Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acquisition and Assessment of Non-Intended Outputs in The Lignite Industry
Acquisition and Assessment of Non-Intended Outputs in The Lignite Industry
and heating value, lignite can be used economi- Analysis of system structure
cally only within relatively short distances from and Modelling
the opencast mines. Therefore all the lignite-
fired power plants are located in close proximity
to the mines. The lignite opencast mines and Classification of
nearby power plants are technical production the material and energy flows
systems with geographical, geological and tech-
Implementation
nological boundary conditions. As almost all
Alteration
geological and most of the geographical restric- Data acquisition and
tions are not variable, the feasibility and the management
economic success of the mine operation under
given market conditions can only be optimised
by technological parameters. All the technical, Material and energy balancing
economic and organisational measures which Calculation of the non-intended outputs
influence the production of a certain quantity
and a defined product quality from a very well
explored deposit and for electricity production Assessment and deduction
as well as for CO2 capture and storage are to be of appropriate measures
understood as technology. Figure 1: Flowchart of the procedure of acquisition and
Even though especially mines appear diffi- assessment of the non-intended outputs.
cult to access to “benchmarking”, the acquisi- including CO2 capture, transport and storage in
tion and assessment of all the material and en- an adequate deposit is analysed. Therefore, a hi-
ergy flows create the potential for comparisons erarchical system definition specific to the re-
of mining operation as well as for power gen- quirements in the lignite industry is necessary
eration from lignite and for comparisons of that allows to systematically break-down the
similar sites with the option to extend the ex- overall system into its relevant processes and
amination globally to different areas. Improve- associated material and energy flows. For mod-
ment, modification and optimisation can be de- elling the overall system as well as the individ-
rived from this knowledge. By means of the ual processes Umberto is used. Umberto is a
methodology the lignite mining, the power gen- software tool to model, calculate and visualise
eration as well as the CO2 capture and storage material and energy flow systems as material
can be optimised to contribute to a sustainable and energy flow networks.
development in the lignite industry. The material and energy flows or compo-
nents of them are classified as non-intended
outputs according to the definition not to be the
2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
production target. Then operational data (input
For the acquisition and assessment of the mate- and output material and energy flows, cost data,
rial and energy flows not only in the mining in- etc.) has to be gathered for the identified ele-
dustry, but also in the lignite industry, an inte- ments using a set of appropriate questionnaires.
grated approach is necessary. Therefore the ob- For further analysis, the acquired data is then
jective of the work presented in this paper has stored in the database of Umberto.
been the development of a methodology suited Further processing of the data primarily
to the comprehensive technical and economic comprises the data reconciliation of the meas-
analysis of all material and energy flows in the ured and estimated values to fit the set of mate-
lignite industry and its application to selected rial and energy balances. For this purpose proc-
operations. ess models are used. Based on the corrected bal-
Figure 1 shows the overall flowchart for the ances for all material and energy components
procedure of acquisition and assessment of the within the overall system the flows containing
non-intended outputs. The procedure is dis- the non-intended outputs are identified and used
cussed in detail within the next paragraphs. to calculate several performance indicators as a
In the first step the structure of the mine op- decision support in taking appropriate optimisa-
eration and the nearby power generation plant tion measures.
3rd AMIREG International Conference (2009): Assessing the Footprint of 32
Resource Utilization and Hazardous Waste Management, Athens, Greece
2.1 System definition and system model extraction”, 01.04 “Haulage/transport”, 01.05
“Supporting”, 01.06 “Material supply”, 01.07
In accordance with the system-analytic scope,
“Repair/maintenance”, 01.08 “Personnel trans-
material and energy flows were only considered
port”, 01.09 “Dumping/loading”, 01.10 “Mine
in connection with the active working phase of a
water management”, 01.11 “Mine ventilation”,
lignite mine and a lignite-fired power plant.
01.12 “Storage/disposal”, 01.13 “Immission
Processes and outputs up to the start of regular
control”, 01.14 “Recultivation during mining”,
production and after the close down were not
01.15 “Recultivation after mining” and 01.16
considered. Providing electricity or in the long
“Overall operation of the mine”. The subsys-
term vision the capture and storage of CO2 in an
tems of first order in the partial system 03 “Po-
adequate deposit are other limits of the system
wer generation” are: 03.01 “Processing of fuel”,
for the investigation.
03.02 “Combustion”, 03.03 “Gasification”, 03.
Due to the differences in the balancing pro-
04 “Steam generation”, 03.05 “Energy conver-
cedure, in the system-analytic approach the
sion in turbines”, 03.06 “Condensation”, 03.07
overall system “lignite industry” is divided into
“Flue gas cleaning”, 03.08 “CO2 capture”, 03.09
the partial systems 01 “Mining”, (02 “Process-
“Process water management”, 03.10 “Providing
ing”), 03 “Power generation” and 04 “CO2 se-
electricity”, 03.11 “Loading/unloading”, 03.12
questration”. For all the partial systems not only
“Disposal”, 03.13 “Repair/maintenance” and 03.
subsystems of first and second order, but also
14 “Overall operation of the power plant”. The
the associated elements are defined. By doing so
subsystems of first order in the partial system 04
a process-oriented proceeding is pursued. The
“CO2 sequestration” are: 04.01 “CO2 compres-
main idea is to finally ascertain the material and
sion”, 04.02 “CO2 transport”, 04.03 “CO2 stor-
energy flows in such a way that the reasons,
age”, 04.04 “Repair/maintenance” and 04.05
origins, quantities and qualities of the non-
“Overall operation of the CO2 sequestration”.
intended outputs can be assigned to the individ-
For further subdivision, all the subsystems of
ual processes. The hierarchical structure of the
first order are divided into subsystems of second
system is represented in Figure 2.
order. To the subsystems of second order the
For the better handling of the hierarchical
elements are assigned.
system structure a four-digit coding scheme is
The content of the system is determined by
introduced. The partial systems, the subsystems
the individual elements and their interrelations.
of first and second order as well as the elements
Elements describe processes, which can not fur-
are unambiguously assigned by two-digit num-
ther usefully be subdivided. One or more pieces
bers. So it is possible to match the recorded in-
of equipment can belong to an individual ele-
puts and outputs to the appropriate elements.
ment, for which the material and energy flows
First of all the main, ancillary and auxiliary
are balanced. The flows represent the relations
processes have to be identified and defined as
that link the elements and/or subsystems. An
subsystems of first order. In the partial system
example is shown in Figure 3.
01 “Mining” the following processes are defi-
In accordance with the principle of Petri nets,
ned as subsystems of first order: 01.01 “Deve-
there are three basic types of components to cre-
lopment”, 01.02 “Preparatory”, 01.03 “Mining/
ate material and energy flow networks in Um-
berto. Material and energy transformation proc-
01 Partial system 1
esses are represented in transitions (T). For each
01.01 Subsystem of 1st order
Inputs Element Outputs
01.01.01 Subsystem of 2nd order
Muck Ore
Dust
Energy Motor Device Exhaust gas
01.01.01.01 01.01.01.n 01.01.00.n 01.00.00.n Lubricant Oil loss
Element Element Element Element and material Abrasion
01.03.03.01 „Loading Waste heat
Fresh air with mobile equipment“ Noise
Figure 2: Numbering convention for the hierarchical sys- Figure 3: Inputs and outputs of the element 01.03.03.01
tem definition. “Loading with mobile equipment“.
3rd AMIREG International Conference (2009): Assessing the Footprint of 33
Resource Utilization and Hazardous Waste Management, Athens, Greece
Mine water
water Groundwater
2.2 Material and energy flows
Meteoric
Meteoric water
water
Besides the process-oriented description of the Process
Process water
water
used to complete the system model. rated costs (C) and revenues (R).
There are three different cases to be distin-
2.5 Assessment
guished:
The constraints in mine operation and the han-
- Case 1: Δ2 > 0 The non-intended output
dling of material and energy flows in the lignite
yields a profit.
industry result from technical necessities of the
- Case 2: Δ2 = 0 A profitable use is not directly
production, safety-relevant requirements and
possible. However, it can be quantified, e.g.
regulations for the protection of health and envi-
for preventing follow-up costs.
ronment. For the observance of all regulations
- Case 3: Δ2 < 0 There is no economic use of
and rules, certain outputs have to be declared in
the non-intended output.
detail. Their effects on health and environment
have to be explained. Nevertheless this does not The determination of the costs for avoidance,
necessarily lead to the monitoring and quantifi- treatment and/or disposal of outputs and as-
cation of all non-intended outputs during opera- signment of the costs to the individual processes
tion. Therefore, each procedure for evaluation of (as far as possible to the elements) as well as the
non-intended outputs in the lignite industry has balancing of the costs in accordance with the
to take into account the legal and safety rules as system structure results in the calculation of per-
well as the social-cultural aspects relevant for formance indicators and possibly in the deduc-
the location of the respective mine. tion of appropriate measures according to prior-
Pre-determined parameters of the system can ity.
be assigned to the geology of the site including
the material content of the deposit. Based on the
3. APPLICATION
mine design, the technical and organisational
parameters within mainly economic limits have For the application of the introduced methodol-
to be taken into account for the assessment of ogy to the lignite industry an opencast mine and
non-intended outputs. Processes can only be lignite power plant in Germany is initially cho-
quantitatively described, optimised and com- sen. The raw lignite is extracted by continuous
pared within certain limits. operation of bucket wheel and bucket chain ex-
Figure 5 shows the flowchart of a possible cavators. It is transported and dumped by con-
procedure for an economic evaluation of non- veyor bridges as well as belt conveyors and
intended outputs in the lignite industry, incorpo- spreaders. The raw lignite from the opencast
mines is transported to the nearby power plants
Source of non-intended by conveyor belt and/or train.
Optimisation
outputs: process The system analysis of a lignite opencast
mine with a nearby power plant results in a
Non-intnded output: complex model which can be arranged into mul-
material or energy tiple subsystems and elements. Based on the
available data, the balancing of material and en-
ergy flows for the defined subsystems is per-
Measure: Measure: Measure:
Avoidance Acquisition/disposal Collection/utilisation
formed. Figure 6 shows the material and energy
flow network of the investigated opencast mine.
T1 is specified by a subnet. T2 to T5 are speci-
Costs C2 Costs C1 Revenues R fied by functions, e.g. based on the stoichiome-
try of chemical reactions or physical laws.
There are still no lignite-fired power plants with
Δ 1 = R – C1 CO2 carbon and capture in work. Nevertheless
R > C1 , Δ1 > 0
the subsystems are included in the material and
energy network for rough calculations of the en-
Δ2 = Δ1 – C2
Δ2 > 0, ΣR >ΣC
ergy demand and the effects on the overall sys-
Δ2 < 0, ΣR < ΣC tem.
Figure 5: Algorithm for the evaluation of non-intended The following non-intended outputs are iden-
outputs based on costs and benefits tified as significant: mine water (especially cer-
3rd AMIREG International Conference (2009): Assessing the Footprint of 35
Resource Utilization and Hazardous Waste Management, Athens, Greece
P6: emissions from P7: mine water P8: emissions from P10: waste heat
opencast mining haulage by train P9: lubricants: air, water,
calcium carbonate
P5: 03.10
P2: lubricants: P3: 01.09.03 "Dumping" T2: 01.04.05.08 "Providing electricity"
fuel and air
"Discontinuous haulage
P14 by train" P4
P13: building
materials
T1: 01 "Mining" T3:03 "Power generation" P15: 01.12.03 "Disposal
in the openc ast mine"
P1: overburden, raw lignite (ash and gypsum)
P11: Electric energy
from the deposit,
groundwater P16
P12: electric energy P20