Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kierkegaard - Kierkegaard's Relation To Hegel Reconsidered PDF

    Uploaded by

    Ayşe Boyacıoğlu
    6 views26 pages

    Original Title

    kierkegaard_Kierkegaard's Relation to Hegel Reconsidered.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views26 pages

    Kierkegaard - Kierkegaard's Relation To Hegel Reconsidered PDF

    Uploaded by

    Ayşe Boyacıoğlu

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 26
    KIERKEGAARD'S RELATIONS TO HEGEL RECONSIDERED JON STEWART ‘eS Kiger Rah Cote ‘the nye Capen CAMBRIDGE ONIVERSITY PRESS ‘THE IRONIC THESIS AND HEGEL'S PRESENCE IN THE CONCEPT OF IRONY Netgear meson, Th ont of fy, ih Cs eso Semis), rie fa wort ini here ae de ag of eae {a soy a Heyes pty seat Up tsp Werks tncipem tery evr he scteenss so Rael re mgue and thre reo extend ext anacs ois work By cman Pe eof ‘Econ sea quaalons em nie tegen el tects wi ete dts oft ero es ae 2 Theataenef ch quotas an anahss in se wors pra ‘ones dla io este wh ny orgy wae Reker sway hc of Hegel, bu hr fo de ht ne thar neath Ferman i it hace FHegts Lc se Php of Hay Hoy of Psp a ‘tare Pa fg Haro tke fetta hinges " a ie te a a age ns Met ATL None in Pani cy Cl Lay Mn, Rin Sent in pe Mui ng a a a ~The nye rae pet Nett nck SERS Se oe eran ou ee ares ae ah egy opieune ayy toes are rel one a) mtsts lin ee esse gti tte eg a ‘kt hg Cane Fieger Wrote Conese? OF nom 9 In The Conc fan erhegas ain objec of sad irony a ple oy Socratic aa a Ona oe ato ofthe work Buc te tox goes bayond asad of thee tte of Socrates inset. Kerker ao examines the nies ta ‘23 ber of German writer ich ws Pei tn Slap! 1829), Johan Ladig Tee (774-859), Karl Wiel Hesiod Sg (18g), Jon Pal rch Riche he aor ed ‘he pony fan Pal (1754-2849, nd Hegel hima a One ‘henerkconsssor thre chapters. Inthe engl tit chper “Thee Made Poni Ritbegard analy the penton of soca onthe varoos leurs of him prascnted by the prima) soures- Xenophon, Pato, a Arophanes "and tp co bgt the foe Ne a Socratic irony found there. He content imerprete Socratic Nosy oe someshing esenially neue in harcte, which tes ond deere ‘rumen casos, aos, nd sooth without hing toy ons ontnt wihwhich replace them There arc onlyuceaonal scores te Hegel this chapter Chap The Acalaton ofthe Vos eregaardanazt the dhnon su wlar Soca ealand ene a atl atenp to extend i interpretation of Soca on to thee secs. Hegel plas a parca important rele in eis dacs ‘ta indice can be nto dominate iy Chapter “The Ve Ne Never egurssenesSe Grek Sopinicmavenrcante school of Greek sought influence by Socrates thi contest he ‘crpetsSortesasawildiorical nial nthe enaormaon ot (Gece, There he ages Hegcion tsion tac Sere roy ixncesary inte moses of weld hry. Het sel eel ea ‘ieqoenyandisanfmponan grein the discon Part Oe ‘egetvSecouneaplcly aid which ao be examined some del ‘We the Sit pr of te dietion wea te gure of Socrates isola eakesuptesue oF hs eton toon the second de «seth once irony sonnet is comeat shepard ‘mines the noon af tn of the German Rone whch Neos ‘eso Hegel ew of Sera roy Reker follows Heel hone tnd interprets Soca iy Being worse necessary. “hs jedi cana othe ony the Romani, whi meray ‘pan Hr Rerhgind, ey of Tek and Sehegl sere sSeriminate ie ec in conta to hat of Sorter wie oar hasnt ale at koa nega, s guided by «profiad ora vom. Seraes hos enn eon toy ese the Ram aoe Struent fr py Reskegars dca ofboth he figure uf Socrates and irony in the Gert Romans gels sped by Hegel woe Inevonstanay eer srt ti prt ofthe exe Although there have been nr of dspues aboot the role and sans of Hegel in this work, dere i orerwhclning evidence th The oncp of ny ia deeply Hegelian text indeed, Hang sees hoe "The Cont of og eve since herby at hehe Wt neh under Hegel way” cording ose Hopelian oven hon cased Kiser interpre the igre ol Sorat Following Hoting. Hines arses ha Kerkegitt wsessentaly egelan ‘when hewrotethistext and terefote aris dersandhng of Seestes "es largely shaped by eget! Like, Hae? a Fenger al sre fora song Hegelian influence in the work br the presen capes woul ke to suppor the view of thee content Tish tue that, whatever Kierhegur’s later een to ge ght have beh, her in is stent years ews cette hy pecs of Hegel Pihlosopl. which heunapoledcal adopted nd enone Eee Tor tis thea can be town oh the consent he ork oe at iret’ cr eamments on TnSeedon Tot te prenut cape ills dhe elbow cen shar Rierhegaratyappren potive eof Hegel Th nef Us Wl? merely Sone ad ts sto bs urs a acne ‘tvelee Hee! irc and to oa dhe egelion facut members on Wievkeyaurds diverttion comic. twill srg tat this ew b noe Plate since isnot in harm with dhe boneless Founalg the discretion Inthe cod section Il eae some of [eked sttemcnt abo let denlepanne wil iat that he hinel veg hi ier bn proton Inuencea by Fel Seton IU, {tse the ean tat te ‘quence ofthe ee chapters f Pat Onc of he bck tows a Heelan Per due to the telerences ta dhe dal crgoties of ps, * Hate pai ha eg pen Deane Nat ag Hepa aga hs pecan “Foto Kep ia Sapa: ig gs Sie a a Tha Toke Cates cea an ehh me rome rests 45 swap, and neces wich ae fn inthe ies ofthese chapters. rig th on ri Hg aoa ir, ‘han Heyes Sections IVI wl conse the seul setyoe inthe pesencehapter Wahhe help ofthis exegesis wi ware het irked lls almost othe lever Hegel tenet of Sonate in Leste th Hist of Pio. Moreover, Kerhegats sent ‘ot Romani irony comes ally verbatim Hepes Larson os etc By means thee sind, T hope to ext dat The Cnet toy profoundly Hegelian work wih epee ois conten Attn ae, these of Hegel in Tie Coco rn sers sight Yard and nproblemate Gren the nmber of gua md alos 1 hi ithe wext ft wos that Heels lunes is sons that cis harly in ned of deswnsraion, Marcon re tat te hot pueudonjmous wor, the interpreter ean seemigly tie te Hegtan von expresed here w Keaegard ina more o leash formar manner Unfortu this seeming obvious oie las teen ‘mnt compseot acne beth oe on ‘etn of the work Ashss Been ned,” The Cap oho name {Meshal exo Mlsoupto kone oft tet sat ‘sci toy oheailvon ee. Trp wat pain te Iporance of Hegel, howe inven ding tht pera Rehegeae tf acnowledes. Thbeup eso avo ds problem by ring hat The Con of ro ist a rant work has Raho ‘aig mtn the vole of estan tert ce Hoge ‘net or rnin. Thin hes to aan of Wertepoeed Jnr ha gos ac teat ar a Fen Mena’ at ‘ig Kien (a9) Sine Mesnard worst has Doe een ip od champoned by aux ofoters sno thas become preset fhatiscem toe the sandr ew of the ater” Sstieececos ey eta eee “iy ln xo Snares rae ‘ayuud Thom Say Pa Oe a crate eat ont Mace. Nn tine Sg of itd Tac: Pa Se City Eranp ae ce toes ssn 16 Neots Me CONCERT oF aunt Ai the end ofthe chapter which he ded se The Come fas, Mesut merely snuges is omic interpret io) te ge mentor evidence. There he eesto an ery Cen tensa With Ritemeyt a ak ied ti views! Nisan ins teat’ ae wh lari a riety oie, ane ‘ou een ai ic the sev dee, ens ap sy The eam ant ug dena rer According co Mesnard, Kiedy! ws iony at sn iene ee Fag its these of Ws sera hte sighs ae \uproblenati Second andmoreiatrexingy th disease yas inonieata metal he cnse dat Rctheyard hewn Playing the ole of legen to crn precede poston. Ts wa ‘hen presume a pat of Keregiards strate of det commun ‘on, whieh frat ita fom eticring Heyel iret Accor estar, Kirhegara pretended here eemcally ts bes Hegelian or reasons: (1) inorder fot the Hegeian lc nce in eee ing his sertadon, which tC. to ter, ea of Hoge, an 2) noir o dpe bore sci which was dominated Uy Hegetonin, and deciveitine gtngisapprobation sel Bath of thse purported moves rene done yen ane examines the set Novel creonstinces rounding he work The first motion Mesnard stnbuts to Kisbogr he desire is agument pone mplable whee oe code ihc compton ‘ot Kierbegaardiveraton comes do he Pau of Pies he Unessiy of Copenage atthe se Ase ntl peony there wasneter ean ne Hegelian school per sein Denmark ad thei hat the Faculte Unie of Copenftgen vas damned byHegelansissinpy notre. Keegan sean ahs ae at "hn es i tm inter a a i et Yn ee irs ‘ole a ‘otis th yg So acco Auge end see, ta cH ana ce nf St Sue monte rests a7 ‘eas wis Sbher, who was nota Hegelian ton the canary, one of ‘hemos oxisposen ers of Hegelian in Denmark. fn 1898 thee Jews before Nieeyaan disetaon, Sher pubihed hs reve of Heshery’s Peas in wich he was eal of bo Hagel snd Heer eget. Ths, he could eal oc have bees the ane whe ‘he diseaton yas intence Too ‘Before dhe oral defense the work had 4 be prone bys profs sors on the feu. Three profesor of eal pilogy alo see 1 oficial rear of Rivsngatsdancrtion: Johan Nil Mad {ogi Peter Oh Branded (0-183), and Frederik Cyst Peterten (1786-1856). Nene of these men tad any stake where it Hegelian and hey coud ikewse nt have been song the Hegelian, ‘whom Kieskogard intended dupe" ta addin, the tne pase then recor of ue unversiy, Hans Cian Ore (7-185, read sud approved the dsertaion. Ose was wel read in pox ad iighlttenced by Kan He ean by means ven aan cee of Higeanisn" to et alert Helberg, be rport ha ipo In pliloscpy stopped wi Hegel wom he ove ya inp ea Moveone his quesions o Heber show tat he was qe ‘ous of he new end Tins, none ofthese mn al exon Scola ca be sgh considret a Hegelian. © “The fina ead, larteaze, ws Kw Hegelian, bute ny be ‘ame a member of the dsetaon comnts by chance and athe st * el nan steno a itt py gen a tienen sete ts te the ea emi lec eee Se rae Rate ne a cer aide ~ REE, emt, en ret ya daar soe manta a te cs Nine tgtin cs nl ihe sod ee ‘nen shoe ap ps a pro a ~ En, tn en ep re cen SER nce nS eam cee “ys. Copenng Cena yrs a= tina ct pp wt fasts ws ‘egies jr wi ean a Pry See generac eer fg tn Re ak 136 EGEL 1 Tm coNcePT oF tos ine, and Kirkegarl had way of kacning aca of dane that he wouid be one ofthe readers. iboen at Restuarant Fesponse for gen toyeter the i gates rege for hee. ‘xprance of the work by the fase Mer had the ht ve together thom the afoemensoned allege, he adv cas aro for i ‘reader, The lag shoice would have bee the new pressor of pilose ply Raviis Nien wh had eplced Pou Martin dates Neen a tee an enthuse of Hegel’ plomphy eh eft nl fost received the profesor (pir anna) ative Uner o CCapesnagenon Apis 82 Nerkegeatdsabmited his ane ‘onlyashor time aterom fs ofthe sae year Ths, he could othe {own ahea of ine ofthe pont he Heyelia Belngareader on tis disertation cami. I ould therefore he heres sake ‘oth ha ekegeard formulated a ste a a onic dsertaion inorder fol NiebenSibber apposed Nien about te ints ion, be ar declined wo hare aye od wth sie ea already been thoroughly alnated by Riehegatts wnprovoed stack ‘aki competence = Ths, hy dealt Martensen became the sith read Boreone, altho he had been a eerrer tm 1858 Martensen only Became profesor in Janay 18s and ee culls Have hauh peed by ‘erkogsurd as a potential veer belo that vine" Buc ihe eer ion stout to hae ben completed een anu 10 an fone ‘841 Give thar Kerker hid way of Frese te cnet ‘eeisinolved in Martesen'sppoinimens as mposhe dae cul have formulated his purported io statgy during he Yeas prt i eprint iahanoeicteanae Oee or sc ale de St ae ee tet Mice maken rch Whang inieeiet span ‘Seg oman ngewe cst Sipe eg ee rece Ee aes cE cate timagmaro napa - Soe ey omy chaweeprche he Bye I SKS, when he conceived of dhe pruee nd began working om te mst be Fecal thathere evidence that lethageatdconceed of The Coney toy and began work ois eaty a 837° Marcon the bh a thewor:seemsto have een writen Becen snr 898s sume 839° Tina the mothalon tha Mesnard cite af wanting to dpe the Hegtins on the feu based on hii inaccuracies. Aide fom DMartensen, there were no Hegel 9 dupe, and wih rape to him, lace he was appoinedprfesior so te, trmsposnble har tLe ould hare known tat hewasgoing ob sree a a ‘Mesnard tesa the scond moan the deste to dupe the sa lus quo and “bourgeos soca” Ths oo ence a inderstanding ‘fhe pottialnd intelectual etinate i ich Kishen dee Sion wt writen: Dring the Yea ater Hegel dentin 1831 hp Nexo was reared, contrary to Mesnard cli, a gene tages to Ae bo eos social fer Hege'students, Fever av Sas tad ‘Morked the teslogial wor wth thes works: Whe le became known shat Feuerbach waste aor of Gedaken a Ta Unie teva fie om is testing posta ered rom viet ie ores there: Some ve yea ltr Strauss spon a ine University ‘of Tabingen ater dhe puleaion a his Das Lite Jan” Hegel’ pio ‘ply was pres s e) a heat to exch Feligion, ply, nd orale thatthe King of Prosi, Fete Weln (ene se he sei obliged co appoint Schelling a profeorship at he University Bertin for he expres paras of destaying de dangerous egelan te ‘encies toward pes among te ment 1 ban was Pa ‘nal et Hegelian hic protbited them fom teaching att Pasar Universi The urna, se Halli either which bad been one of the moot mporaneorusn denen een psp ‘esontledin a bythe rasan goverment Tn ys eee lhe Deus Jeers hanged adie ee Rage slog hes gene into exe Sa eg ae, 0, BGK a yt 8 Diss dsp il BR PT Cue nies Don ek Gh “Se ate oy Ra eld 0 Bae Bo 8. oti et ea Sh al arg ay pie in en i rn Bayh on hag ce Bh STL an Tg ys ‘Sangoma ir aed fg be oerass rt Tae mnt, Now t,o te Ui Pest “The siaon wari diferent Denna Ass noted pres Manns’ eter a the Unies Capen in 188 0 eye tn spate philosophy were wtingh popular among de stn tc he as ataeted pul for cong the mor te youth Dpintoacing Hels ptm oe heap qucsions ee er the putin of feet Hrd Chetan Sats ‘hace Chabon cane yea rm among the Davi nee. tua community a ths sine ihn amly tpaeaer Revkegares Aisertaton, Hans erin, stides ot tcloy who hd ware ‘oti or eed hap oie nin ton bythe Theol Fay athe Uc Capeagen en ithe kno that he shared one of Stes ewe Tt war noe 4m ioe acide As one inet histo cords “The on “oued by Biveler’sappieaon ci he unersod he eee Wetton ofa mone genta ends" Avot Dah tulgean, Anes Frederik Bee, won ma he age ean i ee ‘The Conf yh rh ore ofthe ag Spt which he speed the ew of Brio Bat For hi ey, be was aed fn sa ‘ng a pion fn the sence of the Dan Church, Iss these event ‘har corpeted Martha ooh pnton ply onde oe ‘ance hel rn Hegel, which Nitin ate “Te Preset “phate asa Ee, hse fading agen 1 Ka fen et ed ty ae en Se rita epi fete Nek ks tps si Sarat a Le cops oe Sasa npn eSep Sas see tilde i atic Cake re 2 fi ler Siping, Mara Kewl Man i it lin ie, Rats Cada tptanpech arate is reget el Geng a Fciag ob * tte he ha a leg a a Capen 1 enter si Tl foo op to Religious Cri Adnivedysomeotihesc evens tok placa yea alter erkeyand's diserador adnan atmonpnse where ings changed ‘icky Nonetheless they do give evidence forte fas hier Peso tegel'sphitsopin were hhiycon urea hase of hs Falower were regarded se dangerous Gven ti grea ate rounding Hegetianam ae tine, would be an absurd hisorkal ever thin shots by esi vegeta, won hs ae “Apart from these protien ofthe historical content here ave a sone deep theoretical problems wh the ionic reali. namely. it very presuppesevaanh(degeln stance based presumably on oct Inter tens (eig the Conluding Onsite Peni. Bat ome ca dh egal jie make the oppose presppacon ad ela at irkeyands “an egean statement ater teste nad hat he was dus cone pro-egeian bed on reaing f his tex “The ionic hess hus playa double game wil a sere aged vise to dismiss certain eadngeat on, but inorder to dogo rust ay vor oer readings that fae arena ioe bat rater ranaparen butt provides no eter: for esngieng between these ad moe ence for dhe reading coer for In ths way te Homie reading resoppeness poo fr whi tino prepared ange nthe fina nals, thre sno evidence that Reread wanted ‘eon tn his disertion Inthe way indicated by Med. The one "eng sanachronsue sce tranposes Kerkegand lee peal steed Hegel ono cis ery pete. Rare we ding histine ava student rater ambsalento Heh and he rks and oul cures prioe to Te Go of lo tere fo edence ote ‘er arguments based on evidence Bot itera a eternal tthe ‘est eft the rote reading Fr lvllesamin he external ei hich inclods Kerkeann's own ase Toll ua tan examination of he text il he work, ier ti Apart om the actual cement of dhe work, which will be examined late, there are many reasons exten the text self oelee hat ‘eerigyanrd wassuongh under Hege flues athe tine of te com ‘estion of The Comat fs Abo all son ater ssesmenisot te ‘ork conden deeribek regen in curses nthe orale ‘perso he ear 80 allosten years dhe der theve * fa ae te, Nie gn ayn 9 8 ue IGE IN THE CONCEEY OF aon Aeveling pase which Hiner acs isp of depatanet ‘There Rlethoguaed wie: ‘Eregurd the note anon con nda sera Wk een nat ic pea ens Alto itive that Kehegsards crea of Hage when wit {hisenrin ipo. nonetheless syste cary arate ne ole “igrutln he vast Heyes nelson arena ‘ly nied Socrates long eet ines Tce exprenion “a Hegetan foo lees ie sbi sn gar Tap ee ‘hi pasage wih ne enbersementi eetnote andre wor ing tomate sense ity arguing tno oie Bhs ‘ey in mo way supra erprean, eregeand see ‘ihre that he wars Hela os and wth hes pete to be ome forthe ake af ning econ, On the conan he ae ‘in his pase that he regres hig Hgetin cio of Soe Tt ‘evere mere pling te role ft Hegelian only de he woul Prema haven nn or eet “Thispsage nor anomstons Isilon 894 Seren ‘xpress eet thing promlguted In hr dsoraioe an spe of Hgts doce of the at. He wrx “Tha the sate a Catan sce apposed oe what Hegel aight —tanely ha has mot Seance, tative vate an aypes on the wae (emetng 1a Shite fer hin in my deren) tha de a a the ‘att improve ter sna nomen He Werscpand ‘cma C4 Sl pee ted ike eng ‘tr atin eure ite a eg Sr ey el cerium tescmce itt FE ts X34. adn ety (he poy Rc re rman PUES seamy admis once again by vay of selerdeba to having parroed one of| gels cms: Asa he ocd psa is lear tat Reread nolongerbie hi obs trac and ees hing elmed precy bhucthisentryleaves no roam or dutta, tea scoring so Interpretation of hisimetkecual descopment, te uncrealy accepted some pects of Hegesphosophy atthe dmeofhisdiseation a vas ‘otmerly only pretending todos Fina thete ithe oura fom hy 2 relevant sary which was ‘onginala par oa draft the Condon Octet Pose There ‘erkegand under the psendooyes of Johannes linac ees hin set's being under the sa of Hegel The Can of yt is ser tation Mager Keegand was alert cmough search Sorat considered net o hate understood te pray because ith te hep ‘€ Heetian philosophy, he has became aspenclever sn aetna posi, or has oe Bad the courage to sckedige the negton = By Syngas he sed “elep of legen piles and by deigating himsets‘abjecve" and "ose" ters dat econ anette i Hegel ~Rieckegaard ath ter dat eso ain vo think tat hi Foteptetion of Socrates nthe diserttion wast Hegelian chars tesa the other journal ears, be gn ats das shi allegiance to gel vat tine led hin to mnderstand porte ape othe figure of Socrates al a dese pasages demons tht Kerkegoard a @ ter date ud hms to have been suomgly inlined by Hegel while be ws ‘Ment wing The Cana of ony and that heater reputed these ‘pects of Hagelin. They mabe i clea that he set the Hegelian influenceas olya psig pie tht he ter eeeted The tne sel rll and rept protes sew enone tat Karaganda lnuenced by Heel snd vos not merely pretending toe» Hogs I he ta intenonaly wasted vo pray Hegelian plik ly 6 pay Ing he role ofa Hegelian den there woul be names for vgee ot selergque aa ter peta irked asses of hms Hegetian this ime squares ‘wit the acount given abo hie by ome of his contemporaries ur “sample, Sher recallasollowsa chance encincr ih Berhad fm the street ding rough th ine {do eer hoe at essing hein pid he mee ‘ne {Gammel and aed eat atoning bce Tow an sea stoned bean tet eh we ‘ay voy as he ayo ea cay Ba see at " femlag ra Se a ml wt en ut MEGEL IN Tux concar oF tose Whats important bee is 00 mech the question posed bat ater Ser’slson wo Kise Hegelian pein ad hi elsepion thimasa’Hegelnized Winker” Shem spa ol hHegclin pie ina manner that suggests that war generally ocogiaed sain ao need explanation or defense. Het dha ser delgteitasa per Inplies thai wan somering ato, wich Kirbeeund ater comet eee “Sbbern’s resarks ave consent, wth what Broce ys of [erhegar en ewes "orton tne wash cep with Hegeltn pits which need ans a bavceneratced hi Ulan ethical eapect forthe connect Manse he ‘rors hat pliosply™" Brachner here sas aes hat Reread tats Hegel or Sa he tier moved been This semark comes inthe eotet of discon shout he wan ances on Ritheard dhrng ssa at the Unies of Copenhagen hich wok seen ‘oimply that his Hegclin period tok pice daring thsi. Gen th ‘idence, one ca ifr that Set ad Bre reer this peso when Keeganrd wll tnt Tod Keregaur' om seco of his elect development and the accounts of his comtemporses sie to de ft habe ha 9 Hegetan pio ely i his aver The els fom Chapt # ex suppor is concn since, wis seem here wan ample evidence ‘ts postive Hegelian uftcnce In Pow fh fp of Ove Sl aang fd seared journal ene rom the pti. ive iy there et sen pe ha he mh he we Hagen sen is The Cop of ry. The nate of hee clans ow remains to Be pied Im adivon to his external evidence provided ina by the journals snd papers and seeondand report hs ee clad thatthe ety 1 Met Mata el tlle Nate hi. San dl ae ip ‘Sprain ea Fy pe a a as ‘edad’ tg he ‘ant en a Extpuede ley Overt one dee sce of Thence innate” Spc, isarged in there nln eeepc tncaneeaa thes chaps onan Par Oe Acaigg oan Stes te chapen “Thee Mad mies Te anes Othe View an The ew Mae Neen Hehe Ppre teeta ecgren- pr. ats ftwttehevsk Thue St chine hetero eae ‘es hc he isa Hope metho operate the ead The ‘tei hones tome ee sce gene ur "tora tog rte gob wns Eins tng fhe cept para ote sucathan nbn cass the Ce as Nas a Lute aeons foie ou ae «seg ody th folonng ppl es Sence/amexsence, nd nce angen Wie xepen She seid egy ates (in een tice ae ‘eznes kierepares cine hss homer ge ‘ttn wo sms ere taken ayn seen y te et inept lecures one fd hem medina Nene Nasesn'accoune Fans cues inhit econ ey Mee Pitot Kot Hagel enn Wns See shy he es Vlg and on “iu he Data ‘eal Dsante sindeaion Rikers thee ngores on reer al a an gen Poe fea nny ce a inet Se dice caper i ot One of Te hea ae “correspond to these Kanan categories, “ pode Gnaing Ce anal ae et ppllaleh Sneath nna Oe Fert tat pie ler fe i ped ee utara ante = Godelier eeegunes nen Escada ateaeaae s Sembacrte ait eee l ep Regan bois may ai lly ge waht > fetchau te icmgeismenaea tptioy nares SSS etre te Reese ue MEOLL NCTE coNeErE oF ony Dy ongazing the categories the way he des, Kan indents ha there ian organi eatin bute the eateries in each te ait ets Spell he clams that thesia in each gop eas ‘combination ofthe stand diesen. With ect ema ate ove Kant clans, nein is“the rane which gen thigh po ‘niet Bysshe seems to mean taco he age se otha tae ps, here isasobset of dings hat ae ees, and ese aft do ‘sit-Thus, neces spol rele the eal aensence. Later ‘nthe ttelade tthe Piaoplrl Prints let hcgsenspenn Jehannes Cimscvswl come ore tha poston te neces Jauhe combination ut exgence and posit), whic fs been itd nly atte to Hegel. The same poston ceed in Te Sees ‘nt Dah") oye ates she ine show the ogi tterton ofthe categories al developsit in hia iors shin in the Sef ope he section ene, “Acta” whieh cansotes she tind pan the Wessligt or “The Doctine of Eee), he teats se eateries an temps to demonstate het ongacrlaons to one ander In he cont chaprer ofthat section he wr thn an labora ana of the dierent aspects ofthe modal eategoriee The he eso demo ‘rate hotthee categories pateadynpyanditeveiproaly conan ‘ne aor in cos othe wateral Katon contzpion secon, {ohh the del inthe group ithe combination of he feta the second, Moreover, Hegel account ac ue iferentted that “sraighforward aafss ofthe sequence of cates ~ post et ai, neces; by coma, Hegel dings suber of arts of the thre categories, sc as “oral acta elatie scent eal epi alse ma ad apne ee og more complied tha lhe Rae’ soe cater or Reread Tel ne note that Kerker eens — pos, ctu ne ‘esses trom Hegel sine the ater sce preedes poss findced, Hegel eriies Kant pei pay fs, ne secu * encore tn i -Ehaueeraemines a ‘fan ew dhe mal eategorie which Hegel gen is Lctarson tie st of Psp one reat, The tego of modal oe Soni possi exinence (aoa snd neces Fone ‘oni second: bara though however the cp conceptn comes fines Here eel erties an'ordcring oe cnc ans peal "0 cued by abstraction, Moreones herein Hegel's on at ‘ety hat eembe the simp equence of ony seus aed neces Wis nt necenry to xan Heyes eat asia tallsinceKirtegand ino, suey speaking terete in a econ ‘fete categories for ht sake nd da ot dro ths saps ‘eget pionoply alin he dseaton “The ws of shen agonist he chapter ts of Pst One of Te on of tan seems pl hat she Phenomenon of Soca ern, hic Rlerkegunrd dente the view” wl be anlye i erne ‘of cach of dese de categorie es, tat aes ot obony how Kita chp rele alee moncanent ttn these cgi Inde, it tse how he des rele ie ‘ctl conten of hein copter all. ForenaelyKlegennt roves evseateredexpaatonremartoon is aueaion Ath od SC Chapter nie den with pou be ays ya of eats "hae sed th depen io rech poi ofa enone onthe tee pred» pl oon ew ep te “eqanyamong tse tee se opm Fine a spe) IjavewolSocaesconependiag it butslietttiane ome Shes tan the poor een ough he eplnen proposal ‘ie orca the opp powers yn nea elo ot ‘stn thon tn apo be set, Ness psa Here dhe use uf the eugory of pani concerns the possibile ke Plain the discrepant the acount Socrates git by the tes mao pris sources. ier geard ier oo this by means an iter read of Socrates asirnis The de eens tobe ha he has merely ‘gested thisintespreation with profane tht sts pole ‘ext its merey one interpre pouliy among ater ‘Ghaper den porprealyterpets he ony of Scratesunder the spect oa new eaegry namely seul. Kierbogard explains these In the ana and his employment ofthis exegery a ins fro this poi on, the invetgation wl tke another orm shal Gel wh ‘ome phienornena that hater! fcte do no need oe pron ‘wough a mistake vewbutaerly ned tobe bepein thee late ocence and therenponesplained Thi wection cold be called The EMEA ime YIN Le pare er A pe Acuzaton of the Vie aie acts sel! Ueugh al hee ioral dt." erkogard ron the sad gn as Ah seeon tate Be hnger concer wih personal ‘the authors Nop, Pat, Aristophanes bat teat stoic ats setts dim abs condemnation by is feliow Aenins The hovers b the averted inticae of Sorat in penny ser to soporte che aout the mere posi of sh tonic we extblished te Fit hap Thu the agreed pon hatred Scrat execs sranaor te thesis fae of mere psy to nee acai The inal chapter a One, Str a ny cone necenar ifthe wrkstrel pon avo). The older onder {of Greck ie vas longer ble and Socrates eof ny a eg Sve too set oo the ivi fies tht ary estoy fe ‘ol th hora semen sso nd ay neces Fhe isoltion a chsial Greek cules “nly Gace clare ha oie it anew principe alo erage bt boven spear {eal he pate weds of madras pica tons tao be plowed under dered dm tthe deepest rots Phe te rine st con wold ry need ay rhe Sects fli ples.“ Seen inthis fn. the hoy of Sonar note sisal ft among others bt res 4 nto wold sy Tn the cha, The Worse aay of ny Gon Pat Tao thewer, Rieu yan esp the noon of haere nee in ‘rng gai tron en at an poe coin a i {eal oh Bot oar et ee cen eben ‘eri bcome omy st tbe cme Here understunl theres to bea historia ccc eh esirction ofthe acai of any oven histo pero There ate on ‘very sora debe hone nes ny ttn > te les. Given that Socate eflection atl epic eomexpned ‘he changes inthe Hea of wold spt a thee, dy were storey necessary Ths, nee replaces ality a he eleva eae = REA thongs epg | | tt now exc what 0 mak ofthe am shat he ong leaonal seuctre of Pat One bs egeian In charac Rirhogns ‘heme only vaguely fla the pattern of Megs ansp of ce eat fein he Sate of age, Gen that Hegel's don ofthe modal {eyries des no atthe sequence ~ pili acta neces ieamnoc be said hat dosequence sHagetan oa Rites ts ‘itis indicate fa Hegelian vie Chen th ue hy ay Enntempoary would invehcghttashcnpect hedsrean ws ‘pias get expel gen ha any oe pleop om Asal onmard wet te eategries well Movever ae om the ie enpanator commen slerkerdprvtcs here, ne artilcomtent ‘thicopters seems on tosh neds thw catego anya Ti ‘hat alas would het ange that theres many season nd {ales The Cnet on tt ate dred rom Hegel and thai oto much the works artes content that bear he stamp of Hoge hong ‘Sn the tas ofthe dbus i Secon in hs chapter ts clear hac thre isgou reson o supe that lerkeards increton might ‘be inluenced by sspectsof Hegel plop now tur on wee stent ofthe come of txt elf oer to determine Fis benront is Iyothss, Kerkega mensions Hg socal estat he Cnet of ty, often tee relring bite sme aspect thought and fr tis Fea wu be Impact go tough oF ‘yal relerence seria. Therefore wil be wc pl out same ene eather Tulofestended discusins in which Keegnartamijes in eal some Alene examine Wahan sai the pacage wl pce togain anne for hom wl Riera bncy Hegel works a lon toWhatase he makes of hin ata witch aspect hepa hese ‘pmpathetto and whichones erect nwt owe prope oa hee thefllowing pags (1) Kerbegears dss offer ‘reaton of te amon x the beginning of Chapter The Sets tom athe View" (a) Chapter heey Mae Nena 9 the Rie men oie te manent "ais Ln else oe gun et Snes ee See eee 50 EGE THE concHrE OF toy 'ppendisio Pat One ented, Hes View Sacra (4) thecape er foo Part Teed, “he Woven Waly of roy te Irony of Soeracey an (5) Keegan uf Rem ony inthe chapter trny afer Relte = ‘The fist anasto he eae is the account of Hegel interpretation te damon" which comes atthe begining of the second chapter, “The Aetualation of he View" Tse the pon he dscion es ‘ietkogsud moves to his eaten ofthe ie snd piso ot Suerte ‘Thealscuion hein wih ateaunentoftherelrencesto tke dan the texts Nenophn and Pla andthe mane os the mer tere Deaton The ex eno dab dat Kerkogased dra bea on age ere, od in face his sass allows exe Hegel own aca ‘ment in the Enters nt try of ho to aos, Retard aio quote tom Hegel’ Lect the Pip of Hoss a the Phish of igh! ‘erkegnad begin by claiming that pesos writers have not been let eran de dimon comet dco th aaa as la ‘nen interpreted as someting evel aca Socrates chara ‘er: By contrast Hegel has aise cay on hie by nderanig thephenomenona the daimonasepresenat of Sorses tae iim in thong nae Red png res ina general sense and yet ery pregnant eran he ‘amon: ‘Sora nase co igh, to sono, te deere son of tenets, poste heii ae cpa of el ms ‘Scson in contapostian cay a tomar mural and tae ‘made inelfan races the eee. ssa" Rlrhogaed erase assge rom the Piso Ra agpaeny tomnae the sane pn, White noting that Hegets west extended dactsson ofthe ie Comes Inde Lv the sry of Pip, Ths tte being discon, RerLyoard aten it ch ha gels nccount a thee Isimportaat fr hi, Sidipgaatecd im ems dre rueasees er v Hel i of Bt 8, p24); fk va 8 Se renee ee Ret yg i arco cio tticnbasnhaet items es aon s Account oF re parson 5 eye's amas of the Grek world now dhe eject of his ater ‘Gal Greek cure wae governed by tadional moral oF what Hegel eal “Siebe (amaly qt seal). This ‘celle inthe religion the extn sé the ny of te sae al ‘oF which were belived eave the sanction the gos Such eens snd lus represen ar abvolute aoa command vai te ined ta being iheditely ersd in hes, mene thought o question By incest cling in doute eae egion al mri ad eananding chat hey sly themes rationally SocrmesTepesete Ae deste free af nial and sujecinefeesann. Sacred Dosion, Wierkeganré wes, thio bjt ofitdcsy ich fefecsupon send inarelauon olacfdetchesand olives at ‘esablshed inde heodof thought that ses over eanearie tay while ise eee gan int ong” Wh Socrates the nda ‘ss for dhe tint tine sted wih dhe burden of ral election ad judge, anise prnepleo india come ina cn ih Traders! moray, Higel paras the coal by jusaposing the Delphic orale one of ‘he ln gan o radon marly with Socrates dion, viet ‘onerved as Kin inet, sbjecve oracle, representing the pines ‘leo individuality. See the orl wat exci» mer for the [opgation of tions! moray te eterances are pevete ng absolute wld By appealing vo the oracle, the people elecely “shied dhemsehesthe etm of dds and seton forty alone thc race to choose and determine ther cose of ation lor them lrkeguard cis Hegel cace gun: "Thi clement fac that heft le ad not the pawer of decison, but wore deter from int ‘coe where man dd at et Know hime way a be a ‘en ree and independent to ake upon hint i delde ase do, “This subjecive freedom was tyr presen withthe Grek Tae nective izen ss iano subjective cen oe autonomy since ‘Me wasted in accordance wih ease parers and eastomn which nee thot o have der leiation i ther angio the gs ‘The oracle, undrsout ss the moupece for talons mor and niversiny ten conte with he damon ot Somes, whi sin vidal The damon sot something exter or acenitas He the ‘rst morene tino cceabie tothe pubiespere butraher des iin the person of Ssrates unselfish serine, Teepe “ents the principle of mujeese cede that sand conn 2 Gh sa pa anata mi P GEp Sates Hes Ba ET aha 9 So ‘lin Somat pe by ‘raion moray and inde oe heattot But he damon does btsepresent the extensional ba only set of alcy bons meen and he universality of alien mor, Kieren ‘quotes eye onceagain: the dion of exes sandy econ Sheeatemali of she orate the pore nates othe The inion isnot synonymous Sure nm pitt wil eed een ‘vans hi again ingens hat ipa lod heres he Yo do, Thus altho isin Socrates, qu iil the Jit hotly subjcive eae has active sly sine tes Socrates" ina wi be yet al as antrasY the une pobliemoray ofthe ware "ierkegardl indicates tht his cco of Hegetsnerprctaionof te ain hee at an end ltt he il ow ase ia pl da prize foundation pon which ented Hiden to Heyes account inves merty the wera tha the phetmenn ‘ofthe damon is consent wt soe fterteaion ofthe ny of Secraes With is negative commande and watuings the dation, po ‘et Socrates wih ara that ya fot tld and ehjetne Tse ‘he dain fens crate th stale uth (ales pely soya ‘ie one) that remained tern een ith eapeet tos nt sepa ‘esonng and in his ome fd cong to Rieke, ta Ronse lent "ite now sd this the polemical conse ine we Socrates absebel is whe flea sobs contemporain the eae "ty proved for hin by the dato agains bing pple bya he appenings nie then Socrates pstion ence agin est al ac tony The exsenatpoint teeth the cnn’ common had ‘no pote content bt ater mere ay sane charac the da sn wate Socrates a lhe what nat do, iheer ae Pose sugges for action Th dhe incryctnon the da consent wth Riker’ cla that Sotats had nope dace line andl ena na poston pr lane ney we eset transl ora ‘erkogtad isthe hisdincusion by contrasting his geno meth oly wh hao gel andy fering clan oh om tis poe, {leary vetrrng to Hegel, he writes “Asal, any is ders de aly is aged place aa vanishing cement inthe sen, al ede os ts tae ee een Sate Sean sa nnn wc ee ae ae hr sol pa ns thereon rated very rel. Klerkgaar crcl of Hegel pec Inne method uf asain ony nto acl eomerete conse so alaing kas a asta comeept inflam a genera sem ocr ep For Reread, y contest irony no jt a abst concep Dtruersconetetewuerance ow an ina see sans ‘Thi thepurely penal ie wd whe ence a htt dee ‘eye atte Mtn bee ype teed {Gunderandtheinasuali canons And nce egal ‘navi it dye ee a sate ey proc eek tnamywe eta, tomeveraaperaiony satan eh Sirhegiard’s method, fx cone to Hegel's wil be w aac irony in i conerete coment in dhe ie ofa speichern iertegtard, Hegel hs hismethod overlached inpurancsmpecto ony forin onder so understand their of Socrates one mst exene is we of within te omen o bse acral sein. Feel llegedly flo see tis sine he punporely only imerened sear {historical concept apf thatitepresent bythe Creche ort ‘ronyasa coneepin genera theory af eahecs The deo ony ‘re, iichaimed, of mo eres on. What sintering to not here that Kierkegard rants the leghiiey of iene ad sears sad ‘recognizes that hiss the dom wheze Hegel'sanases sre operate Heures wing o recognize that Hegel makes lam slouthelife ‘fe nda hich « not the subject ater of weenie shane is objetion sects to beta dhe il of Saray cannot ly grasped ‘Uy umans ova purely etary mtd. Bt sheve bo est ae ‘tethod on its awn tensor of Hegel for hi employment ‘erisyaard develops is point ather a the eying of Ue ape bends, "Heyes View of Socrates,” The relation betwen the orga ‘iscusion and is development ere scene since he refers oh fe ‘adicusion ina foomae" Hee Keheyaard eres ep on nee looking important aspect of the figure of Socrates arguing ha Hegel Isat concent wil he various empire pareaartn sansa at ior “Peden npn establish fern ab he peso lnc Sorte dows nxt eee ee rat Soles such acon es ne 54 eck 2 He coNceer oF os SUSI eet tan hl ty aa ‘had ‘nim her he hee ire Nirhegat ges wo ar a w cite Hegel for no being holly eicting * He asibites Hoge lack terest steer peg ‘text erin to his isience-upon angina der hed erpecte: Anything Hike dis effort sed os Hegel at es te Phetomensare parades too ch oahyand sto me thegreatimporsnce thir comander-vehela wert haya taken or snore than the op gh lms serie Acconting o Kieegaard, by viewing bsory only from the mato, Hegeltias not beenabl to yeapal te naamec Socrates sass of ‘non This ai eens o prelate Kirbepuat's cr evil, when charges philly and the tr with bey elect an abated ‘Strangely enough, in his foodton, Ketejard says jom the op Poste ofthis ad ded prises Hegel nethgy on eesey te Point There he dacs he diference benwen an opie eto ‘of history anda philypiel one Hl dco nested why one eg He begins by caning wh Heel tha pitospty neem volves tonal clement, gen tat concepts whicare the oleey Diesopy re hier contingent ene “Canceps, ae Inde ‘vate thir history sd aren se able dan thet tes the lominian ot ume, bat in aid coh al sey never abot nd of ese for the place of ce ih need, pepo owen aneside nomore dear the rcemt hor oft coneeat than ‘can ap i ts eaten hesLegand suk bor tciualitveancepotsnetie higaren teed ees 8 puetyhisorieel acount which merely reuntarion cin ta ilsopiarhisoret act wc recs Ye yenerl Noel pate oes beind she mand phenomena Just he nda ‘waking confession i eran able not nly to eel othe nce ‘tbs le cronoloiebtao orette them entering bag les not compretend them hel, so isin eet so ae oe ‘ecare the event ife ofthe hams ace th thos aloud vk ‘utile Sasaic maa om espagnol Be lioness taste npr SER PURINE tn act mee pu sgt pane SERRA MER mR e u Ml nae soho icine ACCOUNT OF Tie pAINON 185 Duc nist eae i he enor (pias) to exphin 3% Ti ours, cual egcan Yew ad correspon in ‘aincton, oun me ltodcion tothe Lee he of Hisery,Beneen “rg hoy” wich ieoncemed wats ened pirical dat, and “piosophiclhkory” which concerned et !werprtation a hinoyin terms af alter ‘ergaard surpriiny poeson isi ont Hegchan distinction the importance of Hegets Zaz th sty of Psp for The Cn ‘apf tom, sen the sinres beeen thf tex sen that reg angel structed The Cop of fy in acconanee wh his pare of Hegel's etre la atone ha been ged i Sees sites Pcie" was modeled om Hegel's acount of iony inthe Lars Aeti Ths Kierkegaard shows haan ede to these Hegelian texts The long quttons of Hage tents heres sgt ‘hat Klrheguare not jet wholly the maser of the subjecemantee At ‘ies lengthy pasages ate ted with ite or no explanation or dsc sin, an fe: Rethegaaed allows the quotaons om Hegel ek ‘ary the alse or hn mn ily every discs afer heft chapter, erga dene Dey onthe conten: o Hegel's sna! arsahoe and ange acep eget’ views on the bey iss Indeed ierkegserd makes ps sheendofeschsecion tsa hisievnconsstenwitege Hese ‘eps for example Hegeacounc of Socrates esos igute ‘dss deuce free n Greek ete Me Hegel's chaecereion| ‘Serie irony asin negaive and is evi athe Gorman Romani Heals has rater Hegelian concepion ofthe meinen 180, HEGEL BCE coNeHFE OF oY snd developmen this Fal he very thesis the mark dro Iva megane concept i esental's Hegelian notin thw Keke peal to many tte for oppor ‘Nac ont does erkegaird dae Reson the content of Hegel’ hong he Canto ray he lo ty pages makes se ‘of cleaty Hegelian ngage He speaks, for expla word ison (oF the unotng ofthe Mes,” the “phenomnslagel ot oeingtt- snore “he worl historia” ator apes ‘rr and om te Pars of One Si Luan eye's pope Eenguage sens to hive lnc peste fy Keegan tei {Gol forthe expression of is es. Tai paste fetes sce, fen during tht ea period, he eta ot piosphl yon a ince by Peat tae Ol an i Nos Sars 1 The Coup by Hegel sue soci sol sometimes as 2Lcommentaor al sometimes yarelpa in» denon, Hegel ole here smich rete han Fe Pr Sl ing wre ‘specs his philosophy were alluded obit without ay acca ing casio. By contrat Th Cn of ly hee so longer ay stub that Kleene sre! and nied crcaly many of Hegel Dray texts They are qt and aye in deal fashion dati ‘nique in Rlrkegurd’s soca, Neid tove nov ater Ns work ae Hegel print texts made the objet of Kishen sty to a thing approaching the extent seen beret gel es hotaeteagendalr te udyasancholehesclen se most npr Inerlocutr wh at tes comes ta dinate the dacson, Sometimes Nerkegaatdl ce lm, seeing spp for smn win his er ‘or makes use of his anlyer a fot pont for sme seas, By ‘ie ofthe vist Humber of wefeence o Hogel tern hon The Cont of ny thee tan ew dsb at Hegel py an por tae role i hts ext. Een the irc thes ini ait ti sce banging that Kerheyaan paying she role ol Hegelian a this ‘Wisk autherstte Thalsp achenege user nc indced Hegelian ‘lements present. Tn dhe questo becomes ane uf the nate! hat role. Astasbeenseen.onenterpretation of Hegel sarerolein The Cine 4 ny te desis that te ne of gel bee ne, Bat a | hae tied desuonseate hs reading pile fr nuiber of eons 1) Teas not consnnane with Kekegaards mn seadersending of The Compt of hoya tne by Ge felerencee oH Nisa (2) ene not square wi the wane ofthe etl wher ne ines Finds criss Hegel The onels neato anane devotee Hegel, ‘hid one woul expect a pany ose) Te Won ean “les not make sete von x sce he aca at the Uncre ‘ot Copenhagen was atthe ime af Rirbegau’sdisertaion no mote eoKL's cries oF KostayTie sx0N 8 ont by Hegelian than the Bourges soll order was ad hat thereat none Reba cgey poten woe steele ‘The one eating of The Conor mates the mina fae ‘ewig Kerkegars ne polemical wance ont this eat et, ae

    You might also like