Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Lime/Cement Stabilized Layers


CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:
RELATIVE COMPACTION
RELATIVE COMPACTION: Ls = %
% RELATIVE COMPACTION n % n % n %
Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 4 7
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 2 5 8
kad 0.061 0.163 0.235 0.290 0.334 0.370 3 6 9
T 1.46 1.67 1.82 1.94 2.03 2.11
RELATIVE COMPACTION:

La
Xn =
Sn =
OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

kaSn kaSn
Sample No La = Ls + = Ls + =

Value ( Xo )
Lr = La – 2% = La – 2 =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn Xn – Lr
= = = fr = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
Sn Sn La – Lr
Xn – Lr
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons. La – Lr
STABILIZER CONTENT
STABILIZER CONTENT: Ls = % n % n % n % n % n %
Sample size (n) 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 5 9 13 17
ka 0.713 0.755 0.789 0.817 0.840 0.860 2 6 10 14 18
kad 0.617 0.666 0.706 0.738 0.764 0.787 3 7 11 15 19
T 2.18 2.29 2.37 2.44 2.50 2.56 4 8 12 16 20
STABILIZER CONTENT:

La =
L’a =
SnXn =
=

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

Sample No kaSn kaSn


La = Ls + = Ls + =

Value (Xo) L’a = Ls – kadSn = Ls – kadSn =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn Lr = 0.8 x La = 0.8 x La =
= = =
Sn Sn
Xn – Lr
fr = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons. La – Lr
Xn – Lr
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
La – Lr

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION ASSESSMENT: STABILIZER CONTENT


Xn ≥ La Accept La ≤ Xn ≥ L’a Accept
Lr ≤ Xn ≤ La Accept Payment Lr ≥ Xn ≤ La % Payment
Xn ≤ Lr Reject Xn ≤ Lr Reject
VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Stabiliser spread rate checked: tanker/bags Wet areas/Soft spots
Moisture content at compaction (%) Layer thickness, Dmax: Dave: D90 within tolerances
Completion within allowed time hours Surface tolerances: Grade and level
Segregation evident: Yes/no Curing adequate: No rapid drying out
Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G1 - G3 Granular Layers


CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:
INDICATOR TESTS
Property Percentage Passing Sieve
PI
Sieve Size (mm) 37.5 28 20 14 5 2 0.425 0.075
Sample n Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: RELATIVE COMPACTION Ls = %
Sample size (n) 6 7 8 9 10 n % n % n % n % n %
ka 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 0.496 1 4 7 10 13
T 1.820 1.940 2.030 2.110 2.180 2 5 8 11 14
3 6 9 12 15

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

Sample No Xn =

Value ( Xo )
Sn =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn ka =
= = =
Sn Sn
ka ka
La = Ls + x Sn = Ls + x Sn =
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION


Xn ≥ La ACCEPT REJECT

VISUAL ASSESSMENT
Previous layer still acceptable Wet areas
Segregation evident Layer thickness, Dmax:Dave:D90 within tolerance
Excess fines brought to the surface Surface tolerances: Grade and level
Excess fines swept from surface In situ moisture 50% of OMC
Layer firm and stable in mosaic Actual in situ moisture content
Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G4 - G9 Granular Layers


CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:
INDICATOR TESTS
Property Percentage Passing Sieve
GM PI
Sieve Size (mm) 50 37.5 20 5 2 0.425 0.075
Sample n Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: RELATIVE COMPACTION Ø = 15 %
Factors % Relative Compaction
Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n % n % n %
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 0.496 1 4 7
T 1.460 1.670 1.820 1.940 2.030 2.110 2.180 2 5 8
3 6 9

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

Sample No Xn =

Value ( Xo )
Sn =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn ka =
= = =
Sn Sn
ka ka
La = Ls + x Sn = Ls + x Sn =
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION


Xn ≥ La ACCEPT Xn < La REJECT

MDD OMC CBR @ Specified Density


Swell
(kg/m3) (%) 98% 95% 93%
%
%
%

VISUAL ASSESSMENT: Yes / No


Previous layer still acceptable Presence of biscuit layers
Segregation evident Wet areas / Soft spots
Over size removed Layer thickness, Dmax : Dave : D90 within tolerances
Firm well-knit surface obtained Surface tolerances: Grade and level
Excess fine swept from surface
Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for G10 Earthworks


CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:
INDICATOR TESTS
Property Percentage Passing Sieve
GM PI
Sieve Size (mm) 63 50 37.5 20 5 2 0.425 0.075
Sample n Test Values: Xo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RELATIVE COMPACTION
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: RELATIVE COMPACTION Ø = 15 %
Factors % Relative Compaction
Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n % n % n %
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 0.496 1 4 7
T 1.460 1.670 1.820 1.940 2.030 2.110 2.180 2 5 8
3 6 9

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

Sample No Xn =

Value ( Xo )
Sn =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn ka =
= = =
Sn Sn
ka ka
La = Ls + x Sn = Ls + x Sn =
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION


Xn ≥ La ACCEPT Xn < La REJECT

MDD OMC CBR @ Specified Density Swell


(kg/m3) (%) 100% 95% 93% 90%
%
%
%

VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Moisture content at compaction Oversize material removed
Wet area Biscuit layers

Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Asphalt: Binder Content and Percent Voids
CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:

Factors Voids % Binder Content


Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 n % n % n % n % n % n %
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 1 4 7 1 4 7
kad 0.061 0.163 0.235 0.290 0.334 2 5 8 2 5 8
T 1.46 1.67 1.82 1.94 2.03 3 6 3 6
BINDER CONTENT SPECIFICATION % VOIDS SPECIFICATION

Ls = Ls =
Ls' = Ls' =
Xn = Xn =
Standard deviation Sn = Standard deviation Sn =

OUTLIER TEST: OUTLIER TEST:

Sample No Sample No

Value ( Xo ) Value ( Xo )

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn
= = = = = =
Sn Sn Sn Sn

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons. If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

JUDGEMENT LIMITS: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

kaSn kaSn kaSn kaSn


La = Ls + = Ls + = La = Ls + = Ls + =

L'a = Ls – kadSn = Ls – kadSn = L'a = Ls – kadSn = Ls – kadSn =

Lr = La – 0.2% = La – 0.2 = Lr = La – 0.2% = La – 0.2 =

L'r = La + 0.2% = La + 0.2 = L'r = L'a + 0.2% = L'a + 0.2 =

Xn – Lr Xn – Lr
frl = { 0.67 + 0.3 } frl = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
La – Lr La – Lr
Xn – Lr Xn – Lr
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } = = { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
La – Lr La – Lr

L'r – Xn L'r – Xn
fru = { 0.67 + 0.3 } fru = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
L'r – L'a L'r – L'a
L'r – Xn L'r – Xn
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } = = { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
L'r – L'a L'r – L'a

ASSESSMENT: BINDER CONTENT ASSESSMENT: % VOIDS


La ≤ Xn ≤ L'a Accept La ≤ Xn ≤ L'a Accept
Lr ≥ Xn ≤ La % Payment Lr ≥ Xn ≤ La % Payment
L'a ≤ Xn ≥ L'r % Payment L'a ≤ Xn ≥ L'r % Payment
Lr ≥ Xn ≥ L'r Reject Lr ≥ Xn ≥ L'r Reject

Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Asphalt: Compaction and Layer Thickness
CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:

COMPACTION
Ls = 97% - Design mix voids Ø = 15 %
Factors n % n % n %
Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 4 7
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 0.490 2 5 8
T 1.46 1.67 1.82 1.94 2.03 2.11 2.18 3 6 9

La =
Xn =
Standard deviation Sn =

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

kaSn kaSn
Sample No La = Ls + = Ls + =

Value ( Xo )
Lr = La – 1.0% = La – 1.0 =

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn Xn – Lr
= = = fr = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
Sn Sn La – Lr
Xn – Lr
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons. La – Lr

LAYER THICKNESS
D90 Actual Dmax Actual Dave Actual
Base -15 -20 -5
Surfacing -15 -8 -2
Sample Size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ka 0.220 0.300 0.358 0.403 0.440 0.470 0.490
T 1.46 1.67 1.82 1.94 2.03 2.11 2.18

Specification Requirements: Layer thickness mm

Mean Xn =
Standard deviation Sn =

OUTLIER TEST: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

Sample No D90 = %

Value ( Xo )
Dmax = %

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn Dave = %
= = =
Sn Sn

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

ASSESSMENT: RELATIVE COMPACTION ASSESSMENT: LAYER THICKNESS


Xn ≥ La Accept D90 Accept
Lr ≥ Xn ≤ La Accept Pay Dmax Accept
Xn ≤ Lr Reject Dave Reject

VISUAL ASSESSMENT: Yes / No


Segregation evident Binder rich spots
Mix temperature on delivery Layer thickness within tolerances
Mat temperature during rolling Surface tolerances: Grade and level
Tearing of mat behind screed Uniform application of precoated chips

Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY SOC LIMITED

Acceptance Control Work Sheet for Concrete Pavement


CONTRACT: LAYER: CARRIAGEWAY:
LANE: CHAINAGE: km to km
SECTION SECTION
m m DATE: Y Y Y Y M M D D
WIDTH: LENGTH:

Specification Requirements: 28 Day Strength Ø = 5 %


Sample size (n) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
ka 0.745 0.821 0.878 0.923 0.961 0.993 1.020 1.065 1.101 1.131 1.155 1.177
T 1.46 1.67 1.82 1.94 2.03 2.11 2.18 2.29 2.37 2.44 2.5 2.56

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FLEXURAL STRENGTH


Sample No MPa Sample No MPa Sample No MPa Sample No MPa

Ls = Ls =
Mean Xn = Mean Xn =
Standard deviation Sn = Standard deviation Sn =

OUTLIER TEST: OUTLIER TEST:

Sample No Sample No

Value ( Xo ) Value ( Xo )

To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn To Xo – Xn Xo – Xn
= = = = = =
Sn Sn Sn Sn

If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons. If To is bigger than T, result is an outlier. Analyse reasons.

JUDGEMENT LIMITS: JUDGEMENT LIMITS:

kaSn kaSn kaSn kaSn


La = Ls + = Ls + = La = Ls + = Ls + =

Lr = 0.85 x Ls = 0.85 x Ls = Lr = 0.85 x Ls = 0.85 x Ls =

Xn – Lr Xn – Lr
fr = { 0.67 + 0.3 } fr = { 0.67 + 0.3 }
La – Lr La – Lr
Xn – Lr Xn – Lr
= { 0.67 + 0.3 } = = { 0.67 + 0.3 } =
La – Lr La – Lr

ASSESSMENT: COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT: FLEXURAL STRENGTH


Xn ≥ La Accept Xn ≥ La Accept
Lr ≤ Xn ≤ La % Payment Lr ≤ Xn ≤ La % Payment
Xn ≤ Lr Reject Xn ≤ Lr Reject

VISUAL ASSESSMENT:
Segregation evident Curing texture to specification
Time lapse from mixing to placement, max 60 mins Curing as specified
Bleeding evident Joints, formed within time period
Joints, washed out and sealed

Signature Inspector Signature Resident Engineer

Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D Date: Y Y Y Y M M D D

You might also like