Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 IFPTraining - RCM - Sem3 - Booklet
03 IFPTraining - RCM - Sem3 - Booklet
Reservoir Characterization
& Modeling
Semaine 3
Stratigraphy – Sedimentology
Stratigraphy/Sedimentology
on Clastic reservoirs
Laurence BOVE
Sonatrach / IAP
Summary
Table of content
Sonatrach / IAP 2
Exploration‐Production: stakes and challenges
1. Where are hydrocarbons? 2. How to produce them?
In reservoirs (naturals or fractured) Geological reservoir modeling
How did they reach reservoirs? Quantification of reservoir
Where are they coming from? characteristics
(HC generation) Heterogeneities prediction
Why are they trapped in this place? Reservoir model
Sedimentary basin analysis Productivity prediction
Appraisal well
Exploration Strategy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
design
Uncertainties & risks evaluation
Exploration well: OOIP calculation
Sonatrach / IAP 3
Basin exploration workflow: step 1
Petroleum trilogy Exploration tools (seismic)
Source rock / Reservoir / Seal Geodynamics
extension Risk and uncertainties
Risk and uncertainties → Deliverables
→ Deliverables
1 • Basin geometry calibration
• Structural basin reconstruction
• HC index maps for each reservoir Structural
• Petroleum system mapping
→ Hypotheses
analysis
• Events chart
• Potential SR and RR maturity
(kitchen)
• Migration episodes and pathways
• Entrapment and timing
4 2
Petroleum
system Basin Stratigraphic
analysis
analysis analysis
Relationship between tectonic and
sedimentation
Exploration tools (cores, logs, well
correlation)
3 Biostratigraphy
Sequence stratigraphy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 5
Basin exploration workflow: step 2
Deliverables
• Maps
• Play definition and mapping (traps) - Play & prospect extension
- Field shows distribution
Play concept & • Prospect definition and evaluation • Volumetrics (OOIP)
definition • Migration pathways for each play
• Risk and uncertainties
• Prospect ranking
• Yet‐to‐find (explored area)
• Economic
Basin evaluation &
Play assessment
strategy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 6
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic reservoirs
Basin analysis
Sonatrach / IAP
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 10
Map of sedimentary basins
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 11
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 13
Structure of the Earth
Crust
• Lithosphere (10 to 70 km)
Basaltic crust Granitic crust
Mantle Crust
• Upper mantle: Asthenosphere (700km) (LITHOSPHERE)
• Lower mantle: Mesosphere (2 200 km)
Mid Oceanic Upper mantle
Core Ridge (ASTHENOSPHERE)
< passive margin > Atlantic Ocean
• Outer core (2 200km)
• Inner core (1 271 km)
Lower mantle
Subduction (MESOSPHERE)
> active margin <
Rift
Outer core
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Inner core
SiAl NiFe
Sonatrach / IAP 14
Dynamics of the Earth: convection
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Core
Sonatrach / IAP 15
Earthquake activity
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Mid oceanic ridge
Earth‐
quakes
Lithospheric plate boundaries:
Volcanoes
• Divergent (extensional: mid oceanic ridges)
• Convergent (compressional: subduction, collision)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Sliding/Shearing (transform, strike‐slip)
Sonatrach / IAP 17
Types of margins and related basins
3 types of crustal stresses
• Extensional basins
• Compressional basins
• Shear basins
3 types of processes
• Purely thermal
• Lithospheric thickness variation
• Loading and unloading
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 18
Types of sedimentary basins
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 19
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 21
Rift basin
Rift are areas of crustal extension and
thinned continental crust. Regions of
rifting are characterized by lithospheric
stretching, high heat flow and volcanic
activity caused by a thermal anomaly
at depth
Rift zones general characteristics:
• Heat flow of 90 to 110mW.m‐2
• High levels of earthquake activity
and a dome‐shaped Moho
• Normal faults network
Current examples in the Red Sea and in
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Ethiopia
Sonatrach / IAP 22
Failed rift basin
Beginning of rifting
mechanisms and stop of
lithospheric stretching caused
by a reducing and cooling of
the thermal anomaly
Rift zones general
characteristics:
• Heat flow of 80 to 90mW.m‐2
Failed rift basin • A reducing of seismic and
volcanic activity
• A normal faults network
covered a disconformity
Examples in the North Sea and
in Rhine‐Bresse (France)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 23
Intra‐cratonic basin
Intra‐cratonic basins are large
depressions in continental
crust. They have a slow and
homogeneous sedimentary
filling
Generally, intra‐cratonic
basins:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically inactive
• Have sediment overlain on
faults and syn‐rift sediments
Examples in Paris basin and
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Middle‐East
Sonatrach / IAP 24
Passive margin basin
Beginning of rifting
mechanisms and stop of
lithospheric stretching caused
by a reducing and cooling of
the thermal anomaly
Generally, passive margin
zones:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically inactive
• Have sediment overlain on
faults and syn‐rift sediments
Examples in West Africa and
East South America
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 25
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 27
Foreland basin
Foreland basin
Foreland basins are the result
of the downward flexing of
the lithosphere in response to
the weight of the adjacent
mountain belt, though many
geological and geodynamic
processes combine to control
their subsequent evolution
Generally, foreland basins:
• Have a heat flow near‐normal
(60 to 80mW.m‐2)
• Are seismically active
Examples in Alps, Himalayan
and Appalachian chains
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 28
Forearc basin
This basin is located between
the volcanic arc and the
subduction complex
Generally, fore‐arc basins:
• Are highly seismic active
Example in Andes, Java and
Sumatra islands
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 29
Oceanic trench basin
Oceanic trenches are the
deeper part of the ocean floor
where lithosphere is in
subduction under another
The age of the oceanic
lithosphere controls the
trench depth
Generally, oceanic trench:
• Have a highly seismic activity
• Have an associated
accretionary prism
Examples in western South
America and eastern Japan
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 30
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 31
Strike‐slip basin
Strike‐slip basins are due to
transform fault movements
Trans‐pression If the blocks move away from their
initial position, it is a transtensional
movement so there are normal
faults associated to the flower
structure
Symmetrically, transpressional
movement induces reverse faults
Trans‐tension
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 32
Basin analysis
Structural and thermal evolution during burial
• Earth structure
• Extensive context
• Compressive context
• Transform context
• Thermal evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 33
Origin of hydrocarbons
Sonatrach / IAP 34
Origin of Organic Matter
Lipids
Cellulose
Lignine
Type III
Type II Type I
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Plankton Bacteria Wood Algae
Transformation of O.M. & Kerogen
Diagenesis [< 60°C]
Bacterial degradation
Immature stage
Catagenesis [from 60 to 120°C]
Thermal degradation
→ Weak chemical bonds breaking
Oil window
Metagenesis [from 120 to 200°C]
Thermal degradation
→ Strong C–C bonds breaking
(cracking)
Gas window
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 36
Van Krevelen diagram
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 37
Generation & Migration of HC
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 38
Hydrocarbon migration
Primary migration
• Expulsion of hydrocarbons from source rocks towards adjacent rocks. This migration
takes place over very short distances (few centimetres). It depends on the internal
overpressure conditions, linked to the volume of HC generated
Secondary migration
• Displacement of hydrocarbons after expulsion from the source‐rock, over distances
ranging from few meters to several hundred kilometres, until they are trapped
• This migration takes place inside permeable conditions (reservoir rocks, open
fractures open unconformities…). Migration pathways are complex and specific to
each basin, they are mainly driven by pressure decrease. Migration can be lateral
and/or vertical
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Dysmigration
• Hydrocarbon displacement from a “leaking” reservoir to the surface (i.e. seepage)
Sonatrach / IAP 39
Origin of hydrocarbons: summary
Sonatrach / IAP 40
Key Points : The petroleum trilogy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
& migration • Saturation: S
Sonatrach / IAP 41
Timing between elements & processes
The trap must be available before/during migration
Trap
Accumulation and
2. Processes: Generation Migration
Preservation
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Migration
1. Elements: Source rock
pathways
Reservoir and Seal
Sonatrach / IAP 42
Pretroleum system events chart
Rock Units
Source Rock
Elements
Reservoir Rock
Seal Rock
Overburden Rock
Processes
Trap Formation
Gen/Migration/Accum
Preservation
Critical Moment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Critical Moment
Magoon and Dow, 1994
Sonatrach / IAP 43
Cross‐section of a petroleum system
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 44
Map of a petroleum system
Migration pathway
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 45
Petroleum system: Critical steps
Gas
Cap
Entrapment Oil
Accumulation Seal Rock
Entrapment
Preservation Water
Reservoir
Rock
Migration
120° F
(60°C)
Expulsion Source Rock
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
350° F
Generation (120°C)
2480
Sonatrach / IAP 46
Petroleum systems: key points
Key points to keep in mind
Conditions for the formation of a hydrocarbon field
Necessary existence of:
one (or more) mature source rock,
one (or more) reservoir rock,
one seal rock,
a phase of migration (and pathways),
one (or several) traps,
…and:
• an adequate timing between trap formation, hydrocarbon generation and migration
• sufficient quantities of generated hydrocarbons to feed the trap
• preservation of trap integrity throughout geologic times
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
47
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic reservoirs
Clastic depositional environments and facies
Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
Sonatrach / IAP 50
Definition of siliciclastic rocks
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 51
Textural classification
Example of shale structure
(Scanning Eletron Microscope) and composition
Claystones
[Shales]
The classification of clastic sedimentary rocks is complex because several variables are
involved. Particle size (both average size and range of particles’ sizes), particles
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Shales (which consist mostly of clay minerals) are generally further classified on the basis
of composition and bedding
Sonatrach / IAP 52
Formation of clastic rocks
Deposition
• Progressive decrease of current speed leads to deposition of transported load, with
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
resulting sorting according to grain weight (and size)
Sonatrach / IAP 53
Bedforms characteristics
Bedform generation
• Result of interaction of moving fluid on surface sediment
• Undulation on non cohesive surface
• Downstream migration
Bedform boundaries
• Upper bedding surface: constructional structures
− Unidirectional current
− Oscillatory current
• Lower bedding surface: erosional structures (sole marks)
− Current marks: produced by erosion du to the current flow
» Flute marks
» Crescent marks
− Tool marks: objects removed by the current along the surface
» Groove, Bounce, Brush
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Internal bedding
− Horizontal stratification
− Inclined stratification
Sonatrach / IAP 54
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 55
Sediment transport
Tractive sediment transport (bedload)
• Particles roll or skip on sediment
surface with a low level of suspension
• Motion: rolling carpets or turbid clouds
• Decreasing of velocity
→ downstream load deposition
Geometry of deposition: oblique laminae
Agents: Water, wind, ice…
Sonatrach / IAP 56
Clastic depositional processes
Cohesive Non ‐cohesive
Transport in suspension
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Hjulstrom’s diagram
Evolution of erosion vs deposition with stream (or current) speed and particle size
Sonatrach / IAP 57
Primary sedimentary structures
Sonatrach / IAP 58
Bedforms vs flow regime
Oscillatory flow: waves
• Circular motion of particle at water
surface
• Flat orbits at bottom back and
forth motion of particles
• Geometry of deposit: wavy ripples,
plane beds
Unidirectional flow: rivers, wind
• Unidirectional downstream motion
of particles
• Deposition depends on grain size
vs. flow velocity
• Geometry of deposit: irregular
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
ripples, plane beds
Sonatrach / IAP 59
Bedforms in unidirectional flow
Sonatrach / IAP 60
Bedforms shape vs flow velocity
Constructional bedforms
Intermittent transport
Lower Flow regime
Upper flow regime
Erosional bedforms
Permanent transport
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 61
Bedforms in oscillatory flow
Oscillatory flow
• Flattening of wave orbits
• Back and forth motion creating « lateral » motion along the sea bottom
General characteristics
• Symmetrical shape
− Waves ripples
− Hummocks (Swales)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Subplane beds
• Peak or round crests
• Straight crests, with bifurcation
Sonatrach / IAP 62
Bedforms in oscillatory flow
Waves ripples
• Develop in velocity of waves between 9 to 90 cm/s
• Height: up to 20 cm
• Length: up to 1 m
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 63
Bedforms in oscillatory flow
Sonatrach / IAP 64
Erosional flow features
Sole marks
Erosional sedimentary structures on sediment surface (preserved by burial)
• Scour marks erosional turbulence
• Tool marks object imprints
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 65
Processes velocities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 66
Sediment maturity
Key points to keep in mind
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 67
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 69
Workshop: oscillatory bedforms
Identify depositional environment
Name bedforms
Range dimensions (λ, H, L)
Indicate flow direction
Sketch dynamic process
Typical Y‐shaped symmetrical ripples
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 70
Workshop: constructional bedforms
Identify depositional environment
Name bedforms
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 71
Workshop: beach facies analogues
Identify depositional environment
Name bedforms
Range dimensions (λ, H, L)
Indicate flow direction
Sketch dynamic process
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 72
Workshop: erosional bedforms
Flute marks
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Load structures
Sonatrach / IAP 73
Workshop: erosional bedforms
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 74
Workshop: erosional bedforms
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 75
Workshop: erosional bedforms
Crescent
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 76
Workshop: Bioturbation / Way‐up criterium
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 77
Workshop: beach facies analogues
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 78
Workshop: beach facies analogues
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 79
Workshop: beach facies analogues
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 80
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 81
Sedimentary fill hierarchy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 82
How to order the sedimentary pile?
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
"Facies adjacent to one another in a continuous vertical
sequence also accumulated adjacent to one another laterally"
Sonatrach / IAP 83
How to order the sedimentary pile?
Introduction to sedimentary sequences
Depositional sequence in respect to Walther's law
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 85
Sedimentary depositional environments
Continental environments Marine environments
Glacial Shoreline (coast/beach)
Aeolian Delta
Lacustrine • Fluvial‐dominated
Fluvial • Wave‐dominated
• Braided • Tide‐dominated
• Meandering Continental shelf
• Anastomosed • Siliciclastic
Coastal plain • Carbonatic
Slope, canyon
Basin
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Turbiditic fan
Sea level
• Abyssal plain
Sonatrach / IAP 86
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 87
Alluvial fan systems
Fan‐shaped body
• Cone that radiates downslope
• Stream channels emerge from valleys
• Rather coarse detrital sediments
• Poorly sorted
Built up by mountain stream
• At relief's foot
• Change of slope gradient
• Dip of alluvial fan: <10° (3 to
6°)
• Length: from few 100 m to
100 km
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 88
Typical alluvial fan sequence
Sedimentation
• Beds more or less parallel to the surface
• Stratification is moderately developed
Deposition mode
• Debris flow or mud flow dominated
• Extensive masses of mud‐supported coarse‐grained
sediment, moving downward
• Main channel: in upper fan and mid fan
Massive conglomerates
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Coarsening‐up sequence
Sonatrach / IAP 89
Alluvial fans
Alluvial fans are cone‐shaped piles of sediment formed at the foot of highlands where
streams confined by narrow valleys emerge into adjacent lowland. A series of overlapping
alluvial fans generates a clastic wedge
There are some differences between alluvial fans in arid and humid climates.
Sedimentation on alluvial fans begins where the streams leave their confined valleys and
loose some of their transport efficiency
Alluvial fans are composed of two types of sediment:
• Stream deposits
• Sediment gravity‐flows
Current‐transported sediments usually predominate. They are deposited either from
ephemeral or perennial water flow in the channel system or, after extreme rain storms,
from sheet‐floods inundating large parts of the alluvial fan
Sometimes, gravel is concentrated locally to form sieve deposits (coarse gravel and
boulders devoid of finer‐grained matrix). From time to time, large debris flows with a
muddy‐sandy matrix reach the proximal and mid‐fan area and bury part of the pre‐
existing, radiating channel system
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
At their lower end, such debris flows terminate in characteristic lobes, and they often
concentrate large boulders and gravel at their outer margin, forming levees. Later, new
channels cut into the mass flow deposits and rework and redistribute great proportions
of their material
Sonatrach / IAP 90
Fan deltas
Coastal alluvial fans prograding into a lake or into the sea form fan deltas. As soon as the
streams, carrying a high bed‐load, reach the standing water body, they drop their coarse
material at the shore face and in prodelta foresets
The intensity of reworking, sorting, and redeposition, as well as the transport of material
along the shoreline, depend on the wave energy and, in marine environments, on the
tidal range
In the case of lakes and protected embayments, fan progradation is little influenced by
these processes. Gravel and sand accumulate at the mouths of streams until they become
unstable from time to time and move as subaqueous debris flows into deeper water.
There, they alternate with muddy lake or marine deposits
On high‐energy coasts, some of the coarse material dropped at the river mouth is
transported alongshore adjacent beaches where it forms distinctive beach gravel; some
sand and gravel is swept by storms into deeper water
Fluctuations in the water level in lakes or the sea affect both the subaerial and
subaqueous facies of fan deltas. They are reflected by fluvial terraces and coarse grained
river mouth deposits at varying elevations. A lowering of the lake or sea level causes the
emergence of delta foresets and the subsequent cutting of fluvial channels into the
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
foresets. These channels are commonly filled later with fluvial deposits
Sonatrach / IAP 91
Exercise: identify environment and name feature
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 92
Fluvial depositional systems
Main characteristics
• Unidirectional flow regime
• Transport until flow exists, with decreasing grain size of carried particles
• Three types of sediment bedload:
− Bedload
− Suspended load
− Mixed load
• Sediments start to deposit when river loses energy or/and is progressively
abandoned (progressive decantation)
• Typical depositional sequence: basal erosional surface and fining‐upward sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Anastomosed system
Sonatrach / IAP 93
Fluvial depositional settings
Sonatrach / IAP 94
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 95
Braided river systems
Braided rivers are characterized by
high‐sediment load and high velocity
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 96
Typical braided river sequence
Braided rivers and its bars
Several erosional channels
Basal lag deposit
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Stacked fining‐up sequences Basal erosional surface
Sonatrach / IAP 97
Examples of basal conglomerates (lag deposit)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Erosional baseline
Erosion in the flood plain
Sonatrach / IAP 98
Log responses – Outcrop analogue
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 99
Typical braided river architecture
Gravel‐rich braided
system
• Longitudinal bars
• Conglomerates
dominant
Sand‐rich braided
system
• Transverse bars
• Sandstones dominant
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 100
Braided river systems
Braided streams usually consist of several individual channels separated by bars and
islands and therefore form a wide, shallow stream bed. Braided rivers develop near areas
of high relief, which deliver relatively large amounts of debris, gravel and sand into the
fluvial system
From all these characteristics, it can be inferred that braided systems are bed load‐
dominated, they carry and deposit chiefly gravel and sands. Therefore, they consist
predominantly of channel and channel‐flank deposits, while silty and muddy floodplain
facies are subordinate
Downstream, they often display a progressive decrease in grain size, as well as in bed
forms and internal sedimentary structures
The interstices in the gravel are usually later filled with sand during low water periods,
but in this system sandy beds are relatively rare in the proximal zone, unless there is little
gravel available in the source area. Sandy beds develop best at somewhat higher
topography elevations within the braided system next to the active channel system
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 101
Braided river systems
Many bars are somewhat graded. Interbedded with the gravels are thin lenses of sand
representing deposition in abandoned channels or sand wedges at the edge of bars
In places, one can observe repeated successions of fining‐upward gravel‐sand sequences 1
to 2 m thick, but in general it is difficult to identify the bottoms of former channels and the
geometry of their fill. The reason is that the underlying and neighboring sediments also
consist largely of gravel
Downstream, the predominantly gravelly beds grade into beds consisting partly of smaller
pebbles and sand. In the lower, more active channels, bar gravels dominate, whereas
sands and pebbly sands are common at higher topography elevations. In rarely flooded
areas, some silt and mud may be deposited and preserved
In the total assemblage, the gravel content varies between 10 and 70 %. As a result of
downstream and laterally migrating sand and gravel bars, planar and trough cross‐bedding
are the most important internal sedimentary structures
Both the lateral migration and sudden abandonment of channels due to avulsion cause
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
fining‐upward channel fill sequences a few meters thick. Such sequences are considered
the most distinctive characteristic feature of this type of braided river deposit
Sonatrach / IAP 102
Braided river architecture: reservoir potential
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
High Net‐to‐Gross Sheet‐like geometry
Immature sediments; early alteration Thin shaly interval at the top
Require top‐seal/structural traps
Sonatrach / IAP 103
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 104
Typical meandering river sequence
Crevasse splay
Point Bar
Coal
Fine grained sandstone
Organic shale, roots
medium
coarse to
grained sandstone
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Erosion
Meandering river
Fining‐up sequence : point bar
Sonatrach / IAP 105
Generation of meanders
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 106
Meandring river architecture: reservoir potential
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Lower Net‐to‐Gross Shoe‐lace geometry becoming sheet like
Sediment more mature Shales frequent in sequence
Stratigraphic trap potential
Sonatrach / IAP 107
Meandering river systems
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 108
Meandering river systems
Meandering river systems develop one principal, relatively narrow channel of high sinuosity
(> 1.5) and are dominated by mixed load or predominantly suspended load. Their overall
sand content often averages 20 to 40 %. If meandering rivers are associated with a wide
floodplain, the channel sediments may be restricted to a comparatively narrow zone within
the flood basin where they form a meander belt
In a sinuous channel segment, one can distinguish the following morphological features and
depositional sub‐environments:
− Channels and channel fills
− Point bars and lateral accretion complexes
− Chute bars
− Channel plugs (oxbow lakes)
− Levee and crevasse splay deposits
− Alluvial floodplain deposits
• The channel floor is usually covered by lag sediments consisting of the coarsest material
transported by the river during peak flood. This channel lag may also contain mud clasts
or blocks eroded from the banks. Lag sands and gravel usually accumulate between
scour pools and form flat, elongate bars displaying either imbrication of gravel or
crudely laminated and planar cross‐bedded gravelly sand
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Point bars accumulate on the inner sides of river bends, while on the outer side
material from the bank is eroded. In this way, the curvature of the meander tends to
become increasingly exaggerated until the river produces short‐cuts, leaving behind
abandoned channel segments (oxbow lakes)
Sonatrach / IAP 109
Meandering river systems
Most of the point bar material is eroded from the upstream channel banks. It is
deposited in areas of lower velocity turbulence. Because sediment moves up and out of
the channel onto the bar, cross sections of point bars often show fining‐upward
sequences, with sands on top of channel lags
Similarly, the internal structures grade from horizontal bedding (upper flow regime) to
large‐scale and small scale trough cross‐bedding (lower flow regime). The most distinctive
feature of point bars is lateral accretion)
Many meandering channels are accompanied by flat ridges sloping away from the
channel into the floodplain. These levees are built up during moderate floods which just
reach the elevation of the channel ridge. Due to decreasing flow velocity, sand is
deposited along the channel ridges, grading into silt somewhat farther away
Locally, channel water may spill over the levees into the floodplain, forming crevasse
splays. The fallout of sand and silt usually extends farther into the floodplains than the
levees, but such crevasse splays can also contribute to the buildup of the levees
The prevailing internal structures of these sand sheets may resemble those of thin sandy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
turbidites, showing some grading, horizontal lamination and small‐scale ripple cross‐
bedding. These structures are, however, often mashed or destroyed by the roots of
vegetation. Whereas distal crevasse splays become interbedded with floodplain deposits,
levee sands of ten tend to be reworked by subsequent channel migration
Sonatrach / IAP 110
Crevasse splay deposits
Deposits formed during flood period, by
break into the channel levees
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 111
Channel levees deposits
Mississipi
Sonatrach / IAP 112
Transfer mechanisms in siliciclastic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 113
Anastomosing river systems
Develop in
• Upstream area or downstream areas
• Low sinuosity (less than braided)
• Several wandering channels
Particularities of each channel
• Stable banks (not ephemeral)
• Fixed by vegetation
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 114
Anastomosing river architecture: reservoir potential
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Lower Net‐to‐Gross vertical stacked and confined sand bodies encased in mud
Sediment more mature
Sonatrach / IAP 115
Fluvial architecture and reservoir potential
Key points to keep in mind
River systems
• Main reservoirs located in channels and channels belts
• Associated reservoirs located in
− Levees deposits
− Crevasse splays
− Floodplains sandstones
Braided system: reservoir bodies
• Vertical and lateral stacking, good connection
• Geometry: Sheetlike or tabular sandbodies (stacked multistorey infill)
Meandering system: reservoir bodies
• Dominant lateral accretion (point bar – levees – crevasse splays)
• Geometry: “point bar – clay plug” model, isolated sandbodies
Anastomosing system: reservoir bodies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Dominant vertical aggradation, isolated narrow channels
• Geometry: channel fill
Sonatrach / IAP 116
Depositional environment vs reservoir distribution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Variation of reservoir quality with ELF 1997
depositional environment
and energy (slope)
Sonatrach / IAP 117
River types vs reservoir distribution
Sonatrach / IAP 118
River facies: reservoir potential
Fluvial architecture vs reservoir potential
Braided
Meandering
Anastomosed
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Courtesy of Pr. M. Lopez (U. of Montpellier)
Sonatrach / IAP 119
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 121
Coastal deposits
Sonatrach / IAP 122
Clastic depositional environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 123
Delta shapes & energy
Birdfoot
Fluvial
Lobate dominated
Wave Tide
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
dominated dominated
Cuspate Estuarian
Sonatrach / IAP 124
Delta classifications
Delta morphology reflects the relative importance of fluvial, tidal, and wave processes,
as well as gradient and sediment supply
• River‐dominated deltas occur in microtidal settings with limited wave energy, where
delta‐lobe progradation is significant and redistribution of mouth bars is limited
• Wave‐dominated deltas are characterized by mouth bars reworked into shore‐
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
parallel sand bodies and beaches
• Tide‐dominated deltas exhibit tidal mudflats and mouth bars that are reworked into
elongate sand bodies perpendicular to the shoreline
Sonatrach / IAP 125
Deltaic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 126
Key points: Fluvial‐dominated deltas
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fluvial‐dominated deltas are primarily controlled by the water density difference between
the inflowing river water and the standing water on the basin.
Delta – lobe progradation is significant while mouth bar distribution remains limited
Sonatrach / IAP 127
Fluvial‐dominated deltas
Sonatrach / IAP 128
Key points: Wave‐dominated deltas
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
The common sequence reflects reworked
mouth bar into sandbodies and beaches
parallel to the shoreline
Sonatrach / IAP 129
Coastal depositional environments
Shoreline Shelf
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 130
Identify features and infer depositional environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 131
Identify features and infer depositional environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 132
Coastal depositional environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 133
Coastal sedimentary features
Swash zone
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 134
Sedimentary features: HCS stratifications
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Hummocky cross stratification (HCS) forms during storm events
with combined wave and current activity in shallow seas
Sonatrach / IAP 135
Key points: Tide‐dominated deltas
Sonatrach / IAP 136
Tidal environments
Tide
• Periodic phenomenon on coastal domain
• Results from the gravitational attraction (Earth, Moon, Sun)
• Regular rise and fall of water level in the world’s oceans
• Effective agent of transport of sediment
Tidal range: vertical amplitude between low tide and high tide
Characterization
• Particle transport is vigorous and rapid
− Bipolar linear current (alternating tidal currents: Flood/Ebb)
− Cross‐stratification in opposite directions (herringbone) : Flood / Ebb oscillation
• Repeated erosion and creation of tidal channels
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Difficult conditions for living organisms
• Flaser, wavy and lenticular beddings
• Reactivation surface
Sonatrach / IAP 137
Tidal influenced bedforms & sedimentary structures
Tide‐influenced sedimentary structures:
• Herringbone cross stratification → bipolar flow directions
• Mud‐draped cross strata (quite common): result from alternating bedform migration
during high flow velocities with mud drapes deposition during high/low tide slack
water
• Tidal bundles are characterized by a sand‐mud couplet of varying thickness; tidal
bundle sequences consist of bundles that can be related to neap‐spring cycles
Flood
Flood‐ebb
tidal deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Ebb
Sonatrach / IAP 138
Sedimentary structures in tidal range
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 139
Sedimentary structures: tide‐related laminae
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 140
Sedimentary structures: tide‐related laminae
Bundle thickness
vs tide cycles
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 141
Summary table: sedimentary features vs environments
Lenticular Mud
Foreshore High tide (MHW)
Wavy Low → High ℮ Mud/Sand
(Tidal flat) Low tide (MLW)
Flaser Sand
Lower Shaly
Wavy bedding Low ℮ Outer shelf
offshore (burrows)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 142
Key points : Coastal systems and reservoir potentials
Key points to keep in mind
2. Reservoir bodies:
Mouth bar, and aggradational channels complexes
located along the distributary:
Limited lateral extension
Fluvial‐
dominated
Wave‐ Tide‐
dominated dominated
1. Reservoir bodies: 3. Reservoir bodies:
Beach barrier island, very good lateral Isolated tidal bar, poor continuity and extension.
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
continuity, well sorted sandbodies and clay‐free: Well sorted sandstone, but lot of clay drapes due
Best reservoir to intertidal processes: Discontinuous reservoir
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic depositional
environments and facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
− Coastal / deltaic systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
− Marine systems & reservoirs geometry – Quality
Sonatrach / IAP 145
Gravity deposits
Sonatrach / IAP 146
Marine clastic deposits: turbidites
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fluvial vs turbiditic clastics: similar organization of sediments in deeper environments
Sonatrach / IAP 147
Gravity deposits vs. processes & sediment supply
Step 3‐ geometries & extend of turbidites
Step 1‐ Initiation
of gravity deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Step 2 ‐ Processes of
transport &deposition
Sonatrach / IAP 148
Turbidite system general organization
Cross‐sections:
from proximal to distal turbiditic facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 149
Turbiditic system organization
Upper fan
Middle fan
Turbidite deposits:
sedimentary
facies and
log responses
Lower fan
General upward tendency:
coarsening and
New lobe
shallowing upward
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Abyssal plain
Sonatrach / IAP 150
Turbidites: depositional mechanism
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Lab reconstitution of a dynamic gravity flow
(mini turbiditic current = avalanche!)
Sonatrach / IAP 151
Bedforms in unidirectional flow
Sonatrach / IAP 152
Typical turbidite depositional sequences
Main characteristics
• Allochthonous sedimentation
• Highly organized from proximal to
distal part
• Dominantly controlled by
unidirectional flow
• General fining upward sequence
• Facies association from channels
to levees and lobes
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 153
Conventional Bouma sequence & field outcrop
Obara turbidites, Spain
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 154
Conventional Bouma sequence & field outcrop
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
St Jean de Luz turbidites ‐ France
Sonatrach / IAP 155
Deep sea deposits: turbidites
Abundant sediments reworked from delta
Sonatrach / IAP 156
Turbidite outcrop
Turbiditic sandstones
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(Mid fan ‐ channel)
Courtesy Philippe JOSEPH
Sonatrach / IAP 157
Turbidite outcrop
Stacked
channels
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Lower fan ‐ lobes
Turbiditic sandstones
Sonatrach / IAP 158
Turbidite outcrop
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Bouma sequence: Tb and Tc
Sonatrach / IAP 159
Sedimentation rate and sea variations
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 160
Fluvial and deltaic sequences
Gamma Ray log responses and depositional deltaic environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 161
Sediment maturity
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 162
Clastic reservoirs internal geometry and organization
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 163
Clastics
Key points to keep in mind
Clastic sediments are:
• Allochthonous erosional products (weathering, alteration and transportation)
• Transported by fluvial water, wind, ice
• Deposited in basins
The main depositional process of clastic sediments is progressive decantation
due to gradual decay of flow velocity (water or density current), i.e. decreasing
transport energy
Fluvial, deltaic and turbiditic depositional sequences are mostly fining‐upward
The evolution of a fluvial system (e.g. meander) involves both erosional and
decantation processes
The development of a delta is mostly due to progradation (if constant sediment
supply and sea level)
A turbidite results from a single depositional event (intermittent sediment
supply)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
The main source of deep sea deposits is reworking of existing sediments (e.g.
delta)
Sonatrach / IAP 164
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic reservoirs
Log responses in clastic sequences
Sonatrach / IAP
Log responses
in clastic sequences
Sonatrach / IAP 166
Sedimentary processes
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 167
Log responses
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 168
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
169
Log responses
Sonatrach / IAP
Log responses
in clastic sequences
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 171
Typical braided river sequence
Braided rivers and related bars
Several erosional channels
Basal lag deposit
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Stacked fining‐up sequences Basal erosional surface
Sonatrach / IAP 172
Typical meandering river sequence
Crevasse splay
Point bar
Coal
Fine grained sandstone
Organic shale, roots
medium
coarse to
grained sandstone
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Erosion
Meandering river
Fining‐up sequence: point bar
Sonatrach / IAP 173
Typical depositional sequences of fluvial sediments
Key points to keep in mind
Alluvial fan Braided river Meandering river
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 174
Deltaic depositional sequences
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 175
Turbidites sequences
Main characteristics:
• Allochthonous sedimentation
• Highly organized from proximal to distal
part
• Dominantly controlled by unidirectional
flow
• General fining‐upward sequence
• Facies association from channels to
levees and lobes
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 176
Clastic sequences
Gamma Ray log responses
and depositional environments
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 177
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Log responses
in clastic sequences
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 179
Accommodation variations and related sequences
PROGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET
SP RES
Rate of deposition
> 1
Rate of accommodation
RETROGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET
SP RES
Rate of deposition
< 1
Rate of accommodation
AGGRADATIONAL PARASEQUENCE SET
SP RES
Rate of deposition
= 1
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Rate of accommodation
Sonatrach / IAP
MITCHUM and VAN WAGONER 1991 180
Correlations during progradation time
Basinward
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 181
Correlations during progradation time
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 182
Facies distribution wave or fluvial‐dominated environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 183
Facies distribution fluvial or wave‐dominated environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 184
Facies distribution shoreline‐dominated environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 185
Facies distribution in tidal flat‐dominated environment
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 186
Log responses
in clastic sequences
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 187
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 188
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
189
190
Sonatrach / IAP
Sonatrach / IAP
Hierarchy of fluvial architectural elements
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 191
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic reservoirs
Clastic Petrography & Diagenesis
Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenetical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetical regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 194
Mineral diagenesis: Definition
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 195
Why study diagenesis?
To understand:
• Transformation mechanisms from sediment to sedimentary rock
• Sedimentary basin dynamic
• Reservoir quality
• Nature and distribution of porosity and permeability
• Fluid flow evolution
• Extend of oil recovery
• Interaction of secondary recovery fluids with the reservoir
• Movement or binding of pollutants
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 196
Processes
Physical
• Compaction
• Fluid migration
• Pressure solution
Chemical
• Mineral reaction
• Mineral replacement
• Cementation
• Dissolution
• Organic matter evolution
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Tectonic setting and basin evolution
Etc.
→ All processes are interdependent and cannot be easily separated
Sonatrach / IAP 197
What is lithification?
It implies grain cementation in the sediment but not necessarily burial and
compaction (e.g. beachrock)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 198
What type of diagenesis?
Early diagenesis
• Changes essentially biochemical
• First meters of burying
• Early in the history of sediments
• Environment in marine, meteoric, salted zone and vadoze zone
Late diagenesis
• Slower changes (compaction, dissolution and mineralogical
transformations)
• Burying diagenesis (pressure, temperature and fluids effects)
• Type of rock (carbonates, clays, siliciclastics, etc.) controlled by climate,
tectonic and sedimentary contexts
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 199
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 201
Definition of compaction
Rearrangement Cementation
(with volume losses) (without volume losses)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 202
Mechanical compaction – 1/2
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 203
Minerals
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 204
Rearrangement example in siliciclastics
1 mm
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 205
Rearrangement example in carbonates
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 206
Chemical compaction
P1
Where Pw = Pore fluid pressure
P2
And P1 > P2 > Pw
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
spaces
Sonatrach / IAP 207
Pressure‐solution
Sonatrach / IAP 208
Pressure‐solution mechanisms
Major constraint σ1
1. DISSOLUTION
2. DIFFUSION
Grain Minor constraint σ3
3. OVERGROWTH
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 209
Pressure‐solution in sandstone
Φ Overgrowth
Φ
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 210
Pressure‐solution in carbonate
Nummulitic limestone (Eocene, Corsica)
Precipitation
Diffusion
Dissolution
Awl
Concept Polarized light Cathodoluminescence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 211
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (polarized light)
Ex1 Lum Pola
Ex1 Lum nat
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 212
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)
Zoom 2
Zoom 1
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 213
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)
Zoom 1
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Dissolution
Sonatrach / IAP 214
Pressure‐solution example in sandstone (natural light)
Precipitation
Zoom 2
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
500 µm
Sonatrach / IAP 215
Mineralogical dissolution example (Natural light)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Potassic feldspar (FK) dissolution
Sonatrach / IAP 216
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 217
Cementation parameters – 1/2
There is rarely sufficient material in the rock to account for all cements present
Sonatrach / IAP 218
Cementation parameters – 2/2
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 219
Sources of silica cement
Radiolaria
Diatom
Sonatrach / IAP 220
Cementation in sandstone reservoir (Brent)
Uncemented sandstone
Diagenetic front
Cemented sandstone
(calcitic cement)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 221
Sources of kaolin cement
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 222
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 223
Moldic dissolution
Second step, dissolution of cement but not the micrite (more stable). The
shape is preserved. Sparitic precipitation in the cavity © 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 224
Pseudomorph forms
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
From halite (cubic crystal) to a “cubic” calcite
(normally trigonal – hexagonal scalenohedral)
Sonatrach / IAP 225
Recrystallization
The orientation of the first
crystal (as seed) govern the
direction in which further
crystals grows
How to reset all information…
Sonatrach / IAP 226
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 227
Near‐surface sandstone diagenesis
Sonatrach / IAP 228
Subsurface sandstone diagenesis
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 229
Diagenesis and reservoir quality
Key points to keep in mind
Sonatrach / IAP 230
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 231
Reservoir heterogeneities: Summary
Sonatrach / IAP 232
Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous reservoir
Homogeneous reservoir Heterogeneous reservoir
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(Faults, Unconformities, Layers, Facies,
Diagenesis, Fractures, Super K,…)
Heterogeneity: spatial variation of rock physical properties that affect fluid flow
Sonatrach / IAP 233
Key heterogeneities have to be absolutely described in the geological model
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 234
Reservoir heterogeneity: concepts – 2/2
Reservoir heterogeneities
• All relevant factors affecting the dynamic behavior of the field
• Small‐ to large‐scale geologic features
• From static reservoir characterization (significant or not)
• From dynamic reservoir characterization (significant)
Basic principle
• Identify the smallest element that will impact production
Reservoir heterogeneities characterization
calls for the cooperation between all professionals involved in the study
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(i.e. from geophysicists to reservoir engineers)
Sonatrach / IAP 235
Classification of heterogeneities in reservoirs – 1/2
Weber classification (1986) Classification
« How heterogeneitiy affect oil recovery »
Heterogeneity
range
A: Structural
Prior to the modeling phase, it is
1 to 3 necessary to perform a synthesis
of heterogeneity types, for each
B: Stratigraphic 1 to 3 item, taking into account their
impact on fluid flow, using the
following scale:
C: Diagenetic 1 to 3
1 ‐ major heterogeneity
D: Depositional 1 to 3 2 ‐ intermediate heterogeneity
3 ‐ negligible heterogeneity
E: Depositional 1 to 3
Classification objective: highlight
most significant heterogeneities.
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
F: Diagenetic 1 to 3
G: Structural 1 to 3
Sonatrach / IAP 236
Classification of heterogeneities in reservoirs – 2/2
Impact on recovery
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 237
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Clastic Petrography &
Diagenesis
Mineral diagenesis
• Definfition and processes
Diagenesical analysis
• Effect of compaction on primary porosity
• Effect of cementation on primary porosity
• Replacement during diagenesis
• Fluid dynamics and diagenetic regimes
Heterogeneities
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Introduction: heterogeneities in the reservoir
• Reservoir heterogeneity features
Sonatrach / IAP 239
Scale of reservoir heterogeneities
Grain
Obervation
Lamination
scales:
Bed
< 1 mm
Formation Field
< 1 cm
Small ...
< 1 m
Relative
Intermediate ... < 1000 m > 1000 m
scales:
Large ... Very large ...
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
(from Krause and Collins, 1984)
Heterogeneities and investigation tools
do not always have the same scale…
Sonatrach / IAP 240
Small scale heterogeneities
Example of laminations and cross‐beddings
Micro scale: related to a mixture of
different pore types and geometries
(textural features)
Macro scale: often related to
laminations and cross‐beddings
(depositional features: energy)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 241
Large‐scale heterogeneities (1/5)
Faults
• Juxtaposition of reservoir units and low permeability
units
• Clay smearing (injection of clay into the fault plane)
• Cataclasis: sand grains crushing (breccia)
• Diagenesis (fault‐related): cementation due to fluid
circulation and precipitation creating hydraulic seals
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Cataclasis: silicification
Sonatrach / IAP 242
Large‐scale heterogeneities (2/5)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 243
Large‐scale heterogeneities (3/5)
Diagenesis
(power line cable)
DOLOMITE
Dolomitization
front
Bedding
LIMESTONE
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
0 Scale 5 m
Sonatrach / IAP 244
Large‐scale heterogeneities (4/5)
Both shale baffles and permeability streaks
Lateral extension linked with depositional environment
e.g. Hassi‐Messaoud reservoir (silts)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 245
Large‐scale heterogeneities (5/5)
Seeping fractures
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 246
Reservoir characterization and modeling
Key points to keep in mind
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 247
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Une formation IFP Training pour Sonatrach / IAP
Clastic reservoirs
Fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy
Sonatrach / IAP
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 250
Sequence stratigraphy: Introduction
These surfaces are used to provide a frame work to the interpretation of the depositional
settings of the sedimentary section
This interpretation is then used to predict the extent and character of the component
sedimentary facies
Integrated method with all the exploration tools (geology, geophysics, palynology,
geochemistry…)
• Relation between geological layers in a chronostratigraphic understanding
• Basic sedimentary unit: depositional sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Each system tract
• Bounded by physical surface
• Composed of elementary « unit » (genetic unit or parasequence)
Sonatrach / IAP 251
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 253
Accommodation definition
Sediment is deposited in the space
between the seafloor and base level
(sea level or graded stream profile)
which is called accommodation
The way a basin fills with sediment
and the stratal patterns that result
depend upon how much space is
available for the sediment to fill and
how rapidly new space is added
Accommodation may vary as both
the upper and lower boundaries of
this space move up or down
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 254
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 255
Relative sea level vs space availability
Eustacy refers only to the position
of the sea surface with reference
to a fixed datum, such as the
center of the earth, and is
therefore independent from local
factors
Relative sea level incorporates
local subsidence by referring to
the position of the sea surface
with respect to a datum at or near
the seafloor
To discern the rate at which new
space is added, both relative
eustacy fluctuation rate combined
with subsidence rate must be
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
considered
Sonatrach / IAP 256
Accommodation & Equilibrium point
Equilibrium point : Rate of subsidence = Rate of eustatic change
A platform is divided into two parts separated by an equilibrium point
Basinward of :
• Rate of subsidence
> Rate of eustatic fall
• Creation of a new
space added
• Area of relative sea
level rise
Landward of :
• Rate of subsidence
< Rate of eustatic fall
• No creation of new space added
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Area of relative sea level fall
Sonatrach / IAP 257
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 259
Specific dynamic points
Inflection points of the eustatic curve
• Point F: maximum rate of sea level fall F R
− Minimum rate of creation of new space added
• Point R: maximum rate of sea level rise
− Maximum rate of creation of new space added
Depositional dynamic on the shelf at these
specific inflection points of the eustatic curve
• Point F: minimum deposit of sediment
− Maximum erosional phenomenon Point R
• Point R: transgression and development of
− a condensed section
− Maximum drowning of the basin over the shelf
− Location of the maximum flooding surface:
MFS
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Point F
Sonatrach / IAP 260
Theorical sequence: the Exxon “slug”
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 261
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 263
Sequence stratigraphy
1 2
3
4
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 264
Sequence stratigraphy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 265
Key surfaces in sequence stratigraphy
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
In Kendall (2004)
Sonatrach / IAP 266
Sedimentation rate and sea variations
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Within unconfined lobes
Sonatrach / IAP 267
Theorical sequence: “Exxon Slug”
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 268
Systems tract synthesis
These surfaces are used to provide a frame work to the interpretation of the depositional
settings of the sedimentary section
This interpretation is then is used to predict the extent and character of the component
sedimentary facies
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 269
Lowstand‐fan systems tract
Lowstand fans are deposited during rapid eustatic falls which exceed the rate of
subsidence at the shelf edge
Sediment bypasses the shelf and is deposited directly on the slope and in the basin in the
form of point‐sourced submarine fans. This figure illustrates geologic, geographic, and
eustatic conditions conducive to the formation of these deposits
Internally, lowstand fans are characterized by mounded facies and may be extensively
sand prone. These mounds are commonly excellent reservoirs
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 270
Lowstand‐wedge systems tract
The lowstand‐wedge systems tract begins to form during the latter part of a rapid
eustatic fall as lowstand‐fan deposition ends. Deposition is initiated when the rate of
eustatic fall is again equal to subsidence at the shelf edge
This interval is characterized by resumption of a slow rise of relative sea level at the shelf
edge
Deltaic deposition is localized in the upper parts of canyons or embayments cut into the
shelf during rapid eustatic falls
The base of this systems tract is an unconformity. The top grades either into a
transgressive depositional sequence or is a condensed section, if transgressive deposits
are absent or not observed.
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 271
Transgressive systems tract
When the rate of new shelf space added exceeds the rate of sediment supply,
transgression occurs. The timing of this event depends on sediment supply and rate
of eustatic rise, but it will usually occur on the rising limb of the eustatic curve when
the rate of addition of new shelf space increases rapidly prior to the eustatic rise
inflection point
During transgression, only pelagic or hemipelagic deposition occurs on the starved
shelf and basin, generating a starved or condensed section there
Of all the systems tract types, the transgressive systems tract is the most sensitive to
variations of sediment supply, and its occurrence is therefore the most difficult to
predict
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 272
Highstand systems tract
The highstand systems tract is deposited during the eustatic highstand, defined as the
interval between the eustatic rise and fall inflection points. This interval is characterized
by a slowly decreasing relative rise of sea level as the rate of eustatic change gradually
decreases
An unconformity defines the upper surface, and a condensed section marks the lower
limits of this systems tract
Reservoir facies are associated primarily with prograding beach and aggrading fluvial
depositional systems. Organic‐rich facies with source potential may develop on the toes
and delta plains of progradational units
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 273
Shelf‐margin systems tract
The shelf‐margin systems tract is a regressive stratigraphic unit overlying a highstand
deposit and is usually deposited following the inflection point on a gentle eustatic fall
This interval is characterized by a progressive increase in the rate of relative rise of sea
level. The shelf margin systems tract is deposited on the outer part of the shelf and is
marked by an abrupt basinward shift of coastal onlap at its base
The base of this systems tract is an erosional unconformity or its correlative conformity,
whereas the top either grades into a transgressive systems tract or is a condensed
section. The basal unconformity on the shelf is usually marked by paralic/deltaic
sediments overlying fluvial deposits
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 274
Fundamentals of sequence
stratigraphy
Introduction to sequence stratigraphy
• General introduction
• Accommodation definition
• Relative sea level and space available
• Dynamic points
• Sequence development
• Parasequence/genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 275
How to order the sedimentary pile?
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
"Facies adjacent to one another in a
continuous vertical sequence
also
accumulated adjacent to one another
laterally"
Sonatrach / IAP 276
Sedimentation rate and sea variations
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 277
Introduction to sedimentary sequences
Depositional sequence in respect to Walther's law
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 278
Parasequence: depositional processes in system tracts
Progradagradation (Advancing)
Retrogradation (Backstepping)
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
• Elementary deposition sequence (building block)
• Thickness : few meters to few tens of meters
• Bounded by isochrons (2 successives times surfaces)
The genetic sequence
The genetic sequences are short term
depositional sequences (1 Ma) regrouping
orders of cyclicity lower than the 4th order
They are limited by two maximum flooding
surfaces or by two condensed intervals, and
there thicknesses vary from a few
decimeters to few meters
They record a cycle of variation of the
depositional environment, interpreted as
transgression and regression
The genetic sequences are deducted from
essentially sedimentological but none
geometric observations. They are recognized
by drilling or on outcrops
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
P. Homewood, P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001
Sonatrach / IAP 280
The genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
P. Homewood, P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001
Sonatrach / IAP 281
The genetic sequence
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
P. Homewood, P. Mauriaud, F. Lafont 2001
Sonatrach / IAP 282
Definition and example
Objectives of chronostratigraphy:
• Determine the ages
of strata
• Demonstrate the
geographic extend
of strata
• Confirm the
sequence
stratigraphy
interpretations
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 283
Definition and example
Combination between paleontology and stratigraphy. In oil and gas industry,
biostratigraphy corresponds to the study from rock samples (core and cuttings) of
microfossils (pollens, spores, nannofossils, diatoms and foraminifera)
Sonatrach / IAP 284
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION,
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 285
© 2013 ‐ IFP Training
Sonatrach / IAP 286