Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PERSPECTIVES

J Oral Maxillofac Surg


78:496-497, 2020

Temporomandibular Disorders: A
Term Whose Time Has Passed!
Daniel M. Laskin, DDS, MS

Records of the treatment of various temporomandib- Diagnosis, and Management of Temporomandibular


ular joint (TMJ) diseases date back to the fifth century. Disorders to find a solution to the problem. Although
Over the subsequent years, conditions such as disloca- it would seem that the logical solution would be to
tion, arthritis, and ankylosis were generally managed separate the 2 groups of patients diagnostically and
by physicians. However, this changed substantially in therapeutically, the conference participants did just
1934 when James Costen,1 an otolaryngologist, pub- the opposite. As Yogi Berra once said, ‘‘When you
lished the first of a series of articles describing a group come to a fork in the road, take it,’’ and they did—rec-
of patients with TMJ, ear, and sinus symptoms, which ommending combining the 2 groups under the all-
ultimately came to be termed ‘‘Costen syndrome,’’ that inclusive umbrella term ‘‘temporomandibular disor-
he claimed were caused by nerve impingement due to ders’’ (TMD). Although this may have seemed like
overclosure of the bite. This resulted in 2 substantial the least disruptive solution at the time, in retrospect
changes: First, it increased the role of dentists in the it really served no useful purpose and instead has led
diagnosis and treatment of this group of patients, to continued confusion.
most of whom were managed by a mechanically based A review of the literature shows that there currently
gnathologic approach to treatment. Second, it are still numerous publications in which the study
changed the focus from a disease-based to a populations are defined only as having TMD and it is
symptom-based concept of diagnosis. As a result, impossible to determine the specific condition being
patients with a variety of etiologically unrelated condi- treated. Thus, these publications represent a waste
tions were often treated in a similar manner just of time and resources. In addition, one attends lectures
because they had relatively similar signs where clinicians still speak of treating TMD patients as
and symptoms. if they were a homogeneous group and leaves without
It was not until the 1950s and 1960s that the studies really knowing to whom one should apply the recom-
by Lazlo Schwartz and his colleagues at Columbia Uni- mended treatment. Or, one listens to colleagues
versity and Laskin2 and his co-investigators at the Uni- discuss the management of a ‘‘TMD patient’’ when it
versity of Illinois TMJ and Facial Pain Research Center is never clarified whether the patient has a myogenous
showed that there were really 2 different groups of or arthrogenous condition. Certainly, using TMD ter-
patients being included under the Costen syndrome minology does not improve communication or the
heading—those with pathology of the TMJ and those dissemination of knowledge.
with masticatory muscle disorders—and that these Even the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporo-
various conditions required different diagnostic and mandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD),3 which may be
treatment methods. useful as a research tool for studying pain, serve no
Recognizing the existing confusion in the field and purpose as a diagnostic and treatment guide for the
the inappropriate treatment of many patients, in practicing clinician.4 Moreover, the more recently
1982 the American Dental Association organized developed Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular
The President’s Conference on the Examination, Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research

Professor and Chairman Emeritus, Department of Oral and wealth University School of Dentistry, 521 N 11th St, Richmond,
Maxillofacial Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of VA 23298-0566; e-mail: dmlaskin@vcu.edu
Dentistry, Richmond, VA. Received November 25 2019
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The author has no relevant finan- Accepted November 25 2019
cial relationship(s) with a commercial interest. Ó 2019 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Laskin: 0278-2391/19/31370-9
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Virginia Common- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.038

496
DANIEL M. LASKIN 497

Table 1. MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS OF


the point where we are able to recognize most of
TEMPOROMANDIBULAR COMPLEX the diseases and disorders that can affect the TMJ
and the masticatory muscles (Table 1). The American
Muscle Problems Joint Problems Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons should
take a leadership role in organizing an international
Myalgia Congenital anomalies conference that brings together the groups of interest
Myofascial pain Developmental anomalies to develop the diagnostic criteria for the various
Myositis Traumatic injuries
musculoskeletal conditions and a consensus regarding
Myospasm Ankylosis
Hyperkinesia Arthritis
treatment guidelines.
Hypokinesia Neoplasia
Hypertrophy Internal derangements
Contracture Subluxation and/or dislocation
References
Daniel M. Laskin. Temporomandibular Disorder Terminology. J
Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020. 1. Costen JB: Syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms dependent upon
disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Otol Rhi-
nol Laryngol 43:1, 1934
Applications, created in an attempt to make the RDC/ 2. Laskin DM: Etiology of the pain-dysfunction syndrome. J Am Dent
TMD more user-friendly for clinicians, are still defi- Assoc 79:147, 1969
3. Dworkin SF, LeResche L: Research diagnostic criteria for temporo-
cient in the muscle disorders to be considered and mandibular disorders. Review, criteria, examinations and specifi-
continue to combine the unrelated muscle and joint cations, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 6:301, 1992
conditions.5 The time has come to completely elimi- 4. Steenks MH, de Wijer A: Validity of the Research Diagnostic
Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders axis I in clinical and
nate the term TMD and to consider the myogenous research settings. J Orofac Pain 23:9, 2009
and arthrogenous conditions as independent musculo- 5. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al: Diagnostic criteria for
skeletal problems. temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and
research applications: Recommendations of the international
Whereas in the distant past, it may not have been RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special inter-
possible to accomplish this, we have now reached est group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 28:6, 2014

You might also like