortho troPiC : /
~D AnisotroPtC ps Spd Hl
CS) pl wo PE) 248 03 _F Sil apo
ps FEWE jboss a vleay) Less
_ wy Al ow Wl (a Say) 3b
4, (€,) Zit ov pie we At} et!
phases whist bis ios fie (a, 4 5)
slpb Sit) of ~A AM of PHlad] Gy AL 2 SES Jue cae
Consolidation = SS) cs A JEM os Seal
as) orthetrPic sy, secs JaeVek (major \ (ai) 4 ay HICe AM fib ley
oes (miner ) Cory a Dde 253s com LI
’ > JI
\% >a, =o se
Alli a8
Gr + => Fo >e,
i
7 ode
Q@ Strength Anisotropy im clay
The unconseliddled - undrained (UU) Shear strength
of seme Saburaled Clay Can vary, depending on the
direction of load applications this variation is referred
fro as anisotropy with respect ta strength.
Anisotropy is Caused Primarily by the nature of the
deposition of Cohesive Soils, aud Subsequent Consolidakion
mekes the Clay particles orient perpendicular to tne
direction of Yhe Majer Principal Stress. Parallel onientution
of the Clay Particles Com Comse the strength of Clay to
Vary with direction. Figure 2-42 in Das shows am elemeit
of Satavcted Clay im a dePosit with the major Printipal
stress making an angle («) with respect sto the hori zortal .
a for anisotropic Clays, the magnitude of (Cu) is afunetion of («)Qased on several laboratory test results, Casagrande
and Carville (1944) Proposed the Following yelationshiP
Fer the divectismal variation of undramed Shear strengh
. _ «Jd
&, (2.40) CL ay = Comers F (Sata 298) Cures a] sin «
For Ily consolidated ch
normally Consolidaked Clays, C 92) 2 Caceres.
For overconselideled Clogs » Coweysy <
Cries).
Figure 12.43 Shows the directional variation Cor Ce)
based on £4, (12.40).
The anisotropy with respect Ao strength Por Clays Can
have on important effect on various stability Calculahions
Morwallys consolidated anisotropic Clay
sverconsolidated anisotropic
clay
a
4 Asotreple clas
=
3
v
Figure 12-42 strength Sata edy
anisotropy in Clay Figure \2.43 Graphical
vepresentakion of £4 (12-40)
Cohesion undrained Sflocde Jes of Sal Chuo te
in (uu) test
Shev'f Term Param, J Jeol 50 (UU) , Lidl
(Cla rctes thst) ter S55 doick 2 Joi) Sid) VA) ee SAI) aie
(18)
Gls Cy S809 Gow splay 9¥OCR *- over Consolidation ratio
material moclel 32 ths Porameter 95
Je Sut BAN cana gs Goth!
= Hardening sal model Cus)
= Hardening soil with small - strain stiffness (ns
smal)
— Soft Seil model (55)
— Seft soil Creep model ($5C)
— Modified Com-Clay medel (MCC)
IWkol Button ch Initial stress stabs pi pbs
ci LJ) Material models — vets!
o :- The maximum Past effective overburden
Pressure to which he soil Was heen
Subjected,
5 .- Whe Present effective overburden Ovessure
(13)Pre-overburden Pressure or stress
* PoP :-
Wie SHH! ud sick Sov py 3
overconsolidakion ratio
—™ Plaxis += mnitial Button
Fer (WS) Ff (WS small) 6 639)
(ssc) $ (mcc)
Plaxis Default
ocR a4
PoP =0.0 Plaxis Default
when »- PoP = value ya.0
kK, Is Automatically not Considered
But Manually You Cam enter Kk by
Because that Ko i5 the normal Consolidation
Se, Adding Value for PoP Yo
You give the sample overcenselidatian
Case on Plaxis.
(20)is tts
Drainage ‘se )
Uels? cauo sy LoS) SEI gd Jibd He (2 ou eo
Mderial model Je} 3 o505 pds Plaxis & & WI
Plaxis 2 Flow Caleutabions Hep pe wisi x?
Texel Consoidadion test 5 Loar cho tel dell abs
* Dramed
* Umdrained (A)
* undrained (8)
* undrained (C)
x Nan — Porous
. ve ee ee foe oe .
Sait Permeability MALL Bet p Tmo bd VB
Droines type adPlies ts Plastc Calculation only
Drained or long-term Scil behavior in which
Stiffness ond strength ave delined in teyms
of effective properties .
(21)(cordiinat ay) =
SS
undraned or Short-term material behavior
in which stiffness and strength ove delined
in terms of effective Praperties .
A larg bulk shCfness for water i's automatically,
BS oyoy Lb as gsi yd ews
applied to make the Sal as a whale \nComPre ssible
and (excess) Pare pressures ave Calculated even
Above thereatic Ssurfae (water levelmsal
Numerical Analysis of Steady-State Groundwater in Ow Into Tabriz Line 2 Metro Tunnel, Northwestern Iran, With Special Consideration of Model Dimensions