Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 Why Is Phytoplankton
0 Why Is Phytoplankton
0 Why Is Phytoplankton
Figure 2. Phytoplankton
Figure 3. Real-time in vivo phytoplankton measurement Used on their own, these submersible
using fluorescence sensors on a HYDROLAB sonde
fluorescence sensors give instantaneous
Which Fluorescence Should I Use? results regarding relative changes in
Available options include sensors designed to phytoplankton biomass. This relative data
measure in vivo chlorophyll a, phycocyanin, and may be sufficient for the needs of some
phycoerythrin pigments. In vivo chlorophyll a is aquatic scientists or water resource
the most commonly deployed sensor among managers. For others, determining the actual
2
quantitative value using laboratory methods twice as much signal in bucket #2 relative to
is still required, typically in the units of bucket #1, assuming that both samples are
micrograms per liter or cells per milliliter. By operating within the linear range of the
combining in vivo fluorescence field data with sensor. To convert these relative readings into
the taking of occasional grab samples used for quantitative readings, the water samples are
quantitative laboratory analysis, a then taken to a laboratory for quantitative
relationship between both data sets can be analysis. Chlorophyll a extractions are
determined. Once this relationship is known, performed with the bucket samples and it is
a correlation coefficient can be generated, then determined that bucket #1 (that read
enabling the ability to convert unit-less “50” in the field) has 10 micrograms per liter
relative field data into estimations of of chlorophyll a, while bucket #2 (that read
phytoplankton biomass that have units. “100” in the field) has 20 micrograms per liter
of chlorophyll a. With a correlation now
As a very simplified hypothetical example, determined between field data and laboratory
imagine two samples of water taken at the data, one can now make estimations regarding
same time from a pond with green algae and actual concentrations of other simultaneously
placed into two separate buckets. Using a collected field data (in this simplified example,
submersible in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence in vivo field data x 0.2 = estimated microgram
sensor, a reading of “50” from bucket #1 and a per liter concentration.
reading of “100” from bucket #2 are
generated. What this indicates is that there is