Blood type O (probability) 0.

6
Donor having blood O 70
Donor not having blood O 50
Total donors 120

PROBABILITY No
probability of donor having blood O 0.6
probability of donor not having blood O 0.4
Total 1

Column1 Column2
Donor having blood O 70
total of donor 120
proportion 0.58333333

independent (not related)

they had the same result as previous record for the proportion of donors that having Blood O
Call Center
Data 2

Male = 1 Yes = 1 Yes = 1

Female = 0 No = 0 No = 0

Prior Call Length of

Center College Service
Gender Starting Age Experience Degree (years)
0 18 1 0 0.34
0 18 0 1 0.32
1 19 1 1 0.32
1 19 0 0 0.47
0 19 1 0 0.59
1 19 1 0 0.58
1 19 1 0 0.68
0 19 1 0 0.75
0 19 1 0 0.78
1 19 0 0 0.90
1 20 1 0 0.93
0 20 0 1 0.94
0 20 1 0 1.01
0 20 1 0 1.02
1 20 0 0 1.06
0 21 0 1 1.03
1 21 0 1 1.03
1 21 0 0 1.12
0 21 0 0 1.20
1 22 0 1 1.14
0 22 0 0 1.20
0 23 1 1 1.24
1 23 0 0 1.29
1 23 0 1 1.33
0 23 0 1 1.34
1 23 0 1 1.43
1 23 0 1 1.44
1 24 0 0 1.46
0 24 0 0 1.51
0 24 1 1 1.63
0 25 0 0 1.67
1 25 0 1 1.68
1 25 1 0 1.74
1 25 1 1 1.77
0 26 0 0 1.79
1 26 0 0 1.78
0 26 0 1 1.84
1 26 0 0 1.89
0 26 1 0 1.92
0 27 0 0 1.95
1 28 0 0 2.06
0 28 0 1 2.05
0 29 1 0 2.07
0 30 0 1 2.09
1 30 0 0 2.13
1 30 1 1 2.12
0 31 1 1 2.08
1 31 1 1 2.11
0 31 1 0 2.17
0 31 0 0 2.20
0 32 1 1 2.19
1 32 0 1 2.18
1 32 0 0 2.16
0 33 0 0 2.28
1 34 1 0 2.48
1 34 0 0 2.58
0 34 0 0 2.51
1 34 1 0 2.91
0 36 1 0 2.89
0 39 1 0 2.95
0 39 0 0 3.05
0 39 1 0 3.01
1 40 1 0 3.14
1 40 0 0 3.28
0 41 0 0 3.31
1 43 0 0 3.45
1 43 1 0 3.55
0 45 0 0 3.99
0 47 0 0 4.41
0 50 0 0 7.05
 Length of MALE FEMALE
Gender Service (years)
0 0.34 0.32 0.34
0 0.32 0.47 0.32
0 0.59 0.58 0.59
0 0.75 0.68 0.75
0 0.78 0.90 0.78
0 0.94 0.93 0.94
0 1.01 1.06 1.01
0 1.02 1.03 1.02
0 1.03 1.12 1.03
0 1.20 1.14 1.20
0 1.20 1.29 1.20
0 1.24 1.33 1.24
0 1.34 1.43 1.34
0 1.51 1.44 1.51
0 1.63 1.46 1.63
0 1.67 1.68 1.67
0 1.79 1.74 1.79
0 1.84 1.77 1.84
0 1.92 1.78 1.92
0 1.95 1.89 1.95
0 2.05 2.06 2.05
0 2.07 2.13 2.07
0 2.09 2.12 2.09
0 2.08 2.11 2.08
0 2.17 2.18 2.17
0 2.20 2.16 2.20
0 2.19 2.48 2.19
0 2.28 2.58 2.28
0 2.51 2.91 2.51
0 2.89 3.14 2.89
0 2.95 3.28 2.95
0 3.05 3.45 3.05
0 3.01 3.55 3.01
0 3.31 3.31
0 3.99 3.99
0 4.41 4.41
0 7.05 7.05
1 0.32
1 0.47
1 0.58
1 0.68
1 0.90
1 0.93
1 1.06
1 1.03
1 1.12
1 1.14
1 1.29
1 1.33
1 1.43
1 1.44
1 1.46
1 1.68
1 1.74
1 1.77
1 1.78
1 1.89
1 2.06
1 2.13
1 2.12
1 2.11
1 2.18
1 2.16
1 2.48
1 2.58
1 2.91
1 3.14
1 3.28
1 3.45
1 3.55
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

MALE FEMALE
Mean 1.76333333333333 2.01
Variance 0.746141666666667 1.63181666666667
Observations 33 37
Pooled Variance 1.21502843137255
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 68
t Stat -0.934600602706704
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.176650620335032
t Critical one-tail 1.66757228079671
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.353301240670064
t Critical two-tail 1.99546893142984

the p-value is 0.353301241, which is greater than alpha 0.05, therefore we

cannot reject the null hypothesis which that no difference of average between
male and female lenght's of services. Thus the null hypothesis is valid.
Prior Call Center Length of Service EXPERIENCED
Experience (years)
0 0.32 0.34
0 0.47 0.32
0 0.90 0.59
0 0.94 0.58
0 1.06 0.68
0 1.03 0.75
0 1.03 0.78
0 1.12 0.93
0 1.20 1.01
0 1.14 1.02
0 1.20 1.24
0 1.29 1.63
0 1.33 1.74
0 1.34 1.77
0 1.43 1.92
0 1.44 2.07
0 1.46 2.12
0 1.51 2.08
0 1.67 2.11
0 1.68 2.17
0 1.79 2.19
0 1.78 2.48
0 1.84 2.91
0 1.89 2.89
0 1.95 2.95
0 2.06 3.01
0 2.05 3.14
0 2.09 3.55
0 2.13
0 2.20
0 2.18
0 2.16
0 2.28
0 2.58
0 2.51
0 3.05
0 3.28
0 3.31
0 3.45
0 3.99
0 4.41
0 7.05
1 0.34
1 0.32
1 0.59
1 0.58
1 0.68
1 0.75
1 0.78
1 0.93
1 1.01
1 1.02
1 1.24
1 1.63
1 1.74
1 1.77
1 1.92
1 2.07
1 2.12
1 2.08
1 2.11
1 2.17
1 2.19
1 2.48
1 2.91
1 2.89
1 2.95
1 3.01
1 3.14
1 3.55
NO EXPERIENCED
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
0.32
0.47 EXPERIENCED
0.90 Mean 1.74892857142857
0.94 Variance 0.893172883597882
1.06 Observations 28
1.03 Pooled Variance 1.21624949229692
1.03 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
1.12 df 68
1.20 t Stat -0.896845776985351
1.14 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.186482714160467
1.20 t Critical one-tail 1.66757228079671
1.29 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.372965428320935
1.33 t Critical two-tail 1.99546893142984
1.34
1.43
1.44
1.46 the p-value is 0.372965428, which is greater than alpha 0.05, therefore we cannot
reject the null hypothesis which that no difference of average lenght's of services
1.51 between individual with experienced and individual with no experienced . Thus the
1.67 null hypothesis is valid.
1.68
1.79
1.78
1.84
1.89
1.95
2.06
2.05
2.09
2.13
2.20
2.18
2.16
2.28
2.58
2.51
3.05
3.28
3.31
3.45
3.99
4.41
7.05
 NO EXPERIENCED
1.99023809523809
1.42900725900116
42

han alpha 0.05, therefore we cannot

ence of average lenght's of services
idual with no experienced . Thus the
s valid.
College Length of COLLEGE NO COLLEGE
Degree Service (years) DEGREE DEGREE
0 0.34 0.32 0.34
0 0.47 0.32 0.47
0 0.59 0.94 0.59
0 0.58 1.03 0.58
0 0.68 1.03 0.68
0 0.75 1.14 0.75
0 0.78 1.24 0.78
0 0.9 1.33 0.9
0 0.93 1.34 0.93
0 1.01 1.43 1.01
0 1.02 1.44 1.02
0 1.06 1.63 1.06
0 1.12 1.68 1.12
0 1.2 1.77 1.2
0 1.2 1.84 1.2
0 1.29 2.05 1.29
0 1.46 2.09 1.46
0 1.51 2.12 1.51
0 1.67 2.08 1.67
0 1.74 2.11 1.74
0 1.79 2.19 1.79
0 1.78 2.18 1.78 t-Test: Two-Sample
0 1.89 1.89
0 1.92 1.92
0 1.95 1.95
0 2.06 2.06
0 2.07 2.07
0 2.13 2.13
0 2.17 2.17
0 2.2 2.2
0 2.16 2.16
0 2.28 2.28
0 2.48 2.48
0 2.58 2.58
0 2.51 2.51
0 2.91 2.91
0 2.89 2.89
0 2.95 2.95
0 3.05 3.05
0 3.01 3.01
0 3.14 3.14
0 3.28 3.28
0 3.31 3.31
0 3.45 3.45
0 3.55 3.55
0 3.99 3.99
0 4.41 4.41
0 7.05 7.05
1 0.32
1 0.32
1 0.94
1 1.03
1 1.03
1 1.14
1 1.24
1 1.33
1 1.34
1 1.43
1 1.44
1 1.63
1 1.68
1 1.77
1 1.84
1 2.05
1 2.09
1 2.12
1 2.08
1 2.11
1 2.19
1 2.18
 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Column1 COLLEGE DEGREE NO COLLEGE DEGREE

Mean 1.51363636363636 2.06791666666667
Variance 0.319814718614718 1.53898705673759
Observations 22 48
Pooled Variance 1.16247795231729
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 68
t Stat -1.99673312349161
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.024929537891073
t Critical one-tail 1.66757228079671
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.049859075782146
t Critical two-tail 1.99546893142984

the p-value is 0.049859076, which is less than alpha 0.05, therefore we reject the null hypothesis
as there is the difference of average lenght's of services between individual with a college degree
and individual with no college degree. Thus the null hypothesis is invalid

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances

Column1 COLLEGE DEGREE NO COLLEGE DEGREE

Mean 1.51363636363636 2.06791666666667
Variance 0.319814718614718 1.53898705673759
Observations 22 48
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 68
t Stat -2.56767422544908
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.006220670071358
t Critical one-tail 1.66757228079671
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.012441340142717
t Critical two-tail 1.99546893142984

the p-value is 0.01244134, which is less than significant level 0.05, therefore we reject the null
hypothesis as there is the difference of average lenght's of services between individual with a
college degree and individual with no college degree. Thus the null hypothesis is invalid.
CHI-SQUARE TEST

COUNT OF RESPONDENT OF RAW LABELS

Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Cappuccino Latte Mocha
Female 6 10 2 4 7 9
Male 16 5 8 2 3 2
Grand Total 22 15 10 6 10 11

EXPECTED FREQUENCY
Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Cappuccino Latte Mocha
Female 12.32 8.4 5.6 3.36 5.6 6.16
Male 9.68 6.6 4.4 2.64 4.4 4.84
Grand Total 22 15 10 6 10 11

Chi-square Statistic
Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Cappuccino Latte Mocha
Female 3.2421 0.3048 2.3143 0.1219 0.3500 1.3094
Male 4.1263 0.3879 2.9455 0.1552 0.4455 1.6664
Grand Total 7.3684 0.6926 5.2597 0.2771 0.7955 2.9758

Chi-square critical value 14.06714045

p-value 0.003253034 the p-value is 0.003253034, which is less than alpha 0.05
hypothesis that type of drinks and gender ar

COUNT OF RESPONDENT OF RAW LABELS

Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Hot Specialty Ice Blended Tea
Female 6 10 2 20 10 8
Male 16 5 8 7 7 1
Grand Total 22 15 10 27 17 9

EXPECTED FREQUENCY
Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Hot Specialty Ice Blended Tea
Female 12.32 8.4 5.6 15.12 9.52 5.04
Male 9.68 6.6 4.4 11.88 7.48 3.96
Grand Total 22 15 10 27 17 9

Chi-Square Statistic
Brewed Coffee Ice Coffee Espresso Hot Specialty Ice Blended Tea
Female 3.2421 0.3048 2.3143 1.5750 0.0242 1.7384
Male 4.1263 0.3879 2.9455 2.0046 0.0308 2.2125
Grand Total 7.3684 0.6926 5.2597 3.5796 0.0550 3.9509
Chi-square critical value 11.07049769
the p-value is 0.000843755, which is less than alpha 0.05
p-value 0.000843755 reject the null hypothesis that type of drinks and ge
independence.
 Ice Blended Tea Total
10 8 56
7 1 44
17 9 100

Ice Blended Tea Total

9.52 5.04 56
7.48 3.96 44
17 9 100

Ice Blended Tea Total

0.0242 1.7384 9.4050
0.0308 2.2125 11.9700
0.0550 3.9509 21.3750

ich is less than alpha 0.05, therefore we reject the null

pe of drinks and gender are independence.

Total
56
44
100

Total
56
44
100

Total
9.1988
11.7075
20.9063
ich is less than alpha 0.05, therefore we
that type of drinks and gender are
ependence.