Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 146

Formation professionnalisante

Reservoir Characterization
& Modeling

Semaine 3
Stratigraphy – Sedimentology

Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP


 
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Stratigraphy/Sedimentology
on Clastic reservoirs
Laurence BOVE

Sonatrach / IAP

Summary
Table of content

 Basin analysis Slides 9

 Clastic depositional environments and facies Slides 49

 Log responses in clastic sequences Slides 165

 Clastic petrography and diagenesis Slides 193

 Fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy Slides 249


© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 2
Exploration‐Production: stakes and challenges

1. Where are hydrocarbons? 2. How to produce them?
 In reservoirs (naturals or fractured)  Geological reservoir modeling
 How did they reach reservoirs?  Quantification of reservoir 
 Where are they coming from? characteristics
(HC generation)  Heterogeneities prediction
 Why are they trapped in this place?  Reservoir model
Sedimentary basin analysis   Productivity prediction 
 Appraisal well 

Exploration Strategy

 Elaboration of « exploration  Strategy for


guides  »: Plays
field development
 Identification of « Prospects »

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
design
 Uncertainties & risks evaluation 
 Exploration well: OOIP calculation

Sonatrach / IAP 3

Basin exploration workflow: step 1
 Petroleum trilogy  Exploration tools (seismic)
 Source rock / Reservoir / Seal  Geodynamics
extension  Risk and uncertainties
 Risk and uncertainties → Deliverables
→ Deliverables
1 • Basin geometry calibration
• Structural basin reconstruction
• HC index maps for each reservoir Structural 
• Petroleum system mapping
→ Hypotheses
analysis
• Events chart
• Potential SR and RR maturity 
(kitchen)
• Migration episodes and pathways 
• Entrapment and timing
4 2
Petroleum 
system  Basin  Stratigraphic 
analysis
analysis analysis
 Relationship between tectonic and 
sedimentation
 Exploration tools (cores, logs, well
correlation)
3  Biostratigraphy
 Sequence stratigraphy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

 Organic indicators (VR, biomarkers, X‐fluo) Geochemical   Risk and uncertainties


 Thermochronology (fission tracks, mineralogy) analysis → Deliverables
 Rock‐Eval (TOC, HI…) • Basin time calibration
 Risk and uncertainties • Chronostratigraphic chart
(Wheeler)
→ Deliverables
• Stratigraphic basin reconstruction
• Organic matter origin (Kerogene type)
• Maturation curve
Sonatrach / IAP 4
Exploration techniques & tools

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 5

Basin exploration workflow: step 2

• Subsidence mechanisms (back‐ Deliverables


stripping) • Basin thermal calibration
Basin modeling • Temperature evolution (maturation) • Kitchen extension maps
Sequence stratigraphy  • Pressure evolution (compaction) • Generation timing 
framework • HC accumulation • Φ vs. Depth evolution
• Risk and uncertainties

Deliverables
• Maps
• Play definition and mapping (traps) - Play & prospect extension
- Field shows distribution
Play concept &  • Prospect definition and evaluation • Volumetrics (OOIP)
definition • Migration pathways for each play
• Risk and uncertainties
• Prospect ranking
• Yet‐to‐find (explored area)
• Economic

Basin evaluation & 
Play assessment 
strategy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 6
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic reservoirs
Basin analysis

Sonatrach / IAP

Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
©  2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 10
Map of sedimentary basins

Onshore and Offshore basins

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 11

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 13

Structure of the Earth
 Crust
• Lithosphere (10 to 70 km)
Basaltic crust Granitic crust
 Mantle Crust
• Upper mantle: Asthenosphere (700km) (LITHOSPHERE)
• Lower mantle: Mesosphere (2 200 km)
Mid Oceanic Upper mantle
 Core Ridge (ASTHENOSPHERE)
< passive margin > Atlantic  Ocean
• Outer core (2 200km)
• Inner core (1 271 km)

Lower mantle
Subduction (MESOSPHERE)
> active margin <
Rift

Outer core  
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Inner  core 
SiAl NiFe

Sonatrach / IAP 14
Dynamics of the Earth: convection

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Core

Sonatrach / IAP 15

Earthquake activity

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Lithospheric plate boundaries = seismicity (in red)


Sonatrach / IAP 16
Tectonic plates

Mid oceanic ridge

Earth‐
quakes
 Lithospheric plate boundaries:
Volcanoes
• Divergent (extensional: mid oceanic ridges)
• Convergent (compressional: subduction, collision)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Sliding/Shearing (transform, strike‐slip)

Sonatrach / IAP 17

Types of margins and related basins

 3 types of crustal stresses
• Extensional basins
• Compressional basins
• Shear basins

 3 types of processes
• Purely thermal
• Lithospheric thickness variation
• Loading and unloading
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 18
Types of sedimentary basins

 Basins associated with plate divergence


Extensional basins
• Rift, passive margin (plate divergence, ocean)
• Intra‐cratonic basin (intra‐continental, intra‐plate)

 Basins associated with plate convergence


Compressional basins
• Island arc‐type margin (two oceanic plates)
• Continental active margin (ocean / continent plates)
• Inter‐plate collision (two continental plates)

 Basins associated with shearing (sliding movement)


Trans‐tensional basins
• Pull‐apart basin (trans‐tension, local distension in convergence)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 19

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 21

Rift basin

 Rift are areas of crustal extension  and 
thinned continental crust. Regions of 
rifting are characterized by lithospheric 
stretching, high heat flow and volcanic 
activity caused by a thermal anomaly 
at depth

 Rift zones general characteristics:
• Heat flow of 90 to 110mW.m‐2
• High levels of earthquake activity 
and a dome‐shaped Moho
• Normal faults network

 Current examples in the Red Sea and in 
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Ethiopia

Sonatrach / IAP 22
Failed rift basin

 Beginning of rifting 
mechanisms and stop of 
lithospheric stretching caused 
by a reducing and cooling of 
the thermal anomaly

 Rift zones general 
characteristics:
• Heat flow of 80 to 90mW.m‐2
Failed rift basin • A reducing of seismic and 
volcanic activity
• A normal faults network 
covered a disconformity

 Examples in the North Sea and 
in Rhine‐Bresse (France)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 23

Intra‐cratonic basin

 Intra‐cratonic basins are large 
depressions in continental 
crust. They have a slow and 
homogeneous sedimentary 
filling

 Generally, intra‐cratonic
basins:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal 
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically inactive
• Have sediment overlain on 
faults and syn‐rift sediments

 Examples in Paris basin and 
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Middle‐East

Sonatrach / IAP 24
Passive margin basin

 Beginning of rifting 
mechanisms and stop of 
lithospheric stretching caused 
by a reducing and cooling of 
the thermal anomaly

 Generally, passive margin 
zones:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal 
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically inactive
• Have sediment overlain on 
faults and syn‐rift sediments

 Examples in West Africa and 
East South America

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 25

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 27

Foreland basin
Foreland basin

 Foreland basins are the result 
of the downward flexing of 
the lithosphere in response to 
the weight of the adjacent 
mountain belt, though many 
geological and geodynamic 
processes combine to control 
their subsequent evolution

 Generally, foreland basins:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal 
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically active

 Examples in Alps, Himalayan 
and Appalachian chains
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 28
Forearc basin

 This basin is located between 
the volcanic arc and the 
subduction complex

 Generally, fore‐arc basins:
• Are highly seismic active

 Example in Andes, Java and 
Sumatra islands

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 29

Oceanic trench basin

 Oceanic trenches are the 
deeper part of the ocean floor 
where lithosphere is in 
subduction under another

 The age of the oceanic 
lithosphere controls the 
trench depth

 Generally, oceanic trench:
• Have a highly seismic activity
• Have an associated 
accretionary prism

 Examples in western South 
America and eastern Japan
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 30
Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 31

Strike‐slip basin

 Strike‐slip basins are due to 
transform fault movements

Trans‐pression  If the blocks move away from their 
initial position, it is a transtensional
movement so there are normal 
faults associated to the flower 
structure

 Symmetrically, transpressional
movement induces reverse faults
Trans‐tension
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 32
Basin analysis
 Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 33

Origin of hydrocarbons

 Transformation of Organic Matter (O.M.) from dead fauna or flora

 Accumulation & preservation of O.M.


• Accumulation in quiet geological environments (lake, delta, sea)
• Preservation depends on sediment type & rate, environment energy

 Modification of depositional conditions


• Burial, compaction, water expulsion
• Temperature & pressure increase

 Transformation of Kerogen into hydrocarbons


• Oil
• Gas (methane)

Kerogen: non soluble part of O.M. (i.e. lipids)


© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Maturation: chemical transformation, mainly due to temperature (and pressure)


increase during burial

Sonatrach / IAP 34
Origin of Organic Matter

 Lipids

 Cellulose

 Lignine

Type III
Type II Type I

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Plankton Bacteria Wood Algae

Animals = maximum 10% of total generated organic biomass


Sonatrach / IAP 35

Transformation of O.M. & Kerogen

 Diagenesis [< 60°C]
Bacterial degradation
Immature stage

 Catagenesis [from 60 to 120°C]
Thermal degradation
→ Weak chemical bonds breaking
Oil window

 Metagenesis [from 120 to 200°C]
Thermal degradation
→ Strong C–C bonds breaking 
(cracking)
Gas window
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 36
Van Krevelen diagram

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 37

Generation & Migration of HC

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 38
Hydrocarbon migration

Types of migration: The word “migration” covers all types of displacements of


hydrocarbons, from the source rock where they generated to the reservoir rock where they
accumulate

 Primary migration
• Expulsion of hydrocarbons from source rocks towards adjacent rocks. This migration
takes place over very short distances (few centimetres). It depends on the internal
overpressure conditions, linked to the volume of HC generated

 Secondary migration
• Displacement of hydrocarbons after expulsion from the source‐rock, over distances
ranging from few meters to several hundred kilometres, until they are trapped
• This migration takes place inside permeable conditions (reservoir rocks, open
fractures open unconformities…). Migration pathways are complex and specific to
each basin, they are mainly driven by pressure decrease. Migration can be lateral
and/or vertical

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 Dysmigration
• Hydrocarbon displacement from a “leaking” reservoir to the surface (i.e. seepage)

Sonatrach / IAP 39

Origin of hydrocarbons: summary

 Three origins of OM > three different types of Kerogen


• Type I: lacustrine (lake algae, bacteria,…)
• Type II: marine (zoo‐ & phyto‐plankton, micro‐organisms,…)
• Type III: continental (terrestrial vegetation, forests, bacteria…)

 Three steps of OM transformation within source rocks


• Diagenesis (burial, lithification)
• Catagenesis (Kerogen transformation) → ~60°C…
• Metagenesis (cooking, cracking) → ~120°C…

 Three factors for OM maturation


• Temperature (sediments cooking, anoxic conditions, bacterial activity)
• Pressure (sediment compaction, water expulsion)
• Time (molecular evolution, new atomic combinations – compensates for low T°)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 40
Key Points : The petroleum trilogy

Source rock Reservoir rock Seal rock / Cap rock


• Non‐permeable rocks 
Sedimentary rocks rich in  • Porous and permeable rocks (prevent hydrocarbons from 
Definition OM, mature enough to  • Allow displacement and  migration)
generate hydrocarbons hydrocarbon accumulation • Plastic rocks (can be 
deformed but not fractured)
• Very fine‐grained rocks 
(shales, mudstones, 
• Shales or salt rocks (plastic 
marls,…) with interbedded
• Clastic rocks (e.g. sandstone) rocks)
laminations 
Lithology (sediment/OM) • Carbonate rocks (e.g.  • Very compact sandstones or 
limestone) limestones (without 
• Low permeability (internal 
porosity, “tight”)
over‐pressure > under‐
compaction)
• OM production,  Petrophysical parameters:
Specificity deposition, preservation 
• Porosity: Φ Lateral extension and layer 
(process,  & maturation continuity are more 
• Permeability: K important than thickness
parameters,…) • HC generation, expulsion 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
& migration • Saturation: S

Sonatrach / IAP 41

Timing between elements & processes

The trap must be available before/during migration
Trap

Accumulation and 
2. Processes: Generation Migration
Preservation 
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Migration 
1. Elements: Source rock
pathways
Reservoir and Seal

Sonatrach / IAP 42
Pretroleum system events chart

400 300 200 100 Geologic Time


Scale
Paleozoic Mesozoic Cenozoic
Petroleum
D M P P TR J K P N System Events

Rock Units

Source Rock

Elements
Reservoir Rock

Seal Rock

Overburden Rock

Processes
Trap Formation

Gen/Migration/Accum

Preservation

Critical Moment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Critical Moment
Magoon and Dow, 1994

Time of expulsion and migration.


(Trap must already exist)

Sonatrach / IAP 43

Cross‐section of a petroleum system

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 44
Map of a petroleum system

Migration pathway

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 45

Petroleum system: Critical steps

Gas
Cap
Entrapment  Oil
Accumulation  Seal Rock
Entrapment
Preservation Water
Reservoir
Rock

Migration
120° F
(60°C)
Expulsion Source Rock
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

350° F
Generation (120°C)

2480

Sonatrach / IAP 46
Petroleum systems: key points

Key points to keep in mind
Conditions for the formation of a hydrocarbon field
Necessary existence of:
 one (or more) mature source rock,
 one (or more) reservoir rock,
 one seal rock,
 a phase of migration (and pathways),
 one (or several) traps,
…and:
• an adequate timing between trap formation, hydrocarbon generation and migration
• sufficient quantities of generated hydrocarbons to feed the trap
• preservation of trap integrity throughout geologic times

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
47

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic reservoirs
Clastic depositional environments and facies

Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• Reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments)
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
©  2013 ‐ IFP Training

− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality


− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 50
Definition of siliciclastic rocks

 Siliciclastics are detrital sediments that result from the


accumulation of debris from erosion or alteration of existing rocks

 The main mineral components are quartz, feldspars, micas and


clays

 Clastics are classified according to their grain size and shape:


• Conglomerates / Breccias
• Sandstones
• Siltstones
• Shales / Claystones / Clastic muds
(Sandy & shaly sediments family)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 51

Textural classification

Example of shale structure
(Scanning Eletron Microscope) and composition

Claystones
[Shales]

 The classification of clastic sedimentary rocks is complex because several variables are
involved. Particle size (both average size and range of particles’ sizes), particles
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

composition, cement and matrix must all be taken into consideration

 Shales (which consist mostly of clay minerals) are generally further classified on the basis
of composition and bedding

Sonatrach / IAP 52
Formation of clastic rocks

 Weathering and erosion (of outcropping rocks )


• Chemical weathering (alteration)
Agent: rain (+ dissolved CO2)
− Solutions
− Grains
• Mechanical weathering (erosion)
Agents: gravity, freeze/thaw, running water, wind, glaciers

 Transport (of debris + solutions and colloidal particles)


• Agents:
− Continental: water (torrents, streams & rivers), wind, ice (glaciers)
− Oceanic: currents, waves, tides, gravity flow deposits

 Deposition
• Progressive decrease of current speed leads to deposition of transported load, with

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
resulting sorting according to grain weight (and size)

Sonatrach / IAP 53

Bedforms characteristics

 Bedform generation
• Result of interaction of moving fluid on surface sediment
• Undulation on non cohesive surface
• Downstream migration

 Bedform boundaries
• Upper bedding surface: constructional structures
− Unidirectional current
− Oscillatory current
• Lower bedding surface: erosional structures (sole marks)
− Current marks: produced by erosion du to the current flow
» Flute marks
» Crescent marks
− Tool marks: objects removed by the current along the surface
» Groove, Bounce, Brush
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

• Internal bedding
− Horizontal stratification
− Inclined stratification
Sonatrach / IAP 54
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• Reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments)
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 55

Sediment transport

 Tractive sediment transport (bedload)
• Particles roll or skip on sediment 
surface with a low level of suspension
• Motion: rolling carpets or turbid clouds
• Decreasing of velocity
→ downstream load deposition
Geometry of deposition: oblique laminae

 Suspended sediment transport (suspension)


• Particles in suspension (partial, continuous or intermittent) in the water depth
• Motion: ascending movement due to turbulence
• Decrease of turbulence
→ vertical decantation
Geometry of deposition: horizontal laminae
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Agents: Water, wind, ice…

Sonatrach / IAP 56
Clastic depositional processes

Cohesive Non ‐cohesive

Transport in suspension

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Hjulstrom’s diagram
Evolution of erosion vs deposition with stream (or current) speed and particle size
Sonatrach / IAP 57

Primary sedimentary structures

 Formed under influence of same hydrodynamic and/or aerodynamic


conditions as entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment particles

 We must answer and resolve the following questions:


• Which way is up?
• Orientation of process that dispersed sediment?
• What process was responsible for transportation and deposition of
sediment?
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 58
Bedforms vs flow regime

 Oscillatory flow: waves
• Circular motion of particle at water 
surface 
• Flat orbits at bottom  back and 
forth motion of particles
• Geometry of deposit: wavy ripples, 
plane beds

 Unidirectional flow: rivers, wind
• Unidirectional downstream motion 
of particles  
• Deposition depends on grain size 
vs. flow velocity
• Geometry of deposit: irregular 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
ripples, plane beds

Sonatrach / IAP 59

Bedforms in unidirectional flow

 Three main factors controlling bedforms in unidirectional currents:


• Average flow velocity
• Grain size
• Water depth
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 60
Bedforms shape vs flow velocity

Constructional bedforms
Intermittent transport

Lower Flow regime
Upper flow regime

Erosional  bedforms
Permanent transport

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 61

Bedforms in oscillatory flow

 Bedforms produced by wave action

 Oscillatory flow
• Flattening of wave orbits
• Back and forth motion creating « lateral » motion along the sea bottom

 General characteristics
• Symmetrical shape
− Waves ripples
− Hummocks (Swales)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

− Subplane beds
• Peak or round crests
• Straight crests, with bifurcation

Sonatrach / IAP 62
Bedforms in oscillatory flow

 Waves ripples
• Develop in velocity of waves between 9 to 90 cm/s
• Height: up to 20 cm
• Length: up to 1 m

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 63

Bedforms in oscillatory flow

 Hummocky/swaley cross‐stratification (HCS)


• Broad undulations, gently dipping
− Hummocks / Swales
• In fine‐grained sandstone, subparallel laminae (lower surface)
• Wave length: 1 to 5 m
• Average set thickness: ~25 cm
• Storm deposits: below fairweather wave base
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 64
Erosional flow features

 Sole marks 
Erosional sedimentary structures on sediment surface (preserved by burial)
• Scour marks  erosional turbulence
• Tool marks  object imprints

 Visible as negative moulds on layers base (way‐up criteria)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 65

Processes velocities

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 66
Sediment maturity

Key points to keep in mind

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 67

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• Reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments)
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 69

Workshop: oscillatory bedforms

 Identify depositional environment

 Name bedforms

 Range dimensions (λ, H, L)

 Indicate flow direction

 Sketch dynamic process

Typical Y‐shaped symmetrical ripples
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 70
Workshop: constructional bedforms
 Identify depositional environment

 Name bedforms

 Range dimensions (λ, H, L)

 Indicate flow direction

 Sketch dynamic process

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 71

Workshop: beach facies analogues
 Identify depositional environment

 Name bedforms

 Range dimensions (λ, H, L)

 Indicate flow direction

 Sketch dynamic process
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 72
Workshop: erosional bedforms
Flute marks

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Load structures
Sonatrach / IAP 73

Workshop: erosional bedforms

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 74
Workshop: erosional bedforms

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 75

Workshop: erosional bedforms

Crescent

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 76
Workshop: Bioturbation / Way‐up criterium

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 77

Workshop: beach facies analogues

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 78
Workshop: beach facies analogues

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 79

Workshop: beach facies analogues

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 80
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• General reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 81

Sedimentary fill hierarchy

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Jeroen Schokker, Wim Westerhoff & Henk Weerts after Heinz & Aigner, 2003

Sonatrach / IAP 82
How to order the sedimentary pile?

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
"Facies adjacent to one another in a continuous vertical 
sequence also accumulated adjacent to one another laterally"

Sonatrach / IAP 83

How to order the sedimentary pile?

Introduction to sedimentary sequences
Depositional sequence in respect to Walther's law

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• General reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 85

Sedimentary depositional environments

Continental environments Marine environments
 Glacial  Shoreline (coast/beach)
 Aeolian  Delta
 Lacustrine • Fluvial‐dominated
 Fluvial • Wave‐dominated
• Braided • Tide‐dominated
• Meandering  Continental shelf
• Anastomosed • Siliciclastic
 Coastal plain • Carbonatic
 Slope, canyon
 Basin
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

• Turbiditic fan
Sea level
• Abyssal plain

Sonatrach / IAP 86
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 87

Alluvial fan systems
 Fan‐shaped body
• Cone that radiates downslope
• Stream channels emerge from valleys
• Rather coarse detrital sediments
• Poorly sorted

 Built up by mountain stream
• At relief's foot
• Change of slope gradient 
• Dip of alluvial fan: <10° (3 to 
6°)
• Length: from few 100 m to 
100 km
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 88
Typical alluvial fan sequence
 Sedimentation
• Beds more or less parallel to the surface
• Stratification is moderately developed

 Deposition mode
• Debris flow or mud flow dominated
• Extensive masses of mud‐supported coarse‐grained
sediment, moving downward
• Main channel: in upper fan and mid fan

Massive conglomerates

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Coarsening‐up sequence

Sonatrach / IAP 89

Alluvial fans
 Alluvial fans are cone‐shaped piles of sediment formed at the foot of highlands where
streams confined by narrow valleys emerge into adjacent lowland. A series of overlapping
alluvial fans generates a clastic wedge
 There are some differences between alluvial fans in arid and humid climates.
Sedimentation on alluvial fans begins where the streams leave their confined valleys and
loose some of their transport efficiency
 Alluvial fans are composed of two types of sediment:
• Stream deposits
• Sediment gravity‐flows
 Current‐transported sediments usually predominate. They are deposited either from
ephemeral or perennial water flow in the channel system or, after extreme rain storms,
from sheet‐floods inundating large parts of the alluvial fan
 Sometimes, gravel is concentrated locally to form sieve deposits (coarse gravel and
boulders devoid of finer‐grained matrix). From time to time, large debris flows with a
muddy‐sandy matrix reach the proximal and mid‐fan area and bury part of the pre‐
existing, radiating channel system
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

 At their lower end, such debris flows terminate in characteristic lobes, and they often
concentrate large boulders and gravel at their outer margin, forming levees. Later, new
channels cut into the mass flow deposits and rework and redistribute great proportions
of their material
Sonatrach / IAP 90
Fan deltas

 Coastal alluvial fans prograding into a lake or into the sea form fan deltas. As soon as the
streams, carrying a high bed‐load, reach the standing water body, they drop their coarse
material at the shore face and in prodelta foresets
 The intensity of reworking, sorting, and redeposition, as well as the transport of material
along the shoreline, depend on the wave energy and, in marine environments, on the
tidal range
 In the case of lakes and protected embayments, fan progradation is little influenced by
these processes. Gravel and sand accumulate at the mouths of streams until they become
unstable from time to time and move as subaqueous debris flows into deeper water.
There, they alternate with muddy lake or marine deposits
 On high‐energy coasts, some of the coarse material dropped at the river mouth is
transported alongshore adjacent beaches where it forms distinctive beach gravel; some
sand and gravel is swept by storms into deeper water
 Fluctuations in the water level in lakes or the sea affect both the subaerial and
subaqueous facies of fan deltas. They are reflected by fluvial terraces and coarse grained
river mouth deposits at varying elevations. A lowering of the lake or sea level causes the
emergence of delta foresets and the subsequent cutting of fluvial channels into the

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
foresets. These channels are commonly filled later with fluvial deposits

Sonatrach / IAP 91

Exercise: identify environment and name feature 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 92
Fluvial depositional systems

 Main characteristics
• Unidirectional flow regime
• Transport until flow exists, with decreasing grain size of carried particles
• Three types of sediment bedload:
− Bedload
− Suspended load
− Mixed load
• Sediments start to deposit when river loses energy or/and is progressively
abandoned (progressive decantation)
• Typical depositional sequence: basal erosional surface and fining‐upward sequence

 Three main types of river (fluvial) systems (according to braided parameters


and sinuosity index):
• Braided system
• Meandering system

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Anastomosed system

Sonatrach / IAP 93

Fluvial depositional settings

 Channel pattern is the combination of


• Bedload vs suspended load
• Bank stability
• Slope gradient
• Flow fluctuations © 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 94
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 95

Braided river systems
 Braided rivers are characterized by
high‐sediment load and high velocity

 Typical succession of lenticular sorted


conglomerates and coarse sandstones

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 96
Typical braided river sequence
Braided rivers and its bars

Several erosional channels

Basal lag deposit

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Stacked fining‐up sequences Basal erosional surface
Sonatrach / IAP 97

Examples of basal conglomerates (lag deposit)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Erosional baseline
Erosion in the flood plain

Sonatrach / IAP 98
Log responses – Outcrop analogue

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 99

Typical braided river architecture

 Gravel‐rich braided 
system
• Longitudinal bars
• Conglomerates 
dominant

 Sand‐rich braided 
system
• Transverse bars
• Sandstones dominant
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 100
Braided river systems

 Braided streams usually consist of several individual channels separated by bars and
islands and therefore form a wide, shallow stream bed. Braided rivers develop near areas
of high relief, which deliver relatively large amounts of debris, gravel and sand into the
fluvial system
 From all these characteristics, it can be inferred that braided systems are bed load‐
dominated, they carry and deposit chiefly gravel and sands. Therefore, they consist
predominantly of channel and channel‐flank deposits, while silty and muddy floodplain
facies are subordinate
 Downstream, they often display a progressive decrease in grain size, as well as in bed
forms and internal sedimentary structures
 The interstices in the gravel are usually later filled with sand during low water periods,
but in this system sandy beds are relatively rare in the proximal zone, unless there is little
gravel available in the source area. Sandy beds develop best at somewhat higher
topography elevations within the braided system next to the active channel system

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 101

Braided river systems

 Many bars are somewhat graded. Interbedded with the gravels are thin lenses of sand
representing deposition in abandoned channels or sand wedges at the edge of bars
 In places, one can observe repeated successions of fining‐upward gravel‐sand sequences 1
to 2 m thick, but in general it is difficult to identify the bottoms of former channels and the
geometry of their fill. The reason is that the underlying and neighboring sediments also
consist largely of gravel
 Downstream, the predominantly gravelly beds grade into beds consisting partly of smaller
pebbles and sand. In the lower, more active channels, bar gravels dominate, whereas
sands and pebbly sands are common at higher topography elevations. In rarely flooded
areas, some silt and mud may be deposited and preserved
 In the total assemblage, the gravel content varies between 10 and 70 %. As a result of
downstream and laterally migrating sand and gravel bars, planar and trough cross‐bedding
are the most important internal sedimentary structures
 Both the lateral migration and sudden abandonment of channels due to avulsion cause
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

fining‐upward channel fill sequences a few meters thick. Such sequences are considered
the most distinctive characteristic feature of this type of braided river deposit

Sonatrach / IAP 102
Braided river architecture: reservoir potential

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 High Net‐to‐Gross Sheet‐like geometry
 Immature sediments; early alteration Thin shaly interval at the top
 Require top‐seal/structural traps

Sonatrach / IAP 103

Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 104
Typical meandering river sequence

Crevasse splay
Point Bar

Coal
Fine grained sandstone
Organic shale, roots

medium
coarse to
grained sandstone

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Erosion

Meandering river
Fining‐up sequence : point bar
Sonatrach / IAP 105

Generation of meanders

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 106
Meandring river architecture: reservoir potential

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 Lower Net‐to‐Gross Shoe‐lace geometry becoming sheet like
 Sediment more mature Shales frequent in sequence
 Stratigraphic trap potential
Sonatrach / IAP 107

Meandering river systems

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 108
Meandering river systems

 Meandering river systems develop one principal, relatively narrow channel of high sinuosity
(> 1.5) and are dominated by mixed load or predominantly suspended load. Their overall
sand content often averages 20 to 40 %. If meandering rivers are associated with a wide
floodplain, the channel sediments may be restricted to a comparatively narrow zone within
the flood basin where they form a meander belt
 In a sinuous channel segment, one can distinguish the following morphological features and
depositional sub‐environments:
− Channels and channel fills
− Point bars and lateral accretion complexes
− Chute bars
− Channel plugs (oxbow lakes)
− Levee and crevasse splay deposits
− Alluvial floodplain deposits
• The channel floor is usually covered by lag sediments consisting of the coarsest material
transported by the river during peak flood. This channel lag may also contain mud clasts
or blocks eroded from the banks. Lag sands and gravel usually accumulate between
scour pools and form flat, elongate bars displaying either imbrication of gravel or
crudely laminated and planar cross‐bedded gravelly sand

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Point bars accumulate on the inner sides of river bends, while on the outer side
material from the bank is eroded. In this way, the curvature of the meander tends to
become increasingly exaggerated until the river produces short‐cuts, leaving behind
abandoned channel segments (oxbow lakes)
Sonatrach / IAP 109

Meandering river systems

 Most of the point bar material is eroded from the upstream channel banks. It is
deposited in areas of lower velocity turbulence. Because sediment moves up and out of
the channel onto the bar, cross sections of point bars often show fining‐upward
sequences, with sands on top of channel lags
 Similarly, the internal structures grade from horizontal bedding (upper flow regime) to
large‐scale and small scale trough cross‐bedding (lower flow regime). The most distinctive
feature of point bars is lateral accretion)
 Many meandering channels are accompanied by flat ridges sloping away from the
channel into the floodplain. These levees are built up during moderate floods which just
reach the elevation of the channel ridge. Due to decreasing flow velocity, sand is
deposited along the channel ridges, grading into silt somewhat farther away
 Locally, channel water may spill over the levees into the floodplain, forming crevasse
splays. The fallout of sand and silt usually extends farther into the floodplains than the
levees, but such crevasse splays can also contribute to the buildup of the levees
 The prevailing internal structures of these sand sheets may resemble those of thin sandy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

turbidites, showing some grading, horizontal lamination and small‐scale ripple cross‐
bedding. These structures are, however, often mashed or destroyed by the roots of
vegetation. Whereas distal crevasse splays become interbedded with floodplain deposits,
levee sands of ten tend to be reworked by subsequent channel migration
Sonatrach / IAP 110
Crevasse splay deposits
 Deposits formed during flood period, by
break into the channel levees

 Cones composed of sand to silty facies

 Formed by stacked fining upward thin


sequences with small secondary
channels at top during peak of flood

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 111

Channel levees deposits

Mississipi

 Levees deposits, adjacent to the


channel and formed during the
flooding period, are:
• Wedge deposits of alternating fine
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

sand /silts and mud


• Showing parallel to small current
ripple laminations

Sonatrach / IAP 112
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 113

Anastomosing river systems

 Develop in
• Upstream area or downstream areas
• Low sinuosity (less than braided)
• Several wandering channels 

 Particularities of each channel
• Stable banks (not ephemeral)
• Fixed by vegetation
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 114
Anastomosing river architecture: reservoir potential

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 Lower Net‐to‐Gross vertical stacked and confined sand bodies encased in mud
 Sediment more mature

Sonatrach / IAP 115

Fluvial architecture and reservoir potential

Key points to keep in mind

 River systems
• Main reservoirs located in channels and channels belts
• Associated reservoirs located in
− Levees deposits
− Crevasse splays
− Floodplains sandstones
 Braided system: reservoir bodies
• Vertical and lateral stacking, good connection
• Geometry: Sheetlike or tabular sandbodies (stacked multistorey infill)
 Meandering system: reservoir bodies
• Dominant lateral accretion (point bar – levees – crevasse splays)
• Geometry: “point bar – clay plug” model, isolated sandbodies
Anastomosing system: reservoir bodies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training


• Dominant vertical aggradation, isolated narrow channels
• Geometry: channel fill

Sonatrach / IAP 116
Depositional environment vs reservoir distribution

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Variation of reservoir quality with ELF 1997
depositional environment
and energy (slope)
Sonatrach / IAP 117

River types vs reservoir distribution

Slims Williams Windorah 


© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 118
River facies: reservoir potential
Fluvial architecture vs reservoir potential
Braided

Meandering

Anastomosed

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Courtesy of Pr. M. Lopez (U. of Montpellier)

Sonatrach / IAP 119

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• General reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 121

Coastal deposits

 Coastal environment: river outlet, delta

• Continuous quantity of sediments provided by the river

• Deposition driven by energy loss (decreasing flow rate, decantation)


− From coarse‐grained sand (close to coast and beach) to fine‐grained sand and
shales (towards platform and basin)
− Continental environment taking over marine environment with time

• Variable distribution of river sediments according to local dominant


energy factor (river flow, tidal currents, wave action)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 122
Clastic depositional environments

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 123

Delta shapes & energy

 Morphological classification of deltas based on delta front shape which reflects:


• Relation between the relative importance of rive, tide or wave processes
• Sediment supply
• Duration in time

Birdfoot

Fluvial 
Lobate dominated

Wave  Tide 
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

dominated dominated

Cuspate Estuarian

Sonatrach / IAP 124
Delta classifications

 Delta morphology reflects the relative importance of fluvial, tidal, and wave processes,
as well as gradient and sediment supply
• River‐dominated deltas occur in microtidal settings with limited wave energy, where
delta‐lobe progradation is significant and redistribution of mouth bars is limited
• Wave‐dominated deltas are characterized by mouth bars reworked into shore‐

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
parallel sand bodies and beaches
• Tide‐dominated deltas exhibit tidal mudflats and mouth bars that are reworked into
elongate sand bodies perpendicular to the shoreline

Sonatrach / IAP 125

Deltaic environments

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 126
Key points: Fluvial‐dominated deltas

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 Fluvial‐dominated deltas are primarily controlled by the water density difference between
the inflowing river water and the standing water on the basin.
 Delta – lobe progradation is significant while mouth bar distribution remains limited

Sonatrach / IAP 127

Fluvial‐dominated deltas

 Different flow types that determine the distribution of


sediment and sedimentary structures formed in the
delta are hyperpycnal flow and hypopycnal flow
• Hyperpycnal flow produced when the density of the river
water entering the basin is greater than the density of the
standing water in the ocean basin. This higher density
river water will flow below the standing water in the basin
because of the difference in density. A zone of mixing
occurs along the outer edge of the flow. As the river water
flows beneath the standing water, it erodes the previously
deposited bottom sediments.
• Hypopycnal flow is associated with a lower river water
density entering a higher density standing water in the
basin. Under these conditions, the river water will flow
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

out over the standing water, gradually depositing the


suspended clay portion of the sediment load on the
prodelta

Sonatrach / IAP 128
Key points: Wave‐dominated deltas

 Wave‐dominated deltas are primarily


influenced by wave energy and action.

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 The common sequence reflects reworked
mouth bar into sandbodies and beaches
parallel to the shoreline

Sonatrach / IAP 129

Coastal depositional environments

Shoreline Shelf

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 130
Identify features and infer depositional environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 131

Identify features and infer depositional environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 132
Coastal depositional environments

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 133

Coastal sedimentary features

Swash zone
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 134
Sedimentary features: HCS stratifications

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Hummocky cross stratification (HCS) forms during storm events 
with combined wave and current activity in shallow seas 

Sonatrach / IAP 135

Key points: Tide‐dominated deltas

 Tide‐dominated deltas typically occur in locations of large tidal ranges


or high tidal current speeds. The sediment supply is over powered by
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

strong tidal currents, the delta tends to be very small


 Resulting feature of a tide‐dominated delta is that it has many linear
structures parallel to the tidal flow and perpendicular to the shore

Sonatrach / IAP 136
Tidal environments

 Tide
• Periodic phenomenon on coastal domain
• Results from the gravitational attraction (Earth, Moon, Sun)
• Regular rise and fall of water level in the world’s oceans
• Effective agent of transport of sediment

 Tidal range: vertical amplitude between low tide and high tide

 Foreshore: area horizontally alternately covered and uncovered by the tide

 Characterization
• Particle transport is vigorous and rapid
− Bipolar linear current (alternating tidal currents: Flood/Ebb)
− Cross‐stratification in opposite directions (herringbone) : Flood / Ebb oscillation
• Repeated erosion and creation of tidal channels

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Difficult conditions for living organisms
• Flaser, wavy and lenticular beddings
• Reactivation surface
Sonatrach / IAP 137

Tidal influenced bedforms & sedimentary structures
 Tide‐influenced sedimentary structures:
• Herringbone cross stratification → bipolar flow directions
• Mud‐draped cross strata (quite common): result from alternating bedform migration
during high flow velocities with mud drapes deposition during high/low tide slack
water
• Tidal bundles are characterized by a sand‐mud couplet of varying thickness; tidal
bundle sequences consist of bundles that can be related to neap‐spring cycles

Flood

Flood‐ebb
tidal deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Ebb

Sonatrach / IAP 138
Sedimentary structures in tidal range

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 139

Sedimentary structures: tide‐related laminae

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 140
Sedimentary structures: tide‐related laminae

Bundle thickness
vs tide cycles

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 141

Summary table: sedimentary features vs environments

Sedimentary Depositional Water Sediment type 


Environment
features energy Zone (GS)
Parallel landward Swash zone
Backshore stratifications
High ℮
Breaking zone
Sand

Lenticular Mud
Foreshore High tide (MHW)
Wavy Low → High ℮ Mud/Sand
(Tidal flat) Low tide (MLW)
Flaser Sand

Sandwaves (trough) Low tide (MLW) Sand (winnowed:


Laminae

Shoreface Megaripples(tabular) High ℮ Fair weather zone  clean, rounded &


Ripples (sym/asym) (MFWB) sorted)

Upper Storm HCS Storm weather zone 


Low ℮ Silty/Shaly
offshore Wavy bedding (MSWB)

Lower Shaly
Wavy bedding Low ℮ Outer shelf
offshore (burrows)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Deep water Massive (no struct.) Low ℮ Slope Muddy


[Turbidites] [Bouma, Stowe,...] [High ℮ gravity flow] Basin [Sandy/Silty]

Sonatrach / IAP 142
Key points : Coastal systems and reservoir potentials

Key points to keep in mind
2. Reservoir bodies:
Mouth bar, and aggradational channels complexes 
located along the distributary:
Limited lateral extension

Fluvial‐
dominated

Wave‐ Tide‐
dominated dominated

1. Reservoir bodies: 3. Reservoir bodies:
Beach barrier island, very good lateral  Isolated tidal bar, poor continuity and extension.

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
continuity, well sorted sandbodies and clay‐free: Well sorted sandstone, but lot of clay drapes due
Best reservoir to intertidal processes: Discontinuous reservoir

Sonatrach / IAP 143

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional 
environments and facies

 Fluid flows and related sedimentary processes


• General reminders
• Bedforms generation
• Bedforms boundaries

 Depositional environments & Clastic reservoirs geometry (from


continental to marine environments
• Sedimentary fill hierarchy
• Depositional environments
− Fluvial systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality

Sonatrach / IAP 145

Gravity deposits

 Continental environment: broken blocks or erosional debris falling down by


gravity and/or density–turbulence current

 Aquatic environment (lake, open marine)


• Mass flow (debris flow, mud flow)
− Low amount of water incorporated in sediments
− Sedimentation without any sorting (very fast and sudden, almost instantaneous
event)
• Density‐turbulence flow
− Progressive incorporation of water (turbulent flow or current)
− Sediments start to be deposited when flow velocity and related turbulence
decrease: coarser grains are deposited first and finer last
− One turbidite = one single event
− Very good sorting in layers: fining upward sequence with well organized
geometry evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 146
Marine clastic deposits: turbidites

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fluvial vs turbiditic clastics: similar organization of sediments in deeper environments
Sonatrach / IAP 147

Gravity deposits vs. processes & sediment supply
Step 3‐ geometries & extend of turbidites 

Step 1‐ Initiation
of gravity deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Step 2 ‐ Processes of 
transport &deposition
Sonatrach / IAP 148
Turbidite system general organization

Cross‐sections:
from proximal to distal turbiditic facies

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 149

Turbiditic system organization

Upper fan

Middle fan

Turbidite deposits:
sedimentary
facies and 
log responses
Lower fan

General upward tendency:
coarsening and
New lobe
shallowing upward
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Abyssal plain

Sonatrach / IAP 150
Turbidites: depositional mechanism

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Lab reconstitution of a dynamic gravity flow
(mini turbiditic current = avalanche!)

Sonatrach / IAP 151

Bedforms in unidirectional flow

 Three main factors controlling bedforms in unidirectional currents:


• Average flow velocity
• Grain size
• Water depth
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 152
Typical turbidite depositional sequences

 Main characteristics
• Allochthonous sedimentation
• Highly organized from proximal to 
distal part
• Dominantly controlled by 
unidirectional flow
• General fining upward sequence
• Facies association from channels 
to levees and lobes

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 153

Conventional Bouma sequence & field outcrop

Obara turbidites, Spain
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 154
Conventional Bouma sequence & field outcrop

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
St Jean de Luz turbidites ‐ France 

Sonatrach / IAP 155

Deep sea deposits: turbidites

Turbiditic system with midfan/suprafan lobes

Simple turbiditic system without lobes


© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Abundant sediments reworked from delta
Sonatrach / IAP 156
Turbidite outcrop

Turbiditic sandstones

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(Mid fan ‐ channel)

Courtesy Philippe JOSEPH

Sonatrach / IAP 157

Turbidite outcrop

Stacked
channels
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Lower fan ‐ lobes

Turbiditic sandstones
Sonatrach / IAP 158
Turbidite outcrop 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Bouma sequence: Tb and Tc 

Sonatrach / IAP 159

Sedimentation rate and sea variations

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 160
Fluvial and deltaic sequences

Gamma Ray log responses and depositional deltaic environments

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 161

Sediment maturity

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 162
Clastic reservoirs internal geometry and organization

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 163

Clastics

Key points to keep in mind
 Clastic sediments are:
• Allochthonous erosional products (weathering, alteration and transportation)
• Transported by fluvial water, wind, ice
• Deposited in basins
 The main depositional process of clastic sediments is progressive decantation
due to gradual decay of flow velocity (water or density current), i.e. decreasing
transport energy
 Fluvial, deltaic and turbiditic depositional sequences are mostly fining‐upward
 The evolution of a fluvial system (e.g. meander) involves both erosional and
decantation processes
 The development of a delta is mostly due to progradation (if constant sediment
supply and sea level)
 A turbidite results from a single depositional event (intermittent sediment
supply)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

 The main source of continental sediments is erosion of existing rock (outcrops)

 The main source of deep sea deposits is reworking of existing sediments (e.g.
delta)
Sonatrach / IAP 164
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic reservoirs
Log responses in clastic sequences

Sonatrach / IAP

Log responses
in clastic sequences

 Sedimentological & stratigraphic well log analysis


• Log shapes review
• Depositional environment review & logs characteristics
• Parasequences & logs responses
• Clastic system tracts and logs facies responses
©  2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 166
Sedimentary processes

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 167

Log responses

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 168
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
169
Log responses

Sonatrach / IAP
Log responses
in clastic sequences

 Sedimentological & stratigraphic well log analysis


• Log shapes review
• Depositional environment review & logs characteristics
• Parasequences & logs responses
• Clastic system tracts and logs facies responses

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 171

Typical braided river sequence
Braided rivers and related bars

Several erosional channels

Basal lag deposit
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Stacked fining‐up sequences Basal erosional surface
Sonatrach / IAP 172
Typical meandering river sequence

Crevasse splay
Point bar

Coal
Fine grained sandstone
Organic shale, roots

medium
coarse to
grained sandstone

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Erosion

Meandering river
Fining‐up sequence: point bar
Sonatrach / IAP 173

Typical depositional sequences of fluvial sediments

Key points to keep in mind
Alluvial fan             Braided river        Meandering river    

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 174
Deltaic depositional sequences

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 175

Turbidites sequences
 Main characteristics:
• Allochthonous sedimentation
• Highly organized from proximal to distal 
part
• Dominantly controlled by unidirectional 
flow
• General fining‐upward sequence
• Facies association from channels to 
levees and lobes
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 176
Clastic sequences

Gamma Ray log responses 
and depositional environments

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 177

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Log responses
in clastic sequences

 Sedimentological & stratigraphic well log analysis


• Log shapes review
• Depositional environment review & logs characteristics
• Parasequences & logs responses
• Clastic system tracts and logs facies responses

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 179

Accommodation variations and related sequences
PROGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET
SP RES

Rate of deposition
> 1
Rate of accommodation

RETROGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET

SP RES

Rate of deposition
< 1
Rate of accommodation

AGGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET
SP RES

Rate of deposition
= 1
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Rate of accommodation

Coastal plain sandstones Shallow marine


And mudstones sandstones Shelf Mudstones

Sonatrach / IAP
MITCHUM and VAN WAGONER 1991 180
Correlations during progradation time

Basinward

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 181

Correlations during progradation time

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 182
Facies distribution wave or fluvial‐dominated environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 183

Facies distribution fluvial or wave‐dominated environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 184
Facies distribution shoreline‐dominated environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 185

Facies distribution in tidal flat‐dominated environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 186
Log responses
in clastic sequences

 Sedimentological & stratigraphic well log analysis


• Log shapes review
• Depositional environment review & logs characteristics
• Parasequences & logs responses
• Clastic system tracts and logs facies responses

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 187

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 188
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
189

190
Sonatrach / IAP

Sonatrach / IAP
Hierarchy of fluvial architectural elements

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 191

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic reservoirs
Clastic Petrography & Diagenesis

Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenetical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetical regimes

 Heterogeneities
©  2013 ‐ IFP Training

• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir


• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 194
Mineral diagenesis: Definition

 All physical, chemical or biological processes at relatively low temperatures


(less than 200‐250°C) and pressures (less than 2‐3kbars) that affect a sediment
(or a sedimentary rock) after its deposition.

 Compaction, dissolution, cementation, mineral replacement are major


elementary processes of diagenesis activated by physico‐chemical parameters
(pressure, temperature, fluid composition) and/or biological (bacterial activity,
bioturbation)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 195

Why study diagenesis?

 To understand:
• Transformation mechanisms from sediment to sedimentary rock
• Sedimentary basin dynamic
• Reservoir quality
• Nature and distribution of porosity and permeability
• Fluid flow evolution
• Extend of oil recovery
• Interaction of secondary recovery fluids with the reservoir
• Movement or binding of pollutants
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 196
Processes

 Physical
• Compaction
• Fluid migration
• Pressure solution

 Chemical
• Mineral reaction
• Mineral replacement
• Cementation
• Dissolution
• Organic matter evolution

 Geological & climatic


• Original depositional environment
• Diagenetic environment

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Tectonic setting and basin evolution

 Etc.
→ All processes are interdependent and cannot be easily separated
Sonatrach / IAP 197

What is lithification?

 Process which leads to the transformation of a non‐consolidated sediment to a


rock.

 It implies grain cementation in the sediment but not necessarily burial and
compaction (e.g. beachrock)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

 Lithification is the result of diagenetic processes but diagenesis does not


necessarily lead to sediment lithification.

Sonatrach / IAP 198
What type of diagenesis?

 Early diagenesis
• Changes essentially biochemical
• First meters of burying
• Early in the history of sediments
• Environment in marine, meteoric, salted zone and vadoze zone

 Late diagenesis
• Slower changes (compaction, dissolution and mineralogical
transformations)
• Burying diagenesis (pressure, temperature and fluids effects)
• Type of rock (carbonates, clays, siliciclastics, etc.) controlled by climate,
tectonic and sedimentary contexts

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 199

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 201

Definition of compaction

 All processes which lead to a decreasing of porosity in sediment or


sedimentary rock and generate pore fluid eviction

Rearrangement Cementation
(with volume losses) (without volume losses)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 202
Mechanical compaction – 1/2

 Occur at shallow burial depth

 Reworking of sediments (grain repacking and rearrangement, bioturbation)

 « The tightest packing of spheres is rhombohaedral (Φ=25%) while the loosest is


cubic (Φ=50%) » Graton & Fraser, 1935

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 203

Mechanical compaction – 2/2

 Impact of grain size, roundness and sphericity

 Mechanical compaction is generally more effective in mudrocks than


sandstones (high water content in shales, rapidly expelled by compaction)
Water

Minerals

Water Minerals Compaction +


Water 
loss

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 204
Rearrangement example in siliciclastics

1 mm

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 205

Rearrangement example in carbonates

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 206
Chemical compaction

 Mainly achieved by reprecipitation of minerals in remaining pore spaces

 Cementation more obvious in coarse clastics than mudrocks

 Main process is pressure‐solution

P1
Where Pw = Pore fluid pressure
P2
And P1 > P2 > Pw

Pw Reprecipitation of overgrowth forms (dark blue) by 


diffusion of silica from the grain contact to the pore 

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
spaces

Sonatrach / IAP 207

Pressure‐solution

 Development of sutured contact enhanced by presence of clays


• Enhance transport of ions away from site of pressure solution (diffusion
network)

 Much more difficult to produce pressure‐solution in clean sandstones

 In coarse clastic sediments (gravels)


• High pressure contacts
• Rapid porosity loss early in burial slowing down rapidly

 In fine clastic sediments (sandstones & siltstones)


• Higher surface area in contact = fewer nucleation sites
• Rapid porosity loss at depth
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 208
Pressure‐solution mechanisms
Major constraint σ1
1. DISSOLUTION

2. DIFFUSION

Grain Minor constraint σ3
3. OVERGROWTH

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 209

Pressure‐solution in sandstone

Φ Overgrowth
Φ
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 210
Pressure‐solution in carbonate

Nummulitic limestone (Eocene, Corsica)

Precipitation

Diffusion

Dissolution

Awl
Concept Polarized light Cathodoluminescence

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 211

Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (polarized light)

Ex1 Lum Pola

Ex1 Lum nat
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 212
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)

Zoom 2

Zoom 1

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 213

Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)

Zoom 1
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Dissolution
Sonatrach / IAP 214
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)

Precipitation

Zoom 2

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
500 µm

Sonatrach / IAP 215

Mineralogical dissolution example (Natural light)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Potassic feldspar (FK) dissolution
Sonatrach / IAP 216
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 217

Cementation parameters – 1/2

 An allogenic cementation occur during deposition

 An authigenic cementation grown in situ during diagenesis

 There is rarely sufficient material in the rock to account for all cements present

 Degree of supersaturation of the pore fluid, example in silica


• High level, soluble forms precipitate: opal and chalcedony form thin crusts and
mosaics on grains
• Low level: quartz precipitates (because low solubility) and slowly forms
monocrystalline overgrowths

 Other common cements:


• Carbonates (calcite, dolomite)
• Silicates (quartz, opal, potassic & sodic feldpars)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

• Clay minerals (kaolin, illite, chlorite…)


• Sulphates (gypsum, anhydrite…)
• Oxides (haematite…)

Sonatrach / IAP 218
Cementation parameters – 2/2

 From fluids to cement formation:


• Water salinity
• Dissolution of soluble rock
• Groundwater percolation
• Shales expulsion
• Mineral and organic reaction

 Cement precipitation depends on the nucleation

 A slow kinetic or an inhibitor presence can explain the no‐precipitation

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 219

Sources of silica cement

 During early diagenesis:


• Skeletal remains of diatoms and radiolaria
• Quartz dust abraded during transportation

 During late diagenesis:


• Mainly pressure‐solution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Radiolaria
Diatom
Sonatrach / IAP 220
Cementation in sandstone reservoir (Brent)

Uncemented sandstone

Diagenetic front

Cemented sandstone 
(calcitic cement)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 221

Sources of kaolin cement

 Alteration and mineral recombination in porosity

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Kaolin cement Quartz Porosity Quartz Kaolin cement

Sonatrach / IAP 222
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 223

Moldic dissolution

 Initial presence of a shell, rock fragment or grain. Then, micritization by


bacteria. Progression from outside to inside

 Second step, dissolution of cement but not the micrite (more stable). The
shape is preserved. Sparitic precipitation in the cavity © 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 224
Pseudomorph forms 

 Replacement of a preexisting mineral by an other one

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
From halite (cubic crystal) to a “cubic” calcite 
(normally trigonal – hexagonal scalenohedral)
Sonatrach / IAP 225

Recrystallization 

 Sometimes, it is difficult to distinguish cementation and recrystallization

 Change in crystal shape / orientation without compositional change

 The orientation of the first 
crystal (as seed) govern the 
direction in which further 
crystals grows

 Major effect of temperature


© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

How to reset all information…
Sonatrach / IAP 226
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 227

Near‐surface sandstone diagenesis

 Particularly occurs in semi‐arid climates


• Water table very low
• Sediments are oxygenated for long period
• Sparse vegetation (= rapid erosion)
• Immature sediment producing (high amount of unstable minerals like
feldspars, amphiboles…)

 Processes of activation near surface


• Clay infiltration (clay percolation through water)
• Intrastratal mineral dissolution (partial or complete dissolution of instable
minerals)
• Replacement
• Authigenic mineral growth (hydroxydes…)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 228
Subsurface sandstone diagenesis

 Sandstone horizons correspond to fluid pathways especially for fluids from


compacting mudstones

 Fluids carry dissolved ions (potential cements)

 Clays flatten to form a matrix (=permeability decreasing)

 Effect of the fluids composition, temperature and pressure

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 229

Diagenesis and reservoir quality

Key points to keep in mind

 Diagenesis have a strong impact on reservoir quality


 Generally, the quality of clastic reservoirs decrease with diagenesis
by compaction and cementation
 Whereas in carbonate reservoirs, the quality can be also reduced or
improved by physical, chemical or biological processes (dissolution,
dolomitization…)
 The main parameters of reservoir quality affected by diagenesis are
the porosity and the permeability
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 230
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 231

Reservoir heterogeneities: Summary

 Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir


• Homogeneous / heterogeneous reservoirs
• Reservoir heterogeneity concepts
• Classification of reservoir heterogeneities
• Impact of reservoir heterogeneity on hydrocarbon recovery

 Reservoir heterogeneity features


• Scale of reservoir heterogeneities
• Small‐scale observation and analysis
• Large‐scale observation and analysis
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 232
Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous reservoir

Homogeneous reservoir Heterogeneous reservoir

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(Faults, Unconformities, Layers, Facies,  
Diagenesis, Fractures, Super K,…)

Heterogeneity: spatial variation of rock physical properties that affect fluid flow
Sonatrach / IAP 233

Reservoir heterogeneity: concepts – 1/2

 To build a consistent and relevant model:


• All variations in the reservoir quality must be analyzed and classified in a
manner that the main heterogeneities main are clearly highlighted
• For a given study, all heterogeneities that can affect fluid flow are
considered as key heterogeneities

Key heterogeneities have to be absolutely described in the geological model
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 234
Reservoir heterogeneity: concepts – 2/2

 Reservoir heterogeneities
• All relevant factors affecting the dynamic behavior of the field
• Small‐ to large‐scale geologic features
• From static reservoir characterization (significant or not)
• From dynamic reservoir characterization (significant)

 Basic principle
• Identify the smallest element that will impact production

Reservoir heterogeneities characterization
calls for the cooperation between all professionals involved in the study

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(i.e. from geophysicists to reservoir engineers)

Sonatrach / IAP 235

Classification of heterogeneities in reservoirs – 1/2
Weber classification (1986) Classification
« How heterogeneitiy affect oil recovery »

Heterogeneity
range
A: Structural
Prior to the modeling phase, it is 
1 to 3 necessary to perform a synthesis 
of heterogeneity types, for each 
B: Stratigraphic 1 to 3 item, taking into account their 
impact on fluid flow, using the 
following scale:
C: Diagenetic 1 to 3
1 ‐ major heterogeneity
D: Depositional 1 to 3 2 ‐ intermediate heterogeneity
3 ‐ negligible heterogeneity

E: Depositional 1 to 3
Classification objective: highlight 
most significant heterogeneities.
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

F: Diagenetic 1 to 3

G: Structural 1 to 3

Sonatrach / IAP 236
Classification of heterogeneities in reservoirs – 2/2
Impact on recovery

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 237

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic Petrography & 
Diagenesis
 Mineral diagenesis
• Definfition and processes

 Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes

 Heterogeneities

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features

Sonatrach / IAP 239

Scale of reservoir heterogeneities
Grain

Obervation
Lamination
scales:

Bed
< 1 mm
Formation Field

< 1 cm
Small ...

< 1 m
Relative 
Intermediate ... < 1000 m > 1000 m
scales:
Large ... Very large ...
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

(from Krause and Collins, 1984)

Heterogeneities and investigation tools
do not always have the same scale… 

Sonatrach / IAP 240
Small scale heterogeneities

Example of laminations and cross‐beddings

 Micro scale: related to a mixture of 
different pore types and geometries 
(textural features)

 Macro scale: often related to 
laminations and cross‐beddings 
(depositional features: energy)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 241

Large‐scale heterogeneities (1/5)

 Faults
• Juxtaposition of reservoir units and low permeability
units
• Clay smearing (injection of clay into the fault plane)
• Cataclasis: sand grains crushing (breccia)
• Diagenesis (fault‐related): cementation due to fluid
circulation and precipitation creating hydraulic seals
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Cataclasis: silicification
Sonatrach / IAP 242
Large‐scale heterogeneities (2/5)

Genetic unit boundaries


→ represent stratigraphic discontinuities (isolated bar, channel…)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 243

Large‐scale heterogeneities (3/5)

Diagenesis

(power line cable)
DOLOMITE
Dolomitization
front
Bedding

LIMESTONE
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

0 Scale 5 m

Sonatrach / IAP 244
Large‐scale heterogeneities (4/5)

Both shale baffles and permeability streaks
Lateral extension linked with depositional environment
e.g. Hassi‐Messaoud reservoir (silts)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 245

Large‐scale heterogeneities (5/5)

Seeping fractures

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 246
Reservoir characterization and modeling

Key points to keep in mind

 To build a consistent and relevant model for an integrated study:


• All reservoir heterogeneities must be identified and classified (main
ones highlighted)
• All heterogeneities that can impact fluid flow are considered as major
heterogeneities
• Even the smallest elements that can affect production need to be
identified and modeled
• The geological model must take into account all significant
heterogeneities
• Characterization of reservoir heterogeneities calls for integrated multi‐
disciplinary approach (cooperation and team work)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 247

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP

Clastic reservoirs
Fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy

Sonatrach / IAP

Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
©  2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 250
Sequence stratigraphy: Introduction

 Sequence stratigraphy is based on the application of the systematic subdivision of the


section by well defined surfaces

 These surfaces are used to provide a frame work to the interpretation of the depositional
settings of the sedimentary section

 This interpretation is then used to predict the extent and character of the component
sedimentary facies

 Integrated method with all the exploration tools (geology, geophysics, palynology,
geochemistry…)
• Relation between geological layers in a chronostratigraphic understanding
• Basic sedimentary unit: depositional sequence

 Characteristics of a depositional sequence


• Bounded by their unconformities and their correlative conformities
• Composed by systems tracts

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
 Each system tract
• Bounded by physical surface
• Composed of elementary « unit » (genetic unit or parasequence)
Sonatrach / IAP 251

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 253

Accommodation definition

 Sediment is deposited in the space 
between the seafloor and base level 
(sea level or graded stream profile) 
which is called accommodation

 The way a basin fills with sediment 
and the stratal patterns that result 
depend upon how much space is 
available for the sediment to fill and 
how rapidly new space is added

 Accommodation may vary as both 
the upper and lower boundaries of  
this space move up or down
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 254
Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 255

Relative  sea level vs space availability 

 Eustacy refers only to the position 
of the sea surface with reference 
to a fixed datum, such as the 
center of the earth, and is 
therefore independent from local 
factors

 Relative sea level incorporates 
local subsidence by referring to 
the position of the sea surface 
with respect to a datum at or near 
the seafloor

 To discern the rate at which new 
space is added, both relative 
eustacy fluctuation rate combined 
with subsidence rate must be 
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

considered

Sonatrach / IAP 256
Accommodation & Equilibrium point

Equilibrium point   : Rate of subsidence = Rate of eustatic change 

A platform is divided into two parts separated by an equilibrium point

 Basinward of    :
• Rate of subsidence 
> Rate of eustatic fall
• Creation of a new 
space added
• Area of relative sea 
level rise

 Landward of    :
• Rate of subsidence 
< Rate of eustatic fall
• No creation of new space added

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Area of relative sea level fall

Sonatrach / IAP 257

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 259

Specific dynamic points

 Inflection points of the eustatic curve
• Point F: maximum rate of sea level fall F R
− Minimum rate of creation of new space added
• Point R: maximum rate of sea level rise
− Maximum rate of creation of new space added

 Depositional dynamic on the shelf at these 
specific inflection points of the eustatic curve
• Point F: minimum deposit of sediment
− Maximum erosional phenomenon Point R
• Point R: transgression and development of 
− a condensed  section 
− Maximum drowning of the basin over the shelf
− Location of the maximum flooding surface: 
MFS
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Point F

Sonatrach / IAP 260
Theorical sequence: the Exxon “slug”

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 261

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 263

Sequence stratigraphy

1 2

3
4
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 264
Sequence stratigraphy

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 265

Key surfaces in sequence stratigraphy

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

In Kendall (2004)
Sonatrach / IAP 266
Sedimentation rate and sea variations

 Sequence are subdivided by


• Maximum Flooding Surfaces (MFS)
• Transgressive Surfaces (TS)
• Sequence Boundaries (SB)

 Arrangement of vertical succession or stacking patterns of unconfined sheets


• Prograde (step seaward)
• Retrograde (step landward)
• Aggrade (build vertically)

 Sheets and unconfined lobes containing


• Non‐amalgamated bodies

 Incised topographic fill


• Amalgamated, multi‐storied bodies (e.g. incised valleys)

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Within unconfined lobes

Sonatrach / IAP 267

Theorical sequence: “Exxon Slug”

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 268
Systems tract synthesis

 Sequence stratigraphy is based on the application of the systematic subdivision of the


section by well defined surfaces

 These surfaces are used to provide a frame work to the interpretation of the depositional
settings of the sedimentary section

 This interpretation is then is used to predict the extent and character of the component
sedimentary facies

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 269

Lowstand‐fan systems tract
 Lowstand fans are deposited during rapid eustatic falls which exceed the rate of
subsidence at the shelf edge

 Sediment bypasses the shelf and is deposited directly on the slope and in the basin in the
form of point‐sourced submarine fans. This figure illustrates geologic, geographic, and
eustatic conditions conducive to the formation of these deposits

 The systems tract is bounded below and above by discontinuities

 Internally, lowstand fans are characterized by mounded facies and may be extensively
sand prone. These mounds are commonly excellent reservoirs
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 270
Lowstand‐wedge systems tract
 The lowstand‐wedge systems tract begins to form during the latter part of a rapid
eustatic fall as lowstand‐fan deposition ends. Deposition is initiated when the rate of
eustatic fall is again equal to subsidence at the shelf edge

 This interval is characterized by resumption of a slow rise of relative sea level at the shelf
edge

 Deltaic deposition is localized in the upper parts of canyons or embayments cut into the
shelf during rapid eustatic falls

 The base of this systems tract is an unconformity. The top grades either into a
transgressive depositional sequence or is a condensed section, if transgressive deposits
are absent or not observed.

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 271

Transgressive systems tract
 When the rate of new shelf space added exceeds the rate of sediment supply,
transgression occurs. The timing of this event depends on sediment supply and rate
of eustatic rise, but it will usually occur on the rising limb of the eustatic curve when
the rate of addition of new shelf space increases rapidly prior to the eustatic rise
inflection point
 During transgression, only pelagic or hemipelagic deposition occurs on the starved
shelf and basin, generating a starved or condensed section there
 Of all the systems tract types, the transgressive systems tract is the most sensitive to
variations of sediment supply, and its occurrence is therefore the most difficult to
predict
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 272
Highstand systems tract
 The highstand systems tract is deposited during the eustatic highstand, defined as the
interval between the eustatic rise and fall inflection points. This interval is characterized
by a slowly decreasing relative rise of sea level as the rate of eustatic change gradually
decreases

 An unconformity defines the upper surface, and a condensed section marks the lower
limits of this systems tract

 Reservoir facies are associated primarily with prograding beach and aggrading fluvial
depositional systems. Organic‐rich facies with source potential may develop on the toes
and delta plains of progradational units

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 273

Shelf‐margin systems tract
 The shelf‐margin systems tract is a regressive stratigraphic unit overlying a highstand
deposit and is usually deposited following the inflection point on a gentle eustatic fall

 This interval is characterized by a progressive increase in the rate of relative rise of sea
level. The shelf margin systems tract is deposited on the outer part of the shelf and is
marked by an abrupt basinward shift of coastal onlap at its base

 The base of this systems tract is an erosional unconformity or its correlative conformity,
whereas the top either grades into a transgressive systems tract or is a condensed
section. The basal unconformity on the shelf is usually marked by paralic/deltaic
sediments overlying fluvial deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 274
Fundamentals of sequence 
stratigraphy
 Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 275

How to order the sedimentary pile?

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

"Facies adjacent to one another in a
continuous vertical sequence 
also
accumulated adjacent to one another
laterally"
Sonatrach / IAP 276
Sedimentation rate and sea variations

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 277

Introduction to sedimentary sequences

Depositional sequence in respect to Walther's law

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 278
Parasequence: depositional processes in system tracts

Progradagradation (Advancing)

Retrogradation (Backstepping)

Parasequence or Genetic units :

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Elementary deposition sequence (building block)
• Thickness : few meters to few tens of meters
• Bounded by isochrons (2 successives times surfaces)

Elementary cycles of variations accomodation


Influenced by allocyclic parameters (external parameter of the basin)
Sonatrach / IAP 279

The genetic sequence

 The genetic sequences are short term 
depositional sequences (1 Ma) regrouping 
orders of cyclicity lower than the 4th order

 They are limited by two maximum flooding 
surfaces or by two condensed intervals, and 
there thicknesses vary from a few 
decimeters to few meters

 They record a cycle of variation of the 
depositional environment, interpreted as 
transgression and regression

 The genetic sequences are deducted from  
essentially sedimentological but none 
geometric observations. They are recognized 
by drilling or on outcrops
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

P. Homewood,  P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001

Sonatrach / IAP 280
The genetic sequence

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
P. Homewood,  P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001
Sonatrach / IAP 281

The genetic sequence

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

P. Homewood,  P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001
Sonatrach / IAP 282
Definition and example

 Chronostratigraphy is the branch of stratigraphy that studies the absolute age of


rock strata

 Chronostratigraphy is based upon deriving geochronological data for rock units,


both directly and by inference

 Objectives of chronostratigraphy:
• Determine the ages 
of strata
• Demonstrate the 
geographic extend 
of strata
• Confirm the 
sequence 
stratigraphy 
interpretations

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 283

Definition and example
 Combination between paleontology and stratigraphy. In oil and gas industry,
biostratigraphy corresponds to the study from rock samples (core and cuttings) of
microfossils (pollens, spores, nannofossils, diatoms and foraminifera)

 The objectives of biostratigraphy are to:


• Determine the 
age (relative or 
absolute) of strata
• Study the 
paleo‐environment 
during deposition 
and its evolution
• Make correlations 
between layers 
containing the same
fossil population
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 284
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION,

©  2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 285

© 2013 ‐ IFP Training

Sonatrach / IAP 286
 

You might also like