Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How People Are Using The Blogs Today
How People Are Using The Blogs Today
How People Are Using The Blogs Today
Diary blog
A diary blog is often about what is happening in a person's life. It can be a mixture a diary
and a guide site, and there are as many unique types of blogs as there are different people
Collaborative blog
A collaborative contains information that is posted by several individuals not just one author.
In collaborative blogs, readers have the possibility to contribute with links or posts
comments, in order to participate with their opinions, answers and questions. Most collaborative
blogs focus on a specific topic, and the authors can be both regular people as
well as experts within the topic
Company blog
A company blog can include two types of blogs, product and customer service blog. Product
blogs can consist of different approaches. One approach is to provide updates about
the product so customers can receive the latest information. A second approach is to provide
customers with insights and information directly from those who are responsible for
the products. A product blog that keeps customers updated can build loyalty to the product
and the brand/company. The customer service blog is rather similar to product blogs, but
customer service blogs focus completely on issues on the already purchased products. The
customer service blogs is a channel in order to address the issues on the products to the
customers that have purchased the product
The new stage of the development of blogs is the business sector. Business has become a
new phase of the communications that appears on the blogosphere today. Bloggers communicate
and share information to each other since blogs are the new ways for customers
to reach out to the companies. This scenario has made the companies more alert to listen
to their customers’ demands through the blogosphere. Enterprises now have the opportunity
to gain new knowledge from the customer and to gain an idea about what the customers
are saying about them
Types of communication
One-step flow of communication
Opinion leaders
Opinion formers – these people have the same power in affecting people as opinion
leader. However, opinion formers are given the power to affect due to their powerful position,
which could be due to authority, education etc, whereas opinion leaders more is “selected”
by their surroundings
Opinion followers – are the vast majority of the population, they gather their knowledge
from the opinion leader and followers but also directly from the mass communication
Word of mouth
The
benefits for the receiver are rather straight-forward; as they gain lots of information they
would not be able to obtain otherwise. The benefits for the sender can be a little vaguer at
first glance, people like to talk
about the purchases for a number of reasons, such as confirmation, satisfaction, status etc.
Online WOM
Weak ties then provide three possible benefits for the consumer.
first provides a potential input for a decision.
Second, consumer information should be more diverse then that coming from stronger ties.
Thirdly, it also gives consumers the opportunity to gain access to expertise which they normally
would not get access to
Reference groups
A person or a group that an individual refers to for comparison in their decision making
1 groups provide norms on what is generally accepted and
how consumers should behave to be accepted in the
2 Image which is how the consumer is perceived by the group
3 information which the consumer does not have enough knowledge to make the decision
Status refers to the position the person have within the group. High status means greater
power and influence
reinforcement power: Social groups can confirm the purchase both through rewarding
(reward power) or criticising (coercive power)
Types of Groups
comparative group is a group that the consumer does not belong to
Normative Group: provide norms and values that set the standard in behaviour
and ownership
Individuals:
Opinion followers
The most common character that is found in the blogosphere is opinion followers; these
people are ordinary consumers who have experience of the products that are discussed.
The reason to why the informants most often turn to opinion followers can be explained
by the large amount of opinion followers being available online. The relationship between
our informants and the opinion followers is characterised by rather weak ties, since they
have little history of communicating and they lack emotional intensity. These weak ties, between
consumers and the opinion followers, give the consumers problem in assessing the
motives of the one who is providing the online WOM. The main reason to this is the lack
of emotional intensity in the relationship. In order to deal with these weak ties our informants
chose to gather information from a larger number of opinion followers. However,
many times that the informants seemed to trust the information coming from one consumer
follower without looking for same information from other consumers.
Opinion Leaders
When our informants turned to opinion leaders they tended to be satisfied with the information
provided by this blogger. The reason for this is that this relationship is characterised
by stronger ties then between consumers and opinion followers, however, it is still weak
ties compared to real life. The reason to why these ties are stronger then between opinion
followers is the longer history the informants had with their opinion leaders.
Opinion formers
The use of opinion formers in the blogs is very rare, only one of our informants turned to
these characters in the blogosphere. A reason to this was that our informants did not trust
the marketing oriented source of information. Instead, our informants wanted to select
who to listen to themselves, in order to enable trust and respect to grow for an opinion
leader. The majority of the informants did not trust the opinion formers since they had
been given the authority. It is of course possible that some of the consumers within the
blogosphere, that our informants turned to had been selected by organisations due to their
influential position. However, no informant questioned that the opinion leaders they listened
to, were actually given power from an organisation.