Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ursing audits are based on estab-

N lished standards of practice and


are used principally as a mea-
sure of quality. However, as a senior
student at the University of California,
San Francisco (UCSF) School of Nurs-
ing preparing to specialize in operating
room nursing, I discovered the addi-
tional value of the process audit as a
learning tool using direct observation
techniques.
The School of Nursing at UCSF offers

Nursing audit: a unique curriculum that enables senior


students to spend the last six months in
an area of concentration of their choice.
Learning tool A wide range of inpatient and outpa-
tient clinical settings are available to

for students help students enhance their present


nursing skills or train in a specialty
area of nursing. Students who select the
operating room spend 16 clinical hours
Linda Dickey White, RN per week with an individual preceptor
who is responsible for teaching operat-
ing room skills. In addition, two hours
per week are devoted t o lectures dealing
with the theory and principles ofoperat-
ing room nursing with an emphasis on
nursing process. This part of the course
requires preoperative and postopera-
tive visits. In this paper, I describe my
student experiences and how I incorpo-
rated nursing process into my training
with the assistance of the process audit
tool.
Acquiring organizational skills as a
circulating nurse is an important aspect
of learning to function efficiently in the
operating room. My first clinical ex-
periences were somewhat frustrating
because I found myself memorizing the
order in which tasks were performed
without regard to how they related to
the nursing process. As I began study-
~ ~ ~~~

Linda Dickey White, RN, is a staff nurse at


University of California, San Francisco. She
holds a BSN from the University of California,
San Francisco, School of Nursing, and has a
BA from University of California, Berkeley.

AORN Journal, February 1979,Vol29, No 2 247


Figure 7

Preoperative assessment form


Patient's name Age Sex- Date
Preoperative diagnosis Surgeon
Surgical procedure Interviewer
Preoperative visit made and charted-
Chart reviewed
Routine explanations
General information on anesthesia

General information on surgery

Patient and family told:


time and length of surgery
when patient to return to room
where family can wait
Preoperative and postoperative routines explained

premedication
mode of transportation
shave preparation
OR environment
postanesthesia recovery room/intensive care unit
pain medication
special dressings

ing process audit, I realized this tool tively employed by students who are
could provide guidelines for learning learning nursing process practiced in
standards of nursing care for the surgi- the operating room? Nursing process in
cal patient. the operating room consists of the
According to Mohr, audits are de- preoperative, intraoperative, and post-
signed to provide standards of excel- operative phases of surgical care; each
lence in nursing practice and may be involves several components. The audit
used to identify areas that need change tool used at the University of Califor-
to improve the overall pattern of care.l nia, San Francisco, is divided into four
Audits can also help in planning con- sections-assessment, planning, im-
tinuing education, purchasing equip- plementation, and evaluation-to cor-
ment, and in implementing changes in respond with these phases. Preopera-
policy, procedure, and staffing. Process tive assessment allows the nurse t o col-
audits involve one nurse observing and lect physical and psychosocial data for
evaluating the care given by another use in formulating a nursing care plan
nurse. The desired outcome of an audit suited to the needs of the patient. In
is to improve the quality of care rather addition to patient assessment, the
than to serve as a peer review tool. nurse has the opportunity to educate
How then can process audit be effec- the patient about his illness and to dis-

248 AORN Journal, February 1979,Vol29, No 2


drains
casts
catheters
pressure monitoring lines
electrocardiogram
respiratory equipment
other
Assessment
Physical needs

Safety concerns

Medication instructionslinformation

Socioeconomic situation relevant to health care

Environmental concerns

Teaching

Discharge planning

cuss the operating room experience. while in the operating room.


Because of my inexperience with To enhance my teaching skills, I used
preoperative visits, I used the UCSF the UCSF audit tool whereby the au-
audit tool, in addition to the eight as- ditor validates with the patient in a
sessment categories described by Mun- postoperative setting whether or not es-
ley,2 to serve as a guide for my visits sential facts were provided preopera-
(Fig 1).Following a preoperative visit, tively. For example, was NPO status
this form is completed and serves to described, or was the patient told when
facilitate data collection for an assess- he would be returned to his room, where
ment. The form also ensures that teach- visitors could wait, and what type of
ing covered all pertinent information dressing or special equipment to expect
concerning the patient’s surgical ex- following surgery? The categories that
perience. For example, the category of cover general information about
physical needs can alert the nurse to surgery and anesthesia are included to
problems with obesity or limitations verify what the patient was told by
due to arthritis. Therefore, the assess- physicians to assess the patient’s level
ment and concomitant nursing care of understanding. The patient is en-
plan would draw special attention to the couraged to discuss his concerns and
transfer and positioning of the patient seek additional information from physi-

AORN Journal, February 1979,Vol29, No 2 249


cians if desired.
The second phase in the nursing pro- Figure 2
cess occurs intraoperatively and con-
sists of planning and implementing the
patient’s care plan. Prior to the sur- Postoperative
geon’s incision, the nurse is responsible evaluation form
for seeing t h a t all equipment and
supplies are set up according to stan- Application and discharge of physician’slegal
dard care plans and that the patient has orders
been properly identified and prepared
for the operation. During this phase, the Observations of symptoms and reactions
student can examine his or her perfor-
mance of the necessary tasks and com- Supervision of patient
pare it to the standard nursing inter-
ventions contained in the audit. By Supervision of other, nonphysician personnel
using the audit as a checklist, the stu- Reporting and recording
dent can review the items either
preoperatively or postoperatively and Application and execution of nursing process
note the various tasks as they are com-
pleted. As a result, the student has a Promotion of patient’sphysical and emotional
record of care provided and can easily health by direction and teaching
identify tasks that were improperly per-
formed or omitted. General comments
For example, the checklist may re-
veal t h a t the student is handing
supplies to the scrub nurse rather than tunity for the student to learn according
assisting anesthesia during intubation, to established standards of practice;
failing t o note sponge and needle therefore, a discussion of outcomes be-
counts, or forgetting placement of the comes an essential step in the learning
cautery groundplate. Perhaps the process. The audit is not intended as a
problem of handing supplies to the performance evaluation or peer review,
scrub nurse could be approached with but rather as a learning experience to
the student’s preceptor who could re- aid students in the mastery of technical
view those items that are needed first and organizational skills.
and those that can wait until intubation The final phase of the nursing process
is completed. Therefore, audits can be is the postoperative interview, which
used as a mechanism that allows moti- provides an opportunity t o review the
vated students t o learn at their own surgical experiencewith the patient. By
pace and concentrate on those aspects of asking for information given during the
organization and priority setting that preoperative visit, the student can as-
are the most difficult to master. sess the patient’s recall and under-
The student can review the audit in- standing and give subsequent rein-
diGidually or select a peer or preceptor forcement in areas where teaching may
with whom t o discuss questions or con- have been inadequate. In addition to a
cerns that may arise regarding audit preoperative assessment sheet, a
outcomes. Audits performed by stu- guideline (Fig 2) for postoperataive vis-
dents should not be used for the same its was devised based on Phaneuf ’s
purpose as those done by experienced seven functions of nursing p r a ~ t i c e . ~
staff. Instead, audits provide an oppor- This format also proved useful in self-

250 AORN Journal, February 1979,Vol29, No 2


evaluation of my role during the in- Child sexual abuse
traoperative phase of care. For example,
in reviewing the procedure, I could exceeds reported cases
check if my supervision of the patient Actual incidence of sexual abuse of
was adequate during transfer and posi- children is far greater than the reported
tioning or if my charting was accurate number of cases, according to the
and helpful to other nurses. As with the responses of physicians questioned in a
intraoperative audit tool, I was able to survey by the University of Washington
review my performance, increase my School of Medicine, Seattle.
awareness of the role of the circulating Reporting in the Journal of the American
Medical Association, Jennifer
nurse, and work at strengthening areas James and William M Womack say
where optimal care was lacking. physicians seem reluctant to report cases
By the completion of my training, I of child sexual abuse encountered in their
felt that I had mastered the basic skills practice. More than half the physicians
of patient care in the operating room as responding to the poll said they saw at
a result of this process. I believe this least one identifiable sexually abused child
increased experience enhanced my un- annually, James and Womack said. Many
derstanding of nursing concepts and al- of the abused children were said to be
lowed me to pursue the more technical suffering from severe emotional shock, and
skills of operating room nursing. By almost all of them needed professional
counseling.
using a tool such as audit, I found a
Two-thirds of the physicians said they
guide for outlining criteria for nursing sometimes did not report such cases to
practice and a n aid in the establishment authorities because reporting would be
of nursing priorities. By combining the harmful to the family and that the problem
tool with the basic knowledge of the could be handled better privately. The other
theory and principles of nursing pro- third was dissatisfied with the manner in
cess, I believe students will be able to which state social service agencies handled
incorporate this information, leading to such cases.
a better understanding of the role of the
operating room nurse and his or her re- Nursing college given
lationship to patient understanding and
education. Improving patient care in a graduate training grant
manner directly beneficial to the pa- The Rush University College of Nursing,
tient is a primary goal in nursing prac- Chicago, has received a $180,000 grant
tice and in nursing audits. Therefore, from the U S Department of Health,
quality assurance efforts are essential Education, and Welfare to continue its
to determine that this goal is met by program of developing nursing practitioner
practicing nurses as well as those in programs at the graduate level.
The grant will be used largely to support
training. faculty programs in the college’s various
Notes
clinical specialties. The college hopes to
1. B J Mohr, “JCAH patient care audit,” AORN
expand its efforts in medical-surgical
Journal 22 (August 1975) 187-190. nursing, gerontological nursing, oncology
2. M J Munley, “Directobservation tool,” AORN nursing, and psychiatric nursing with the
Journal 22 (August 1975) 191-194. grant, according to Luther P Christman,
3. Maria Phaneuf, “The nursing audit for evalua- R N , dean of the college of nursing.
tion of patient care,”Nursing Outlook 14 (June 1966)
51-54.

AORN Journal, February 1979, Vol29, No 2 251

You might also like