Data Science in Business Model Predicting Better Loans

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 37

Predicting Better Loans

at Flagstar FSB
MOONS OF JUPYTER, LLC
Executive Summary
Flagstar FSB has an opportunity to expand loan servicing contribution by $1M+
annually through predictive modeling

Moons of Jupyter used data modeling to analyze nearly 4M mortgages over the past
20 years and:
◦ Highlight costliness of servicing loans at-risk of default
◦ Fine-tune data inputs to train model
◦ Identify significant key attributes as drivers of default rates

Provides new value proposition to Government Sponsored Entities and other


investors: our mortgages have less risk, we know what to look for
Bad loans are expensive to service
Flagstar is a top-10 mortgage originator and
servicer in the US
Originating nearly 800k loans per year
Average servicing margins
◦ Good: 15bps
◦ Defaults: -25bps

Default rate is 2.9%*, higher than industry


average of 2.1%
Flagstar can lower servicing costs, improve its
reputation, improve cost forecasting on
current portfolio
Default rates from *2000-2010
Approach to Problem

Predictive
Modeling
• Fannie Mae single- • Financial forecast of
family loan data since • Train key attributes improved bps spread
2000 • Boosted trees model • Contribution Margin
• LTV, DTI, Credit Score, • Improved accuracy of expansion
etc default rates
Attribute Economic
Analysis Impact
Our model uses boosted regression trees
Benefits and overview of boosted trees model:
◦ 1. Clusters borrower profiles using attributes such as DTI, LTV, first time
buyer, and predicts based on profiles. E.g. Borrowers with DTI > 35%, LTV
>85%, and FTB have an X% chance of default
◦ 2. Compares its predictions to actual results, and then iterates based on
the bias in the results, making for increasingly accurate predictions
◦ 3. Creates easy to read outputs – list of feature importance and % chance
of default risk

Key modeling decisions


◦ 1. Dropped data from biased Great Recession years (2005, 2006, 2007,
2008)
◦ 2. Used grid search to tune parameters of models
◦ 3. Only incorporated variables that are available at the point of
origination
Economic Impact
Annual Impact of Model Use
Annual Loans Sold & Serviced 800,000 Skill Score (improvement) 4.60%
Median Loan Value $240,000 Current Default Rate 2.87%
Margin per Good Loan 0.15% New Default Rate 2.74%
Margin per Bad Loan -0.25%

Current Annual Contribution $265.9M


New Annual Contribution $266.9M
Dollar Margin Expansion $1M Margin Expansion 38 bps
Risk Factors
Average time to default is approx. 5 years
◦ Loans originated from 2015-present may deviate from historical baselines

Under-rating risk of some loans due to unrealized results Last 4 year data

False negatives risk underwriting fewer loans


◦ Value left on table
Recommendations
Create target profile for borrowers
◦ Adjust for credit score, mortgage insurance needed, property type
◦ Improved resource allocation

Benchmark recent borrowers (2015-Present) against new target profile


◦ Highlight future risks of default not captured in the dataset

Redefine sales approach to GSEs (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac)


◦ Value proposition for reduced risk of default
◦ Negotiate lower guarantee fees or premium price for loans
Appendix
Tableau Visualizations
File created on: 1/17/21 2:24:55 PM EST
Paul Shaaf

You might also like