Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Protective Coatings in The Gas Turbine Engine: Jeanine T. Demasi-Marcin, Dinesh K. Gupta
Protective Coatings in The Gas Turbine Engine: Jeanine T. Demasi-Marcin, Dinesh K. Gupta
Abstract
The gas turbine engine provides one of the harshest environments challenging material systems today. Engine components are subject
to rigorous mechanical loading conditions, high temperatures, and corrosive or erosive media. Historically, engine manufacturers
have applied protective coatings to increase the durability and field performance of alloys or composites. Field experience as well as
the development ofprocessing technologies has led to the evolution ofmany new and improved coating systems for a variety ofengine
component applications. In the fan and compressor areas, erosion-resistant coatings are used to minimize blade wear, antigallant
coatings are used for fretting wear of blade root attachments and corrosion-resistant coatings are used for blade and disk materials.
In the case of the combustor and turbine areas, diffusion and overlay coatings have been developed for oxidation and/or corrosion
resistance and ceramic coatings are used widely as thermal barriers. In this paper, we shall review the current state of the art for
coating technology in gas turbine engine applications with a look towards future needs and directions.
__ ~.
I,,
Turbine coatings
Burner coatings
necessary to force the coating reaction to occur. Gaseous diffusion layer is formed within the substrate alloy. The
chemical precursors flow around and can be introduced thickness of this layer is controlled by processing time
into internal passages of the part to be coated. It is at at temperatures. The CVD process has the advantage
the part surface, which is maintained at a controlled over the conventional pack process in that it is a cleaner
temperature, that the reactants then thermally decom- process and blockage of cooling holes and passages with
pose to form the desired coating. This process is ideal pack material in turbine airfoils is not a concern. In
for component designs which are complex. It is a “non- terms of repair, slurry processes are primarily used for
line-of-sight” process which means that challenging patching of an aluminide, an oxidation resistant coating
design geometries with narrow passages may be coated produced by the CVD technique [2].
and receive full coverage. The internal cooling passages During PYD the process takes place within an evacu-
of a turbine blade, for example, require an aluminide ated chamber. A high energy source such as an electron
coating for corrosion resistance. Usually relatively beam or electric arc is used to vaporize the solid material
smooth uniform coatings are produced where the thick- desired for coating. During sublimation, a vapor cloud
ness can vary and deposition rates will depend on the is formed containing the coating atoms or molecules.
reaction conditions. A disadvantage of the CVD process The component to be coated is immersed in the area of
is that, because it is a non-line-of-sight technique, proper uniform vapor space. The vapor then condenses onto
masking and tooling become design considerations and the substrate which is heated to a controlled temperature
an expense [1]. for optimization of coating residual stresses. The corn-
Pack cementation and slurry spray diffusion processes plexity of the process vastly increases as the composi-
are chemical deposition processes. In the pack process, tional complexity increases such as for an M—Cr—Al—Y-
the part to be coated is immersed within a “bed” or type coating. This is because the vaporization pressures
pack mixture containing the coating element source, a of each of the elements of interest must be considered
halide energizer and an inert filler material. The reaction in producing controlled alloy chemistry. PVD processes
occurs within a furnace at high temperatures under are of a “semi-line-of-sight” type and produce a coated
protective atmospheric conditions for several hours. The surface which replicates the substrate surface, i.e. a
coatings produced are smooth and uniform, and a smooth substrate surface initially will result in a smooth
J.T. DeMasi-Marcin, D.K. Gupta / Protective coatings in gas turbine engine 3
~
~
1200
800
400
____________________
are then carried into the plasma and propelled onto the 0
substrate, which is heated to a controlled temperature 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
in order to control stress. In general, a much lower Year
deposition temperature is maintained during thermal . .
Fig. 2. Business growth for various coating processes.
spraying than in CVD or PVD processing. Thermal
spraying processes are not practical for complex compo-
nents with coatings required in narrow passages since it
is a “line-of-sight” processing technique, i.e. good coating 3. Compressor abradables and erosion coating systems
coverage can only be expected on those surfaces which
are in the direct line of the plume. Consequently, most In advanced aircraft gas turbine engines, very small
parts with curved surfaces must be fixtured, manipulated clearances are required between the rotating airfoils and
and rotated within the coating stream. This is usually the stator case in order to minimize gap losses and to
an automated process where robotic operations are most increase efficiency. This allows for more forced air flow
practical. The advantages of thermal spraying are that through the compressor to be converted to thrust upon
it is relatively inexpensive, part size is not a concern, combustion, as opposed to escaped air flow at blade
and deposition rates are high. The coating surface pro- tip—shroud locations. Use of abradable seal systems has
duced is, however, usually rough (an Ra of a few hundred) allowed engine designs to “close the gap” which has
and subsequent finishing operations are usually required resulted in improved performance, greater performance
for airfoil aerodynamics. Plasma spraying is used to retention, and reductions in specific fuel consumption.
deposit ceramic thermal barrier coatings, M—Cr—Al--Y Today, abradable seal systems represent one of the most
oxidation-resistant overlays and abradable seal systems significant applications of coatings in gas turbine engines.
in both the compressor and the turbine. Abradable systems are designed to account for rotor
A more recent advance in coating processing is the misalignment and thermally driven dimensional changes.
high velocity oxy-fuel process. This process uses high Abradable seal systems are designed to wear without
pressure and velocities which it obtains from combus- damage to the blade tip and to maintain a smooth finish
tion flames and, like thermal spraying, a powder charge for aerodynamic loss purposes [3]. The abrasive blade
is utilized. The temperature of the plume is much lower tip materials and static abradable seal materials have
than in plasma spraying, enabling thicker deposits to been developed jointly so as to achieve optimum blade
be obtained because of reduced residual stresses. Higher tip and seal wear characteristics. The material character-
deposition rates can also be obtained, resulting in istics required are resistance to erosion from foreign
reduced costs compared with plasma spray processing. particles as well as abradable seal debris, good abradabil-
There are many other coating processes being ity with little damage to the blade, and the ability to
explored and developed, many of which involve subtle withstand the operational temperatures without deterio~
variations on the more commonly used methods. Over ration in mechanical properties [4].
the past few decades, advanced engine designs, perfor- In abradable seal systems, a balance is needed between
mance and reliability targets have been major drivers spalling resistance, surface finish, erosion, abradability
which augmented the use of coatings for engine and oxidation resistance. Abradables are produced by
applications. As seen in Fig. 2, vapor deposition and plasma spraying; this allows for control of these critical
plasma spray coating businesses have flourished. They properties at reasonable costs and with repair ease. The
are today the two major coating processing technol- plasma spray process used is fully automated for depos-
ogies used. ition of nickel-base alloy. Porosity and density control
4 J.T. DeMasi-Marcin, D.K. Gupta / Protective coatings in gas turbine engine
is the key to good abradability. Microstructural control Compressor airfoil particulate erosion has been a
is maintained through spray parameters and powder concern especially at airlines where hubs are in locations
size. The optimum microstructure is shown in Fig. 3(a). which experience severe winters, and sand is used to
This seal material is hard and machined to a smooth de-ice runways. Ingested sand carried through the corn-
surface finish, and has been shown to provide up to 1% pressor at high velocities causes rapid erosion of titanium
increase in compressor efficiency. airfoils, resulting in dimensional losses and engine perfor-
The blade tips spinning at high speeds must act as an mance deterioration as seen in Fig. 4. A titanium nitride
efficient cutting tool. This is necessary so as not to coating produced by cathodic arc PVD has been used
damage the seal or blades which can result in blade to maintain dimensional conformance. However, a
fracture if inefficient cutting is experience. As part of the monolayer of TiN was observed to result in a small-
compressor abradable system, a blade tip coating was angle brittle erosion failure which led to “worm-holing”
developed to cut a groove optimally in the plasma of the airfoil. This is illustrated for the trailing-edge
coated shroud to obtain a “good” seal as shown in pressure side of a compressor blade in Fig. 5. A TiN
Fig. 3(b). The tip system currently used is shown in multilayer system was developed which greatly improved
Fig. 3(c). The tip coating is an electroplated nickel, with coating durability, owing to interfacial impact energy
a hard angular grit which is encased in the nickel scattering and/or absorption. Fig. 6 exhibits the
coating. The microstructure is shown in Fig. 3(d). improvement in erosion resistance obtained.
* ¼
•T __ __
~ ~ .
(a) (b)
(C) Id)
Fig. 3. Compressor abradable seal—tip system: (a) seal microstructure; (b) rubbed seal; (c) blade tip; (d) tip microstructure.
J.T. DeMasi-Marcin, D.K. Gupta / Protective coatings in gas turbine engine 5
I
I I
(a)
(a) ‘. •. —.
Flight cycles
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
di~s~n,0.8~ I
JT9D (b)
(b) 0.6 Stage 9
Fig. 5. Airfoil erosion mechanism.
Fig. 4. Compressor airfoil erosion.
6
5X
4. Combustor and turbine abradable coating systems -
Increased
turbine
temperatures
100r
501-
(°F)
Base
Oxidation-resistant
metallic layer
Hot
combustion
gases
Internal .. I
cooling air — — — — — ~
/~
Insulating ~ ~. — —
I-------- /4c~~
ceramic layer - —
(~=0.01 inch)
—, ~ ~ ~
•11i.1tfl1
1
pressure side hot-spot region while the ceramic patch blade tips. Abradable turbine seals allow for reduced
coated blades showed essentially no airfoil distress and tip—stator clearances and hence improved turbine effi-
only limited TBC degradation. This is illustrated in ciency. Abradable turbine blade air seal materials for
Fig. 13. advance high performance gas turbine engines must
Ceramic thermal barrier coatings are also used for provide a balance between abradability and long-term
turbine abradable seals. They improve engine perfor- capability to resist erosion and thermally induced spall-
mance by minimizing air cooling and leakage losses. As ation. To meet these requirements, plasma-sprayed
for the case in the compressor, significant efficiency Zr02-based ceramic air seals are in production for
losses can result from loss of high pressure gases around various aircraft applications. The current plasma-
8 J.T. DeMasi-Marcin, D.K. Gupta / Protective coatings in gas turbine engine
________p_p _
tJ
I ______
F
Relative
spallation 5 -
life
0
Dense PWA 264 PWA 266 electron
ceramic plasma beam — physical
deposited vapor deposited
ceramic ceramic
Fig. 12. Thermal spallation resistance of a thermal barrier coating.
sprayed seal is a graded ceramic which provides the abradability and thermal cycling exhibit reduced
required abradability for clearance control, as well as cracking.
insulative properties to lower cooling air flow require-
ments and to improve spallation resistance. The graded 5. Future requirements
structure can reduce ceramic—metallic thermal mismatch
strains associated with free expansion and minimize Engine design concepts are moving towards greater
cracking, to improve spallation resistance [12]. This thermal and propulsive efficiency. Materials and especi-
system is shown in Fig. 14. In cases of higher gas path ally coatings will continue to play an impressive role in
surface temperatures and larger temperature gradients, advancing performance, efficiency and reliability. Future
accelerated cracking may result in spallation of thick engines will operate at higher temperatures and speeds
ceramic layers near the seal surface. Examination of and will need extended component life at reduced costs.
thermal cyclic tests and experimental engine tested tur- Reduced costs may be realized in part through common-
bine seals shows that the seals generally fail by laminar ality of coating processes and compositions. In addition,
cracking in the fully stabilized (20% Y203) Zr02 layer. ease of repair will continue to be a key concern at
The progressive ceramic cracking combined with indige- overhaul shops for jet engine customers.
nous surface erosion in the blade rub path adversely Material durability improvements especially in the
effects seal life and the engine’s performance margin, area of “hot-section” components, will continue to drive
Seals with controlled ceramic microstructure for rub the technology. Higher temperature ceramics, greater
J.T. DeMasi-Marcin, D.K. Gupta / Protective coatings in gas turbine engine 9
Partially stabilized
Zirconia ~—3rd graded zone
~_— mixed ceramic
Fully stabilized
Zirconia
~r~i1 150-200 mils
thick
2nd graded zone
mixed ceramic
Alumina Metallic
_____
+
JIE”III
~pp ~ ii 1st graded zone
Metallic to Alumina
________
!tl~E1IlT~WLiImiu.~•
Metal substrate
References
[1] T.E. Schmid and RJ. Heeht, Proc. 9th Ceramic Engineering
Science Cont., Cocoa Beach, FI~1988, 1988, p. 1089.
[2] D.S. Rickerby and M.R. Winstone, Mater. Manuf. Processes,
7(4) (1992) 495.
[3] MO. Borel, A.R. Nicoll, H.W. Schdapfer and R.K. Schmid, Surf.
Coat. Technol., 39—40 (1989) 117.
[4] K. Hajmrle, MA. Clegg, L.T. Shiembob and D.L. Stewart,
Thermal Spraying, Vol. 1, London, 1989.
[5] M. Gell, D.N. Duhl, D.K. Gupta and K.D. Sheffler, .1. Met., 39
(1987) 11.
[6] D.K. Gupta and D.S. Duvall, Superalloys 1984, Metallurgical
Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984, p. 711.
[7] P.C. Patnaik and J.P. Inmarigion, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 4(3)
(1989) 347.
[8] 5. Meier, D.K. Gupta and K.D. Sheffler, J. Met. 43 (1991) 50.
[9] iT. DeMasi, M. Ortiz and K.D. Sheffler, Thermal barrier coating
life prediction model development, phase 1, Rep. Contract
NAS3-23944, NASA Cr-182230, 1989.
[10] iT. DeMasi-Marcin, K.D. Shefiler and S. Bose, J. Eng. Gas
Turbine Power, 12 (1990) 521.
________ [11] SM. Meier and D.K. Gupta, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, in press.
(b) ~ [12] T.E. Strangeman, Trans. ASME, (1991), mt. Gas Turbine and
Aeroengine Congr. and Exposition, Orlando, FI~1991.
Fig. 13. JT9D first-stage HPT turbine airfoils after 15 000 h (a) with a
thermal barrier coating and (b) without a thermal barrier coating.