Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Antioxidant Phenolic Metabolites From FR
Antioxidant Phenolic Metabolites From FR
Antioxidant Phenolic Metabolites From FR
23 739
© 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. Allrightsreserved
INTRODUCTION
decreased the capillary permeability and fragility seen in scurvy [8]. This
gave rise to a claim for the vitaminic action of flavonoids (vitamin P),
which were later stripped of their vitamin status around 1950. During the
70s and 80s the absorption, excretion and metabolism of flavonoids was
extensively studied [9-11].
In the last decade, there has been a resurgence in the interest shown in
flavonoids and other phenolics because of possible links with the
prevention of cancer and cardiovascular diseases [12]. It is thought that
these natural compounds may protect tissues against oxygen free radicals
and lipid peroxidation, both of which play a role in several pathologies
such as atherosclerosis and cancer. Atherosclerosis is an important factor
in the development of cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart
disease and thrombotic stroke. It is characterised by thickening and
narrowing of the arteries caused by the formation of fibrofatty and fibrous
lesions that obstruct the blood flow. A major hypothesis proposes that
oxidised low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles play a key role in the
development of atherosclerosis, and so the avoidance or delay of LDL
oxidation by dietary antioxidants might provide a promising strategy for
preventing atherosclerosis and, therefore, coronary heart disease.
However, the ability of dietary antioxidants to inhibit LDL in vivo still
remains to be established [13].
The present chapter reviews the antioxidant activity of fruit and
vegetable phenolics and its relationship with health and nutrition, as well
as the effect of processing and postharvest technological treatments on
these antioxidant metabolites, and on the nutritional quality of fruit and
vegetable derived food products.
Carbohydrate metabolism
PEP + E4P
gallate
Quinate
Caffeate
HO'
Fig. (1). Phenolic metabolism. PEP (phospho enol pyruvate); E4P (erythrose 4-phosphate); DAHP
(3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate); PAL (phenylalanine ammonia lyase). Stress
transcriptionally activates the key enzymes of phenolic metabolism (PAL and DAHP synthase).
The enzyme DAHP synthase regulates the carbon flow in the shikimate
pathway. Different biotic and abiotic stresses, including mechanical
wounding and fungal elicitation, induce the accumulation of DAHP
synthase mRNA, and, therefore, of phenolic metabolites.
742 TOMASBARBERAN etaL
R3 R5
apigenin H OH
luteolin OH OH
chrysoeriol OCH3 OH
diosmetln OH OCH3
R3 R5
anthocyanidins ?3 H
pelargonidin H
^OH cyanidin OH H
+ peonidin OCH3 H
H ^
^Rs delphlnidin OH OH
petunidin OCH3 OH
" ^
^v^ ^-^y'OH malvldin OCH3 OCH3
OH
Fig. (2). General structures of antioxidant flavones, flavonols and anthocyanidins.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 743
OH
epogallocatechin-3-gaUate OH gallocatechin-3-gallate OH
""^C OH
epigallocatechin
OH
OH OH
epicatechin catechin
Fig. (3). General structures of antioxidant flavan-3-ols.
744 TOMAS-BARBERAN et aL
HQ, l^COOH
OH
caffelc acid
HO,, l^COOH
chlorogenic acid (5-O-caffeoyIquinic acid)
cryptochlorogenic acid (4-0-cafreoylquinic acid)
HO' neoclilorogenicd acid (3-O-caffeoylquinic acid)
isociiiorogenic acid 'a' (4,5-di-O-cafreoylquinic acid)
isochlorogenic acid 'b' (4,5-di-O-cafreoylquinic acid)
isochlorogenic acid 'c' (4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid)
OH
chlorogenic acid (5-0-caffeoylquinic acid)
R3 R4 R5
cinnamic acid H H H
p-coumaric acid H OH H
caffeic acid OH OH H
ferulic acid OMe OH H
sinapic acid OMe OH OMe
FRUIT PHENOLICS
Apple
Apricot
^,*\0—glucose
resveratrol oleoeuropein
OH
OH
OH O
phloridzin naulngenin chalcone
glucx)se
Cherry
Both Prunus avium and Prunus cerasus fruits are included in the generic
name of cherry. Both contain similar phenolics, but with some minor
differences. Prunus avium contains cyanidin 3-rutinoside as the main
pigment, with cyanidin 3-glucoside, peonidin 3-rutinoside and peonidin 3-
glucoside also being present [16]. Prunus cerasus, however, accumulates
cyanidin 3-2"-glucosyl-rutinoside as the main pigment, while cyanidin 3-
rutinoside, 3-sophoroside, 3-glucoside and 3-(2'*-xylosylrutinoside) and
peonidin 3-rutinoside are observed in smaller amounts [17]. There was a
wide variation in the anthocyanin content between cultivars. Thus, pale
pink cultivars contain less than 40 mg of anthocyanin per kg of peel, while
in intense red skinned cultivars it can reach 300mg/kg peel. However,
other intensely pigmented varieties, in which both the peel and flesh
contain pigments, may present values of 3500-4500 mg anthocyanin per
kg fresh weight offruit[16].
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 747
Within the term citrus, we can include sour orange (Citrus aurantium),
lemon {Citrus limon), grapefruit {Citrus paradisi), mandarin, Clementine
and tangerine {Citrus reticulata) and sweet orange {Citrus sinensis). These
fruits are characterised by the accumulation of high amounts of flavanone
glycosides (1700-2800 mg naringin per kg grapefruit; 2700-6000 mg
Table L Flavonoids of Citrus Fruits
Abs 280 nm
1 •AAA^^n..,JL^JO
10 30 40
Fig. (6). HPLC chromatogram of lemon juice phenolics: (1) eriocitrin, (2) diosmetin 6,8-di-C-
glucoside, (3) hesperidin, and (4) diosmetin 6-C-gIucoside. HPLC conditions: RP Cis column (12
X 0.4 cm; particle size 5 jum). Mobile phase: acidified water (5% formic acid) (A) and methanol
(B). Gradient: 0 min-10% B, 30 min- 40% B, 40 min- 80% B. Flow rate: I mL/min.
Grapes
Olive
Peach
Pear
Plums
Within the term plums, several Prunus species may be included {Prunus
domestica, P. salicina, etc.) with substantial varietal differences existing
in their phenolic composition.
In the red pigmented cultivars, the anthocyanin pigments are quite
similar to those of cherry, and include cyanidin 3-glucoside as the main
compound, along with cyanidin 3-rutinoside, peonidin 3-glucoside and
peonidin 3-rutinoside.
The phenolic acids detected are characteristic, and include vanillic
acid, and glucosides of/7-hydroxybenzoic, protocatechuic, vanillic,
syringic and salicylic acids. 3'-Caffeoylquinic is the principal phenolic
acid derivative (63-218 mg caffeic acid per kg fresh weight) [19],
although other p-coumaric and ferulic acid derivatives have also been
reported [16].
Small amounts of catechin (8-17 mg/kg) and epicatechin (10-14
mg/kg) have also been detected [19], while higher amounts of quercetin
and kaempferol 3-rutinosides have been detected, especially in the skin.
Raspberry
Abs320nm
10 15 20 25
Abs SlOnm
^0 L^
10 20 25
The external part of the fruit contains several quercetin and kaempferol
derivatives, mainly quercetin and kaempferol 3-glucosides and
glucuronides. Hov^ever, other less frequent glycosidic combinations have
been reported in specific cultivars [32;33].
Strawberry
VEGETABLE PHENOLICS
Artichoke
1-Caffeoylquinic 38
3-Caffeoylquinic 52
1 4-CaffeoyIquinic 267
1 1,3-di-Caffeoylquinic 61
1 1,4-di-CaffeoyIquinic 143
4,5-di-CaffeoyIquinic 225
3,5-di-CafFeoyIquinic 347
1,5-di-Caffeoylquinic 837
3,4-di-Caffeoylquinic 429
Asparagus
Carrot
Celery
In celery (Apium graveolens), the leaves, stalks and tubers (celeriac) are
consumed. The phenolic content of tubers is much smaller than that of the
other organs, and is located mainly in the external tissues. The main
flavonoid in the leaves is apiin (apigenin 7-apiosylglucoside, 202 mg/kg
f w.), although luteolin (48 mg/kg f w.) and chrysoeriol (27 mg/kg f w.) 7-
apiosylglucosides are also present. In addition, trace amounts of apigenin
(6 mg/kg f w.), luteolin (11 mg/kg f w.) and chrysoeriol 7-glucosides have
been detected [48]. The flavonoid content of the tubers is much smaller
(apiin 1.7 mg/kg and luteolin 7-apiosylglucoside 0.8 mg/kg fw.).
In a recent study of the luteolin and apigenin content of commercial
celery purchased in the U.K., white celery stalks and green and white
celery hearts were studied [49]. The amounts detected in the white celery
stalks (36-40 mg luteolin per kg f w. and 90-104 mg apigenin per kg) were
in keeping with the 22 mg luteolin and 108 mg apigenin per kg f w.
previously reported for celery purchased in The Netherlands [50].
However, significant sample-to sample variation was observed in the U.K.
study, and some samples contained no flavonoid at all when purchased
[49].
When the phenolic acid derivatives of celery roots were studied [38;51]
those of caffeic acid (89-168 mg/kg fw. depending on the cultivar) were
the most abundant, although ferulic acid was also present in substantial
amounts (34-61 mg/kg), with p-coumaric acid derivatives only existing at
trace levels (< 0.5 mg/kg). Much greater amounts of these compounds
were found in the corresponding aerial parts [51]. In a study on the
characteristic phenolic compounds of celery roots which may be
responsible for discolouration during cooking, the main compound was
chlorogenic acid (5*-caffeoylquinic acid; 2-65 mg/kg f w.), while 5'-
feruloylquinic acid (1-8 mg/kg) and 5'-p-coumaroylquinic acid (1-3
mg/kg) were also present [52].
The coumarins, scopoletin and aesculetin, were present in celery roots
in amounts smaller than 0.5 mg/kg fw. [51]. The coumarin concentration
was five to ten times higher in the peel of the tuber than in the edible
portion. When celery tubers were coated with pectin gels and stored for 6
months at 4^0 and 95% relative humidity, the furanocoumarin
concentration increased considerably [53].
The furanocoumarins, psoralen, bergapten, xanthotoxin and
isopimpinellin, were detected in celery leaves and stalk. The total
furanocoumarin content ranged from about 12 to 50 mg/kg in Florida
cultivars [54]. Treatment with fungicides increased the bergapten content
2-4 times in leaves and stalk, xanthotoxin 2-3 times in stalk, and
isopimpinellin about 2-3 times in leaves, while psoralen levels remained
constant. This fact is of some importance since linear furanocoumarins are
the cause of photosensitive reactions in humans.
756 T O M A S - B A R B E R A N etaL
flavonoids and kale 200-500 mg/kg. Cultivation under glass led to lower
flavonol levels being recorded in the leaves than when plants were grown
in the open field [57]. It has also been demonstrated that the flavonol
content of Brussels sprouts and kale leaves increases during development.
Broccoli leaves contain 3-sophoroside-7-glucoside derivatives of
kaempferol, quercetin and isorhamnetin [43]. In the case of kale, the
kaempferol content has been reported as 13-30 mg/kg f.w. and the
quercetin content as 7-20 mg/kg, depending on the cultivar [58]. In red
cabbage no kaempferol was detected and only small amounts of quercetin
(2 mg/kg f.w.) were reported [58].
The pigmentation of red cabbage is caused by cyanidin derivatives
which are acylated with various phenolic acids. Cyanidin 3-sophoroside-
5-glucoside and its derivatives acylated with malonic acid and one or two
residues of j9-coumaric, ferulic or sinapic acids have also been detected
[59;60]. The relative stability of these pigments seems to be related to
their degree of acylation.
Eggplant
content was much higher in the outer leaves than in the inner leaves. In
some of these samples, kaempferol derivatives were also detected in small
amounts (up to 2 mg/kg).
In a recent paper on red lettuce ('Lollo rosso') the flavonoids, quercetin
3-glucoside, 3-glucuronide and 3-(6"-malonyl) glucoside were detected as
well as the new naturally occurring flavonoid quercetin 3-(6"-malonyl)
glucoside-7-glucoside [67]. In this case three different tissues were
differentiated: white, green and red. White tissue contained only 43 mg
flavonoids per kg f w., while the green tissue contained 244 mg/kg and the
red tissue 1384 mg/kg.
The quercetin content of lettuce cultivars purchased in the market in
The Netherlands ranged from 2 to 30 mg/kg f w. [68]. In a recent survey
of the quercetin contents of lettuce cultivars purchased in the U.K., head
lettuce cultivars again contained the smallest amounts (11 mg/kg). Green
leaf lettuce cultivars (e.g. 'Green salad') contained 147 mg/kg, while red
cultivars like 'Lollo Rosso' contained the highest amounts: 91 Img / kg in
external leaves and 450mg / kg in inner leaves [49].
In red lettuce cultivars, the only pigment detected was cyanidin 3-(6"-
malonyl) glucoside [67;69]. This compound reaches 950mg/kg f.w. in the
red tissues, but is also present in the green tissue (100 mg/kg) and midribs
(20 mg/kg), where during cold storage it may reach 45 mg/kg. This
pigment is degraded in minimally processed 'Lollo rosso' during storage in
air.
As regards phenolic acid derivatives, lettuce, endive and chicory only
contain caffeic acid derivatives (and in some cases traces of ferulic acid).
The caffeic acid content of lettuce ranged from 182 to 381 mg/kg fw. in
cultivars grown in the field, and 40-108 mg/kg in greenhouse grown plants
[64]. In chicory, the caffeic acid content ranges from 99 to 138 mg/kg and
in endive an average of 164 mg/kg has been reported. When external and
internal leaves were differentiated, the caffeic acid levels in lettuce ranged
from 160 to 600 mg/kg and in endive from 160 to 870 mg/kg [38].
In freshly harvested lettuce, the caffeic acid derivatives caffeoyltartaric,
dicaffeoyltartaric, caffeoyl malate and chlorogenic acids have been
identified, as they were in endive and chicory [63]. In the case of lettuce,
the outer leaves contained 28 mg/kg caffeoyltartaric, 160 mg/kg
dicaffeoyltartaric, 15 mg/kg caffeoylmalate and 55 mg/kg chlorogenic
acid, while the inner leaves contained almost half these amounts.
However, after minimal processing (wounding) or ethylene exposure, the
phenolic metabolism is activated and other caffeic acid derivatives such as
the isochlorogenic isomers (3,5-dicaffeoylquinic, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic and
4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acids) accumulate, especially in the white tissue
(midrib) [67;70-72].
Fig. 8 shows typical HPLC chromatograms of 'Lollo rosso' phenolics,
and Fig. 9 a characteristic chromatogram of 'Romaine' lettuce. The main
difference in the phenolic compound patterns of both lettuce types is that
760 TOMAS-BARBERAN etaL
Abs 330 nm
1 67
0 6 10 15 20 25
min
Abs 520 nm
10 mm 15 20 25
Fig. (8). HPLC chromatogram of red lettuce anthocyanins and other phenols: (1) caffeoyltartaric
acid, (2) chlorogenic acid, (3) dicaffeoyltartaric acid, (4) quercetin 7-glucoside 3-(6"-
malonylglucoside), (5) dicaffeoylquinic acid (isochlorogenic acid), (6) quercetin 3-giucuronido, (7)
quercetin 3-glucosido, (8) quercetin 3-malonylglucoside, and (9) cyanidin 3-maIonylglucoside.
HPLC conditions: RP Cig column (12 x 0.4 cm; particle size 5 ^m). Mobile phase: acidified water
(5% formic acid) (A) and methanol (B). Gradient: 0 min- 5% B, 25 min- 40% B. Flow rate: 1
mL/min.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 761
Abs 330 nm
10 15 20 25 30 35
min
Fig. (9). HPLC chromatogram of *Romaine' lettuce phenols: (1) caffeoyltartaric acid, (2)
chlorogenic acid, (3) dicaffeoyltartaric acid, and (4) dicaffeoylquinic acid (isochlorogenic acid).
HPLC conditions: RP Cig column (12 x 0.4 cm; particle size 5 ^m). Mobile phase: acidified water
(5% formic acid) (A) and methanol (B). Gradient: 0 min- 5% B, 40 min- 40% B. Flow rate: 1
mL/min.
Onion
biosynthesised, and the flavonoid content decreases from the outer to the
inner scales.
When the quercetin contents of eight onion varieties grown in the
U.S.A. were determined [74] the highest quercetin content in the edible
portion was about 60 mg/kg f.w., although in some cultivars smaller
amounts of kaempferol were also detected. In similar studies on the
quercetin content of onions on the market in The Netherlands and U.K.,
the quercetin content ranged from 284 to 486 mg/kg in fresh Dutch onions
[50], while their U.K. counterparts contained 185-634 mg/kg [49]. Both
Abs 260 nm
10 15 20
min
Fig. (10). HPLC chromatogram of red onion anthocyanins and other phenols: (1) quercetin 3,4'-
diglucoside, (2) quercetin 4'-glucoside, (3) isorhamnetin 4'-glucoside, (4) cyanidin 3-glucoside, (5)
cyanidin 3-arabinoside, (6) cyanidin 3-malonyIglucoside, and (7) cyanidin 3-maIonyIarabinoside.
HPLC conditions: RP Cjg column (12 x 0.4 cm; particle size 5 Jim). Mobile phase: acidified water
(5% formic acid) (A) and methanol (B). Gradient: 0 min- 15% B, 15 min- 35% B, 25 min- 40% B.
Flow rate: I mL/min.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 763
amounts were higher than those found in the U.S.A. but no kaempferol
was detected in the European cultivars.
In Spanish commercially purchased red onion the anthocyanin
pigments, cyanidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-arabinoside, cyanidin 3-(6"-
malonyl) glucoside and cyanidin 3-(malonyl) arabinoside, were found
alongside the flavonols, quercetin 3,4'-diglucoside, quercetin 7,4'-
diglucoside, quercetin 3-glucoside, dihydroquercetin 3-glucoside and
isorhamnetin 4'-glucoside. The anthocyanin content of this cultivar was
233 mg/kg f w. and the flavonols content was 943 mg/kg [75]. When
quercetin glycosides were quantified in other red and white onion
cultivars, the contents at harvest ranged from 1187 to 1917 mg/kg fw.
although 40% of the flavonoids were lost during the curing process
(drying) to which onions are submitted before retail in order to extend
their storage life. After curing, the total flavonol glycosides ranged from
864 to 1390 mg/kg [76]. No significant loss of flavonoids was observed
after 6 months' storage. Minimal processing to obtain shredded onion and
storage in perforated films led to a slight decrease in the anthocyanin
content after 7 days' storage [75].
Fig. 10 shows HPLC chromatograms of red onion phenolics. Four
anthocyanins are visible in the 520 nm chromatogram and three principal
flavonoids can be clearly observed in the 260 nm chromatogram.
Hydroxycinnamic acid or benzoic acid derivatives cannot be observed in
any significant quantity in the chromatograms.
Pepper (Sweet)
Bell peppers, both green and red, contain low amounts of phenolic acid
derivatives: /7-Coumaric (< 4 mg/kg), caffeic (< 10 mg/kg), ferulic (<15
mg/kg), sinapic (<5 mg/kg) and vanillic (10 mg/kg) acids [77]. Caffeoyl
glucose, feruloyl glucose and sinapoyl glucose are the main
hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives found, while no quinic acid derivatives
have been detected [63]. Feruloyl glucose may accumulate up to 11 mg/kg
f w. and sinapoyl glucose up to 5 mg/kg in some red cultivars.
As regards flavonoids, they are mainly found in green peppers and are
confined to the skin. Quercetin ranges from 12 to 18 mg per kg in whole
pepper and luteolin was found to occur at 15 mg/kg [78]. However, when
the pepper was divided into external (28%) and internal (72%) parts, the
flavonoid content of the external tissues was much higher (43-63 mg
quercetin per kg and 54 mg luteolin per kg) than that of the inner parts
which contained less than 1 mg/kg of flavonoids [78].
Potato
Ab8 350nm
Tomato
Abs 340 nm
Fig. (12). HPLC chromatogram of tomato peel phenolics: (1) chlorogenic acid, (2) quercetin 3-
rutinoside, and (3) naringenin chalcone. HPLC conditions: RP C\% column (12 x 0.4 cm; particle
size 5 fim). Mobile phase: acidified water (5% formic acid) and methanol. Gradient: 0 min- 10% B,
30 min- 40% B, 40 min- 80% B. Flow rate: 1 mL/min.
1 Substrate References
Lard [122] 1
X free radical
H
+XH
CONJUGATED DIENE
j^'^^^^K HYDROPEROXIDE
.Fe^"" or Cu+
alcoxy radical
p-scission -
ALDEHYDES
Fig. (13). Chemistry of lipid oxidation.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 769
Inductors References
During the last steps of lipid oxidation, the fatty acid chains breakdown
to give aldehydes (hexanal, propanal, malondialdehyde), depending on the
lipid structure. These compounds react with thiobarbituric acid to give
coloured compounds the measurement of which at 535 nm can be used to
follow the oxidation process in its terminal phase [91], In addition,
hexanal, which is an important decomposition product of n-6
polyunsaturated fatty acid peroxidation in rat liver samples, human red
blood cell membranes, and human LDL (low density lipoproteins), can be
measured by headspace gas chromatography [92]. Malondialdehyde,
another important decomposition product, can also be analysed by GC
(Gas Chromatography) [93], and, after reaction with urea to give 2-
hydroxypyrimidine, by HPLC [94].
The antioxidant activity of a given compound, or plant or food extract,
can also be measured by determining its ability to neutralise free radicals,
which act as free radical scavengers. Free radicals which absorb in the
visible region can be generated in vitro, and the free radical scavenging
activity can be readily measured by following the decrease in this
absorbance value since the free radical becomes discoloured when
neutralised. The radical cation 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-
sulphonate) (ABTS-^) in aqueous phase can be generated by the
interaction of ABTS, H2O2 and metmyoglobin [95], and the antioxidant
activity of different compounds can be evaluated since they suppress the
formation of ABTS'^. Recently, another system for ABTS radical
production, in this case catalysed by peroxidase, has been reported [96]. It
is also possible to use the commercial free radical 2,2-diphenyI-l-
picrylhydrozyl (DPPH) [97].
770 T O M A S - B A R B E R A N et al
PHENOLICS AS ANTIOXIDANTS
The antioxidant activity of different food products has been linked to their
preventive role in cardiovascular disease [68;86;98;99]. Many of them are
fruit and vegetables, although cereals, herbs and spices also show
important antioxidant activity. Processed fruit products also provide
important antioxidant protection as has been described for orange and
lemon juice, [100], grape juice [91], grape pomace [101] and red wines
[102-107]. Very pronounced Hn vitro' antioxidant activity has been
demonstrated in tea [99; 108] and olives [27]. Many herbs and spices
containing antioxidant constituents can be useful to prevent rancidity of
meat and fish products [109-112]. Fibre also has antioxidant activity,
mainly due to the presence of phenolic metabolites linked to the
polysaccharides [87]. Thus, the antioxidant activity of barley leaves [93],
pineapple peel fibre [113] and rice-hull [114] have been described.
Polyphenols are responsible for most of the antioxidant activity of the
above mentioned food products. Spices have been used since ancient
times to prevent the rancidity of fish and meat products, as well as to
provide an appealing flavour. In recent publications, it has been
demonstrated that the antioxidant activity of herbs and spices is mainly
due to antioxidant phenolics and to other secondary metabolites. These
plant polyphenols inhibit the oxidative rancidity of frozen cooked fish
flakes [112], salted cooked ground fish [115], meat lipids [116] and lard
[117]. In a recent paper, the effect of tea and green tea catechins and
extracts in the prevention of oxidation in a fish meat model system was
demonstrated [118]. Epigallocatechin gallate and epicatechin gallate were
the most active compounds, which, in turn, were more antioxidant than
epigallocatechin and, particularly, than epicatechin. The antioxidant
activity of green tea phenolics and extracts and the flavonol myricetin was
also tested in oil-in-water emulsions, where they showed a high activity
[119]. However, some flavonoids may exhibit a pro-oxidant effect in the
presence of ferric ion [119].
Antioxidant activity has been reported for different structural groups of
phenolic secondary metabolites.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 771
Benzoic Acids
The antioxidant activity of gallic acid (Fig. 5) and of its methyl, propyl
and lauryl esters has been reported [120]. These compounds decreased the
peroxidation of brain phospholipids, although under some conditions they
acted as pro-oxidants. Gallic acid is a common constituent of gallotannins
(hydrolysable tannins), and is present in the form of polymers in many
plant products. Ellagic acid is a gallic acid dimeric derivative, v^hich
occurs in many plants, and is derived from ellagitannins. Its antioxidant
activity has been demonstrated, in the inhibition of lipid peroxidation in
rat liver microsomes [121]. This activity was higher than that of the
related substances, hexahydroxydiphenic acid (Fig. 5) and ellagic acid
tetraacetate. Food processing releases ellagic and gallic acids from their
respective polymers, and probably increases the antioxidant activity and
nutritional interest of the processed products.
Caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and sinapic acids (Fig. 4) and their esters and
glycosides have all shown interesting antioxidant activity [122; 123]. 3,5-
Dicaffeoyl-4-succinylquinic acid and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid
(isochlorogenic acid) showed antioxidant activity in a P-carotene-linoleate
method [123].
Five dicaffeoyl quinic acid derivatives, mono- and di-acylated with
succinic acid, were isolated from an edible root used in Japan (Arctium
lappaa L.). Their antioxidant activity increased with the number of
caffeoyl residues per molecule and was in all cases higher than that of a-
tocopherol[88]. The succinyl residues had no effect on this activity. In
another recent experiment, the antioxidant activity of caffeic and ferulic
acids, their phenylethyl esters, rosmarinic acid (a caffeic acid dimer) and
chlorogenic acid was evaluated in lard [122], and their activities were
compared with those of a-tocopherol and BHT. All the compounds
significantly prolonged the induction time of lipid oxidation in lard.
Caffeic and rosmarinic acids were the most active. When the lipid
substrate was changed to com oil, the induction time decreased and the
most powerful antioxidant was rosmarinic acid, which also was the most
active in scavenging free radicals in an in vitro assay (DPPH assay, see
above). Chlorogenic acid was less effective than caffeic acid in the three
models.
Ferulic acid and ester combinations may also be components of fibre.
When the effect of these compounds on LDL oxidation was recently
tested [87], ferulic acid, when added as free acid, showed little antioxidant
effect. However, ferulic acid sugar esters had a positive effect. Both facts
together indicate that affinity of the LDL particle for the bound ferulic
acid is important for the antioxidant effect. It has also been reported that
772 T O M A S - B A R B E R A N et aL
the antioxidants present in Japanese sake are ferulic acid sugar esters,
which are cell-wall fragments of rice solubilised from insoluble dietary
fibre by enzymatic hydrolysis [87].
Catechins (FIavan-3-ols)
Extensive research has been carried out into catechins, since they are the
principal responsible compounds for the antioxidant activity of tea and
wine. In a recent paper, the antioxidant activity of epigallocatechin (Fig.
3), epigallocatechin gallate, epicatechin gallate, epicatechin and catechin
was tested in different lipid systems [108] and was compared to that of
gallic acid and propylgallate. It was found that the efficacy of these
compounds as antioxidant varies with the system used. Thus, in com oil
triglycerides oxidised at 50^C, epigallocatechin, epigallocatechin gallate
and epicatechin gallate showed higher activity than epicatechin and
catechin, which have a lower number of hydroxyls per molecule. In com
oil-in-water emulsions, all tea catechins, gallic acid and propylgallate
acted as pro-oxidants at 5 and 20 ^M by accelerating hydroperoxide and
hexanal production. In soy lecithin liposomes oxidised at 50^C,
epigallocatechin gallate and propylgallate were the best antioxidants.
However, when the liposomes were oxidised at 37^C with cupric acetate,
catechin and epicatechin were better than epicatechingallate, while
epigallocatechingallate, epigallocatechin, propylgallate and gallic acid
promoted lipid oxidation. The better antioxidant activity observed for tea
catechins in liposomes than in emulsions can be explained by the greater
affinity of the polar catechins towards the polar surface of the lecithin
bilayers.
Anthocyanin Pigments
Epidemiological Studies
During the last 25-30 years several epidemiological studies have been
carried out in different countries in an attempt to evaluate the effect of
dietary habits on the development of coronary heart disease. These studies
examined the diet of individuals in the 1960s and recorded mortality by
heart attack during a 25 year follow-up. Recent studies, using modem
analytical techniques, have evaluated the average flavonoid and flavone
intake as it would have been around 1960 in 16 cohorts participating in the
Seven Countries Study. It was found that the average flavonol and flavone
intake was inversely correlated to the rate of mortality due to coronary
heart disease [138]. The intake of flavonols and flavones, together with
smoking and the intake of saturated fat, explained about 90% of the
variance in coronary heart mortality rates in the 16 cohorts.
In addition, five prospective within-population cohort studies have
been carried out, four of them on coronary heart disease and one on
strokes. The four coronary heart disease studies were carried out in The
Netherlands (Zutphen) [139], the USA (Health Professionals study) [140],
the U.K. (the Caerphilly study) [141], and Finland [142]. In the Zutphen
study, coronary heart disease was inversely associated with flavonol
intake, in which a maximum intake of 42 mg/day and a minimum of
12mg/day were recorded. A clear dose-response correlation was observed.
In the Health Professionals study, a modest non-significant inverse
association was found (flavonoid intake between 40 mg/day and 7
mg/day). The Finnish study indicated a weak inversely associated
correlation, while the Caerphilly study involving Welsh men showed that
flavonoid intake increased the mortality.
The authors of the Caerphilly study offered the following possible
explanation for the increase in mortality found in those individuals with a
higherflavonoidintake. The main source of phenolics in the individuals of
the Caerphilly study was tea. However, the subjects used milk in their tea
776 TOMAS-BARBERAN et al
and it is known that milk proteins form complexes with flavonoids that
inhibit their absorption. The intake of tea with no added milk indeed
raised plasma antioxidant capacity in volunteers whereas tea with milk did
not [143], However, the lack of absorption is an insufficient explanation
since plasma concentrations of catechins and quercetin in volunteers given
tea were the same whether the tea contained milk or not [12].
The only epidemiological study on stroke was that undertaken in
Zutphen and this also showed that flavonoid intake reduced considerably
the risk of stroke [144].
To summarise, from the available epidemiological studies, 3 out of 5
indicate the protective role of flavonoids, one shows that there is no
association, and one indicates a positive association of flavonoid intake
with the development of coronary heart disease. These results show that
the evidence obtained is not conclusive and that more studies need to be
carried out.
It is possible, however, that an evaluation of dietary flavonoid intake
today, with currently used cultivars, postharvest technological treatments,
storage conditions and processing, should not be compared with the intake
arising from the products available during the time in which the above
studies were performed. Present cultivars are grown under controlled
environmental conditions in greenhouses to avoid environmental stress,
using treatments to protect plants from pests and with irrigation and
nutritional conditions close to the ideal situation. Plants, therefore, no
longer need to produce phenolic secondary metabolites as defence
mechanisms, and the phenolic content of present day fruit and vegetables
is likely to be very much reduced compared with that of the cultivars
available 25 years ago.
It is also essential to consider how food is ingested, and the possible
effect of combinations of different products. The effect of food proteins on
the absorption, bioavailability and in vivo antioxidant activity of fruit and
vegetable phenolics may be as important as it was in the case of tea [143].
In addition, another point should be considered. What is the real
availability of phenolics to be absorbed in the intestinal tract? The above
mentioned epidemiological studies on the flavonoid content of fruit and
vegetables, were performed on lyophilised material extracted by boiling
with HCl in methanol-water (50%) [68]. These conditions are harsher than
those actually occurring after the ingestion of food, when digestive
enzymes will play a much more important role. Thus, the availability {in
vivo extraction from food) of phenolics in the gastro-intestinal tract, may
be very different from the numbers reported [68].
Bioavailability
to pass through the intestinal wall and resist metabolism in the, liver. The
fraction of molecules that successfully survive these barriers (intestine and
liver) can be considered as bioavailable [138].
Oxidants, such as free radicals, are continuously generated by cells and
have the potential to damage these cells. A steady-state antioxidant
concentration that is sufficiently high to prevent this deleterious oxidation
would be beneficial. Because food is not consumed continuously over 24
hours, the input of dietary antioxidants occurs as a series of pulses
separated by many hours. Rapid elimination of these antioxidants from the
body after a meal would be undesirable and it is feasible that kinetic
parameters vary between foods.
There are three main questions concerning the absorption of phenolics.
First, to what extent are these compounds absorbed from the gastro-
intestinal tract? Which factors affect their absorption? What percentage of
the phenolics present in a given product (fruit, vegetable, processed food,
etc.) are available for absorption after digestion of the product?
The absorption of flavonoids from the diet was long considered to be
negligible, since most of the flavonoid compounds in plants, except
catechins, are bound to sugars as glycosides, and these were considered
non-absorbable [9; 10]. The same can be stated for other phenolic
compounds (phenylpropanoids, anthocyanins, etc.). Studies with germ-
free rats showed that large amounts of unchanged glycosides were
excreted with faeces, whereas only small amounts of glycosides were
found in the faeces of rats with normal microflora [145]. Evidently,
enzymes that can split these predominant P-glycosidic bonds were not
secreted into the gut or present in the intestinal wall. Bacteria in the colon
were able to hydrolyse flavonoid glycosides, but at the same time
degraded the released flavonoid aglycones. Since the absorption capacity
of the colon is far less than that of the small intestine, it was assumed that
only free flavonoids (aglycones) are absorbed in the gut, and that
glycosides are not [137]. This assumption was never seriously questioned
even though there was little evidence to support it.
In the 70s and 80s, balance studies with radioactively labelled
flavonoids were performed to quantify the rate of absorption of different
compounds including catechins, quercetin and flavanones (aglycones in
all cases) in different mammals including man. Different absorption rates
were detected depending on the flavonoid type. Thus, catechin was well
absorbed since 47% to 58% of the administered radioactivity was excreted
in urine. Quercetin was less well absorbed than catechins and only 4-13%
of the administered radioactivity was recovered with urine, while around
40% was excreted with faeces. The absorption of flavanones was higher
with 30% being excreted with urine [137].
The absorption of flavonoids from food was recently studied by
Hollman et al [146], who studied the absorption of onion quercetin
derivatives after the administration of onion. To circumvent the problem
778 TOMAS-BARBERAN et aL
Metabolism
of polyphenols from the scald affected zones was due to the reduction of
quercetin aglycone to flavan-3,4-diol followed by a production of
polymeric compounds [158]. When 'Granny Smith' apples were wounded
with a hypodermic needle prior to cold storage for 7 months at O^C, no
superficial scald developed in the tissues adjacent to the wounded areas,
while non-wounded tissue developed scald on greater than 60% of the
apple surface. The increase in antioxidant hydroxycinnamic acid
derivatives in the wound area suggests that it was this type of compounds
which was responsible for scald prevention [159].
There are several reports in which the anthocyanin pigments of fruits
and vegetables increased during cold storage. The concentration of
anthocyanins of the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton)
increased by 18% after 2 weeks at l^C [160], and the total anthocyanin
concentration of pomegranate arils increased during storage in air and was
significantly different from the initial value after 4 weeks' storage at lO^C
[161]. This increase was associated with an increase in the key enzyme of
phenolic metabolism, phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) [161].
Some vegetables, such as onions or potatoes, are stored at room
temperature. In the case of onions, this storage starts after a curing
(drying) process. When the effect of curing and storage on the flavonol
composition of two onion cultivars (Red Baron and Crossbow) was
studied [76], a 50% loss of quercetin 4'-monoglucoside was observed
during the initial drying process (curing). However, there was little change
in the phenolic content and composition during 6 months of storage.
Controlled Atmospheres
Some fruit and vegetables are stored under atmospheres enriched in CO2
and with reduced levels of O2. These storage conditions have a marked
effect on phenolic metabolism and phenolic composition. Thus, 'Williams'
pears stored in air accumulate more phenolics than fruits stored under
controlled atmospheres (1% COj-P/o O2 and 3% C02-3%02). A
controlled atmosphere, then, strongly reduces the ability of pears to
synthesise phenolic compounds [153].
Carbon dioxide-enriched atmospheres (10-20% CO2 in air) are used to
extend the postharvest life of strawberries [162]. However, some adverse
effects on colour, mainly a reduction in the intensity of red of the internal
tissue, have been reported. Changes in strawberry anthocyanins and other
polyphenols in response to carbon dioxide treatments have been studied
[36]. The external and internal anthocyanin contents were significantly
different in fruit stored in air compared with the initial values or with
those of fruit stored under CO2 enriched atmosphere. No differences in the
external anthocyanin content between fruit stored under C02-enriched
atmospheres and freshly picked fruit were observed. However, there was a
noticeable decrease in the internal anthocyanin content, particularly at 20
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 783
Minimal Processing
Domestic Processing
REFERENCES
[1] Verlangieri, A.J.; Kapeghian, J.C.; el-Dean, S.; Bush, M. MedHypoth. 1985,16,
7-15.
790 TOMAS-BARBERAN et al
[36] Gil, M.I.; Holcroft, D.M.; Kader, A.A. J.Agric.Food Chem, 1997, 45, 1662-
1667.
[37] El-Negoumy, S.I. Fitoterapia 1987, 58, 178-180.
[38] Herrmann, K. ZLebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1978,167, 262-273.
[39] Lattanzio, V.; Cardinalli, A.; Di Venere, D.; Linsalata, V.; Palmieri, S. Food
Chem. 1994,50,1-7.
[40] Winter, M.; Brandl, W.; Herrmann, K. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1987,184,
11-16.
[41 ] Adzet, T.; Camarasa, J.; Laguna, J.C. J.Nat.Prod. 1987, 50, 612-617.
[42] Woldecke, M.; Herrmann, K. Z.Lebensm, Unters.-Forsch, 1974,155, 151-154.
[43] Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1977,165, 151-164.
[44] Babic, I.; Amiot, M.J.; Nguyen-The, C ; Aubert, S. J.Food Scl 1993,58, 351-
356.
[45] Babic, I.; Amiot, M.J.; Nguyen-The, C ; Aubert, S. J.Food Sci. 1993, 58, 840-
841.
[46] Mercier, J.; Kuc, J. J.Sci.FoodAgric. 1997, 73, 60-62.
[47] El-Moghazi, A.M.; Ross, S.A.; Halim, A.F.; Abou-Rayya, A. Planta Med. 1980,
40, 382-383.
[48] Galensa, R.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1979,169, 170-172.
[49] Crozier, A.; Lean, M.E.J.; McDonald, M.S.; Black, C. J.Agric.Food Chem.
1997, 45, 590-595.
[50] Hertog, M. G. L. Flavonols and flavones in foods and their relation with cancer
and coronary heart disease risk. 1-149. 1994. Wageningen University. Thesis.
[51] Stohr, H.; Herrmann, K. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1975,159, 219-224.
[52] Brandl, W.; Galensa, R.; Herrmann, K. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1983,177,
325-327.
[53] Rober, M.; Pydde, £.; Knorr, D. Lebensm.-Wiss.u.-Technol 1991,24,466-468.
[54] Nigg, H.N.; Strandberg, J.O.; Beier, R.C.; Petersen, H.D.; Harrison, J.M.
JAgric.Food Chem. 1997,45, 1430-1436.
[55] Schmidtlein, H.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch, 1975,159,139-148.
[56] Brandl, W.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1983,176, 444-447.
[57] Wildanger, W.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1973,152, 134-137.
[58] Bilyk, A.; Sapers, G.M. JAgric.Food Chem. 1985, 33, 226-228.
[59] Tanchev, S.S.; Timberlake, C.F. Phytochemistry 1969, 8, 1825-1827.
[60] Hrazdina, G.; Iredale, H.; Mattick, L.R. Phytochemistry 1977,16,297-299.
[61] Guo, C ; Cao, G.; Sofic, E.; Prior, R.L. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 1787-
1796.
[62] Diallinas, G.; Kanellis, A.K. Plant Mol.Biol. 1994, 26,473-479.
[63] Winter, M.; Herrmann, K. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1986, 34,616-620.
[64] Schmidtlein, H.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1975,159, 255-263.
[65] Starke, H.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1976,161, 25-30.
[66] Woldecke, M.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1974, 75(5, 153-157.
[67] Ferreres, F.; Gil, M.I.; Castaner, M.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A. J.Agric.Food Chem.
1997, 45,
[68] Hertog, M.G.L.; Hollman, P.C.H.; Katan, M.B. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1992, 40,
2379-2383.
[69] Yamaguchi, M.A.; Kawanobu, S.; Maki, T.; Ino, I. Phytochemistry 1996, 42,
661-663.
[70] Iwagami, S.; Sawabe, Y.; Nakagawa, T. Shoyakugaku Zasshi 1992, 46 , 339-
347.
792 T O M A S - B A R B E R A N et aL
[71] Ke, D.; Saltveit, M.E. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 1136-1140.
[72] Tomas-Barberan, F.A.; Loaiza-Velarde, J.; Bonfanti, A.; Saltveit, M.E.
J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1997, 722, 399-404.
[73] Starke, H.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm.Unters.-Forsch, 1976,161, 137-142.
[74] Bilyk, A.; Cooper, P.L.; Sapers, G.M. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1984, 32, 274-276.
[75] Ferreres, P.; Gil, M.I.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A. Food Res.Int 1996,
[76] Price, K.R.; Bacon, J.R.; Rhodes, M.J.C. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 938-
942.
[77] Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1977,165, 87-98.
[78] Woldecke, M.; Herrmann, K. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1974, 755 (4), 216-
219.
[79] Sachse, J. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-Forsch. 1973, 753, 294-300.
[80] Brandl, W.; Herrmann, K. ZLebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 1984, 7 78, 192-194.
[81 ] Aritomi, M.; Kawasaki, T. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2043-2047.
[82] Aritomi, M.; Komori, T.; Kawasaki, T. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 231-234.
[83] Ferreres, P.; Castaner, M.; Tomas-Barberan, F.A. Phytochemistry 1997, 45,
1701-1705.
[84] Lindeberg, J. Food Chem. 1996, 55, 73-94.
[85] Krause, M.; Galensa, R. ZLebensm. Unters.Forsch. 1992,194, 29-32.
[86] Leake, D.S.In Phytochemistry of Fruit and Vegetables', Tomas-Barberan, F.A.,
Robins, R.J., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1997; pp 287-311.
[87] Ohta, T.; Semboku, N.; Kuchii, A.; Egashira, Y.; Sanada, H. J.Agric.Food
Chem. 1997,^5,1644-1648.
[88] Maruta, Y.; Kawabata, J.; Niki, R. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1995, 43, 2592-2595.
[89] Murase, H.; Nagao, A.; Terao, J. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1993, 41, 1601-1604.
[90] Osawa, T.; Namiki, M. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1985, 33, lll-im.
[91] Tamura, H.; Yamagami, A. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1994, 42, 1612-1615.
[92] Frankel, E.N.; German, J.B.; Davis, P.A. Lipids 1997, 27, 1047-1051.
[93] Kitta, K.; Hagiwara, Y.; Shibamoto, T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1992, 40, 1843-
1845.
[94] Tsuda, T.; Watanabe, M.; Ohshima, K.; Norinobu, S.; Choi, S.W.; Kawakishi,
S.; Osawa, T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1994, 42, 2407-2410.
[95] Miller, N.J.; Diplock, A.T.; Rice-Evans, C.A. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1995, 43,
1794-1801.
[96] Amao, M.B.; Cano, A.; Hernandez-Ruiz, J.; Garcia-Canovas, P.; Acosta, M.
AnaUBiochem 1997, 236, 255-261.
[97] Bondet, V.; Brand-Williams, W.; Berset, C. Lebensm.-Wiss.u.-Technol 1997,
50,609-615.
[98] Hertog, M.G.L.; van Poppel, G.; Verhoeven, D.In Phytochemistry of Fruit and
Vegetables', Tomas-Barberan, F.A., Robins, R.J., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford,
1997; pp 313-329.
[99] Cao, G.; Sofic, E.; Prior, R.L. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1996, 44, 3426-3431.
[100] Miyake, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Osawa, T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3738-
3742.
[101] Larrauri, J.A.; Ruperez, P.; Saura-Calixto, F. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45,
1390-1393.
[102] Kanner, J.; Frankel, E.; Granit, R.; German, B.; Kinsella, J.E. J.Agric.Food
Chem. 1994, 42, 64-69.
[103] Waterhouse, A.L. Chem.Ind 1995, 338-341.
[104] Simonetti, P.; Pietta, P.; Testolin, G. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 1152-1155.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 793
[105] Soleas, G.J.; Tomlison, G.; Diamandis, E.P.; Goldberg, D.M. J.Agric.Food
Chem. 1997,45, 3995-4003.
[106] Frankel, E.N.; Waterhouse, A.L.; Teissedre, P.L. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1995, 43,
890-894.
[107] Hurtado, I.; Caldu, P.; Gonzalo, A.; Ramon, J.M.; Minguez, S.; Fiol, C.
J.Agric.Food Chem. \991,45, 1283-1289.
[108] Huang, S.W.; Frankel, E.N. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3033-3038.
[109] Vekiari, S.A.; Oreopoulou, V.; Tzia, C ; Thomopoulos, C D . J.Amer.Oil
Chem.Soc 1993, 70,483-487.
[110] Miura, K.; Nakatani, N. Agric.Biol.Chem. 1989, 53, 3043-3045.
[111] Lyckander, I.M.; Malterud, K.E. Acta Pharm.Nord 1992, 4, 159-166.
[112] Boyd, R.; Green, D.P.; Giesbrecht, F.B.; King, M.F. J Sci FoodAgric 1993,6],
87-93.
[113] Larrauri, J.A.; Ruperez, P.; Saura-Calixto, F. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45,
4028-4031.
[114] Ramarathnam, N.; Osawa, T.; Namiki, M.; Kawakishi, S. J.Agric.Food Chem.
1989,57,316-319.
[115] Ramanathan, L.; Das, N.P. J.FoodSci. 1993, 58, 318-320.
[116] Shahidi, F.; Zheng, Y.; Saleemi, Z.O. J.FoodLipids 1993,1,69-78.
[117] Dziedzic, S.Z.; Hudson, B.J.F.; Barbers, G. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1985, 33, 244-
246.
[118] He, Y.; Shahidi, F. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45,4262-4266.
[119] Roedig-Penman, A.; Gordon, M.H. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45, 4267-4270.
[120] Aruoma, O.I.; Murcia, A.; Butler, J.; Halliwell, B. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1993,
41,1880-1885.
[121] Osawa, T.; Ide, A.; Su, J.D.; Namiki, M. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1987, 35, 808-
812.
[122] Chen, J.H.; Ho, C.T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1997, 45,2374-2378.
[123] Chuda, Y.; Ono, H.; Ohnishi-Kameyama, M.; Nagata, T.; Tsushida, T.
J.Agric.Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2037-2039.
[124] Igile, G.O.; Oleszek, W.; Jurzysta, M.; Burda, S.; Fafunso, M.; Fasanmade, A.A.
J.Agric.Food Chem. 1994, 42, 2445-2448.
[125] Kitta, K.; Hagiwara, Y.; Shibamoto, T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1992, 40, 1843-
1845.
[126] Miyake, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Morimitsu, Y.; Osawa, T. J.Agric.Food Chem.
1997, 45,4619-4623.
[127] Igarash, K.; Yoshida, T.; Suzuki, F. J.Jap.Soc.FoodSclTechnol. 1993, 40, 138-
143.
[128] Tsuda, T.; Ohshima, K.; Kawakishi, S.; Osawa, T. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1994,
-^2, 248-251.
[129] Wiseman, S.; Mathot, J.; de Fouw, N.; Tijburg, L. Atherosclerosis 1996,120,
15-23.
[130] Vinson, J.A.; Jang, J.; Dabbagh, Y.A.; Serry, M.M.; Cai, S. J.Agric.Food Chem.
1995, 43,2798-2799.
[131] Faure, M.; Lissi, E.; Torres, R.; Videla, L.A. Phytochemistry 1990,29, 7)117,-
3115.
[132] Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. FoodSci.Technol.(London)
1995,28,25-30.
[133] Cao, G.; Sofic, E.; Prior, R.L. Free Radical Biol.Med 1997,22, 749-760.
794 T O M A S - B A R B E R A N et al
[134] Chen, Z.; Chan, P.; Ho- KY; Fung, K.; Wang, J. Chem-Phys-Lipids 1996, 79,
157-163.
[135] Nagai, N.; Nakai, A.; Nagata, K. Biochem-Biophys-Res-Comnum 1995, 208,
1099-1105.
[136] Rice-Evans, C.A.; Miller, N.J.; Paganga, G. Free Radical BiolMed. 1996, 20,
933-956.
[1) Hollman, P. C. H. Determinants of the absorption of the dietary flavonoid
quercetin in man. 1-187. 1997. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen. Thesis.
[2) Hertog, M.G.L.; Kromhout, D.; Aravanis, C ; Blackburn, H.; Buzina, R.
Arch.Intern,Med 1995,155, 381-386.
[137] Hertog, M.G.L.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Hollman, P.C.H.; Katan, M.B.; Kromhout, D.
The Lancet 1993, 342, 1007-1011.
[138] Rimm, E.B.; Katan, M.B.; Ascherio, A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C.
Ann.Intern.Med 1996,125, 384-389.
[139] Hertog, M.; Feskens, E.; Hollman, P.; Katan, M.; Kromhout, D. Lancet. 1993,
5^2,1007-1011.
[140] Knekt, P.; Jarvinen, R.; Reunanen, A.; Maatela, J. Br.Med.J. 1996, 312, 478-
481.
[141] Serafini, M.; Ghiselli, A.; Ferro-Luzzi, A. Eur,J.Clin.Nutr. 1996, 50,28-32.
[142] Keli, S.O.; Hertog, M.G.L.; Feskens, E.J.M.; Kromhout, D. Arch.Intern.Med.
1996,156, 637-642.
[143] Griffiths, L.A.; Barrow, A. Biochem J1972,130, 1161-1162.
[144] Hollman, P.C; de Vries, J.H.M.; van Leeuwen, S.D.; Mengelers, M.J.B.; Katan,
M.B.Am.J.Clin.Nutr. 1995,62, 1276-1282.
[145] Hackett, A.M.; Marsch, I.; Barrow, A.; Griffiths, L.A. Xenobiotica 1979,9,491-
501.
[146] Okushio, K.; Matsumoto, N.; Kohri, T.; zuki, M.; njo, F.; ara, Y.
Biol.Pharm.Bull 1996,19, 326-329.
[147] Lee, M.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Sun, Y.; Gobbo, S.; Balantine, D.A.;
Yand, C.S. Cancer Epidemiol.Biomark.Prev. 1995, 4, 393-399.
[148] Lembke, B.; Kinawi, A.; Wurm, G. Arch.Pharm. 1994, 327, 467-468.
[149] Hollman, P.C.H.; Katan, M.B.In Flavonoids in health and disease', Rice-Evans,
C.A., Packer, L., Eds.; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1997; pp in press
[150] Lattanzio, V.; Van Sumere, C.F. Food Chem. 1987, 24, 37-50.
[151] Amiot, M.J.; Tacchini, M.; Aubert, S.; Oleszek, W. J.Agric.Food Chem. 1995,
^5,1132-1137.
[152] Blakenship, S.M.; Richardson, D.G. J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1985,110, 336-339.
[153] Perez-Ilzarbe, J.; Hernandez, T.; Estrella, L; Vendrell, M. Z.Lebensm.Unters.-
Forsch. 1997, 204, 52-55.
[154] Coseteng, M.Y.; Lee, C.Y. J.FoodSci. 1987,52, 985-989.
[155] Golding, J.B.; McGlasson, W.B.; Leach, D.N.; Wyllie, S.G. Proceedings of the
ISHS Postharvest 96,1996.
[156] Piretti, M.V.; Gallerani, G.; Brodnik, U. Postharvest Biology and Technology
1996,5,11-18.
[157] Abdalla, A.Y.; Gil, M.L; Biasi, W.; Mitchan, E.J. Postharvest Biology and
Technology 1997,
[158] Kalt, W.; McDonald, J.E. J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1996,121, 142-146.
[159] Holcroft, D.M.; Gil, M.L; Kader, A.A. J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1997,
[160] Kader, A.A. Food Technol. 1986, 40, 99-100-102-104.
[161] Lin, T.Y.; Koehler, P.E.; Shewfelt, R.L. J.FoodSci. 1989, 54,405-407.
ANTIOXIDANT PHENOLIC METABOLITES 795