Marking Criteria Individual Speaking Langblog PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Marking criteria: Individual speaking (Langblog)

For the ​individual speaking tasks​, you will be marked using the following criteria:

Individual speaking task

Task achievement, comprehensibility and pronunciation


Task achievement, comprehensibility and pronunciation take into account how well the finished work answers the task requirements, how
comprehensible the speaker is, and the speaker’s pronunciation and intonation.

Fluency and coherence


Fluency and coherence take into account how natural speaker sounds and hesitation. It also includes the use of linking words and other
linguistic devices to connect ideas (e.g. pronouns) to help the listener understand the speaker.

Language: Grammar and vocabulary


Grammar and vocabulary takes into account the variety and accuracy of grammatical structures and vocabulary the speaker uses.

PLEASE NOTE:

1. IF YOUR WORK DOES NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS THE TASK, YOUR MARK MAY BE LOWERED OR YOU MAY RECEIVE A
FAILING MARK FOR YOUR WORK.

2. ALL WORK SUBMITTED TO THE CLASSROOM MUST BE YOUR OWN. SEE THE WARNING ABOUT PLAGIARISM AND ORIGINALITY
OF YOUR WORK IN THE COURSE PLAN.
Marking criteria: Individual speaking (Langblog)

Task achievement, comprehensibility and Fluency and coherence Language: Grammar and vocabulary
pronunciation
9,10 ● Very good completion of task with no significant ● Communicates spontaneously and naturally ● Accurate use and wide variety of basic grammatical structures
A omissions and few irrelevancies ● Occasional hesitation to search for expressions and vocabulary
● Very easy to understand ● Uses a variety of cohesive devices efficiently and ● Some complex grammatical structures used successfully
● Pronunciation and intonation always very clear accurately to connect ideas ● Use of synonyms to avoid repetition
and natural and these are used to emphasise ● Occasional minor errors
meaning and attitude
7, 8 ● Good completion of task with minor omissions ● Produces long stretches of speech which are clear ● Good use and variety of basic grammatical structures
B ● Almost always easy to understand ● Occasional hesitation to search for patterns and ● Some complex grammatical structures used but not always
● Pronunciation and intonation generally clear expressions with a few noticeably long pauses successfully
and natural and although there may be some ● Uses some cohesive devices to link and connect ● Some use of synonyms but some repetition
errors, the meaning is clear ideas

5, 6 ● Adequate completion of task but there may be ● Produces quite long stretches of continuous ● Adequate use of grammatical structures and vocabulary to
C+ some irrelevant information speech complete the task
● Generally easy to understand ● Frequent long pauses ● May use complex grammatical structures but errors make the
● Pronunciation and intonation noticeably ● Adequate use of some cohesive devices to link speaker difficult to understand at times
influenced by first language, don’t always sound ideas ● Adequate range of vocabulary but some repetition and basic
natural and sometimes affect comprehension errors

3, 4 ● Inadequate completion of task with significant ● Produces some short sentences ● Frequent basic grammatical errors which make speaker difficult
C- parts not included in terms of content and/or ● Very noticeable hesitation to understand
irrelevant information ● Links groups of words only with simple linking ● Minimal vocabulary to complete the task and major errors make
● Difficult to understand words such as “and”, “but” and “because” speaker generally difficult to understand
● Pronunciation and intonation strongly
influenced by first language, don’t sound
natural, generally impeding comprehension

0, 1, 2 ● Inadequate completion of task ● Very short, isolated words and expressions ● Insufficient vocabulary and grammatical structures to complete
D ● Almost always impossible to understand ● Very long pauses to search for expressions the task
● Inaccuracies in pronunciation and intonation ● No use of linking expressions
make speaker incomprehensible

You might also like