Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clinical Assessment of A Supplement of Pycnogenol® and Arginine in Japanese Patients With Mild To Moderate Erectile Dysfunction
Clinical Assessment of A Supplement of Pycnogenol® and Arginine in Japanese Patients With Mild To Moderate Erectile Dysfunction
Hiromitsu Aoki,1 Junji Nagao,1 Taro Ueda,1 Jeffry M. Strong,2 Frank Schonlau,2* Song Yu‐Jing,3
Yan Lu3 and Shigeo Horie3
1
Central Laboratories, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 4‐4‐10 Doshomachi, Chuo‐ku, Osaka, Japan
2
Horphag Research (UK) Ltd., London, UK
3
Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2‐11‐1 Kaga, Itabashi‐ku, Tokyo, Japan
A double‐blind parallel group comparison design clinical study was conducted in Japanese patients with mild to
moderate erectile dysfunction to investigate the efficacy of a supplement containing Pycnogenol® and L‐arginine.
Subjects were instructed to take a supplement (Pycnogenol® 60 mg/day, L‐arginine 690 mg/day and aspartic
acid 552 mg/day) or an identical placebo for 8 weeks, and the results were assessed using the five‐item erectile
domain (IIEF‐5) of the International Index of Erectile Function. Additionally, blood biochemistry, urinalysis and
salivary testosterone were measured. Eight weeks of supplement intake improved the total score of the IIEF‐5. In
particular, a marked improvement was observed in ‘hardness of erection’ and ‘satisfaction with sexual intercourse’.
A decrease in blood pressure, aspartate transaminase and γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase (γ‐GTP), and a slight
increase in salivary testosterone were observed in the supplement group. No adverse reactions were observed
during the study period. In conclusion, Pycnogenol® in combination with L‐arginine as a dietary supplement is
effective and safe in Japanese patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: erectile dysfunction; edicare; pycnogenol; L‐arginine; Japanese; testosterone.
Table 1. Background of subjects included in analysis triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol, sodium, potassium and chlorine. The pH,
Measured baseline qualitative protein, qualitative glucose and occult blood
values(mean ± standard deviation) were investigated by urinalysis. Blood biochemistry
analysis and urinalysis was consigned with BML
Placebo group Supplement group
Inc. Salivary testosterone was analyzed by ELISA
Age (years) 50.6 ± 7.5 51.4 ± 9.0 (Demeditec Diagnostics, Germany) at the Department
Height (cm) 169.3 ± 3.8 169.2 ± 5.8 of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine.
Body weight (kg) 67.1 ± 9.2 69.8 ± 6.1
BMI (kg/m2) 23.4 ± 2.9 24.4 ± 2.0 Statistical analysis. The student’s t‐test was employed
Systolic blood 128.4 ± 12.9 125.7 ± 13.9 for inter‐group comparison of the change in IIEF‐5
pressure (mmHg) scores, blood biochemistry and salivary testosterone.
Diastolic blood 80.8 ± 10.0 76.6 ± 10.2 Wilcoxon’s signed rank sum test was used for intra‐
pressure (mmHg) group comparisons, and differences in mean values
Pulse rate (beats/min) 69.4 ± 8.5 76.6 ± 10.2
were assayed. In each case, the level of statistical
Total IIEF‐5 score 17.5 ± 0.5 16.0 ± 0.9
significance was set at p < 0.05.
Salivary testosterone 53.5 ± 8.4 53.5 ± 10.0
(pg/ml)
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 26: 204–207 (2012)
206 H. AOKI ET AL.
Total score
Change in score
Before study After 4 weeks After 8 weeks
Q3
Placebo 3.4 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.2 Figure 1. Based on the pre‐ingestion level, the change is calculated
Supplement 2.9 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.3 3.2 ± 0.3 from the score obtained after ingestion, and the result is indicated
in mean ± standard deviation. Placebo group: n = 11; Study drug
Q4
group: n = 12; Student’s t‐test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Placebo 3.8 ± 0.2 4.3 ± 0.2 3.9 ± 0.3
Supplement 3.9 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 0.3 4.0 ± 0.3
Q5
in the supplement group at 4 and 8 weeks (mean increase Placebo group Study supplement group
REFERENCES
Demir T, Demir O, Kefi A, Comlekci A, Yesil S, Esen A. 2006. Stanislavov R, Nikolova V, Rohdewald P. 2008. Improvement of
Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in patients with metabolic erectile function with Prelox: a randomized, double‐blind,
syndrome. Int J Urol 13: 385–388. placebo‐controlled, crossover trial. Int J Impot Res 20:
Lamm S. 2009. Prelox® for Improvement of erectile quality. Eur 173 –180.
Endocrinol 5: 70 –74. Thompson IM, Tangen CM; Goodman PJ et al. 2005. Erectile
Rohdewald P. 2002. A review of the French maritime pine bark dysfunction and subsequent cardiovascular disease. JAMA
extract (Pycnogenol), a herbal medication with a diverse clinical 294: 2996–3002.
pharmacology. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 40: 158 –168. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc. 2007. Maritime
Shirai M. 2002. The prevalence of ED in Japan: cross‐national Pine Extract. United States Pharmacopoeia, 28th edn. USP:
epidemiologic study. Nippon Rinsho 60(Suppl 6): 200–202. Rockville, MD; 2155–2116.
[In Japanese] Yasuda M, Ide H, Furuya K et al. 2008. Salivary 8‐OHdG: a useful
Stanislavov R, Nikolova V. 2003. Treatment of erectile dysfunc- biomarker for predicting severe ED and hypogonadism. J Sex
tion with pycnogenol and L‐arginine. J Sex Marital Ther 29: Med 5: 1482–1491.
207–213.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Phytother. Res. 26: 204–207 (2012)