Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

3.

Accused did not kill the 3rd person


ENUMERATION despite opportunity to do so
(Judge Campanilla Reviewer)
PROXIMATE CAUSE
Motive
 Even if the victim is suffering from an
 When proof of motive is required:
internal ailment, accused is still criminally
1. There is doubt as to the identity of the liable, if the blow delivered:
culprit;
1. Is the efficient cause of death;
2. Evidence is circumstantial or inconclusive
2. Has accelerated his death; or
- And there is some doubt on WON the
3. Is the proximate cause of death
crime has been committed or WON the
accused has committed it;
3. Act committed gives rise to variant crimes IMPOSSIBLE CRIME
(e.g. Robbery vs Theft) Requisites:
- There is need to determine the proper 1. Offender performed an act w/c would have
crime to be imputed to the offender been an offense against person or property;
4. Where it forms an essential element of the 2. Offender performed an act w/ evil intent;
offense (e.g. libel or slander, or malicious
mishcief) 3. Offender did not commit the offense
because of the impossibility of its
accomplishment or employment of
 Proof of motive is not required: inadequate or ineffectual means; and
1. Accused has been positively identified 4. Offender in performing an act is not
as the assailant, or where his violating another provision of the law
participation is shown;
2. Where the criminal act did not give rise CONSPIRACY as a crime (Art. 8)
to variant crimes;
Requisites:
3. Where the crime involved is culpable
felony or offense or malum prohibitum 1. There must be an agreement to commit a
crime;
2. Conspirators must be decided to commit
INTENT such; and
3. There must be law prescribing a penalty for
 Circumstances that negate intent to kill (3 rd conspiring to commit such crime
person): PROPOSAL OR CONSPIRACY is punishable:
1. Accused is not aware of the presence of 1. Conspiracy or proposal to commit Treason
the 3rd person or no showing of
awareness; 2. “ “ “ Coup d’etat

2. The victim was hiding; or 3. Conspiracy to commit Sedition


4. Conspiracy to commit arson
5. Conspiracy to commit crime involving 3. Unity of penal provision infringed upon or
trafficking dangerous drugs violated
6. Conspiracy to commit terrorism Elements of UNLAWFUL AGGRESSION:
7. Conspiracy to commit child pornography 1. There must be a physical or material attack
or assault;
8. Cons to commit money laundering
2. The attack or assault must be actual or at
least imminent; and
PROPOSAL OR CONSPIRACY not punishable:
3. The attack or assault must be unlawful
1. Proposal to commit sedition;
2. Proposal to commit espionage;
3. Proposal to commit highway robbery;
4. Conspiracy to commit direct or indirect
assault;
5. Conspiracy to commit trafficking in person;
and
6. Conspiracy to assassinate the President –
repealed by PD 1110-A

CONSPIRACY AS A MODE OF INCURRING


CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Requisites: (for purpose of applying the the
collective responsibility rule)
1. There must be conspiracy to commit a
crime;
2. The crime agreed upon has been
committed; and
3. The conspirators must preform an act in
furtherance of conspiracy
XPN: in case of the mastermind of the crime

DELITO CONTINUADO (Continued Crime)


Requisites:
1. Plurality of acts performed separately
during a period of time
2. Unity of criminal intent and purpose; and

You might also like