Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FB77WPCC/T04: M-18 Iridium Industrial Spark Plug
FB77WPCC/T04: M-18 Iridium Industrial Spark Plug
FB77WPCC/T04: M-18 Iridium Industrial Spark Plug
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 2
FB77WPCC Iridium Design
Characteristics
• Terminal
1 • Solid Post, C1018 Steel, Ni Plated 1
• Insulator
2 • 2140 ceramic, ribless
2
• Core Seal and Supressor
3 • IFISS – Industrial Fired-In Suppressor Seal
• Shell
4 • C1010 Extruded, Ni-Plated
• Shell Seal 5
5 • Hot Lock
• Centre Electrode
6 • Thin-walled Ni with enlarged copper core
4
3
• Ground Electrode
7 • Inconnel 600 Ni with enlarged copper core
6
• Electrode Precious Metals
8 • Ir- Alloy Centre Electrode, Pt-Alloy Ground Electrode
8 7
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 3
FB77WPCC IFISS Core Technology
IFISS vs. Capsule Resistor
IFISS vs. Capsule Resistor Comparison - Specifically designed for
Resistance vs. Temperature industrial applications,
10000
IFISS is a fired in
Capsule Resistor Industrial FISS suppressor seal, which
7500 significantly improves
Resistance [Ω]
0
-50 50 150 250 350 450
Temperature [˚C]
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 4
FB77WPCC Electrode Enhancements
Centre Electrode and Ground Electrode Temperature Comparisons
RB77WPCC FB77WPCC
Thin-walled and exposed Cu on new design provides cooler running temperature at centre
electrode tip of 65-125°C.
Core seal on IFISS design shows lower temperature of less than 50°C compared to RB77WPCC
design
25% increase in cross section area (ground electrode) equates to less than 15°C cooler
temperature at electrode tip and significantly improved heat transfer out.
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 5
FB77WPCC Hot Lock Shell Seal
Hot Lock vs. Sillment Shell Seal Comparisons
Hot Lock vs. Sillment Shell Seal - Pressurized Lift
100%
80%
Average Lift [% Comparison]
60%
40%
20%
0%
Applied Load - 55MPa
At 55MPa applied pressure the new hot-lock design shows a 40% reduction in core lift due to increased
shell rigidity and pre-assembled load.
Increased rigidity and pre-assembled load also provide a more consistent, evenly distributed, and higher
compression load at the lower shell seat, resulting in improved sealing against combustion gases.
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 6
FB77WPCC Hot Lock Shell Seal
Hot Lock vs. Sillment Shell Seal Comparisons
Hot Lock vs. Sillment Shell Seal - Set
0.0030
Note - pressurized to 69MPa
0.0020
Hot Lock
Sillment
Sillment
Set [mm]
0.0010 RB77WPCC
0.0000
1 2 3 4 5
-0.0010
Sample
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 7
FB77WPCC Assembly Robustness
Hot Lock vs. Sillment Shell Seal Comparisons – Shell Torque Strength
Shell Torque Strength - Sillment vs. Hot-Lock
100%
Torque Strength [% Difference]
90%
80%
70%
50%
Sillment Shell Seal Hot Lock Shell Seal
Shell torque strength testing displayed the hot-lock design to be 25% stronger than the Sillment shell seal
design at the smallest cross section. This improvement gives a more robust shell/assembly design allowing
for a higher „margin of error‟ over torque conditions during engine assembly/disassembly process.
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 8
FB77WPCC Weld Process
Enhancements
Advanced Laser Welding Process
FB77WPCC Ground Electrode – Cross Section and A Top View Current RB77WPCC
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 9
FB77WPCC Longer Run Life
FB77WPCC Service FB77WPCC Life Advantage
100%
Life Advantage
RB77WPCC FB77WPCC
Electrode Wear
60%
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 10
FB77WPCC/T04
T04 = 4 PACK
Shipping Carton = 48 (12 x T04 pack)
PACK BARCODE L mm W mm H mm KG
GA EMEA 04/10/2011 11