Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Role of Banks in Agricultural Lending - India: SSRN Electronic Journal October 2009
Role of Banks in Agricultural Lending - India: SSRN Electronic Journal October 2009
net/publication/228257280
CITATIONS READS
0 723
2 authors, including:
Sairavi Subramaniam
7 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sairavi Subramaniam on 05 December 2018.
Abstract
sector in lending. India growing in population needs more food production even to
meet its own demand. It is critical now that agricultural sector has been pushed as
secondary sector rather than primary. Author has conceptually presented in this article
the need for banking sector to consider improving their lending schemes. The primary
objective of the author is to highlight that banks data are not sufficiently supporting
the Priority sector lending, which in turn is going to have big impact on the
agricultural sector itself. The factors like branch operations, number of branches in
rural areas, financial inclusion and its impact, credit deposit ratio, lending policies,
RBI policy, sectoral development and other factors are analyzed with empirical
evidence and statistical relevance. Authors are of opinion that agricultural sector
needs more attention from union government and also they should watch how their
policies are implemented in banks. More researchers should drive their academic and
empirical research to show how rural branches at micro level functions. Authors are
given their own suggestions and conclusions based on the statistical data collected
Key words – Banks, agricultural lending, priority sector lending, financial inclusion
banking laws, so as to secure greater elasticity in the forms of currency available for trade and to prevent
the limitations of law from operating to increase the embarrassment of a financial panic (William Howard
Introduction
Commercialized banks need to support various sectors to have balanced growth in the
economy. It should ensure that economic growth percolates through all sections of
masses. But unfortunately, in agricultural sector small and Marginal farmers suffer
seriously due to non availability of funds for their occupation. Medium and large scale
farmers may get necessary funds through submission of adequate collateral, while small
and marginal farmers deprived of all comforts including capital investment. World Bank
report pronounces around 1.1 billion people’s in India is poor at rural area (WDR, 2008).
One of the major reasons for the poverty is a low accessibility for credits by rural poor.
This leads authors to think deeply about the contribution of banks towards the
agricultural sector and what role they currently play in the economy. If banks are helping
agricultural mass heavily, then the concern about low accessibility and disbursement
raises doubts about the performance of financial sectors in India. In this article, author
tries to bring the importance of banks in helping and restoring the confidence in the
minds of rural farmers by providing more accessibility towards credits and other
facilities.
Indian banking sector has undergone numerous reforms and changes over the past
decades to enhance its performance to the international level. The financial independence
of the country depends on the sound financial system operating within the country. India
one of the largest country in south Asia, it has varied financial institutions, instruments
and financial system. Indian banking system was considered as well developed with the
presence of foreign and domestic banks including well developed stock market (Bery,
1996). Below table shows the latest data on Banks, branches until 2008.
Table 1 reveals that nationalized banks are in the increasing trend and have extended into
different areas. In comparison with previous year, the trend shows generally increasing
and positive. Nationalized banks opened more branches while others are also seen in the
increasing trends.
3
Below table 2 shows number of branches opened during 2004-08 based on four
different division’s viz. rural, semi-urban, urban and metro places. RBI statistics claims
that most of the branches are inaugurated on rural sides than metro cities. The proportion
of bank branches in rural areas exceeds the metro numbers. It seems that number of
offices opened in rural areas during 2006/07 was 112 and that of urban seems to be 509
in number and that of metro 344. It is evident, even though number of branches in
operation exceeds in rural than urban; of late the concentration of banks were on urban
Table 3 shows the accessibility and reachability of the individual consumers to the
reachable even though, it doesn’t top in the table. Comparatively with other major
countries, it is well enough to maintain this position to serve to its client. But on the
contrary, for demographic penetration, India is much lesser than other countries. Growing
population in India is one of the factors that every nationalized bank has to consider to
4
see how to reach maximum number of clients. It will be useful if E-banking and E-
operations are designed to reach large number of clients and serve them at the best as
fast.
The table above reveals among total number of households, rural mass usage of
banking services were apparently lower compared to that of urban mass. Even rural
household exceeds urban mass; it seems that banking services usage by rural mass was
5
bare minimum. This could be due to non-awareness of such services, illiteracy or even
lack of understanding about the advantage of banking services and banking products. In
addition these factors are also valid reason to assume that credit flow to rural mass is
lower because of lack of existence of schemes, poor communication and illiteracy etc.
Financial inclusion
Reserve bank of India (RBI) and other policy makers including National bank for
agriculture and rural development (NABARD) has framed policies initiating financial
inclusion with banks. The primary goal of the policy was to include the rural mass in the
banking operation and make it vulnerable for every individual rural mass to use them. In
view of that financial inclusion summits and workshops were conducted to impart the
importance of such theme to the rural mass. According to one of the recent survey
highlighted in the seminar, only 59% of the adult population in India has a savings
account and in rural areas they are only 39% enjoys banking facilities (ET Bureau, 2008).
The importance of including rural mass into the banking sector to make it reachable for
them was primarily a good objective to work on. But on the contrary, the function of
2.5 crore no- frill account opened during April 2007- May 2009, were largely non
operative. Only 11% of these accounts were currently active (Dhall, 2009, Sanjay Sinha,
2008). Additionally, these accounts were transacting with a minimum amount of Rs. 50 –
100, but charges Rs.50-250 for transaction fee and services. In support of this view,
Robin Roy, associate director of PWC, ; “The threshold levels for number of free
6
needed to serve this segment. But banks would need to seriously look at the bottom of the
pyramid. It’s the quality of no frills account holders that holds the key.”
(2007) shows about potential growth for Indian banks in rural areas. In addition, the
report states that high geographic fragmentation in banking locations which makes
banking services not available to rural population. Almost 73% of customers dispersed in
and around 650,000 Indian rural villages as of 2005. There is a greater demand for
financial inclusion, but unfortunately the reach of such program was not strong to every
rural village in India. In addition, “The scale of business in financial inclusion is so big
governor, Reserve bank of India, and added lack of interest and involvement by big IT
times, 2009). Financial inclusion failed due to the lack of proper application, poor
delivery, in sufficient planning and rich do not have compassion for the poor
(Chakrabarty, 2009). Failure of this scheme has left 60% of the Indian mass not having
access to the financial services. It is important to gather forces like big IT industries
companies to support their schemes and RBI should monitor the functioning of the
scheme.
RBI has identified priority sectors like small scale industries, agriculture as
important sector to finance and issue more credits for their development. In a recent
article, Ramasubba Reddy (March, 2009) claims that C-D ratio (Credit-deposit ratio) for
metro cities by commercialized banks were highest to 87% and that of rural was 57%
7
only. As of March 2009, rural deposits were Rs.3.65 lakh crores, where as credits were
extended to Rs. 2.09 lakh crores only. If the same ratio like metro could have been
maintained the balance of Rs. One lakh crore should have been issued as credit to the
rural mass but reality is that it has been diverted towards the metro credits and
developments. Poor farmers were left in the hands of loan sharks with heavy interest
payments. Extrapolating the data from the RBI website, Reddy presents the below table
statistics showing application of funds towards metro region exceeds the other regions in
total.
Reddy claims that “Major chunk of credit to the extent of 96% of the total credit
in the State is given in Metro agglomerations. A megre 4 % of the total credit is given in
the rest of the vast track of Maharastra.” The discrimination between Metro and other
regions are evident and also clearly understood from the bank stand point of view. Also
to note that banks vision has changed from Agricultural development to Industrial
development issues.
8
Source adapted from www.rbi.org.in
9
Debt profile of rural farmers
From the above graph, it is clearly evident that commercial banks credit policy
has shifted towards Industry sector rather than agricultural sector. The above graph
depicts the banking activities for 2007, showing that agriculture credits were in the range
between 12-13% from nationalized banks and scheduled banks. Only rural banks have
more agricultural attention than other banks. The question of availability of funds and
huge cartel of funds might be available from nationalized banks rather than rural banks.
Most of the regional rural banks will be operating as co-operative society, who has its
own limitation for sourcing funds because of member’s subscription, awareness of capital
share and other elements. More over regional rural banks operations were also restricted
to a particular region as standalone institution. This might not help much for Indian
farmer’s population who need more help to save them out of the crisis. Unless, a
nationalized bank comes out with more agricultural credit and loan to help the marginal
and small rural farmers, the fate of agriculture is always under conspiracy.
10
The above table on debt profile clearly projects the data for year between 1993-94
and 99-2000 on source of debt for rural farmers. It was found that most of funds were
generated from Money lenders and it has considerably increased from 27.6% to 31.7%
instead banking credit allocation were only between 18.9% and 17.2% during these years.
The trend seems scary for economy because banks are leaving farmers unattended in the
hands of guilty loan sharks who are exploiting the need of farmers in greater extent and
leaving them in streets wandering for food and shelter even. Unless bank or government
steps into this situation to protect the poor gullible farmers, there is going to be a massive
decrease in agricultural employment, food production, and lead the country for food
shortage soon.
11
Above mentioned table also evidently shows the declining trend of farmer’s credit
compared to the deposits. The proportion seems not equal at all based on the table, where
farmers deposit more to the banks, but reaping less credits for their survival (Vallabh &
Chatrath, 2006).
Nationalized banks have more political intervention rather than any other quasi
operational works too. One such area it plays strongly is rural credits and agricultural
loans. Government decides on agricultural policy from time to time and enacts
agricultural reforms. Every year during fiscal budget session, agriculture becomes one of
the top demanded item and allocations towards agriculture sector will always be
12
From the table data, it can be seen that agriculture credit for year 2007-2008 was
11% but of 2008-09 was 13%. There is an increase in the trend of agricultural
disbursement during the above mentioned year, but on the contrary it is evident that
increase in the agricultural during 2007- 08 and 2008-09 was less than other
corresponding periods. Total bank credit was estimated to increase by 20% in 2009-10,
but on the other hand targeted increase in agricredits was only 13%. Also summing up of
all three years agri credit growth was less than that of total bank credit growth. Country
facing drought situation, food shortage, it is necessary that agricredits have to be opened
to rural mass. Agricultural credit are particularly popular because the benefits are
transparent, while the costs are not, stated by Adams, Graham and von Pischke (2005).
Indian banks having constraints with financial resource have restrictions in amount
lending to agriculture, due to politicians intrude in bank affairs will face intertemporal
Small farmers and Marginal farmer’s small loan amount for Rs 25000 declined
from 50% in 1990 to mere 10% in 2008. And loans over Rs one crore skyrocketed by
more than 400% during the same period. According to RBI data, institutional credit flow
to farmers registered a compound annual growth rate of 47% between 2003 and 2007, but
the number of farmer accounts grew by 22% and average loan per account increased by
20%. According to the NABARD’s latest report, only 27% of cultivator households get
getting credit. The rest, comprising mainly small & marginal farmers, have no access to
13
credit, though their landholdings constituted nearly 80% of total holdings and 36% of
In a recent interview with Dr. Raghuram Rajan, (2007) on bringing reforms into
" There is "very little evidence" that all the additional rural credit helped agricultural investment or
growth to any meaningful degree -- the most likely reasons being that much of the bank credit was
"misallocated" or not accompanied by sufficient public investment, leading to "a lot of wastage
(knowledge@wharton)".
In addition, Rajan states that, bank lending programs are also hijacked by politicians
in post nationalization era and admits that agricultural lending are highly manipulated by
Loan Mela
Most of the banks will be urged to adapt Loan mela scheme due to stringent RBI
mandates. Every nationalized bank has to provide 18% of adjusted net bank credit to
agriculture sector, of which 13.5% is to be disbursed as direct credit and 4.5% towards
indirect credit to agriculture. Failing to maintain the required credits, banks will be forced
to give target loans to rural peoples. Administration of this program has been highly
criticized due to lack of proper scrutiny and awarding loans to unworthy creditors were
noted in this scheme. Commenting on the performance of this loan mela, Rajan (2009)
states that "This was without any credit evaluation and purely on the politician's word," he said.
"Obviously, [the politician's] friends and relatives got the credit, and obviously they didn't bother to repay
[the loans]."
14
Loan disbursement
India like developing countries always has corruption and bribery practices active
at all levels in the organizations. Banks are also not exempted from the clutches of such
practices. Bringing out the status of rural credit disbursement, Raghuram Rajan states that
“With the attraction of a highly subsidized rate, do people with the best credit get the
loan? The guy who has bribed the most gets the loan." He cited household surveys where
respondents reported paying bribes of up to 43% of their loan amounts to secure their
loans. He said the beneficiary has no intention of paying back the loan, "because that is
the only way he can justify the bribe." Stating the average time consumed for loan
disbursement has become 33 weeks and banks are not stepping forward to help the rural
Sectoral development
15
Comparing different sectors and the investment range from banks towards these
sectors were shown in the above table. It shows that Industry ranks first in the sectoral
growth compared to agriculture. This clearly states that Indian economy has diverted
their vision from agriculture to Industrial sector after 1995. This visualizes clearly that
what steps that government will be adapting for the growth of agricultural sector will be
secondary rather than industrial sector development. The focus on Indian agricultural
sector is the need of the hour for the union government to consider that they have lot to
play to improve this dying sector and giving boost to the economy of the India.
Crop insurance
Farm sector credits can be protected by proper insurance coverage and risk
pooling. When our current Prime minister declared drought hit zones and identified
districts drought due to poor monsoon and rainfall, he urged ministry of agriculture to
come out with plans to meet the food scarcity issue in India. Ministry of finance and
Agricultural Insurance Scheme (MNIAS) has assigned to identify the crop insurance
status and trends in India. To their surprise, in a recent survey during 03, they found only
4% of the country’s have availed a crop insurance scheme. In a subsequent survey done
by National Sample Survey Organization during 2003, they found out about 57% of
Indian farmers were even unaware about the crop insurance scheme (economic times,
2009). These data’s highlights that Indian farmers were not aware of such a facility where
by they can be covered for the risk element in the crops. It’s important to have some
farmer awareness education to coach the gullible, marginal farmers regarding availing
loans, credit availability, crop insurance, role of subsidies etc. This type of education
16
might help illiterate farmers and bring some awareness into them about those schemes
Other factors
Other factor like broader span of control for banks and bank administration to
control rural mass leads to poor quality lending. In one of personal conversation with
author one of the bank administrative staff in charge for disposing agricultural loans
stated that some of the districts, & states, banks were asked to adapt more that 3 – 5
villages. Bank engages one or two officers in charge for agricultural credit disbursement
and lending operations. In most of the cases, it might be even only one officer or even
skeleton of staff with one manager and one officer with one teller cum clerk to take in
charge of entire rural bank administration. This bank might be controlling 3-4 village
rural population. Statistically, this branch going to handle 3-4 village farmers deposits
and credits. Bank administration might not be in a position to inquire the nature of loan
claimed or even to disburse the loan because, they might not be sure of the quality of the
creditors too. In case of target loans, banks might even admit loans to unscrupulous
account holders too. This is not an entertaining trend. It might be better if RBI can come
with how many bank personnel works in every branch and ratio of bank loan disbursal
per bank for every year. This might be good to trace them on micro level to understand
individual banks at rural level function and its operation. Policies hang over the walls of
banks but the realism is some thing different to assimilate. The other areas to explore
might be on bank level efficiency and its operation. How well individual bank manager
contributes to the community development and how well does bank integrate with the
rural society. This identification of bank and bank administration might help banks to
17
mingle with the society. This might even take banks to the door steps of the needy people
rather than depending on IT system and big IT companies backing for financial
RBI need to revise their standards to understand that still India is an agriculture
base economy and it a developing country like India need to grow, first rural poverty
need to be eradicated. This can only be achieved by bringing out the Indian farmers out
of debts and helping them to have economic independence in their career. Developing
rural leadership, community leadership and rural colleges could bring the knowledge for
the gullible farmers. This might help them to get awareness about banking products and
services available. Authors are also interested to further explore the micro level
operations of rural banks and its administration in helping rural community with
statistical evidence. Need for bank is give a boost for the economy irrespective of sectors,
if banks have partial views on farmers and industrial persons, the views might be
Conclusion
It is important to note that Indian products are known to world wide based on the
fertility and rich sources of food products. India, today on contrary struggling to achieve
food sufficiency due to lack of proper planning, leader and lack of capital. Farmer’s
accessibility towards capital is only through bank credits. If banking sector considers
development to Indian sub continent, it will be great to implement their plans, policies
and guidelines properly without any considerations and help the growth of agricultural
sector in India. Will bank support the growth of Indian agriculture to achieve food
18
List of references
2. PTI (2009, 18th May). 20-PSU banks fail to meet farm sector lending target till
www.indianfarmers.org
4. Anup roy (2009, Aug 17). Banks to meet target by lending for allied agricultural
5. Reserve Bank of India (2009). Statistical tables relating to banks in India 2007-
http://www.censusindia.org
7. IST (2009, 18th Jul). IT players failed us in financial inclusion drive. The
8. Yogesh Kochhar (2009, 11th Feb). Telecatalyse financial inclusion. The economic
times. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com
9. Sanjay Sinha (2009, 23rd April). Political limits to financial inclusion. The
10. Vallabah & Suraj (2006). Role of Banks in Agriculture and Rural development.
11. Mckinsey & corporation (2007). Indian Banking: Towards Global Best Practices.
19
12. Knowledge@wharton (2009, 7th May). As foreign banks detour, public banks
13. Knowledge@wharton (2009, 15th Nov). Raghuram Rajan on Rewriting the rules
14. Prabha Jagannathan (2009, 16th Jul). Crop cover immersed in red tape. The
15. Bery, S. 1996. “India: Commercial Bank Reform” in Financial Sector Reforms,
American Countries (Ed) Faruqi, Shakil. EDI Seminar Series, The World Bank,
Washington, D.
20