PROJECT

Empirical formula for core binding energy

BY

Name : ArisJulianto
Cindi Elvani
Nurhayati
Gloris Philip
Class : Bilingual Physics Education 2017
Strata : S-1
Course : Basic Nuclear

Physics Departement
Faculty Of Mathematics And Sciences
State University Of Medan
2020
 PREFACE

Praise the presence of God Almighty for all his blessings so that the paper “Project" can
be completed until it is finished. Do not forget the author expressed his gratitude for the
assistance of those who have contributed by contributing both material and thoughts. And the
author hope that this paper can increase knowledge for readers. In the future, it can improve the
form and increase the contents of the paper to make it better. Because of the limited knowledge
and practice of the author, the author believes there is still a lot of experience in writing this
paper. Therefore, the author expects constructive suggestions and criticisms from readers for the
perfection of this paper.

Medan, May 2020

Author
 1.1 Definition
A “semiempirical formula” for BΛ=BΛ(A), the ground state binding energy of a Λ in
hypernuclei is proposed by adopting a Λ-nucleus potential for which the Schrödinger equation
can be solved analytically. This formula, which is obtained from the corresponding energy
eigenvalue equation without any approximation is subsequently expanded in powers of the mass
number A of the core nucleus and discussed. There are two adjustable parameters which are
determined by fitting to known experimental binding energies of the Λ in hypernuclei.
Empirical formula for core binding energy or the semi-empirical mass formula (SEMF). Lets
us use the above general ideas to arrive at a mass formula that describes the gross
behaviour of the binding energy of nuclei. Our argument will be at the classical level
(mainly) and we consider nuclei to be nothing more than ``blobs'' or ``chunks'' of
nuclear matter, without looking at the precise nature of the nuclear interaction.

Imagine that we did have nuclear interactions that saturates (a strong repulsive
core to the nucleon-nucleon interaction that keeps the nucleons apart) then we would
expect that the binding energy of a nucleus would depend on the volume of the
nucleus. The volume of the nucleus is linear in the atomic number due to the
saturation, and hence non-zero distance between nucleons, independent of the number
of other nucleons 

In the above argument we have neglected the fact that for nucleons near or at the
surface of the nucleus, the number of nucleons they see (on average) is less than if
they were in the nuclear medium itself. This means that we have to remove a
contribution to the binding energy that depends on the area of the nuclear surface.
Hence, we have a contribution of the form as for an object of radius R, the volume is
proportional to R , while the surface is proportional to R.
 Figure 2.3: Energy energy fraction plot, calculated to different correction factors,
diplomatic as function A, by using the coefficient a from Phone on Table 2.1. Note the similarity
with the results of the experiment on Figure 2.2.

The above formula is also known as the Weizsacker formula 5 (or the more complete
Bethe-Weizsacker formula). The theoretical plot as function A, with various levels of different
corrections, is shown in Figure 2.3.
Table 2.1: Various sets of constant values for Equality (2.3).

As a semi-empirical equation, there are various sets of coefficient values a (av, as, ac, aa,
and ap), both obtained from the 'fitting' of experimental data and from theoretical calculations, as
shown in Table. 2.1. The energy fraction plot calculated using different sets of coefficients is
presented in Figure 2.4. It can be seen that each set of coefficients produces a curve with a
different peak position, with the peak of the Ferbel curve closest to the experimental data (A =
56), as shown in Figure 2.3.

Figure 2.4: Plots of binding energy fraction, calculated up to the term a symmetry, using
different coefficients. Notice the similarities with each other.
1.1 Computational Bonding Energy (B) Using SEMF
Figure 1.1 Editor of the Binding Energy Function

Figure 1.2 "Run" Result from the Binding Energy Function

The "Run" result column shows a red warning. This is due to the presence of spaces that must
sometimes be written using the symbol "underline" (_). But this has no effect on the outcome of
the settlement. In the "Run" trial we use atomic number 13, with an atomic mass of 12 and the
results are -745, 4525.
 “A” adalah nilai dari nomor atom,
sedangkan “Z” adalah nilai dari
massa atom.

“av, as, ac, aa” merupakan set nilai

konstanta. Pada kali ini kita
menggunakan Beiser.

Penulisan rumus dari energy ikat.

Figure 1.3 Explanation of Parts and Functions in the "Editor" Column