Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advanced Financial MGMT Notes 1 To 30
Advanced Financial MGMT Notes 1 To 30
Calculation of EFR:
LEVERAGE
The term leverage refers to a relationship between two interrelated variables. In a business
firm, these variables may be costs, output, sales, revenue, EBIT, Earning per share etc. Thus,
leverage reflects the responsiveness or influence of one variable over some other financial
variables. In leverage analysis, the emphasis is on the measurement of the relationship of two
variables rather than on measuring these variables. It is important to remember that leverage
In simple terms, leverage may be defined as the % change in one variable divided by the %
change in some other variable. Here, the numerator is the dependent variable (X) and the (Y)
variable.
1. Operating Leverage
2. Financial Leverage
Operating Leverage:
The relationship between Sales revenue and EBIT is defined as operating leverage.A business
with high fixed costs is said to have high operating leverage. Operating leverage is measured
by the sensitivity of profit before interest and taxes to change in sales. It is calculated as
percentage change in earningsbefore interest and tax for each 1% change in sales. Degree of
Question 1: ABC ltd. Sells 1000 units @ Rs. 10 per unit. The cost of production is Rs. 6 per
unit and is of variable nature. Theoperating profit (EBIT)of the firm is 1000 x (Rs 10 – 6) =
4000. Suppose the firm is able to increase the sales level by 50% resulting in total sales of
1500 units. The operating profit of the firm would now be 1500 x (Rs10 – Rs6) = Rs 6000.
= Rs.2000 / Rs 4000
----------------------------
Rs. 5000 / Rs.10,000
=1
The operating leverage of 1 denotes that the EBIT level increase or decreases in direct
proportion to the increase or decrease in sales level. This is due tothe fact that there is not any
fixed cost and total cost is variable in nature.However,this is generally not the
case.Companieshave fixed costs in their cost structure.So let us consider the example of the
Question2: ABC ltd. Sells 1000 units @ Rs. 10 per unit. The cost of production is Rs. 6 per
unit and is of variable nature. The firm has a fixed cost of Rs. 2000 in addition to the variable
costs of Rs 6 per unit. Suppose the firm is able to increase the sales level by 50% resulting in
= Rs.2000 / Rs 2500
= 1.6
The Operating Leverage of 1.5 means that the % increase in the level of EBIT is 1.6 times
that of % increase in sales level.That is, for every increase of 1% in sales level, the %
increase in EBIT would be 1.6%. In the case of ABC Ltd, the % increase in EBIT is 80% and
% increase in sales is 50%. It means that. This relationship between % change in EBIT and %
Automobile 1.57
A firm having higher DOL (Degree of operating Leverage) can experience a magnified effect
on EBIT for a small change in sales revenue. Higher DOL can lead to an immense increase in
operating profits for a very small percentage increase in sales.This helps a company in the
growth phase where operating profits increase in greater proportion to sales. But if there is
decline in sales level, EBIT. may be reduce equally drastically or even be negated, i.e., a loss
may be incurred. This means that in a down phase a firm may reach the breakeven point very
quickly. That is the operating profit may become zero for a very small or marginal drop in
sales. If the fixed costs are higher, the firm’s operating leverage and its operating risks are
higher. If operating leverage is high, it means that the break-even point would also be reached
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage is a measure of the relationship between the EBIT and the EPS. TheDFL
(Degree of Financial Leverage) reflects the effect of change in EBIT on the level of EPS. It is
EBT = (EBIT – I)
I=Interest
If EBIT is (a) Rs. 1,00,000 (ii) Rs. 80,000 and (iii) Rs. 1,20,000, Calculate financial leverage
debentures@10%
@12%
equity shareholders
A firm can finance its investments through debt and equity.In addition, companies may also
use preference capital. The rate of interest on debt is fixed.Similarly the rate of dividend on
preference shares is fixed, though preference dividend is paid from profit after tax. The rate
charge source of funds such as debt and preference capital along with owners’ equity in the
Financial leverage plays a major role in deciding the optimum capital structure. The capital
structure is concerned with the raising of long-term funds both from the shareholders and
through debt. A financial manager has to decide about the ratio between fixed cost funds and
equity share capital. The effects of debt (fixed cost funds)on cost of capital and financial risk
have to be considered before selecting a final capital structure. The EPS of a company is
strongly affected by the degree of financial leverage. If the company is in a growth phase,
then a high financial leverage will help the company use its fixed cost funds to increase
profits for equity shareholders.However,in a down phase,a high financial leverage may wipe
out the company’s profit before tax or even lead to losses before tax.Thus financial leverage
Where
D=Debt ;E=Equity
The first two measures are also called measures of capital gearing.However,they suffer from
certain limitations when it comes to measuring financial leverage.Since they are static
measures that reflect the borrowing position at one point in time,they fail to reflect the level
of financial risk of the company’s ability to repay interest and debt in relation to its earnings.
CombinedLeverage:
Both the financial and operating leverage magnify the revenue of the firm. While operating
leverage has an effect on the firm EBIT,financial leverage affects the firm’s profit after tax or
financial leverage. It focuseson the percentage change in EPS for a given change in sales. If a
company has a high operating and financial leverage,even a small change in sales will have a
% Change in EPS
= ------------------------- (OR)
% Change in sales
Question 4:A company has sales of Rs. 8,00,000, Variable cost of Rs. 5,00,000, fixed cost of
Rs. 1,00,000 and long-term loans of Rs. 8,00,000 at 10% rate of interest. Calculate combined
leverage.
Solution:
Particulars
Sales 800,000
Contribution 300,000
EBT 120,000
Question 5:
1. Find the leverage ratios of both the firms. Which firm is riskier?
2. Calculate the leverage ratios of both the firms if they experience a decreaseof
Solution 5a:
DOL
Firm A has a higher operating leverage. SoFirm A is riskier. Under favourable conditions
Firm A’s operating profit margin will increase at a faster rate than Firm B.However,in
unfavourable conditions Firm B would do better since its profits will fall at a lesser rate.As a
result, Firm B will have a lower break-even point than FirmA.This makes Firm A more prone
20% 20%
DOL 3 6 2 2.67
The DOL of Firm has increased to 6 after a 20% drop in sales whereas the DOL of firm B has
increased to 2.67. After the 20% drop Firm A has a higher operating leverage.This is because
the fixed cost of firm A is 2.4 times that of Firm B. This makes Firm A very vulnerable in a
downphase.The EBIT of Firm A has fallen by 60% for a 20% drop in sales .The EBIT of firm
Question 6:
XYZ Company has currently and equity share capital of Rs 40 lakhs consisting of 40,000
equity shares of Rs. 100 each. The management is planning to raise another Rs. 30 lakhs to
finance a major programme of expansion through one of the four possible financing plans.
2. Rs. 15 lakhs in equity shares of Rs. 100 each and the balance in 8% debentures.
3. Rs. 10 lakhs in equity shares of Rs. 100 each and the balance through long-term
The company’s EBIT will be Rs. 15 lakhs. Assuming corporate tax of 50%. Determine the
EPS and financial leverage. Which plan has the highest risk?
Solution 6:
(15,00,000X8%)
Borrowings(20,00,000X9%)
Veszprem 1,80,000
dividend(15,00,000X12%)
shareholders
Plan 3 (1.136)has the financial leverage and highest risk. This plan will lead to the maximum
drop in EPS for percentage drop in EBIT. Plan 1 and Plan 4 have thelowest financial leverage
Question 7:
EBIT 1,120
EBT 320
Solution 7:
DCL=DOLXDFL
=1.625X3.5
=5.6875
% change in EPS
=5X5.6875 =28.4375%
Capital Structure and its Theories
Capital Structure means a combination of all long-term sources of finance. It includes
Equity Share Capital, Reserves and Surplus, Preference Share capital, Loan,
Debentures and other such long-term sources of finance. A company has to decide
the proportion in which it should have its own finance and outsider’s finance
particularly debt finance. Based on the proportion of finance, WACC and Value of a
firm are affected. There are four capital structure theories for this, viz. net income,
net operating income, traditional and M&M approach.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Capital structure is the proportion of all types of capital viz. equity, debt, preference
etc. It is synonymously used as financial leverage or financing mix. Capital structure
is also referred to as the degree of debts in the financing or capital of a business
firm.
Financial leverage is the extent to which a business firm employs borrowed money
or debts. In financial management, it is a significant term and it is a very important
decision in business. In the capital structure of a company, broadly, there are mainly
two types of capital i.e. Equity and Debt. Out of the two, debt is a cheaper source of
finance because the rate of interest will be less than the cost of equity and the
interest payments are a tax-deductible expense.
Capital structure or financial leverage deals with a very important financial
management question. The question is – ‘what should be the ratio of debt and
equity?’ Before scratching our minds to find the answer to this question, we should
know the objective of doing all this. In the financial management context, the
objective of any financial decision is to maximize the shareholder’s wealth or
increase the value of the firm. The other question which hits the mind in the first
place is whether a change in the financing mix would have any impact on the value
of the firm or not. The question is a valid question as there are some theories which
believe that financial mix has an impact on the value and others believe it has no
connection.
HOW CAN FINANCIAL LEVERAGE AFFECT THE VALUE?
One thing is sure that wherever and whatever way one sources the finance from, it
cannot change the operating income levels. Financial leverage can, at the max, have
an impact on the net income or the EPS (Earning per Share). Changing the financing
mix means changing the level of debts. This change in levels of debt can impact the
interest payable by that firm. The decrease in interest would increase the net income
and thereby the EPS and it is a general belief that the increase in EPS leads to an
increase in the value of the firm.
Apparently, under this view, financial leverage is a useful tool to increase value but,
at the same time, nothing comes without a cost. Financial leverage increases the risk
of bankruptcy. It is because higher the level of debt, higher would be the fixed
obligation to honour the interest payments to the debt providers.
Discussion of financial leverage has an obvious objective of finding an optimum
capital structure leading to maximization of the value of the firm.
Important theories or approaches to financial leverage or capital structure or
financing mix are as follows:
NET INCOME APPROACH
This approach was suggested by Durand and he was in favour of financial leverage
decision. According to him, a change in financial leverage would lead to a change in
the cost of capital. In short, if the ratio of debt in the capital structure increases, the
weighted average cost of capital decreases and hence the value of the firm
increases.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is the weighted average costs of equity
and debts where the weights are the amount of capital raised from each source.
According to Net Income Approach, change in the financial leverage of a firm will
lead to a corresponding change in the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
and also the value of the company. The Net Income Approach suggests that with the
increase in leverage (proportion of debt), the WACC decreases and the value of firm
increases. On the other hand, if there is a decrease in the leverage, the WACC
increases and thereby the value of the firm decreases.
For example, vis-à-vis equity-debt mix of 50:50, if the equity-debt mix changes to 20:
80, it would have a positive impact on the value of the business and thereby increase
the value per share.
It further says that with the increase in the debt component of a company, the
company is faced with higher risk. To compensate that, the equity shareholders
expect more returns. Thus, with an increase in financial leverage, the cost of equity
increases.
ASSUMPTIONS / FEATURES OF NET OPERATING INCOME APPROACH:
1. The overall capitalization rate remains constant irrespective of the degree of
leverage. At a given level of EBIT, the value of the firm would be
“EBIT/Overall capitalization rate”
2. Value of equity is the difference between total firm value less value of debt i.e.
Value of Equity = Total Value of the Firm – Value of Debt
3. WACC (Weightage Average Cost of Capital) remains constant; and with the
increase in debt, the cost of equity increases. An increase in debt in the
capital structure results in increased risk for shareholders. As a compensation
of investing in the highly leveraged company, the shareholders expect higher
return resulting in higher cost of equity capital.
In the case of Net Operating Income approach, with the increase in debt proportion,
the total market value of the company remains unchanged, but the cost of equity
increases.
For Diagrammatic representation and Examples, please refer to the book.
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
This approach does not define hard and fast facts. It says that the cost of capital is a
function of the capital structure. The special thing about this approach is that it
believes an optimal capital structure. Optimal capital structure implies that at a
particular ratio of debt and equity, the cost of capital is minimum and value of the firm
is maximum.
As per this approach, debt should exist in the capital structure only up to a specific
point, beyond which, any increase in leverage would result in the reduction in value
of the firm.
It means that there exists an optimum value of debt to equity ratio at which the
WACC is the lowest and the market value of the firm is the highest. Once the firm
crosses that optimum value of debt to equity ratio, the cost of equity rises to give a
detrimental effect to the WACC. Above the threshold, the WACC increases and
market value of the firm starts a downward movement.
ASSUMPTIONS UNDER TRADITIONAL APPROACH:
The rate of interest on debt remains constant for a certain period and
thereafter with an increase in leverage, it increases.
The expected rate by equity shareholders remains constant or increases
gradually. After that, the equity shareholders start perceiving a financial risk
and then from the optimal point and the expected rate increases speedily.
As a result of the activity of rate of interest and expected rate of return, the
WACC first decreases and then increases. The lowest point on the curve is
optimal capital structure.
For Diagrammatic representation and Examples, please refer to the book.
MODIGLIANI AND MILLER APPROACH (MM APPROACH)
The Modigliani and Miller approach to capital theory, devised in the 1950s, advocates
the capital structure irrelevancy theory. This suggests that the valuation of a firm is
irrelevant to the capital structure of a company. Whether a firm is highly leveraged or
has a lower debt component has no bearing on its market value. Rather, the market
value of a firm is solely dependent on the operating profits of the company.
The fundamentals of the Modigliani and Miller Approach resemble that of the Net
Operating Income Approach.
Proposition I: It says that the capital structure is irrelevant to the value of a
firm. The value of two identical firms would remain the same and value would not
affect by the choice of finance adopted to finance the assets. The value of a firm is
dependent on the expected future earnings. It is when there are no taxes.
Formula
The Modigliani-Miller theory believes that valuation of a firm is irrelevant to its capital
structure. The equation describing this relationship is as follows:
VU = V L
Thus, the market value of a firm depends on the operating income and business risk
rather than its capital structure. Therefore, the market value of an unlevered firm can be
calculated using the following formula:
VU = V L = EBIT
--------
ke0
where EBIT is earnings before interest and taxes, and ke 0 is the required rate of return
on equity of an unlevered firm.
The Modigliani-Miller theory of capital structure also believes that the weighted average
cost of capital (WACC) is fixed at any level of financial leverage and equals the
required rate of return on equity of an unlevered firm (ke 0).
WACC = ke0
Another proof of the Modigliani-Miller theory of capital structure is arbitrage, i.e.,
simultaneous buying and selling of shares with the same business risk but with different
prices. In this case, investors will sell overvalued stock and buy undervalued stock;
therefore, the price of overvalued stock will decline, and the price of undervalued stock
will increase until they are equal, i.e., until the moment when market equilibrium will
occur. When the market reaches equilibrium, arbitrage becomes impossible. Therefore,
the market value of firms within the same class of business risk will be the same
regardless of their capital structure.
Proposition II: It says that the financial leverage boosts the value of a firm
and reduces WACC. It is when tax information is available.
It says that financial leverage is in direct proportion to the cost of equity. With an
increase in the debt component, the equity shareholders perceive a higher risk to the
company. Hence, in return, the shareholders expect a higher return, thereby increasing
the cost of equity. A key distinction here is that Proposition 2 assumes that debt
shareholders have the upper hand as far as the claim on earnings is concerned. Thus,
the cost of debt reduces.
This theory recognizes the tax benefits accrued by interest payments. The interest paid
on borrowed funds is tax deductible. However, the same is not the case with dividends
paid on equity. In other words, the actual cost of debt is less than the nominal cost of
debt due to tax benefits. The trade-off theory advocates that a company can capitalize
its requirements with debts as long as the cost of distress, i.e., the cost of bankruptcy,
exceeds the value of the tax benefits. Thus, the increased debts, until a given threshold
value, will add value to a company.
This approach with corporate taxes does acknowledge tax savings and thus infers that
a change in the debt-equity ratio has an effect on the WACC (Weighted Average Cost
of Capital). This means that the higher the debt, the lower the WACC. The Modigliani
and Miller approach is one of the modern approaches of Capital Structure Theory.
Please refer to the book for Examples and detailed diagrams.
Criticism of MM Approach
The Modigliani-Miller theory of capital structure was criticized because the assumption
that capital markets are perfect is completely unrealistic. The arbitrage, as proof of the
Modigliani-Miller theory, was also strongly criticized. If there are no perfect capital
markets, the arbitrage will be useless because a levered and an unlevered firm within
the same class of business risk will have different market values.
The reasons why arbitrage does not allow market equilibrium in real life are as follows:
Transaction costs. If there are transactions costs, buying stock will require bigger
initial investments, but the return remains the same. Therefore, the market value
of a levered firm will be higher than an unlevered one, assuming that both of
them are within the same class of business risk.
The cost of borrowing is not the same for individuals and firms. The cost of
borrowing depends on the individual credit rating of the borrower.
Institutional constraints. Institutional investors slow down arbitrage because they
limit the use of financial leverage by their clients.
Bankruptcy cost. The higher the financial leverage, the higher is the probability
of bankruptcy. Therefore, bankruptcy costs have a strong influence on firms.
Many critics of the Modigliani-Miller theory of capital structure believe that assumptions
are unrealistic and that the market value of a firm as well as WACC depends on
financial leverage.
The trade-off theory states that the optimal capital structure is a trade-off between
interest tax shields and cost of financial distress.
All the above-mentioned logics are applied to develop the hierarchy of pecking order
theory. This hierarchy should be followed while taking decisions related to capital
structure.
Capital Structure Policy
Capital Structure Decision: Whether to use debt or equity for capital budgeting activities, or what
proportion to be maintained in capital structure??
Trading on Equity: means use of debt i.e. financial leverage in capital structure would enhance
the earning of shareholders i.e. EPS (earning per share).
Practical Considerations in Determining Capital Structure:
1. Assets
2. Growth Opportunities
3. Debt and Non-debt Tax Shields
4. Financial Flexibility and Operating Strategy
5. Loan Covenants
6. Financial Slack
7. Control
8. Marketability and Timing
9. Issue Costs
10. Capacity of Raising Funds
EPS under Alternative Finance Plans
Example:
A company’s present capital structure contains 4,000,000 equity shares and 100,000 preference
shares. The firm’s current PBIT is Rs.25 million. Preference shares carry a dividend of Rs.3 per
share. The earnings per share is Rs.4. The firm is planning to raise Rs.40 million of external
financing. Two financing alternatives are being considered: (i) issuing 4,000,000 equity shares
for Rs.10 each, (ii) issuing debentures for Rs.40 million carrying 12 percent interest.
Required (a) Compute the EPS-PBIT indifference point.
Solution:
Teaching Notes for Dividend Policy
a. Dividend Policy
b. The dividend policy of a firm determines what proportion of earnings is paid to
shareholders by way of dividends and what proportion is ploughed back in the firm for
reinvestment purposes
c. Since the principal objective of corporate financial management is to maximize the
market value of equity shares, the key question of interest to us is: What is the
relationship between dividend policy and market price of equity shares?
d. Traditional Position
e. According to the Traditional Position expounded eloquently by Benjamin Graham and
David Dodd, the stock market places considerably more weight on dividends than on
retained earnings
f. Their view is expressed as follows:
g.
h. P: market price per share; D: dividend per share, E: Earnings per share; m: multiplier
i. Traditional Position
j. According to them:
k. “… the considered and continuous verdict of the stock market is overwhelmingly in
favour of liberal dividends as against niggardly one.”
l. Advocates of the traditional position cite the results of cross-section regression analysis
like the following:
m. Price = a + b Dividends + c Retained Earnings
n. Traditional Position
o. Empirically, the omission of risk imparts an upward bias to ‘b’, the coefficient of
dividend, and the measurement error characterizing retained earnings imparts a
downward bias to ‘c’, the coefficient of retained earnings.
p. Hence the claim of traditionalists that b > c implies that a higher dividend payout ratio
increases stock value cannot be vindicated.
q. Walter Model
r. Assumptions:
The firm is an all-equity financed entity. Will rely on retained earnings to finance its
future investments
The rate of return on investment is constant
The firm has an infinite life
1. Walter Model – Valuation Formula
2.
3. P: price per equity share,
4. D: dividend per share
5. E: earnings per share
6. (E-D): retained earnings per share
7. r : rate of return on investments
8. k : cost of equity
9. Walter Model - Implications
1) The optimal payout ratio for a growth firm ( r > k) is nil
2) The optimal payout ratio for a normal firm ( r = k) is irrelevant
3) The optimal payout ratio for a declining firm ( r < k) is 100 percent
1. Gordon Model - Assumptions
a) Retained earnings represent the only source of financing for the firm
b) The rate of return on the firm’s investment is constant
c) The growth rate of the firm is the product of its retention ratio and its rate of return
d) This assumption follows the first two assumptions
e) The cost of capital remains constant and its greater than growth rate
f) The firm has a perpetual life
g) Tax does not exist
Gordon Model - Formula
P0: price per share at the end of year 0,
E1: earnings per share at the end of year 1,
(1-b): fraction of firm’s earnings distributed as dividend
b: fraction of firm’s earnings retained
k: shareholders’ required rate of return
r: rate of return on firm’s investments
br: growth rate of earnings and dividends
Gordon Model - Implications
1. The optimal payout ratio for a growth firm ( r > k) is nil
2. The optimal payout ratio for a normal firm ( r = k) is irrelevant
3. The optimal payout ratio for a declining firm ( r < k) is 100 percent
a. Miller and Modigliani Position
b. Assumptions:
1. Information is freely available to everyone equally
2. There are no taxes
3. Floatation and transaction costs do not exist
4. There are no contracting or agency costs
5. No one exerts enough power in the market to influence the price of a security. Price
Takers
6. Investment and financing decision are independent
- Miller and Modigliani Position
(a) If a company retains earnings instead of giving it out as dividends, the shareholders enjoy
capital appreciation equal to the amount of earnings retained.
(b) If it distributes earnings by way of dividends instead of retaining it, the shareholders
enjoy dividends equal in value to the amount by which his capital would have appreciated
had the company chosen to retain its earnings.
(c) Hence, the division of earnings between dividends and retained earnings is irrelevant
from the point of view of the shareholders
(1) Criticisms of MM Position
(i) Information about Prospects: In a world of uncertainty the dividends paid by the
company, based as they are on the judgment of the management about future, convey
information about the prospects of the company
(ii) Uncertainty and Fluctuations: Due to uncertainty, share prices tend to fluctuate,
sometimes rather wildly. Investors who prefer a higher current income may prefer a
higher payout ratio, while those who may prefer a lower current income may prefer a
lower payout ratio
1. Criticisms of MM Position
I. Offering of Additional Equity at Lower Prices: In practice, firms guided by merchant
bankers, offer additional equity at a price lower than the current market price. This
practice of ‘underpricing’ mostly due to market compulsions, ceteris paribus, makes a
rupee of retained earnings more valuable than a rupee of dividends.
II. Issue Cost: In the real world where issue cost is incurred, the amount of external
financing has to be greater than the amount of dividend paid. Retained earnings are
preferred
(a) Criticisms of MM Position
V. Transaction Costs
VI. Differential Rate of Taxes
VII. Rationing: Self-imposed or Market-imposed
VIII. Unwise Investments
Rational Expectations Hypothesis
What matters in economics is not what actually happens but the difference between what
actually happens and what was supposed or expected to happen
Hence only the surprises in policy would have the kind of effects the policy maker is
striving to achieve
Rational Expectations Hypothesis
If the dividend is announced equal to what the market had expected, there would be no
change in the market price of the share, even if the dividend were higher (or for that
matter lower) than the previous dividend.
The higher expectation was reflected in the market price already
Rational Expectations Hypothesis
In a world of rational expectations, unexpected dividend announcements would transmit
messages about changes in earnings potential which were not incorporated in the market
price earlier
The reappraisal that occurs as a result of these signals leads to price movements which
look like responses to the dividends themselves, though they are actually caused by an
underlying revision of the estimate of earnings potential
Radical Position
Directly or indirectly dividends are generally taxed more heavily than capital gains.
So, radicalists argue that firms should pay as little dividend as they can get away with so
that investors earn more by way of capital gains and less by way of dividends
(iii) Feasibility study: After the preliminary screening, a detail feasibility study is conducted. In
this, a detailed project report is prepared which consists of
the cost of the project,
means of Financing
the schedule of implementation of the project
estimation of profitability based on projected sales
and social profitability is looked at.
The ultimate decision whether to go for this project or not done here.
(iv) Implementation of a project
Preparation of the blueprints and the design of the project and planned engineering selection of
Missionaries and equipment negotiations for the project for the actual construction of the
building, training the employees and commission to the plant to run commercial production.
(V)Performance review: In the performance, the review takes a realistic view of the assumptions
undertaken by the project. It is a valuable tool for decision making in future. It looks at whether
the trial runs are successful actual performance with the performance of the project in the
feasibility study.
Accounting rate of return(ARR) = Average profit of a tax divided by the average book value of
the investment.
ARR appraise criteria for projects using the accounting profits, like payback criterion
accounting rate of return is simple in both concept and application and does not consider the time
value of money concept. It considers return over the entire life of the project and therefore serves
better as a measure of profitability.
Annual capital charge this kind of Appraisal criteria is used in evaluating mutually exclusive
projects,cash flow estimation by evaluating projects with unequal life.
Steps involved in computing the annual capital charge or as follows·
Step One determine the present value of the initial investment and
operating costs using the cost of capital as the discounting rate.
Working Capital refers to a firm’s investment in short term assets viz. cash,
short term securities, accounts receivable and inventories.
Current Assets
o Cash and Bank Balances
o Temporary Investments
o Short term Advances
o Prepaid Expenses
o Receivables
o Inventory of Raw Material, Stores and Spares
o Inventory of work-in-progress
o Inventory of Finished Goods
Current Liabilities
o Creditors for Goods purchased
o Outstanding Expenses
o Short term Borrowings
o Advances received against Sales
o Taxes and Dividends payable
o Other Liabilities maturing within a year
Net working capital refers to the excess of current assets over current
liabilities and it is difference between current assets and current liabilities.
It is an indicator of the liquidity position of a firm and the extent to which
the working capital may need to be financed by permanent sources of funds.
Current Assets:
Raw material Stock xxx
Work-in-process stock xxx
Finished goods stock xxx
Sundry Debtors xxx
Bills Receivable xxx
Short term investments xxx
Cash and bank balances xxx
Gross Working Capital xxx
The Operating Cycle is the length of time between the company’s outlay on raw
materials, wages and other expenses and inflow of cash from sale of goods. Quicker the
operating cycle less amount of investment in working capital is needed and it improves the
profitability. The duration of operating cycle depends on nature of industry and efficiency in
working capital management.
Cash
Materials,
Receivables Labour
Expenses
Sales
WIP
Finished
Goods
When depreciation is excluded from expenses in the operating cycle, the net
operating cycle represents the ‘cash conversion cycle’.
Days
Raw Material Holding Period xx
Work-In-Process Period xx
Finished Goods Holding Period xx
Receivables Collection Period xx
Gross Operating Cycle xx
Less: Creditors Payment Period xx
Net Operating Cycle xx
Nature of Business
Manufacturing Cycle
Production Process
Business Cycle
Seasonal Variations
Scale of Operations
Inventory Policy
Credit Policy
Accessibility to Credit
Business Standing
Growth of Business
Market Conditions
Supply situation
Environment Factors
Financing Strategy:
Long-term funds = Fixed Assets + Total Permanent Current Assets
Short-term funds = Total Temporary current assets
Zero Working Capital Approach: This is one of the latest trends in working
capital management. The idea is to have zero working capital i.e., at all
times the current assets shall equal the current liabilities. Excess
investment in current assets is avoided and firm meets its current liabilities
out of the matching current assets.
Total Current Assets = Total Current Liabilities
Or
Total Current Assets – Total Current Liabilities = Zero
C.A.
Working Capital Leverage =
T.A.−⌂ C.A.
Where: C.A = Current Assets, T.A. = Total Assets (i.e. Net Fixed Assets+
Current Assets) ⌂ C.A. = Change in Current Assets
Illustration-01:
[Rs. In Lakhs]
Illustration-02:
The entire current assets are being financed by the bank finance @16% p.a.
The EBT is Rs.100 Lakhs. The Company is planning to reduce its level of
investments in current assets by Rs.100 Lakhs with an efficient working
capital management. Show the impact of change in working capital on the
Company’s return on investment (ROI).
Solution:
EBT 100
ROI = X 100 ROI = X 100 = 20%
Total 500
Assets
EBT 100
Add: Savings in interest due to reduction in investment in 16
current assets
Total EBT 116
Revised ROI = 116
X 100 = 29%
400
Illustration-03:
XYZ Ltd. expects its COGS for 2018-19 to be Rs. 136 Crores. The operating
cycle for the planned year is expected to be 54 Days. The company wants to
maintain a desired cash balance of Rs. 1.5 Crores to meet the contingencies.
What is the expected working capital requirement for the year 2018-19.
(Assume 360 Days in a year).
54 Days
[Rs. 136 Crores X ] + Rs. 1.5 Crores = Rs. 21.90 Crores
360 Days
Under this method, each individual item of current assets and current
liabilities are estimated as follows:
Budgeted Production p.a. (units) X Material Cost per unit X Raw Material
Holding Period / 365 days or 52 weeks or 12 months
Work-In-Progress Stock:
Investment in Debtors:
Budgeted Credit Sales p.a. (units) X Raw Material Cost per unit X Creditors
Payment Period / 365 days or 52 weeks or 12 months
Cash Balances:
Prepaid Expenses:
Sundry Creditors:
Budgeted Production p.a. (units) X Selling Price per unit X Debtors Collection
Period / 365 days or 52 weeks or 12 months
Advances:
Any advances received, along with orders, reduce the amount of required
working capital.
Prepare an estimate of net working capital requirement for WCM Ltd. adding
10 percent for contingencies from the information given below:
Current Liabilities:
Creditors for raw materials: (104000 units X Rs. 80 X 4/52) 6,40,000
Creditors for wages: (104000 units X Rs. 30 X 1.5/52) 90,000
7,30,000
Net Working Capital 45,15,000
Add: 10% for contingencies 4,51,500
Total Working Capital 49,66,500
Practice Questions
Problem-01
Rs.
Raw materials consumption per annum 842000
Annual cost of production 1425000
Annual cost of sales 1530000
Annual sales 1950000
Average value of current assets held:
Raw materials 124000
Work in progress 72000
Finished Goods 122000
Debtors 260000
The company gets 30 days credit from its suppliers. All sales are made on
credit only. A year is considered to have 365 days.
Problem-02
Raw Material 90
Direct Labour 40
Overheads 75
205
Profit 60
Selling Price Per Unit 265
s. Raw Materials are in stock on average one month.
t. Materials are in process, on average 2 weeks.
u. Finished goods are in stock, on average one month.
v. Credit allowed by suppliers- one month.
w. Time lag in payment from debtors- 2 months
x. Lag in payment of wages- 1½ weeks.
y. Lag in payment of overheads- one month
20% of the output is sold against cash. Cash in hand and at bank is
expected to be Rs.60000. it is to be assumed that production is carried on
evenly throughout the year. Wages and Overheads accrue similarly and a
time period of 4 weeks is equivalent to a month.
Problem-03
Production during the previous year was was 15,00,000 units. The same
level of activity is intended to be maintained during the current year. The
expected ratios of cost to selling price are:
Selling price is Rs 10 per unit. You are required to make a provision of 10%
for contingency (except cash). Prepare the working capital forecast
statement.
References:
'Financial Management - Comprehensive text with case studies’- Ravi Kishore
Edition 7.
Inventory Management
Background:
“Inventory” represent second largest category of `Asset’ after `Fixed Assets’ for
a manufacturing company.
The proportion of `Inventory to Total Asset’ generally varies from 15% to 30%
in a manufacturing concern.
Nature of Inventories:
Types of Inventory:
4) Material Cost:
5) Ordering Cost:
6) Carrying Cost:
7) Shortage Cost:
www.eFinanceManegement.com
ABC Analysis- ABC analysis stands for Always Better Control Analysis. It is
an inventory management technique where inventory items are classified
into three categories namely: A, B, and C. The items in A category of
inventory are closely controlled as it consists of high-priced inventory which
may be less in number but are very expensive. The items in B category are
relatively lesser expensive inventory as compared to A category and the
number of items in B category is moderate so control level is also moderate.
The C category consists of a high number of inventory items which require
lesser investments so the control level is minimum.
VED Analysis- VED stands for Vital Essential and Desirable. Organizations
mainly use this technique for controlling spare parts of inventory. Like, a
higher level of inventory is required for vital parts that are very costly and
essential for production. Others are essential spare parts, whose absence
may slow down the production process, hence it is necessary to maintain
such inventory. Similarly, an organization can maintain a low level of
inventory for desirable parts, which are not often required for production.
www.yourarticlelibrary.com/
Example of EOQ
h) EOQ
i) Total Ordering Cost p.a
Solution:
a) EOQ = √2*250000*500/100
= 1581 units
Having too much or too little inventory is unfavourable for any busi- ness. If
the inventory is too little, the organisation would face regular stock-outs,
which would in turn involve high ordering costs. On the other hand, a large
investment in inventory can also be disadvantageous. Therefore, an
organisation should ideally keep an optimum level of inventory where the
inventory cost is the lowest. The various stock levels maintained by an
organisation can be discussed as follows:
Danger Level: Refers to the level beyond which the inventory should not
fall in any case. If the danger level is reached, immediate steps should be
taken to replenish the stocks, even if it means incurring additional costs
in arranging the materials. The danger level is determined by the
following formula:
Danger Level = Average consumption × Lead Time for emergency purchases
Example
Conclusion
Inventory management is an essential part of every business. With an
effective inventory management system in place, the business can
significantly reduce its various costs like warehousing cost, inventory
carrying cost, ordering cost, cost of obsolescence, etc. It improves the supply
chain of the business. Managers are able to forecast the level of production at
which they need to place new orders for inventory. Hence, organizations
should take all the necessary steps to maintain an effective inventory
management and control system.
References:
4. Text Book on `Financial Management – Theory and Practice’ by Prasanna
Chandra (9th Edition).
5. Text Book on `Financial Management – Principles and Practice’ by G.
Sudarsana Reddy.
6. Text Book on `Cost Accounting – Principles and Practice’ by Manash Dutta.
7. Text Book on `Introduction to Cost Accounting’ by Dr. P. C. Tulsian.
8. https://www.accountingcoach.com/blog/what -is-eoq
9. https://efinancemanagement.com/costing-terms/inventory-management-
techniques
Receivables Management
The word receivable stands for the amount of payment not received. This
means the company has extended credit facility to its customers. The sale of
goods on credit is an essential part of the modern competitive economic
systems. When firms extend trade credit, that is, invest in receivables, they
intend to increase the sales to existing customers or attract new customers.
This motive for investment in receivables is growth-oriented. Secondly, the
firm may extend credit to protect its current sales against emerging
competition. Here, the motive is sales-retention. As a result of increased
sales, the profits of the firm will increase.
The major categories of costs associated with the extension of credit and
accounts receivable are:
c. Credit rating i.e the paying ability of the customers shall be reviewed
before agreeing to any terms and conditions.
e. Customer relations should be maintained and thus to reduce the bad debts.
ILLUSTRATIONS
7. H Ltd has at present annual sales level of Rs 10,000 units at Rs 300 per
unit. The variable cost is Rs 200 per unit and fixed cost amount to Rs
3,00,000 per annum. The present credit period allowed by the company is 1
month. The company is considering a proposal to increase the credit period
to 2 months and 3 months and has made the following estimates:
Existing Proposed
Solution
12 6 4
Solution:
Current Proposed
Sales 36000 35500
Revenue@32/unit 1152000 1136000
VC@25/unit 900000 887500
FC 144000 144000
Collection exp 10000 30000
BD (% of revenue) 34560 11360
Profit from sales (A) 63440 63140
Investment in 1044000*58/360 1031500*40/360=114611
debtors = 168200
Opp cost on 33640 22922
investment in
debtors @ 20% (B)
Net Profit (A-B) 29800 40218
Net gain from 10418
implementing new
policy
Current Proposed
Sales-units 200000 225000
Revenue 6000000 6750000
VC 4000000 4500000
FC 1000000 1000000
ACP 60 45
Avg Investment in
debtors 833333.333 687500
Opp cost on investment
in debtors 166666.667 137500
Opp cost on Working
capital @20% - 20000
Cash discount (WN) - 67500
Net profit 833333.333 1025000
Additional benefit due to
CD 191666.6667
Factoring
The modern factoring involves a continuing arrangement under which
a financing institution assumes the credit control/protection and
collection functions for its client, purchases his receivables as they
arise (with or without recourse to him for credit losses, i.e., customer’s
financial inability to pay), maintains the sales ledger, attends to other
book-keeping duties relates to such accounts receivables and
performs other auxiliary functions.
Factoring is an asset based method of financing as well as specialized
service being the purchase of book debts of a company by the factor,
thus realizing the capital tied up in accounts receivables and
providing financial accommodation to the company.
The book debts are assigned to the factor who collects them when due
for which he charges an amount as discount or rebate deducted from
the bills. Thus, the factor is an intermediary between the supplier and
customers who performs financing and debt collection services.
Factoring Process
The seller sells the goods to the buyer and raises the invoice on
customer.
The seller then submits the invoice to the factor for funding. The
factor verifies the invoice.
After verification, the factor pays 75 to 80 percent to the
client/seller.
The factor then waits for the customer to make the payment to
him.
On receiving the payment from the customer, the factor pays
the remaining amount to the client.
Fees charged by factor or interest charged by factor may be
upfront i.e. in advance or it may be in arrears. It depends upon
the type of factoring agreement.
In case of non – recourse factoring services factor bears the risk
of bad debt so in that case factoring commission rate would be
comparatively higher.
The rate of factoring commission, factor reserve, the rate of
interest, all of them are negotiable. These are decided depending
upon the financial situation of the client.
Advantages Of Factoring
Disadvantages Of Factoring
The following are the disadvantages:
Factor collecting the money on behalf of the company can lead
to stress in the company and the client relationships.
The cost of factoring is very high.
Bad behavior of factor with the debtors can hamper
the goodwill of the company.
Factors often avoid taking responsibility for risky debtors. So
the burden of managing such debtor is always in the company.
The company needs to show all details about company
customers and sales to factor.
References:
Financial Management – Khan & Jain – 6th edition
Financing Current Assets
Cash credit and overdraft are two types of short-term financing that
financial institutions provide to their customers. Both are used to prevent
checks from bouncing or debit cards from being declined when there are
insufficient funds in checking accounts. The primary difference between
these forms of borrowing is how they are secured.
Business accounts are more likely to receive cash credit, and it typically
requires collateral in some form. Overdrafts, on the other hand, allow
account holders to have a negative balance without incurring a large
overdraft fee.
Commercial paper
Trade credit
Factoring Services
Introduction
Debtor’s Management has been one of the major aspects of working capital
management besides cash and inventory management. As the accounts
receivable amount to the blocking of the firm‘s funds, the need for an outlet
to impart these liquidity is obvious. Other than the lag between the date of
sale and the date of receipt of dues, collection of receivables involves a cost
of inconvenience associated with tapping every individual debtor. Thus, if
the firm could contract out the collection of accounts receivable it would be
saved from many things such as administration of sales ledger, collection of
debt and the management of associated risk of bad-debts etc.
Origin
Factoring has a long and fascinating history and the word factor has its
etymological origin in the Latin word ―Facere which means to make or do,
i.e. to get things done. During 15th and 16th centuries, factors were
appointed
by manufacturers in England, France and Spain in order to arrange for
sales and distribution of then goods in the colonies in the New World. The
first credit factors in modern times were textile agents in the eighteenth
century. Thus, the earlier factors used to provide services under marketing,
distribution, administration and finance. From 1920s however the factors
began to specialise in performing the credit and collection function for their
clients.
Mechanics of factoring
Factoring offers a very flexible mode of cash generation against receivables.
Once a line of credit is established, availability of cash is directly geared to
sales so that as sales increase so does the availability of finance. The
dynamics of factoring comprises of the sequence of events outlined in figure.
(2) Seller (client) negotiates with the factor for establishing factoring
relationship.
(3) Seller requests credit check on buyer (client).
(4) Factor checks credit credentials and approves buyer. For each approved
buyer a credit limit and period of credit are fixed.
(5) Seller sells goods to buyer.
(6) Seller sends invoice to factor. The invoice is accounted in the buyers
account in the factor‘s sales ledger.
(7) Factor sends copy of the invoice to buyer.
(8) Factor advices the amount to which seller is entitled after retaining a
margin, say 20%, the residual amount paid later.
(9) On expiry of the agreed credit period, buyer makes payment of invoice
to the factor.
(10)Factor pays the residual amount to seller.
Types of factoring
Type of Avail- Protection* Credit Sales Collection Disclosure
Factoring ability against bad Advice Ledger Customers
of debts Adminis-
Finance tration
Full Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Source
(Non-
Recourse)
Recourse Yes - Yes Yes Yes Yes
Factoring
2. 75% of the working capital gap will be financed by the bank i.e.
4. The third alternative is also the same as the second one noted above
except that it excludes the permanent portion of current assets from the
total current assets to be financed out of the long-term funds, viz.
Where,
CL stands for Other Current Liabilities (i.e. Current Liabilities other than
Bank Borrowings)
Liabilities;
Assets:
1st Method :
= 1,80,000+60,000+1,00,000+1,50,000+20,000 = 5,10,000
3rd Method :
References:
Institute of Company Secretaries Financial Management Module
https://www.investopedia.com/
Treasury Management And Control
Transaction motive
This refers to the holding of cash to meet routine cash requirements to
finance the transactions which a firm carries on in the ordinary course of
business. A firm needs cash for making transactions in the day to day
operations. Cash is needed to make purchases, pay expenses, taxes,
interest, dividend, etc. Similarly, there is a regular inflow of cash to the firm
from sales operations, returns on outside investments, and so on. These
receipts and payments constitute a continuous two-way flow of cash. The
need for cash as a buffer arises due to the fact that there is no complete
synchronization between cash receipts and payments. Sometimes cash
receipts exceed cash payments or vice-versa. Thus, to ensure that the firm
can meet its obligations in a situation in which disbursements are in excess
of the current receipts, it must have an adequate cash balance.
Precautionary Motive
A firm is required to keep cash for meeting various contingencies. Firms
hold cash to meet uncertainties, emergencies, running out of cash and
fluctuations in cash balances. The future cash flows and the ability to
borrow additional funds at short notice are often uncertain. Sometimes,
uncertainty can result in prolongation or disruption of operating cycle. The
cash balances held in reserve for such random and unforeseen fluctuations
in cash flows i.e. to meet unexpected contingencies are called as
precautionary balances. The more unpredictable are the cash flows, the
larger is the need for such balances.
Speculative Motive
It refers to the desire of a firm to take advantage of opportunities which
present themselves at unexpected moments and which are typically outside
the normal course of business. While the precautionary motive is defensive
in nature, the speculative motive represents a positive and aggressive
approach. The speculative motive helps to take advantage of an opportunity
to purchase raw materials at a reduced price on payment of immediate cash;
a chance to speculate on interest rate movements by buying securities when
interest rates are expected to decline; delay purchases of raw materials on
the anticipation of decline in prices; and make purchase at favourable
prices.
Compensating Motive
This is a motive for holding cash/ near-cash to compensate banks for
providing certain services or loans. Usually clients are required to maintain
a minimum balance of cash at the bank. Since this balance cannot be
utilised by the firms for transaction purposes, the banks themselves can use
the amount to earn a return. Such balances are compensating balances.
These are also required by some loan agreements between a bank and its
customers.
Baumol’s Model
Assumptions
The firm is able to forecast its cash needs with certainty.
The firm’s cash payments occur uniformly over a period of time.
The opportunity cost of holding cash is known and it does not change
over time.
The firm will incur the same transaction cost whenever it converts
securities to cash.
The Model
The firm incurs a holding cost for keeping the cash balance. It is an
opportunity cost; that is, the return foregone on the marketable
securities. If the opportunity cost is k, then the firm’s holding cost for
maintaining an average cash balance is as follows:
Holding Cost=k(C/2)
The firm incurs a transaction cost whenever it converts its marketable
securities to cash. Total number of transactions during the year will be
total funds requirement, T, divided by the cash balance, C, i.e., T/C. The
per transaction cost is assumed to be constant. If per transaction cost is
c, then the total transaction cost will be:
Transaction cost=c(T/C)
The total annual cost of the demand for cash will be:
Total Cost=k(C/2) +c(T/C)
The optimum cash balance, C*, is obtained when the total cost is
minimum. The formula for the optimum cash balance is as follows:
2cT
C*
k
For Example, the outgoings of Gemini Ltd. are estimated to be Rs. 5,00,000
per annum, spread evenly throughout the year. The money on deposit earns
12% p.a. more than money in a current account. The switching costs per
transaction is Rs. 150. Calculate the optimum amount to be transferred.
Solution:
According to Baumol, the optimum amount to be transferred each time
is ascertained as follows:
Where,
C = Optimum transaction size
A = Estimate cash outgoings per annum Le. Rs. 5,00,000
T = Cost per transaction Le. Rs. 150
I = Interest rate on fixed deposit Le. 12% p.a.
The difference between the upper limit and the lower limit depends on the
following factors:
the transaction cost (c)
the interest rate, (i)
the standard deviation (s) of net cash flows.
The formula for determining the distance between upper and lower control
limits (called Z) is as follows:
1/ 3
(Upper Limit – Lower Limit) = (3/ 4 × Transaction Cost × Cash Flow Variance/ Interest Rate)
References:
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/cash-
management/
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cash-management.asp
https://www.accountingnotes.net/firm/motives-for-holding-cash-balances-
in-a-firm-5-motives/11106
https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/accounting/working-capital-
management/cash-nature-and-motives-for-holding-it-working-
capital/68146
Financial Management – Ravi M Kishore – 7th edition
Financial Management – Khan & Jain – 6th edition
Financial Management- I. M Pandey: 11th Edition