Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Migrant Puerto Rican Lesbians Negotiating Gender, Sexuality, and Ethnonationality
Migrant Puerto Rican Lesbians Negotiating Gender, Sexuality, and Ethnonationality
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to NWSA Journal
This article is based on a study with thirty-two Puerto Rican lesbians who
migrated from Puerto Rico to either New York City (NYC) or Hartford,
CT. It addresses these women's experiences in dealing with their gender,
sexuality, ethnonationality, race/color, socioeconomic status, and migra
tion. Social science research on Latina lesbians, in particular migrant
Puerto Rican lesbians, has been scant to nonexistent. Their experiences,
however, help us to understand the complex relationship between mul
tiple minority statuses, points of oppressions, and lived experiences. The
data were collected and analyzed using a feminist standpoint perspective
as well as an intersectionality framework. The findings show how these
women's negotiation of their multiple identities and sexuality is influ
enced by socioeconomic status, gender performance, race/color, and geo
graphical locations. While these women exhibited varying levels of resil
ience, almost all of the women found it difficult to obtain acceptance or
a place for their multiple identities to be equally addressed or respected.
The lives of Puerto Rican lesbians (or women who have sex with women?
WSW) have not been readily addressed in the social science literature. In
fact, within the social science literature, research on Latina lesbians (and
WSW) in general has been scant. Only a handful of empirical studies over
the last thirty years have focused on the experiences of Latina WSW (for
example, Acosta 2008; Arg?elles and Rivero 1993; Espin 1999; Hidalgo
and Hidalgo-Christensen 1976-1977; Whitam et al. 1998). Due to this
overall lack of research on Latina lesbians, we have ignored many of the
contributions to social science inquiry that their lives and experiences
could bring to our understanding of gender, race, culture, sexuality, and
issues of multiple identities and oppressions. Their relative invisibility
from the social and behavioral science literature is not only a disservice
to their lives but to the larger knowledge to be garnered in understanding
their experiences. Much of what we have come to understand about Latina
lesbians has been provided by autobiographical work, literary analysis, and
cultural studies (for example, Esquibel 2006; Moraga and Anzald?a 2002;
Ramos 1987; Torres 2007; Torres and Pertusa 2003). While these works
are rich and have presented intellectually intriguing accounts that have
significance for Puerto Rican people than for other Latina/os (Duany
2003). Ramon Grosfoguel (1997) noted that ethnonationality may be a
better term or conceptualization of the Puerto Rican experience since it
"accommodates the Puerto Ricans' diverse and peculiar subject positions
better than that of nation" (74-75).
While Puerto Rico is not technically a nation, nationalistic discourses
abound including those related to the masculinity of the State and Puerto
Rican womanhood. Interwoven in these discourses are not only ideologi
cal convictions associated with national identity but the Island's political
relationship with the United States. In the case of the backlash against
feminism in the 1960s in Puerto Rico, feminism was conceptualized as
another form of cultural colonialism by the United States as well as a
threat to Puerto Rican men's masculinity and heteronormativity (Crespo
2001). Accordingly, Puerto Rico has been described as culturally intoler
ant of homosexuality (Cunningham 1989). Pico (1980) has described the
maintenance of a male-dominated nationalistic ideology as a defense
mechanism forged against the cultural and economic colonialism during
the first decades of U.S. domination in Puerto Rico. Thus, Puerto Rican
lesbians simply by their identities as lesbians challenge a nationalistic
discourse embedded in the conceptualization surrounding Puerto Rican
(heterosexual) "womanhood" and notions of family.
At the level of the family, general research on Latina/o families has
shown a greater importance placed on family and family interdependence
among Latina/os as compared with Anglos (Garcia-Preto 2005; Zambrana
1995). Within the family, heteronormative gender and sexuality-related
messages and behaviors are supported either by being voiced directly or
through the silences in gender and sexual discourses (Acosta 2008; Car
rillo 2002; Hurtado 2003; Zavella 2003). Within these verbal and nonver
bal communications, the importance of virginity, marriage, motherhood,
and domesticity is highlighted for young girls and women. In addition
to the elevation of these states for women, there are also cautionary
verbal and nonverbal messages about the dangers of transgressing the
boundaries of heteronormativity for women (Zavella 2003). There is
evidence, however, that women subvert cultural and social conventions
by behaving in a manner that contradicts cultural expectations, in par
ticular the popular imagined notion of Latinas as passive and showing
little agency in their familial and romantic relationships (Gonzalez-Lopez
2005). Latina lesbians can also subvert cultural and social conventions
by manipulating these expectations to create spaces to hide their desires
and activities. For example, Elizabeth Crespo-Kebler (2003) in interviews
with Puerto Rican lesbians raised in the 1920s-1940s found that some
of the women used the expectation of female disinterest in sex to limit
or end sexual contacts with their husbands while engaging in sexual
relationships with women.
shapes their social lives, and their social lives structure their environments
(Aldrich 2004; Hayden 1995; Mitchell 2000). Although some research has
been conducted focusing on urban gay and lesbian identities and commu
nities, many neglected areas remain, such as sexualities in small towns
and rural environments as well as the connections between sexuality,
space, and other social markers (for example, race/ethnicity) (Knopp 1995).
Sexual identities are constructed and flexible; they create opportunities for
self-definition as well as constraints (Carrillo 2002). Their shape remains
to be investigated in local and varied contexts.
The perspective utilized in this paper is one of applying a contempo
rary understanding of feminist standpoint theory, acknowledging all the
problems and trappings of seeking to explore any possible commonalities
around women's experiences given their varying positions in society and
issues of power. J. T. Wood (qtd. in O'Brien Hallstein 2000) argues that
"moving away from the distorting practice of simply including neglected
groups in research, standpoint theory uses marginalized lives as the start
ing point from which to frame research questions, concepts, develop
designs, define what counts as data, and interpret findings" (8). Also, I
employ as an analytic tool intersectionality, which has been useful in fem
inist and anti-racist scholarship. Intersectionality, defined as "the notion
that subjectivity is constituted by mutually reinforcing vectors of race,
gender, class, and sexuality, has emerged as the primary theoretical tool
designed to combat feminist hierarchy, hegemony, and exclusivity" (Nash
2008, 2). As Patricia Hill Collins (2000) notes, "[Sjexualities constructed
in conjunction with an unquestioned heterosexism become manipulated
within class, race, gender, and nation as distinctive systems of oppression"
(132). There are critiques of both the "under theorizing" and marginal
ization of lesbians (Calhoun 1995) and women of color (Collins 2000) in
feminist discourses. Thus, there are concerns about the adequacy of any
contemporary feminist theory to fully capture the experiences of lesbians,
and, even more, lesbians of color.
In this paper, however, my focus is to explore the lived experiences of
migrant Puerto Rican lesbians as they deal with their identities as women,
lesbians, and Puerto Ricans, as well as others, and the negotiation of their
identities. To this end, the paper attempts to add to future debates about
lesbian experience and the intersection with gender, race, class, migration,
and geography. To quote Cindy Cruz (2001), "[Situating knowledge in
the brown body begins the validation of the narratives of survival, trans
formation, and emancipation of our respective communities, reclaiming
histories and identities. And in these ways, we embody our theory" (668).
That I had to help out with the cooking while my brother played outside. I knew
that I could not go to some of the places my brothers went. My mother was
always more concerned about where I had been and what I had been doing. I
needed to come straight home from school. My parents didn't want the neighbor
to think I was a callejera [a girl of the streets/'^oose"]. They wanted me to be
seen as a good girl that should be respected.
Many of the women reported that the important messages from their
upbringing included that they behave gender appropriately, stay close to
home, and maintain a reputation as a good girl. Most of them also acknowl
edged that these expectations were different than those for their male
counterparts. While a few enjoyed those roles and did not question the
differences in treatment based on gender, many of the women expressed
feeling constrained by those roles. That is to say, these women were not
uniform in the way that they perceived those roles, felt constrained by the
roles, or even challenged the appropriateness of being treated differently.
The majority, however, spoke of wanting more freedoms to be outside,
to be independent, and as they grew older, to be given more freedom to
express their sexuality. Many of them challenged these perceived limita
tions by staying out late or by verbal confrontations with family about
the fairness of those expectations, and/or by silently strategizing a way to
move away from the "control" of family and neighbors.
Veronica:
I knew that as long as I stayed close to my family and in my town I would never
have any freedom. I knew since I was a little girl that I was going to move to
San Juan and attend the university so I [could] create a life for myself.
Only a few of the women identified in terms of race. In fact, the vast
majority of women had trouble in understanding themselves in terms of
racial categories but rather understood that being Puerto Rican was,
many ways, a racialized category. That is to say, they became more aw
once they migrated to the States that regardless of skin color, they w
not perceived as white. For some this created conflicts in the way th
thought of themselves and their identity.
Janet:
They don't treat me like I am white. I don't see myself in terms of a race. I am
a Puerto Rican woman. ... In Puerto Rico, we don't think like that.
It is important to point out that the few women who identified them
selves clearly as ethnically Puerto Rican as well as identifying separately
in terms of race, also identified as black.
Eliana:
Soy puertorriquena y negra. People here always think I am from Jamaica or
Trinidad. When I go to bodegas in the neighborhood, I get strange looks from
the store people. They sometimes speak Spanish like I don't understand. . . .
When I was in Puerto Rico, they knew I was Puerto Rican but I was too dark to
be seen as the same [as lighter-skinned Puerto Ricans]. For me, I am aware that
being dark makes me different no matter where I am.
Maria:
I always knew. From the time I was little, I always knew. I was always looking
at mis primas [my female cousins] and wanting to just look at them dressing
and undressing. I always wanted to be outside with the boys and my mother
was always running after me not understanding my need to be outside and be
free all the time.
Alejandra:
It wasn't anything I thought about, you know, I liked boys. I liked going out,
dressing up. I just got married young. Too young. I would not want my daugh
ters married as young as I was. I was unhappy but I never knew why. It was not
until I left my husband, we were already here [Stateside] that I realized I was
attracted to women. Well, not women, a woman. She was a lesbian, real butch,
very shy. We became friends and then at thirty-three with three small children
I got involved with her. It was terrible. I didn't know what to do. I did not want
anybody to know. I was worried about my children and my family in Puerto
Rico. I was sure they would blame my moving here and being away from them
as making me lose my morals.
In Alexandra's narrative, not only does she discuss her sexual involve
ment with a woman later in her life through her attraction to a lesbian,
but her concerns about her family knowing what was going on with
her life were connected to concerns with her having migrated. As Espin
(1997) notes, "[I]n many immigrant communities, being 'Americanized' is
derogatorily synonymous with being sexually promiscuous" (189). Thus,
in this case, her decision to move from Puerto Rico and the sexuality she
was now experiencing was somehow linked to either the "corrupting"
influence of living in the States or the problems associated with being
away from the family's watchful eyes.
The women in this study spoke of their growing-up experiences in
hindsight; therefore, the narratives of their identities are part of their
reflections and reconstructions of their experiences. As such, they are a
reflection of how they perceive their own development of their identities.
Their views of what identities came to the foreground of their conscious
ness and how they dealt with it also reflect their own particular struggles.
When asked how they saw their identities as Puerto Rican lesbians (or
women in a sexual relationship with other women), many of the women
described their emerging identities in a similar sequence as Olga whose
response was, "I was a woman first, then a Puerto Rican, and then a les
bian, and now I am all." That is to say, Olga felt that her earliest memories
involved being aware that as a female she was different than the males
around her. Later that identity felt merged with a sense of being a Puerto
Rican woman. For her as well as some others, Puerto Rican-ness had
something to do both with her gender and her humanity as well as politi
cal consciousness. After that, her sexuality was something that she either
Many of the women in this study reported being given more leeway in
terms of gender performance and lack of interest in having a boyfriend
or being married as children and adolescents while growing up in Puerto
Rico. They attributed this greater liberty to their parents7 or guardians7
concerns about female heterosexual sexuality and a relief that they were
not "boy crazy77 and would not get pregnant young. As they grew older,
when there was a greater expectation that they would marry and have
children, any gender nonconformity was seen as more of a problem. As
Lourdes Torres (2007) notes, "[I]n mainstream Puerto Rican culture, where
femininity is expected of women and strictly enforced beginning at an
early age, masculine clothing and behavior mark a woman as generally
other and specifically as lesbian" (241). By early adulthood, they began
receiving more negative responses and pressures to conform. Those who
refused to conform for one reason or another found increased levels of
harassment in the family and in the larger society. Elba, who identifies as
a butch lesbian, stated that she had to act and dress feminine in order to
be taken seriously and maintain her job in Puerto Rico:
I felt that I was in drag. I never wore those clothing except when I went outside
my home. ... I came home and quickly changed. I just wanted to rip that skirt
off and put [on] my pants so I [could] feel like myself. ... If people saw how I
wanted to dress, how I was inside, I would never be given a job, not in Puerto
Rico. A woman needs to look like a woman. I knew that I needed to leave.
Josefa:
When I know I am going to be at a lesbian party I dress up for the lesbians. Pew
if I am going to a non-gay party, I will dress much more traditionally. I will try
to be more traditional so as not to draw attention.
In other words, the level in which a woman could play or was willing to
play with her looks and gender performance also triggered social "accep
tance77 and "rejection" as well as an ability to "fit77 or "not fit77 in the
society.
Socioeconomic Status
unfold across transnational social fields is very much rooted in the class
structures of both sending and receiving countries/places. . . ." (453). The
migrant Puerto Rican lesbians in this study were roughly equally divided
among three broad socioeconomic categories: 1) Middle-class profession
als,- 2) working-class workers, and marginal working-poor,- and 3) those
who were without jobs, reliable housing, and dependent on some form of
public assistance and social services. Among these three groups, there were
differences that seemed to be associated with their socioeconomic status.
This does not mean that all the women in the particular socioeconomic
class were identical but the majority seemed to share some commonalities.
Most of the middle-class, professional Puerto Rican lesbians were more
likely to identify and acknowledge their sexuality and same-sex attrac
tions from a younger age, have never married, had less sex with males,
had better family situations (including lack of violence and drug problems
in their lives as well as having been raised in a two-parent home), and
were less likely to have had children than the other two socioeconomic
categories. Their educations involved college and/or graduate and profes
sional school. Some completed their education in the States. Most were
middle-class in Puerto Rico and a few obtained a more middle-class status
Stateside after completing their degrees. For a few of these women, college
and being seen as "studious," "not boy crazy," and "a serious woman"
also allowed a "cover" for their sexuality and resistance to dating men or
getting married.
Jacqueline:
As long as I told my mother that I wanted to study and that I did not go out
because I have an exam or machos papeles [many papers] to do she was satisfied.
I was not looked [at] as strange but as serious. I was a serious woman. I think
that is why I got so far with my education. As long as I was in school, I did not
have to seriously date since I needed to finish my studies. I was hoping by the
time I finished school I would be too old for them to care anymore [laughing].
Unfortunately, that was not true.
Most of these women reported they were unable to oppose all the social
and family pressures to engage in heterosexual dating, and they needed to
seem as if they were at least trying to find a suitable man with whom to
settle down. Their years of education and professional accomplishments
allowed them to appear to be "choosy" about whom they dated since their
increasing educational status also meant that they had to find a man that
would be as prepared as they were, thus, reducing the frequency and length
of relationships with men. Also, many of these women through their
elevated educational attainment were able to gain financial independence
from their families and to obtain a positive professional identity to balance
against the more negative identities of not being married, and the greater
stigma of being a lesbian.
As Milta noted, "I am respected because soy una mujer bien preparada
[I am a highly educated women]. If I was gay and lived in the streets, then
I would be seen como basura [like garbage]... It would be harder to show
that being gay was not a problem."
The working-class or working-poor lesbians had either some high
school or a high school diploma. They were less likely to deal with their
sexuality in terms of sexual identity,- some of them had had some early
same-sex experience. For these women in particular, it was more common
to have had long-term relationships with men as compared with the other
two categories. Several of these women had migrated Stateside while mar
ried or partnered with men but while in the States began to identify as
lesbian, bisexual, or having a same-sex relationship.
Alicia:
I never thought I would not marry. I got together with Juan and we had two
children. I was happy for awhile with him and the children. Then when we
came here [Stateside] he became different and I changed too. It wasn't until I
was thirty plus and on my own that I got to meet Julia. ... I still don't like to
think of myself as a lesbian. I have been with men. I like men. ... I just [also]
like women.
The last category of migrant Puerto Rican lesbian in this study were
those who were living in poverty (a couple were homeless) with low edu
cational attainment usually consisting of no more than eighth or ninth
grade. Many of these individuals had a history of abuse (both physical
and sexual), family dysfunction, mental health problems, and physical
health concerns at a level unlike the other two socioeconomic groups.
Their issues were greatly complicated because of this history and difficult
social circumstances, including the fact that there were rules in homeless
shelters and drag treatment programs that did not allow for women to be
together inside the program.
Teresa:
I am in a program right here in Hartford. I want to leave it but I am not allowed
because of the courts. I have a girlfriend there too but I can't be with her. It
is against the rules. I just wish we can leave and be together. ... I was living
on the streets after I left home, I sold drugs and I got lots of problems. I take
medication. I don't know how I am going to take care of my girlfriend.
Carmen:
My family is so fucked up they don't care who I am with. They have their prob
lems but they also throw things at my face when they want to annoy me. Like
they say you are such a bull dyke, that's why no man will have you.
While many of the women in these difficult economic and family situ
ations spoke of abuse, maltreatment, and limited job opportunities, a few
were trying very hard to get out of the situations in which they found
themselves, and attributed their relationships with women partners as
giving them support.
Luisa:
I was born very poor, but poor, poor, poor! We had nothing. My mother she was
great trying to keep us fed and together. She looks at my relationship with my
girlfriend and says to me all the time "Mi7ja [my daughter] you did good. You
are with a good woman." She sees that my woman works hard and is there [for
me] better than any man.
Loue and Mendez (2006) in their study of eight Puerto Rican lesbians
who were severely mentally ill noted that a couple of the women spoke
about their lesbianism as being caused by their sexual abuse. While
the researchers noted that there is no research supporting a causal link
between sexual abuse and lesbianism, it raises an important issue which
I also explored with the women who reported childhood sexual abuse.
None of the women who spoke about being abused as a child, includ
ing incest, pointed to their childhood abuse as leading to their sexual
relationships with women or lesbianism. Instead, they tended to report
that the romantic and sexual relationships they had with women as
empowering their lives in some way. Their relationships with women
were discussed independently from their relationships and negative
experiences with men.
In this study, the women at the two extreme sides of the social and
economic spectrum, the economically very well-off and independent of
family support, and the extremely economically deprived with little or
no familial support reported less conflicts around their sexual identities
and self-disclosures than the women situated in the middle where their
economic situation and family connections made them feel vulnerable
and in need of family or social support. This middle group felt they had
more to lose from possible full disclosures of their sexual identities to
their families and at work.
Most of the women moved to the States alone while some of them
moved with their significant others, predominantly male partners. They
arrived having few family members or friends living Stateside. Once State
side, almost all of the women who were lesbians on the Island reported a
shift in how they saw themselves in terms of their identities, as well as
changing sources of oppression and resistance. The most significant shift
was the relative importance or consciousness around their sexual identity
versus ethnic identity. Most women who were lesbian on the Island spoke
of the constraints on their sexuality, the limited venues to meet women,
the secrecy in which they lived their lives as lesbians, and the very small
circle of friends (ambiente) they could be open with about their sexual
identity. While they reported some improvements post-migration to be
more "themselves" and needing to "hide" their sexual identity less, they
also reported an increase in discomfort they encountered regarding gen
eral attitudes and treatment of Stateside Puerto Ricans. Thus, while they
struggled more with their sexual identity in Puerto Rico, they were now
struggling more with the identities as Stateside Puerto Ricans.
The women who were extremely well-educated and arrived to good
professional and semi-professional positions and salaries were particularly
disturbed by their encounters and what they saw as the negative attitudes
and beliefs about Puerto Ricans. Since none had been raised in the States,
they reported having to get used to thinking of themselves as "different"
Puerto Ricans.
Elisa:
As a Puerto Rican woman, I know who I am. I know the politics of Puerto Rico
and where I am in that politics. I did not realize that it would feel so different
to be a Puerto Rican here. People are always saying things to me that I think
shows the [sic] ignorance. I have a family that is highly respected and powerful.
Yet, here, people think I came from el barrio and I am poor.
These women acknowledged that being a Stateside Puerto Rican was also
an identity that the dominant society perceived as part of an underclass,
regardless of one's own particular social standing. Those women who were
of higher socioeconomic status reported more tension in terms of their
new classification as Stateside Puerto Rican. The confrontation of these
types of misconceptions about Puerto Ricans and the racism encountered
Stateside were also voiced by the middle-class Puerto Rican migrants in
Aranda's (2007) study.
Women who in Puerto Rico had not been wealthy or well educated
expressed less tension about the shift in their ethnic identity. Yet, these
women also reported feeling different than those Stateside-born Puerto
Ricans.
Angela:
I don't see myself like a Nuyorican. I see myself as a Puerto Rican. ... I have
friends and I even had a girlfriend who was Puerto Rican raised here. We got
along well but sometimes it was like we were two different cultures. My grow
ing up in Puerto Rico gives me a different experience from her. For example, I
like to speak Spanish but she didn't know how to speak Spanish. I am now with
a Dominicana and I like that I can speak Spanish with her.
Rosa:
I feel that it is really funny. When I was in Puerto Rico, I [was] made to feel
bad about being a pata [lesbian]; now I am here and I am made to feel bad I am
Puerto Rican. Why do I always have to feel bad about who I am? I just want to
be in a place where none of it matters.
Conclusions
This research centered on the lived experiences of thirty-two migrant
Puerto Rican lesbians. As such, it attempted to understand both the
commonalities and differences in terms of these women's understanding
and experiences with multiple identities and the multiple oppressions
associated with those identities. While there is a multitude of identi
ties and social circumstances that surround an individual's life, this
research focused on only four main identities?being a woman, a lesbian,
a Puerto Rican, and a migrant. These are all statuses that have histories of
discrimination, oppression, and marginalization.
The findings of this study show how these women's negotiation of their
multiple identities and sexuality is influenced by, among other factors,
socioeconomic status, gender conformity, race/color, and the geographical
locations they inhabit. As such, throughout their lives, they are constantly
negotiating their identities, privileging and/or denying one identity over
Notes
1. The term Stateside describes the Puerto Rican population living in the United
States, outside of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, or other U.S. territories.
According to Falcon (2004), "[T]he term is less ambiguous than other terms
more usually used, such as 'mainland Puerto Ricans/ 'Puerto Ricans in the
United States/ 'U.S.-based Puerto Ricans/ 'the Puerto Rican diaspora/ and so
on, which given Puerto Rico's political relationship with the United States
and the presence of Puerto Ricans in foreign countries, can be imprecise in
many respects" (2).
2. Colonial migrants is a term that may better describe the geopolitical frame
work and position of Puerto Ricans in the United States. As Grosfoguel (2003)
has noted, the effects of colonial status are embedded in contemporary stereo
types of Puerto Rican migrant culture and identities.
3. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University
of Connecticut and followed all ethical guidelines for fieldwork and inter
viewing. The study was funded in part by a Social Science Research Council,
Sexuality Research Fellowship, which was funded by the Ford Foundation, and
an internal grant from the University of Connecticut-Storrs.
References
Acosta, Katie L. 2008. "Lesbianas In The Borderlands: Shifting Identities and
Imagined Communities." Gender & Society 22(5): 639-59.
Acosta-Belen, Edna, and Carlos E. Santiago. 2006. Puerto Ricans in the United
States: A Contemporary Portrait. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Aldrich, Robert. 2004. "Homosexuality and the City: An Historical Overview."
Urban Studies 41(9): 1719-37.
Aranda, Elizabeth M. 2008. "Class Backgrounds, Modes of Incorporation, and
Puerto Ricans7 Pathways into the Transnational Professional Workforce."
American Behavioral Scientist 52(3): 426-56.
-. 2007. "Struggles of Incorporation among the Puerto Rican Middle Class."
The Sociological Quarterly 48(2): 199-228.
Arg?elles, Lour des, and Anne M. Rivero. 1993. "Gender and Sexual Orientation
Violence and Transnational Migration: Conversations with Some Latinas We
Think We Know." Urban Anthropology 22(3-4): 259-75.
Asencio, Marysol, and Katie Acosta. 2009. "Migration, Gender Conformity, and
Social Mobility among Puerto Rican Sexual Minorities." Sexuality Research
and Social Policy 6(3): 34-43.
Bowleg, Lisa, Jennifer Huang, Kelly Brooks, Amy Black, and Gary Burkholder.
2003. "Triple Jeopardy and Beyond: Multiple Minority Stress and Resilience
among Black Lesbians." Journal of Lesbian Studies 7(4): 87-108.
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1995. "The Gender Closet: Lesbian Disappearance under the
Sign 'Women/" Feminist Studies 21(1): 7-34.
Carrillo, Hector. 2002. The Night is Young: Sexuality in Mexico in the Time of
AIDS. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness
and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Crespo, Elizabeth. 2001. "Liberaci?n de la Mujer: Los Feminismos, la Justicia
Social, la Naci?n y la Autonomia en las Organizaciones Feministas de la
Decada de 1970 en Puerto Rico." In Documentos del Feminismo en Puerto
Rico: Facsimiles de Historia, vol. 1, 1970-1979, ed. Ana Irma Rivera Lassen
and Elizabeth Crespo-Kebler, 39-95. San Juan: Editorial de la Universidad de
Puerto Rico.
Knopp, Lawrence. 1995. "Sexuality and Urban Space: A Framework for Analy
sis." In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, ed. David Bell and Gill
Valentine, 149-61. London: Routledge.
La Fountain-Stokes, Lawrence. 2009. Queer Ricans: Cultures and Sexualities in
the Diaspora. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-. 2005. "Cultures of the Puerto Rican Queer Diaspora." In Passing Lines:
Sexuality and Immigration, ed. Brad Epps, Keja Valens, and Bill Johnson
Gonzalez, 275-309. Cambridge, MA: David Rockefeller Center for Latin
American Studies and Harvard University Press.
Loue, Sana, and Nancy Mendez. 2006. "I Don't Know Who I Am: Severely Men
tally 111 Latina WSW Navigating Differentness." fournal of Lesbian Studies
10(1/2): 249-66.
Mahler, Sarah J., and Patricia R. Pessar. 2006. "Gender Matters: Ethnographers
Bring Gender from the Periphery toward the Core of Migration Studies."
International Migration Review 40(1): 27-63.
Matthei, Linda Miller. 1996. "Gender and International Labor Migration: A
Networks Approach." Social Justice 23(3): 38-53.
Moraga, Cherrie L., Gloria E. Anzald?a, eds. 2002. This Bridge Called My Back:
Writings by Radical Women of Color. 3rd ed. Berkeley, CA: Third Woman
Press.
Mitchell, Don. 2000. Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Black
well Publishers.
Murray, Alison. 1995. "Femme on the Streets, Butch in the Sheets (A Play on
Whores)." In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, ed. David Bell and
Gill Valentine, 66-74. London: Routledge.
Nash, Jennifer C. 2008. "Re-Thinking Intersectionality." Feminist Review 89:
1-15.
O'Brien Hallstein, D. Lynn. 2000. "Where Standpoint Stands Now: An Introduc
tion and Commentary." Women's Studies in Communication 23(1): 1-15.
Ortiz, Vilma. 1996. "Migration and Marriage among Puerto Rican Women." Inter
national Migration Review 30(2): 460-850.
Pedraza, Silvia. 1991. "Women and Migration: The Social Consequences of
Gender." Annual Review of Sociology 17(1): 303-25.
Pessar, Patricia R. 1999. "Engendering Migration Studies: The Case of New Immi
grants in the United States." American Behavioral Scientist 42(4): 577-600.
Pico, Isabel. 1980. "Apuntes Preliminares para el Estudio de la Mujer Puertor
riquena y su Participaci?n en las Luchas Sociales de Principios del Siglo XX."
In La Mujer en la Sociedad Puertorriquena, ed. Edna Acosta-Belen, 23-40. Rio
Piedras, PR: Ediciones Hurac?n.
Portes, Alejandro, and Ruben G. Rumbaut. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ramos, Juanita, ed. 1987. Compaheras: Latina Lesbians (An Anthology). New
York: Latina Lesbian History Project.
Rothenberg, Tamar. 1995. "'And She Told Two Friends': Lesbians Creating Urban
Social Spaces." In Mapping Desires: Geographies of Sexualities, ed. David Bell
and Gill Valentine, 165-81. London: Routledge.
Segura, Denise A., and Patricia Zavella, eds. 2007. Women and Migration in the
U.S.-Mexico Borderlands: A Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Stevens, Patricia E. 1998. "The Experiences of Women of Color in the Health Care
Encounter: Narrative Insights for Improving Access and Quality." Journal of
Lesbian Studies 2(1): 77-94.
Strum, Philippa, and Danielle Tarantolo, eds. 2003. Women Immigrants in the
United States: Proceedings of a Conference sponsored by the Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Migration Policy Institute,
September 9, 2002. Accessed 17 June 2009. <www.wilsoncenter.org>.
Torres, Lourdes. 2007. "Boricua Lesbians: Sexuality, Nationality, and the Politics
of Passing." CENTRO Journal 19(1): 230-49.
Torres, Lourdes, and Immaculada Pertusa, eds. 2003. Tortilleras: Hispanic and
U.S. Latina Lesbian Expression. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Vidal-Ortiz, Salvador. 2004. "On Being a White Person of Color: Using Autoeth
nography to Understand Puerto Ricans7 Racialization." Qualitative Sociology
27(2): 179-203.
Whitam, Frederick L., Christopher Daskalos, Curt G. Sobolewski, and Peter
Padilla. 1998. "The Emergence of Lesbian Sexuality and Identity Cross-Cultur
ally: Brazil, Peru, the Philippines, and the United States." Archives of Sexual
Behavior 27(1): 31-56.
Zambrana, Ruth E. ed. 1995. Understanding Latino Families: Scholarship, Policy
and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zavella, Patricia. 2003. "Talkin' Sex: Chicanas and Mexicanas Theorize about
Silences and Sexual Pleasures." In Chicana Feminisms, ed. Gabriela F. Arren
dondo, Aida Hurtado, Norma Klahn, Olga N?jera-Rarmrez and Patricia Zavella,
228-53. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.