Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ec 075 ST Ocr Red
Ec 075 ST Ocr Red
~ l:l •
541.5
' • S7
T6
39 How Trees Grow Ph1hp R Morey
BOOKS IN THE SERIES 40 Endogenous Plant Growtli Substance:
2nd edn T A Hill
1 Ecological Energetics John Phillipson 41 Hair · Michael Ryder
2 Life in the Soil 42 The Structure and Function of Enzyme!
R M . Jackson and Frank Raw 2nd edn Cohn H Wynn
3 The Study of Behaviour 2nd edn 43 Introductory Statistics for Biology
John D. earthy 2nd edn R E Parker
4 An Introduction to Parasitology 2nd edn 44 Biology of Aphids A F G Dixon
R Alan Wilson 45 Biology of the Food Industry
6 Plant Taxonomy 2nd edn H. R Barn ell
V. H.Heywood 4 6 An Introduction to Animal Breeding
6 Microecology J . L. Cloudsley-Thompson John C. Bowman
7 Guts 2nd edn John Morton 47 Experimental Psychology : An
8 The Body Fluids and Their Functions Introduction fo r Biologi sts
2nd edn Ga~h Chapman Malcolm Jeeves
9 The Electron Microscope in Biology 4 8 Plants and Mineral Salts
2nd edn A V. Grimstone James F Sutcliffe and Dennis A Baker
1 O Translocation in Plants 2nd edn 49 Estuarine Biology R S K Barne s
Michael Richardson 50 Pest Control and Its Ecology
11 Muscle 2nd edn D. R. W1lk1e H F van Emden
12 Plant Breeding Wilham J C. Lawrence 51 The Ecology of Small Mammals
13 Understanding the Chemistry of the M J Delany
Cell Geoffrey R Barker 52 Phytoplankton A D Boney
14 Plants and Water 2nd edn 53 Bone and Bi omineral ization
James F. Sutcliffe K S1mk1ss
15 Developmental Plant Anatomy 54 The Biology of Plant Phenolics
Ala n R. Gemmell John R L Walker
16 Plan • .,ymbiosis George D Scott 55 Arthropod Vectors of Diseasa
17 Fungal Parasitism Brian J . Deverall James R Busv1ne
18 Population Dynamics 2nd edn 56 The Biology of Slime Moulds
Maurice E Solomon J M Ashworth and Jennifer Dee
19 Chemical Communication 57 Dor mancy and the Survival of Plants
John Ebling and Kenneth C. H1ghnam Trevor A Villiers
lO Human Genetics and Medicine 58 Ecology of Plants in the Tropics
2nd edn Cyril A Clarke Daniel H Janzen
21 Cell Division and Heredity Roger Kemp 59 The Optical M icroscop e in Biology
22 Animal Skeletons John D Currey Sav1le Bradbury
23 Investigation by Experiment 60 The Secretion of Milk Ben Mepham
0 V S. Heath 61 The Biology of Eucalypts
24 Animal Growth and Development Lindsay D Pryo r
David R. Newth 62 Marine Zooplankton John H W1ckste
25 Animal Photoperiodism Brian Lofts 63 Homeostasis Richard N Hardy
26 Natural History of Infectious Disease 64 Diseases in Crops B E J W heeler
J A. Boycott 65 Plant Tissue Culture
27 The Membranes of Animal Cells Dennis N Butcher and David S Ingram
2nd edn A P. M Lockwood 66 Lichens es Pollution Monitors
28 The Biology of Respiration 2nd edn David L Hawksworth and Fra ncis Rose
Christopher Bryant 67 Animal Asymmetry A Charles Nevil If
29 Size and Shape R. McNeil Alexander 68 Phytochrome and Plant Growth
30 Cellular Radiobiology Richard E Kendrick and Barry Frankland
Christopher W . Lawrence 69 Genetics and Adaptation E B Ford
31 Chloroplasts and Mitochondria 70 Population Cytogenetics Bernard Joi
Michael A Tribe and Peter A Whittaker 71 A Biology of Locusts R ~- Chap man
32 Fungal Saprophytism 2nd edn 72 The Dynamics of CompetItIon and
H J. Hudson Predation M ichael P Hassell
33 Animal Flight Colin J. Pennycu1ck 73 Mammalian Odours and Pheromone s
34 How Grasses Grow 2 nd edn D M ichael Stoddart
R. H M Langer 74 Decomposit ion C F Mason
36 Temperature and Animal Life 2nd edn 75 Viviparity Peter J Hogarth
Richard N. Hardy 76 Ecology of Fish es in Tropical Waters
36 Nervous Systems R H. Lowe-McConnell
Peter N R. Usherwood 77 Ecology and Archaeology
37 Photosynthesis 2nd edn Geoffrey W D1mbleby
D O Hall and K K Rao
38 The Biology of Pollution 2nd edn
Kenneth M ellanby l see al so 1ns1de rear cover)
The Institute of Biology's
Studies in Biology no. 122
The Ecology of
Streams and Rivers
Colin R. Townsend
B.Sc .• D.Phil.
Lecturer in Biology. University of East Anglia. Norwich
Edward Arnold
© Colin R. Townsend, 1980
Townsend, Colin R
The ecology of streams and rivers. - (Institute
of Biology. Studies in biology; 1u
ISSN 0537-9024).
1. Stream ecology
I. Title I I. Series
574.5'263 Q.H541.5.S7
Because it is no longer possible for one textbook. to cover the whole field
of biology while remaining sufficiently up to date, the Institute of Biology
has sponsored this series so that teachers and students can learn about
significant developments. The enthusiastic acceptance of 'Studies in
Biology' shows that the books are providing authoritative views of
biological topics.
The features of the series include the attention given to methods, the
selected list of books for further reading and, wherever possible,
suggestions for practical work..
Readers' comments will be welcomed by the Education Officer of the
Institute.
1980 Institute of Biology,
41 Q.ueen's Gate,
London SW7 5HU
Preface
Preface iii
Introduction
1. 1 The lotic ecosystem 1.2 Spatial pattern in ecology 1.3 The
biota oflotic ecosystems
References
1 Introduction
1 .J. I Plants
The large plants of freshwater environments are known as macrophJleJ.
The major groups are the flowering plants, mosses and liverworts, some
encrusting lichens and a few unusually large algal forms such as Chara.
Most of the aquatic higher plants are members of diverse families in
which the majority of species are terrestrial. An adaptive feature which fits
many of them for life under water is a good supply of aerenchyma tissue,
contributing to adequate internal aeration in the relatively low oxygen
levels and rates of diffusion which ocrur. Another feature of a submerged
way oflife is the low light intensity. Adaptations allowing relatively high
rates of photosynthesis under these conditions include absence of cuticle
from stems and leaves and high concentrations of chloroplasts in the
epidermal layer. Many plants, however, have floating leaves which are in
direct contact with the atmosphere. Some macrophytes, such as mosses,
3
ATTACHED ALGAE
(al
-~~
~
' -~'
Achnanthes Cladophora
Gloeotrichia tJ Lemanea
PHYTOPLANKTON
(fl (gl (hi (ii
X /lj
Scenedesmus Anabaena
(j)
•
,+)I
Pediastrum
(kl
Chlamydomonas
Diatoma
Asterionella
liverwons and lichens, may be found attached IO rocks, while others, like
the Aowering duckweeds are free-Aoating. Most of the Aowering plants,
on the other hand, are rooted in the substrate. These can usually be found
in lemic water bodies as well as in streams and rivers. In fact, no rooted
plant shows any special adaptation to running water. Those that occur
can do so because of their tough but Hexible stems and their creeping
stoloniferous or rhizomatous growth habit.
Algae are of great importance as primary producers in streams and
4 THE BIOTA OF LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS § 1.3
rivers. Atlachtd algae are associated with all kinds of sol id objects incl ucl ing
rocks (tpilithic algae) and macrophytes (epiphyticl, while others occur on
mud and silt surfaces (tpiptlic). This attached community consists
primarily of microscopic forms, but filamentous algae such as Cladoplrora
also occur (Fig. 1-1 ). The other main algal category is the phytoplankton.
This consists of free-floating microscopic forms and in most marine and
lake environments is responsible for the major part of plam production.
It assumes a much less important role in most regions of streams and
rivers where the rapid throughput of water makes it impossible for
phytoplankton populations to build up. In fact, any free-floating
microscopic algae found in upstream stretches are almost certain to be
attached algae which have become dislodged. However, in deeper
downstream regions phytoplankton may become important, with
diatoms often the dominant taxon.
r .3.2 Fungi and bacteria
Some bacteria are also able to photosynthesize. However, the most
crucial role played by fungi and bacteria (Fig. 1-2) is as decomposers of
dead organic matter.
(al
(b) (cl
".I..
Fig. 1-1 Characteristic microorganisms of streams and rivers. (a) The fungus
ClavariopsiJ (U/uatu:a showing release of tetra-radiate spores. (b) Developing spore
of the fungus Gyoer.lfJtlla sptciosa. (c) The aquatic actinomycete Actinoplanei.
(d-i) Some freshwater bacteria: Id) Micrococcw; (e) Pstudomonas; (0 Vibrio; (g)
Spirillum; lhl Chromalium; (i) Btggialoa. (Drawn to various scales.)
§ 1.3 THE BIOTA OF LOTIC ECOSYSTEMS 5
All organic substrates, whether derived from dead bodies or faeces and
whether they die in the water or fall in from outside, will be metabolized.
The microorganisms best suited to deal with solid matter are the fungi
and actinomycetes. These arc usually able to adhere to, or penetrate the
surface, and may produce extracellular degrading enzymes. The small
molecules released during this metabolism, and any soluble organic
compounds entering the stream from its catchment area, are rapidly
consumed by bacteria. Fungal spores and bacteria are very abundant in
stream and river water, so dead material is rapidly colonized.
Many aquatic fungi have branched spores, and the commonest type
consists of four long, straight arms diverging from a common point. This
tetra-radiate structure is believed to act like a minute anchor allowing the
spore to attach efficiently 10 a substrate even in turbulent water. The
spores are sometimes concentrated by air bubbles into a persistent foam
which may be seen below rapids and waterfalls. If the foam is collected in
a jar it quickly breaks down into bubble-free liquid. It is a straightforward
matter to mount a drop of this on a microscope slide and to examine the
spores it contains. Nearly all can be identified to species under a low
power, 16 mmobjeccive(1NGOLD, 1975).
t .J.J Animals
The animals oflotic ecosystems (Fig. 1-3) can be categorized according
to where they live. A few species are associated with the water surface, such
as water striders (GerriJ sp.): these are referred to as newton. Some species
dwell in mid-water. Powerful swimmers which occur are called nekton.
Those with limited powers of movement and more or less at the mercy of
the current are called z.ooplankton. Like the phytoplankton, zooplankton
will usually be most abundant in downstream regions. The commonest
zooplankton in lotic ecosystems are the Rotifera and the micro-
crustacean Cladocera and Copepoda. However, these usually contribute
little to the invertebrate biomass even in rivers. The majority of
invertebrate species are associated with the scream bed and are referred to
collectively as the benthos. Insects are more numerous than any other
invertebrate class. Other groups are generally less important, although
there may be many species or large biomasses in certain habitats. These
include sponges, flatworms, oligochaete worms, leeches, molluscs,
crustaceans and mites.
The principal vertebrate group is the fish. The majority of fishes which
occur in streams and rivers are also to be found in lentic ecosystems.
6
ZOOPLANKTON
Difflugia Bosmina
Brachionus
BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES
l11li lh~
~
~
~ . (IJ
Stenophylax
Simulium
(ml
Baetis
Chironomus
di'?::::
Epeorus
Fig. 1--g Representalives of the invertebrale fauna of streams and rivers. (a1
rotifer; (b) and (cl protozoan; (d) cladoceran; (cl copcpod; (f) oligochae1e worm;
(g) leech; (h) bivalve mollusc; (i) amphipod; ij) blackffy laiva; (k) mayffy nymph.
(I) cased caddis laiva; (ml stoncffy nymph; (n) chironomid laiva. (Drawn to
various scales.)
2 The Flowing Water Environment
11.1 Introduction
The one-way flow generated by gravity in streams and rivers has far-
reaching consequences for every aspect of their ecology. Characteristics
of flow which are influential are water velocity, stream discharge and
turbulence. Flow velocity is itself influenced by a combination of channel
characteristics such as slope, width and depth. The nature of the mineral
substrate, the concentrations of dissolved and suspended materials, and
temperature, are further factors which play important ecological roles.
The objectives of this chapter are two-fold. First, to show that these
intrinsic physico-chemical features of the lotic environment are partly
determined by extrinsic forces, and that it is not appropriate to view the
stream or river as an isolated entity. Secondly, to identify the patterns
which exist in the physico-chemical environment so that in later chapters
it may be possible to explain some associated patterns in the distribution
of species and in community functioning.
vapour and gases move back from the wa1er 10 1he surrounding
environment.
It is easy to become engrossed in the biology of s1reams and rivers and
to ignore the properties of their catchment areas. However, 1he ecologisl
needs a broader perspective and in the last decade or so inves1iga1ors have
begun to treat the catchment area as a unit of study.
The most fundamental interactions between a lolic ecosys1em and i1s
catchment area concern the input of water and chemicals. The elements of
hydrology and water chemistry are discussed in a general way in 1hc
following section before proceeding 10 a more detailed 1rea1mem of a
particularly well-studied catchment in the U .S.A.
(i) Surjact run-off. Precipitation falling on the land will ei1her infihrare
into the ground or move over the surface as surface run-off. The
Precipitation
il il tl tl
Evaporation
and
transpirati
Fig. 2-1 Diagram of the various pathways of water after arrival in a catchment
area.
THE CATCHMEl'IT AREA AS A UNIT OF STUDY 9
proportion in each category will depend on the infiltration capacity of the
soil surface and the rainfall intensity. In the case of impermeable ground,
such as hard bedrock or soil which is frozen solid, all the water will move
downhill as surface run-off. In highly permeable soils, such as sand, all
the incoming water is likely to infiltrate.
(ii) lnler.flow. Permeability often decreases with depth because of soil
compaction and filling of pores by washed down particulate material. If
an impermeable horizon underlies a permeable surface horizon, water
will How downhill parallel to the surface above the interface between the
horizons. This is referred to as interAow.
(iii) Groundwater discharge. Everywhere at some depth is rock that is
impermeable and watertight, because cementation and pressure have
closed up the pores. Water can sink so far and no further. It collects as
groundwater in the porous material over this impermeable layer, filling all
the pores and forming something analogous lO a saturated sponge. The
waler lablt - the top of this zone of saturation - rises until it is exposed in
the bottom of the deepest depression in the area, usually a stream
channel. Thus, the groundwater discharges into the stream.
2. 2. 2 Variations in flow
Groundwater discharge forms the major input of water 10 many
streams and rivers. This has important consequences for the nature ofthe
flowing water environment as a place to live. Water moves very slowly
through the ground. Therefore, the input of water lO stream channels lags
days or weeks behind the rainfall from which it is derived. The input will
be regular because it represents the 'overflow' from the slowly changing
groundwater reservoir. It is particularly important during long, dry spells
and ensures that most lotic ecosystems provide permanent habitats.
Of course, many stream channels do dry up periodically, particularly
in arid regions of the world. Such intermittent streams nevertheless
usually possess diverse communities. Some of the species they contain
survive by burrowing down into the damp substratum, while others
produce eggs or resistant stages which can withstand long periods of
drought. Often the stream channel retains isolated pools of water and
many species persist in these and recolonize the rest of the stream when
flow is restored.
The other extreme pattern of water flow is the flood. In times of very
high water discharge, the substratum of the stream bed is likely to be
scoured out and many animals and plants with it.
::1.::1.4
The Hubbard Broolc Jludy
LIKENSand BORMANN (1972), in their important work on several small
catchments in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Nn,·
Hampshire, U.S.A. (Fig. 2-2), have quantified the inputs of water ,111d
chemicals from the various possible sources. Precipitation gauges were
placed throughout the catchment to monitor the amount of water
arriving and to determine the quantity of chemicals contributed in thio;
form. The stream outflow from each catchment area was measured at
specially constructed weirs, and its dissolved and particulate chemica I
loads were analysed.
The average annual precipitation was 12 3. 2 cm. Of this, 40. 796 returned
to the atmosphere by evapotranspiration, while 59.396 found its way into
the stream channels as groundwater discharge. Surface run-off and
interAow were insignificant because the watertight bedrock was overlain
by highly permeable sandy loam soil and glacial till. StreamAow varied
markedly with season. Sixty-eight per cent of annual How occurred
during snow-melt in March, April and May. In the warm summer
months, when forest growth was at a maximum and transpiration rates
30
co C=:J Precipitation
B
<ii - Streamflow
::,
C:
20
C:
co
0
Q)
CJ)
co 10
c
Q)
~
Q)
a.
~
(a) 0 1 km (bi
Fig. 2-2 (a) Map of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in New Hampshire, U.S.A. The stream C',Hchmt·llls used i11 dwmkal
budget studies are indicated by dashed outlines. (b) Average annual prccipiiation ancl streamtlow, 1955-1969. (From t.lKFNS and
BORMANN, 1972.)
12 THE CATCHMENT AREA AS A UNIT OF STUDY
were high, streamffow was low. In autumn, transpiring surfaces were lost
when the deciduous trees shed their leaves: slreamffow increased
dramatically at this time.
Chemicals entered the streams via groundwater discharge in two
forms; 8096 dissolved and 2096 associated with particulate mailer. The
nutrient budgets in the catchments for some important elements art·
shown in Table 1.
Flow velocity. Average How velocity (v) is influenced by river slope (s),
average flow depth (d) and resistance to Aow offered by the river's bed and
banks (0 in the following manner
v=flip
where g is the gravity constant.
Thus, water will Aow faster where the slope is steeper, where the How
depth is greater and where resistance to How is less. River slope is
generally steepest al the headwaters and declines progressively
downstream. If slope were the sole determinant then average Aowvelocity
would decrease with distance from the river's source. However, How
depth increases downstream as a result of increased streamAow as
tributaries join the main river. In addition, resistance to How decreases
(because the river becomes deeper and its bed consists of finer particles,
both reducing frictional resistance) and this also tends to increase average
flow velocity. Because the effects on How velocity of increasing depth and
decreasing resistance outweigh that of declining slope, the outcome of
these opposing forces in most rivers, except during bankfull and Hood
conditions, is for average How velocity to increase downstream (Fig. 2-3).
This may come as a surprise to many readers who believed that
headwater streams flowed faster than large rivers approaching the sea.
Headwater streams only appear to How fast in relation lo their shallow
depth whereas rivers appear to How sluggishly with respect to their
greater depth. However, it is true that many large rivers have been subject
to human manipulation of discharge using dams and lock-gates which
artificially reduce the average flow velocity.
Note that there is much variation in How velocity both across the width
of streams and rivers (usually maximal near the middle and susbstantially
reduced among macrophytes, if present) and also down the length of
short stretches. In small streams, for instance, shallow fast-flowing riffies
alternate with deeper pools. Flow velocity also varies with time, in
response to fluctuations in discharge during wet and dry periods of
weather.
14
an nual discharge
Mean
Distance downstream
Fig. 1-3 The relationship between average Row velocity and distance from 1h•·
headwaters.
Water surface
0·2
~
~ 0·4
Io 0·6
I
!!l I
"i: 1Mean
:::::, 0·8 I velocity
I
I
Units of velocity
Fig. 2-4 The relationship between Row velocity and depth in an open chanrwl
PATTERN IN THE PHYSICO-CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT 15
subject to, and how will this vary downstream? River morphologists
prefer to talk in terms of shear stress on the bed (T 0 ) where
T0 = yds the constant y is termed the specific weight of water
In this equation, too, the factors How depth (d) and slope (s) vary in an
opposite manner in a downstream direction. However, slope declines
more quickly than depth increases (there could easily be a hundred-fold
decrease in slope but perhaps only a ten-fold increase in depth) and thus
for a given discharge frequency T 0 declines downstream.
The greater the shear stress on the bottom, the more likely an organism
is to be dislodged and swept away. Thus, it is clear that the shear stress
encountered by benthic organisms is likely to be a more influential factor
near the headwaters, despite the lower average How velocity there.
Substratum particle size. It is not just organisms that are affected by shear
stresses on the river bed. Particles in the substratum are also liable to
dislodgement. The particles that remain at a location will be those which
are larger than the flowing water is capable of carrying away. The smallest
ones to be dislodged will be carried in the column of water as suspended
load while the larger ones will be rolled or bounced along the bouom
as bed load. Since shear stress on the bottom generally decreases
downstream, it would be predicted that substratum particle size will
become smaller the further one moves from the source. This is exactly
what is found (e.g. Fig. 2-5).
200 ·'\,
100 \
~
\
.
e_g 50 \
\
\
a, \
N
'i)i 10 \
\
C 5 \
...
'iii
Cl>
\
\
C \
a, \
a, 1 \
~ ·5 \
\.
• \
\
.1
1 50 100 500 1000 5000
Distance from headwaters (km)
Fig. 1-5 Relationship between mean grain size of bed ma1erial and dis1ance
from headwa1ers in 1he Yellows1one-Missouri-Mississippi river sys1em. (Af1er
LEOPOLD, L. e. tt al. (1964). Fluvial Processes in Geomorpholot:J. W. H. Freeman, San
Francisco.)
16 PATTERN IN THE PHYSICO-CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT
g. 1 Introduction
Certain abiotic factors vary more or less regularly down the leng1h of
rivers. The patterns are far from perfect, but nevertheless corresponding
longitudinal sequences in the distribution of many species are found.
Figure 3-1 gives examples from the macrophytes, several invenebra1e
groups and fish. The purpose of this chapter is to identify the abiotic and
biotic factors which are likely to influence such distribu1ion panerns.
There have been surprisingly few detailed studies of the mechanisms
underlying particular serial replacements of species. The bes1 understood
examples will be presented in the appropriate sections.
3.2.1 Current
Although average flow velocity generally increases in a downstream
direction, current exerts its greatest influence on the benthic communi~-
in upstream regions. Here the water is usually turbulent and shallow,
exerting considerable shear stress on the stream bed. Thus, thosr
organisms which possess the most obvious adaptations lO 1·esist being
swept away are usually found upstream and particularly in wrremial
waters.
Plants. The only plants to be found in the most extreme flows arc
encrusting algae, such as Chamatsiphon fwcus, unbranched filamemous
algae, such as Ulothrix z.onata, and mosses and liverworts. However, these
squat species are susceptible to smothering by accumulating sih or sand
and, since they do not possess roots, they are easily washed away if the
substrate is subject to scouring. Thus, they cannot become established on
an unstable substrate. The adage 'a rolling stone gathers no moss' is
highly appropriate!
Fig. s-1 Longitudinal patterns in the distribution of: (a) certain macrophytes in
the River Swale (data from HOLMES, N. T. H. and WHITTON, B. A. (1977). Fmhwaln
Biolog:,, 7, 545-58); (b) stonefty nymphs (plecoptera) of the genus Ltuctra and
mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera) of the genera Ctntroptilum and Catnis in the River
Endrick. in Scotland (from MAITLAND, P. s. ( 1966). The fauna of the River Endrick.
Studits on Lode l.mnond II. Blackie, Glasgow); (cl fish in a Virginian stream in thr
U.S.A. (From BURTON, G. W. and ODUM, E. P. ( 1945). Ecolog:,, 16, 1h-g4.)
19
L. inermis
L. geniculata
L. fusca
Centroptilum luteolum
- - - ----1 Centroptilum pennulatum
===-------i Caenis rivulorum
40t
-:r
t?
C
~
:i
0
n s m
20
0
n s m
'-'
8 Myriophyllum lemna
o... spicatum minor
j20[i]~tls:~
10
0
~4
0
~
nsmf nsmf
J.1.J Temperature
II is well known that temperature regime changes with distancl' from
river source. For example, maximum summer temperatures tend tu
increase downstream, and this is panicularly marked for stream\ whi1 h
rise in the mountains. We may postulate that the serial rcplan·ment ol
some species will be related to a longitudinal pauern in tempcratun·
60
"C
Ill
'E
8 50
-
.,,f
.gC 40
'iii
0
~ 30
l!!
g
o 2
Ill
Cl
"'
-
E 10
~
:. 0
IIICIQ rNl'fM --1 I- _,.
I
- - . .....
,...
0. virilis 0. ,mmunis Together
Fig. 3--3 Substratum preferences (rock, gravel, mud) for the crayfish species
0rcorucles virilis and ·0. immunis when alone and when together, expressed as a
percentage of total positions recorded. (After BOVBJ ERG, 19 7o.)
ABIOTIC FACTORS, ADAPTATION AND DISTRIBUTION 115
'
.s::.
-;- 100
Cl
,¥
<5
§
E
.!!! 30
:g
ea
il
E
-e
{g 10
C
ea
in
Temperature •c
Fig. s-4 The relationship between standard metabolism and temperarun· lo,
three species offish, typical of a downstream series. (From VARU:Y, 19fi7 .1
high metabolic rate which only increases three-fold between sand 20°C
It is able to remain active and therefore to feed in cold water, bur ii\
metabolism is already so high that it cannot suivive as tempera1ull'
increases, and will die at approximately 13°C. It can be described a\ ;1
cold-water stenotherm, able to exist only in a small range ol
temperatures. At the other extreme, the eurythermal goldfish (Cara111111
auralw) shows a considerable rise in metabolism with increase 111
temperature and can suivive over a wide range. Its upper lethal
temperature is approximately 41°C. However, it is probably inactive in
very cold water. The perch (Ptrca Jluvialilis) represents an intermedia1r
category. Its upper lethal temperature is approximately 33°C.
Table I shows the temperarures that are optimal for growth and typical
for spawning of cold-water stenotherms, intermediate species and
eurytherms from temperate regions. These concur with the downstream
distribution of the species.
In physiological terms, the adaptation to life in a particular
temperature range seems to lie in the adjustment of basal metabolism 10
those temperatures. A similar phenomenon has been described for an
invertebrate series.
ABIOTIC FACTORS, ADAPTATION AND DISTRIBUTION 27
Abergavenny
N 1 10km
"'
Fig. 3-5 The distribution of hydropsychid larvae (bold lines) in tributaries and
lower reaches of the River Usk in Wales. (From HILD REW, A. G. and EDINGTON ,J. M
( 1979).J. Anim. Ecal., 48, 557-76.)
29
~
feH, I
Diplectrona Hydropsyche
;n,,,o;,;,
Hydropsyche
pellucidula
-7{ -~
5 10 15 20 25
Temperature °C
3lIll ·02
I!!
u
·=iii
:i
;;
C
0 ·01
~
:!
u
"iii
·2
.5
Temperature •c
Fig. 3-7 The intrinsic rate of natural increase of three Ratwonn species,
measured in the laborawry at different temperatures. (After PATTEE tl al., 1973.)
]:
a;
1"'183
Cl)
II)
Cl)
>
0
.0
"'
a I
1-5
km downstream
Fig. 3-8 The distribution of Crenobia alpina and Polyctlis Jelina in the Nam Heilyn
stream in Wales. (Percentages indicate stream slope.)
Total positive
reactions per
Gammaru.s Ephemeroptera Pltcoptera Trichoptera individual
The diets of the control C. alpina population and that of P.Jtlina were
broadly similar, so criterion (ii) was satisfied. In addition, it is clear that
although the diet of C. alpina in both the absence and presence of P.felina
contained comparable proportions of stonefly nymphs (Plecoptera) and
34 THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS
3.6 Conclusion
While most studies in particular rivers have revealed longitudinal
patterns in distribution, it is important to note that these patterns are not
36 CONCLUSION
organic matter (FPOM, < 1 mm) and coarse particulate organic matter
(CPOM, > 1 mm and up to whole leaves, twigs, etc.). The CPOM and
FPOM compartments are taken to include the microorganisms which are
intimately associated with them.
LIGHT-Macroph/ytes CPOM~.
fiJ "'!>~,~~hre~dders~
1:.\.":"Ii,
1-,
ALLOCHTHONOUS _ _ _.. DOM11occu1a1, FPOM-Collectors-Predat~
INPUT m,crobial
Kl,on
Fig. 4-1 A general model of community energy Row in lotic ecosystems. (Several
arrow~ have been omitted for clarity-see text for details.)
400
0L-!:~:t:=::!::::::;t;::==tt::::~===-====;!!
0 8 16 24 32 8 16 24 32
.f.!
u
ea
a.
.,!.
ea
.!!
~
ea 800 Id) Hemicellulose
0
-~
i 400
.!:
C>
·c:C: 0 -=-o--±9---="15=---"""2""4,---~32
"iii 32
E
I!!
C>
E
60 (f) Total nitrogen
o.,,.__ __,,____,,..,,._----=..,____
0 8 16 24 32
Weeks
Fig. 4-2 Weights of various chemical components remaining in white oak leaf-
packs at various times during decomposition. (After SUBERKROPP, K., GODSHALK.
G. L. and KLUG,M.J. ( 1976). Ecology, 57, 720-7.)
Since chemical make-up is so influential in decomposition, inter-
specific differences in rates of disappearance are to be expected. At one
extreme, dead aquatic macrophytes are probably among the fastest to
decay while twigs may take several years. Species-specific rates of decay
have been noted for tree leaves with, for example, ash and alder
disappearing fastest (in excess of 1.5% per day), sycamore, maple and
willow at an intermediate rate, and beech and oak slowest (less than 0.596
perday:PETERSENandcuMMINS, 1974).
§ 4.1 GENERAL MODEL OF LOTIC COMMUNITY ENERGY FLOW 41
EXPORT M 111SO
Pan,cvl11e 5040
GROUNDWATER
AU.(ICKT-,sl
- -
•ROMUPSTREAM
•ORESTCAHOr<
Fig. 4-4 Diagrammatic representation of energy How in Bear Brook. All figures
arc in kj m- 1 yr• . (After FISHER, s. c. and LIKENS, c. E. ( 1973). Ecological monographs,
45, 4u-59.)
LONGITUDINAL PATTERN IN COMMUNITY ENERGY FLOW 45
fruits , twigs and branches from rhe forc·st canopy which fell or blew into
the stream, 2596 as dissolved organic mauer in groundwater drainage into
the srream, and the remaining 3196 in the Aowing water column from
upsrream (2296 dissolved and 996 particulate>. The total annual input of
energy to the stream was 25 360 kJ m- 2 •
Approximately 19 900 kJ m- 2 , almost equally divided between leaves
and branches. was stored within the 1700m study section. This detritus
reservoir did not vary much from year to yea~ and the system was
considered to be in a steady state. As would be expected. the rate of
decomposition of leaves was faster than that of branches, with turnover
times of I yr and 4.2 yrs respectively .
No detailed studies were performed on the heterotrophic components
of the community, but by calculating the difference between total energy
inpur and energy exported downstream as dissolved or particulate matter
ii was found that the heterotrophs accounted for 3496, with micro-
organism metabolism predominating.
The results of 1his study tally well with the hypothetical model shown in
Fig. 4-3. The system relies almost entirely on allochthonous matter as an
energy base. However, a similar study on New Hope Creek in North
Carolina revealed a peak of auached algal production on the stream bed
in early spring, before the forest canopy had developed (HALL. J. w., 1972,
quoted in MANN, 1975). In this case, the total yearly input ofleafmaterial
was estimared as 8800 kJ m- 2 yr-•, while another' 4-8000 was provided by
autochthonous production. Further research is required to determine
whether such seasonal switches in productivity are of general significance.
EXPORT
AllOCH-
TMONOUS
TREES
....,._,on 1uoo
{
Mtetopltyle1
An..-•- _ __:_:_--t,{]~~J--
the river bed and in the diets of certain invertebrates and fish. Production
by auached algae was not measured but was assumed 10 be small in
comparison to that of phytoplankton, which was 18 400 kJ nr 2 yr- 1 • This
assumption is probably correct. A study of another medium-sized river,
the Ouawa River in Canada, revealed that although the standing crop
biomass of attached algae was larger than 1ha1 of phytoplankton the
annual production of the lauerwas more than 2.5 times as great.
The alloch1honous input 10 the Thames was derived from the same
sources as Bear Brook, but only the tree leaves were moniwred. These
contributed only 330 kJ m- 2 yr 1 • The input of dissolved and FPOM from
upstream will certainly have been much more substantial than the
au1och1honous component. Some indication of their relative role~ is
given by the fact 1ha1 filter-feeders took approximately 2 .5 times as much
dead particulate mauer as phytoplankton cells. As was the case for Bear
Brook, however, the majority of the imported material will have been
exported downstream having played no part in community metabolism.
A certain amount of particulate organic mauer was stored on the river
bed and together with the auached algae this cons1i1u1ed an imponam
source of food for collector-gatherers such as 1ubificid worms and
gastropods. Unionid mussels and sponges were the dominant bemhir
collector-filterers, consuming large quantities of suspended FPOM and
phytoplankton, while filter-feeding zooplankwn were common among
vegetation and between pebbles on the river bed. Young fish derived most
of their food from zooplankwn, older ones from benthic detritus and
invertebrates. Pike and large perch were piscivorous.
This investigation of a downstream station where the river is wide.
quite deep and turbid, supports some general points in the model shown
in Fig. 4-3. For example, it has been shown 1ha1 the amotrophic
component of energy supply is relatively more important, that 1he
macrophytes are restricted 10 the river margins and that phytoplankton
assume significance. However, the lauer point needs 10 be in1erpre1ecl
with caution. The Thames has been greatly influenced by the ac1ivi1ies of
man, and it appears that the high population densities of phytoplankwn
are promoted by the presence of weirs and locks every few miles (w
maintain a constant depth for navigation). Thus, water has a sufficiently
long retention time for populations to build up. Retention time is also the
significant factor in relatively undisturbed rivers. Water in small streams
such as the Rheidol in Wales (48 km long) takes less than a day to run its
course. The average run of water for the Thames ( 240 km) is six or seven
days, while a long river such as the Volga in the U .S.S. R. before dams were
built in 1928 took 50 days to run its 2747 km course when in Hood, much
longer in summer. Since the generation time of many zooplankton is
three or four days, shorter for phytoplankton, it is hardly surprising that
short rivers, and the headwaters of all, are devoid of plankton. In general,
some planktonic organisms appear a few days from a river's source while
an abundant phytoplankton probably takes 20 days or so to develop. The
LONGITUDINAL PATTERN IN COMMUNITY ENERGY FLOW 47
plankton in longer rivers probably originate with innocula injected from
backwaters, adjacent lakes and swampy areas. The populations may pass
through several generations as they arc swept downstream, but the
majority must eventually perish in the sea.
These studies, and others like them, lend rnppon 10 the model of
longitudinal changes in community energy Row, but further work is
required.
0-5 10 50 500
Width of stream (ml
Fig. 4-6 Pie diagrams showing the relative proportions of various categories of
caddis Ry genera in upstream and downstream sections of North American
streams. S - shredder, C-collector, P- predator, C -grazer. (After WIGGINS. c. e.
and MACKAY, R.J. (1978). Ecology, 59, 1211-110.) This is a test of the stream con-
tinuum concept ofK. w. CUMMINS.
48 CONCLUSIONS § 4.3
FPOM. Interestingly, shredders also decreased in relation 10 grazers ancl
1his reAec1s 1he increased production of auached algae in 1he unshaded
downstream reaches. The proportion of predatory genera did 1101 v,11)'-
4.3 Conclusions
In 1his chapter, downstream changes in several environmental fanors
have been used to explain some fundamental variations in community
energy How. The key factors were amount and form of alloch1honous
input, shading from above as influenced by river wid1h, shading
within 1he wa1er column as influenced by dep1h and 1urbidil)', flow
characteristics and 'age' of the water mass. Somt' of 1hese variables ,1lso
figured prominently in the discussionoflongitudinal dis1ribu1ion pauerns
of individual species, and, of course, this is 1101 surprising. After all, 1he
community is the sum of its parts, and facwrs 1ha1 influence dis1ribu1ion
of the pans also affect 1he whole. However, 1he energetics approach
provides a different perspective and throws new light on 1he dis1ribu1ion
of individual species. For instance, among the net-spinning hydropsychicl
caddis larvae, species in 1he subfamily Arctopsychinae spin ne1s wi1h a
coarse mesh, those of the Hydropsychinae spin intermediate mesh ancl
the Macronematinae the finest of all. The usual downstream dis1ribu1ion
of North American species is shown in Fig. 4-7. The coarse mesh of thl'
Arctopsychinae permits them to deal with the abundant CPOM (,1s
well as animal prey) which occurs in mountain streams, whl'reas lhl'
Hydropsychinae and 1he Macronematinae can fiher the minute FPOM in
the downstream reaches they inhabit.
The energetics approach also provides an insight imo a striking
life-history phenomenon observed in cool headwater streams. The·
detritivorous invertebrates are able to metabolize al temperaiures below
the normal optimum and this is seen as an evolutionary response to lhl'
Hydropsychinae
Macronematinae
Headwaters Downstream
5. 1 Introduction
Habitats in streams and rivers are not usually homogeneous. Local
heterogeneity exists in mineral particle size, the occurrence of detritus, in
local patterns of Aow velocity and in depth. This is reflected in the
distributions of benthic organisms which are, as a rule, highly clumped.
In other words, individuals of a given species tend to be over-represented
in certain microhabitat patches and under-represented or absent in
others. Most microdistribution studies have been performed in shallow
streams, which are relatively easy to study, and have concerned benthic
invertebrates.
Although the primary concern is with horizontal microdistribution on
the surface of the stream bed, recent investigations have shown that a
proportion of the populations of benthic invertebrates may be found
deep within the substratum. Work on vertical microdistribution will be
discussed first.
Percentage of invertebrates
occurring at each depth
10 20 30
Surface
10
20
30
Depth
(cm)
40
50
60
70
Fig. 5-1 Mean percentage depth distribution within the stream bed for all
invertebrate taxa in the Speed River, Canada. (After WILLIAMS. D. D. and HYNES.
H. B.N.(1974). Fmhwal. Biol., 4, 2gg-56.)
I lydropJycht Jiltalai
Plectrocnemia comptna
5.J.4 Food
It is 10 be expected that the distribution of animals will reflect the
distribution of their food, and very often this appears to be the underlying
factor. In the case of G. pulex, discussed above in the context of particle
size, the presence ofleaves was influential in explaining microdi.stribution
during the autumn and winter. Many detritivores are associated with leaf-
packs (the 'shredders' in general), while others (the 'collector-gatherers')
are more likely 10 be associated with finer detrital particles in the
substrate. Figure 5-2a gives a typical examele of the relationship for
several taxa between number of animals and-dry weight of fine detrital
particles. Other studies have shown that invertebrate predators often
54 MICRODISTRIBUTION ON THE SUBSTRATUM SURFACE § 5.3
exhibit aggregative responses, that is they are commonest where 1heir prey
arc abundant (Fig. 5-2b, c and d). Net-spinning lan-ae of 1he caddis
Plectrocnemia compersa (discussed in§ 5.3. 2 in the contex1 of flow velocity
preference), provide a good example. Their aggregative response comes
about because of a reduced probability of abandoning a net if prey
are taken regularly ( HILDREw and TOWNSEND, 1980).
Clearly, the presence of food is often the proximate cause of
invertebrate microdistribution patterns. Even in cases in which a fac1or
other than food is the proximate cause food may, nevertheless, be 1he
ul1imate factor. For example, the preference of net-spinning caddis for
"'
,:, Q)
(cl 8 (di
10
"'"'
"'
E a, 8 6
.2 a.
.o E
g~
-
al"' 8.
ci E 4
6
4
fti ~
O! 2
- Q. 2
0
5-.J. 5 Enemies
No direct evidence on the influence of predators and competitors is
available from invertebrate microdistribution studies. However, since
prey are likely to be more vulnerable in relatively homogeneous substrata
such as bedrock or silt because these offer fewer refuges from predation
than gravel, stones or leaf-packs, it can be postulated that the relative
densities of prey in various substratum patches will sometimes be
affected. In addition, a role for competitors can be inferred from
experimental work which has demonstrated a higher rate of dispersal
from densely populated patches. This will tend to reduce, to some
extent, the degree of clumping of a population.
6.1 Introduction
The objective of most microclistribution studies has been to describe
the spatial organization of a benthic community at an instant. prnduring
a record analogous to a still photograph. The impression is that the
pattern so described is unchanging, and that its structure can be
explained simply in terms of the ability of organisms IO select appropriate
microhabitats. In fact, the assemblages arc in a continuous state or nux as
a result of shifting patterns of now and substratum and because or the
organisms' own activities. The results of a microdistribution study can be
likened to an action photograph, such as that or footballers 011 a
newspaper sport's page. To fully understand the dynamic 11;11u1-c ol the
system it is necessary to emulate a cine film analysis and disc-ovn the
movements which led to the configuration fixed in the still phowgraph.
as well as subsequent events.
When a large amount of rain or snow-melt results in increased flow the
shear stress exerted on the stream bed intensifies and the substratum is
scoured. Sanely beds and other readily erodable formations may lose
material to substantial depths, and organisms on and in the subsu·,11um
will also be removed. As the Aood recedes and shca1· stresses diminish,
material and organisms from upstream will be deposited. The mmTmclll
of invertebrates associated with flood conditions is termed cala.1trophic drift
and may involve the displacement of a large proportion of the l)('nthic
community.
Although during long periods of lower discharge the substratum is
relatively stable, many benthic organisms arc still on the mm·c·, either
along the stream bed or in the flowing column of watei-. If a net is placed
in a stream or river, facing upstream and suspended above the bottom, it
will rapidly collect an appreciable number ofbenthic invertebrates which
have lost contact with the substratum and arc being carried along in the
current. The vast majority are undamaged and would quickly have
regained a foothold had they not been trapped in the net. This
phenomenon is called invertebrate drift. ll occurs even in very slight flow
and is of major importance in the continuous redistribution of benthic
organisms from one patch to another.
Upstream, downstream and random movements in contact with the
stream bed, as well as movements through the substratum, add to the
complicated picture ofbenthic community dynamics.
(d)
Aerial
28·2%
(b)
Fig. 6-1 Pie diagram showing percentage contribution to colonization of sub-stratum trays by (a) drift, (b) benthic
upstream migration, (cl vertical upward migration, (d) aerial sources. (After WILLIAMS and HYNES,,1976. )
INVERTEBRATE DRIFT 59
probably did so in the drift. The rates of accumulation of species were
similar on the two kinds of tray, demonstrating the overwhelming
importance of drift in colonization. Representatives of most species
arrived within three days.
It is clear from these experiments that invertebrate drift is of major
significance in benthic redistribution. The next section considers this
phenomenon in more detail.
,., (bi
.,, 60
s 10
I!
.0
CD 40 ftl 8
t: )(
CD
> !! 6
-
.!:
0
c:i
z
20
0
z
c:i 4
2
Day number
Fig. ~11 Colonization curves of(a) total individuals and (b) species, on bottom
trays (solid line) and suspended trays (dashed line). AfterTOWNSEND and HILDREW.
1976.)
number of studies from different parts of the world have shown that the
amount of drift increases at night, and particularly during the period
soon after sunset. This is the case for a wide variety of taxa. Such pauerns
occur because of periodic changes in behaviour of the animals which
render them more susceptible to dislodgement. For instance, many sit
immobile during the day, sheltered within the substratum and under
stones, but emerge to forage at night. Presumably, this has the advamage
that it reduces the likelihood of being eaten by predators which rely on
vision . Several taxa, however, regularly exhibit higher drift rates during
daylight. Day-active patterns may in some cases result from a direct
water-temperature/activity relationship.
Several environmental factors exhibit diurnal periodicities and could
thus act to govern the daily pattern of drift. Obviously, incidem light
and temperature vary during day and night. However, pH and the
concentrations of oxygen, carbon dioxide and silicon have also been
shown to vary, in relation to the daily course of photosynthesis and algal
cell division . By carrying out experiments in which all factors were held
constant except light, HOLT and WATERS ( 1967 l were able to show that drift
was depressed during the night by keeping the lights on , and that
artificially advancing nightfall caused the drift peak to appear earlier ( Fig.
6-3). It is clear that light is usually the governing factor. Indeed. even
bright moonlight has been found to depress drift .
The solar eclipse witnessed in Australia on 113 October 1976 provided
an unusual opportunity to investigate the inlluence of light on drift. The
0·1
01:::::::::::::::~-----
ENCLOSURE-EXPERIMENTAL LIGHT
·04
0·2
0 ½2!!1'!4~-oo~,.2-f4.~oo'JP--,2:.-:4~.oo~-=:24~.ll:1oo~H~
Fig. 6-s (a) The influence of continuous lighting on the drift race of Gammarus
pstudolim11111w. (b) The influence of experimentally advancing dusk on the drift
rate of Battis vagans. At the head of each graph the shaded portions represent
periods of darkness. (After HOLT and WATERS, 1967.)
§ 6.3 INVERTEBRATE DRIFT 61
eclipse was total for only three minutes commencing at 16.42 hours. The
periods of rapidly decreasing and increasing light intensity, 'dawn' and
'dusk', each lasted for 15 minutes. Hourly drift samples were taken in a
small stream on u, 23 and 24 October. Several taxa were found 10
be more abundant in the drift after sunset and these also exhibited
an eclipse-related increase in abundance !Fig. 6-4). Cricotopw
(Chironomidae) larvae were less abundant in the drift after sunset and
also exhibited an eclipse-related decrease in abundance.
Tome
Fig. 6-4 Occurrence in the drift on (a) u (b) 23 and (cl 24 October 1976 of
each of three taxa. A11he base of each histogram the black horizontal bar indicates
darkness. The solar eclipse on 23 October lasted for approximately gg minutes.
(After CADWALLADER, P. L. and EDEN, A. K. (1977). Awt.j. Mar. Frtshwaltr Rts., 28,
799-805.)
entering the drift and regaining a foothold somewhere else. Some species,
notably those whose food resources were patchily distributed, drifted
more than the average, with, for example, a value of 1496 for the predatm-y
net-spinning caddis, Plectrocnemia cOT1Jpma. Other species drifted at much
lower rates, or indeed not at all, for example the pea mussel I, PiJidium sp.
Mel.AV (1970) attempted to discover how far individuals move while in
the drift. He did this by means of experimental disturbances of the stream
bottom to release organisms into the drift at increasing distances from a
drift sampling net. On the basis of his results (Fig. 6-5) it is clear that 60%
of organisms drift less than 10 m. However, this may have been an
underestimate because some animals may have been damaged or killed as
a result of their drastic treatment and may have drifted further than usual.
The consensus from several field studies is that the majority of drifting
organisms move less than 2 m at a time. Many regain the bottom
accidentally, when brought into contact with it, while others exhibit active
movements which reduce the period that they remain in the drift.
50
.., 40
'
E
d
Z 30
~
·;;;
~ 20
-0
:;;
0 10
g' 15 15
:i::
-0
Gi 10 10
.0
E
:::,
I
''
z 5 5 ''
0
'-/
'
0 3 6 0
Time (hrs)
(a) (bl
Fig. 6-6 Distribution of total numbers of Ephtmerella mbvaria nymphs drifting
in a darkened stream (a) at basal (dashed line) and increased (solid line) Row
velocity and (b) under clear Rowing (dashed line) and high sediment (solid line)
conditiom. (After CIBOROWSKI, J. J. H., POINTING, P. J. and CORKUM. L. D. ( 1977).
Fmhwat. Biol., 7, 567-72.)
flow velocity is too high. (Whether the latter results from an active
response or passive dislodgement is unclear.)
Alternatively, patches may not possess acceptable biotic characteristics.
The presence of appropriate food resources is often crucial in the
microdistribution of benthic invertebrates(§ 5.3.4). HILDEBRAND (1974)
has shown that the herbivorous nymphs of the mayfly Ephe~rella
needhami (a 'scraper') drift at a higher rate when fewer attached algae are
present on the stony substrate of an artificial stream, and HILDREW and
TOWNSEND ( 1980) demonstrated that the average time before the car-
nivorous larvae of the caddis Plectrocnemia conspersa drift from an experi-
mental stream is significantly shorter when prey are not available.
Experiments have shown that individuals are also more likely to drift in
the presence of competitors. This may occur simply as a result of the
'jostling' of animals feeding at high density (WALTON, REICF, and ANDREWS,
1977). However, in the case of P. conspersa, and other sessile net-spinning
caddis larvae, space in which to spin may be a directly limiting factor.
Highly aggressive behaviour has been reported for hydropsychid caddis
64 M0LLER'S COLONIZATION CYCLE
'o,"'
112 LI
113 TI
C
114 N
J
115 V
C
116 lr _
Development Roy A L Batt
117 Collagen : the Anatomy of a Protein
John W oodhead-Galloway
lo.gyno. 122
IIWflBQ'ed by The
ng the
ng the
olog(sta.
tute lta
uld be
Oueena