UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

BACHELOR OF ACCOUNTING (HONS)

PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING

GROUP ASSIGNMENT PRESENTATION

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the assignment are as follow:

1) To familiarize students with the issues for public sector organizations.

2) To build and instill the teamwork skills
3) To apply student-centred learning approach
4) To develop students’ analytical, interpersonal and presentation abilities

REQUIREMENTS

1. Formation of groups
Students are required to form their own groups of not more than 6. All members in each
group are expected to contribute in producing the group assignment.

2. Content
Each group is required to prepare a presentation using suitable slides. The topic is on
Accountability Issues in a Malaysian Government Agency. Students are required to
find one issue from the Auditor General’s Report. To support your presentation, you
should search additional information from the Internet, journals, newspaper or any other
sources. The issues must be for the last 5 years i.e. 2015 to 2019

Students are encouraged to use their own creativity in preparing the slides. However,
they must ensure that their presentation has the following content:

1) Team introduction
2) Introduction on the Government Agency
3) The Accountability Issues
4) Explain the types of Accountability that have not been fulfilled: Financial,
Management and Programme Accountability
5) Lessons learned
6) Suggestions for improvement
7) Conclusion

1
SUBMISSION DATE

Based on the prepared slides, each group is required to do a presentation during week
13 lecture. The time allotted for each group is 20 minutes and 5 minutes for Q&A
session. Students must hand in the soft copy of the slides and to submit it to the lecturer
before their presentation.

The assessment criteria for the group presentation are as stated in the mark sheet.

2
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING (SEPT 2015)

GROUP PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Program:
Group: Name Student ID
Year 3
Bachelor in Accounting
Title: Date:

Please circle the marks awarded

No Items Poor Satisfactory Excellent Marks

1 Content (10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
marks)
(Not Enough Materials) (Reasonably Judged) (Consistent with
Purpose)

2 Flow of 1 2 3 4 5
presentation
(10 marks) (No Logical Order) (Reasonably Ordered) (Clear Flow of
Presentation)

3 Adaptation to 1 2 3 4 5
Audience
(No Attempt to Relate to (Some Attempt to (Audience Thoroughly
(5 marks) Audience) Relate to Audience) Involved)

4 Teamwork (5 1 2 3 4 5
marks)
(None or Poor Cooperation) (Fair amount of (High Level of
Cooperation) Cooperation)
5 Handling 1 2 3 4 5
Questions (5
marks) (Poorly Dealt with Audience) (Fairly Well Handled) (Competently Handled)

6 Timing 1 2 3 4 5
(5 marks) (Badly Judged, Too Short or (Reasonably Well (Exactly Judged)
Too Long) Judged)
(30Introductio
minutes)
7 Overall Effect 1 2 3 4 5
and Creativity
(Very Dull) (Fairly Engaging) ( Highly Interesting &
(5 marks) Engaging)
Comments:
Total (40 marks)

Lecture Acknowledgement:
(Name and Signature)