This document summarizes four legal cases:
1) Navarro vs. Executive Secretary - Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the law creating the province of Dinagat Islands, arguing the requirements were not met.
2) Sangguniang Brgy. of Don Mariano Marcos vs. PB Martinez - Sangguniang Bayan removed the incumbent barangay captain but the court found they did not have authority to remove an elected official.
3) Pimentel vs. Aguirre - Petitioner challenged an administrative order, arguing the President's power over LGUs is one of general supervision, not control. The court found executive officials are subject to the President's power of control.
This document summarizes four legal cases:
1) Navarro vs. Executive Secretary - Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the law creating the province of Dinagat Islands, arguing the requirements were not met.
2) Sangguniang Brgy. of Don Mariano Marcos vs. PB Martinez - Sangguniang Bayan removed the incumbent barangay captain but the court found they did not have authority to remove an elected official.
3) Pimentel vs. Aguirre - Petitioner challenged an administrative order, arguing the President's power over LGUs is one of general supervision, not control. The court found executive officials are subject to the President's power of control.
This document summarizes four legal cases:
1) Navarro vs. Executive Secretary - Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the law creating the province of Dinagat Islands, arguing the requirements were not met.
2) Sangguniang Brgy. of Don Mariano Marcos vs. PB Martinez - Sangguniang Bayan removed the incumbent barangay captain but the court found they did not have authority to remove an elected official.
3) Pimentel vs. Aguirre - Petitioner challenged an administrative order, arguing the President's power over LGUs is one of general supervision, not control. The court found executive officials are subject to the President's power of control.
This document summarizes four legal cases:
1) Navarro vs. Executive Secretary - Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of the law creating the province of Dinagat Islands, arguing the requirements were not met.
2) Sangguniang Brgy. of Don Mariano Marcos vs. PB Martinez - Sangguniang Bayan removed the incumbent barangay captain but the court found they did not have authority to remove an elected official.
3) Pimentel vs. Aguirre - Petitioner challenged an administrative order, arguing the President's power over LGUs is one of general supervision, not control. The court found executive officials are subject to the President's power of control.
Inc. (PETAL) is a non-governmental organization, founded by petitioner Ramonito Acaac, which is SANGGUNIANG BRGY. OF DON MARIANO engaged in the protection and conservation of MARCOS VS. PB MARTINEZ ecology, tourism, and livelihood projects within Misamis Occidental. In line with its objectives, PETAL NAVARRO VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY FACTS: built some cottages made of indigenous materials on Capayas Island FACTS: Petitioner Sangguniang Barangay is the legislative body of Barangay Don Mariano In May 2002, Mayor Azcuna issued Notices of Illegal On October 2, 2006, the President approved Marcos, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, a local Construction against PETAL for its failure to apply for into law Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9355 (An Act government unit created, organized and existing a building permit prior to the construction of its Creating the Province of Dinagat Islands). The as such under pertinent laws of the Republic of buildings in violation of PD No. 1096 but the notices Commission on Elections (COMELEC) conducted the Philippines. Respondent Martinez is the went unheeded. the mandatory plebiscite for the ratification of incumbent Punong Barangay of the said local the creation of the province under the Local government unit. In July, 2002, the Sangguniang Bayan of Lopez Jaena Government Code (LGC). With the approval of the people from both the mother province of adopted Municipal Ordinance No. 02, Series of Martinez was administratively charged with Surigao del Norte and the Province of Dinagat 2002 which classified Capayas Island as timberland Dishonesty and Graft and Corruption by Islands, the President appointed an interim set and property belonging to the public domain and petitioner through the filing of a verified of provincial officials. Later, during the 2007 prohibited, among others, the construction of any complaint before the Sangguniang Bayan as the synchronized elections, the Dinagatnons elected structures, permanent or temporary, on the disciplining authority over elective barangay their new set of provincial officials who premises, except if authorized by the local officials pursuant to Section 61[4] of Rep. Act No. assumed office on July 1, 2007. government. Azcuna approved the subject 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government ordinance. It was then submitted to the Sangguniang Code. Petitioner assailed the constitutionality of RA Panlalawigan of Misamis Occidental which No. 9355 contending that when the law was conducted a joint hearing on the matter. Sangguniang Bayan rendered its Decision which passed, Dinagat had a land area of 802.12 imposed upon Martinez the penalty of removal square kilometers only and a population of only Acaac filed an injunction before RTC assailing the from office. 106,951, failing to comply with Section 10, validity of the ordinance on the ground that it was Article X of the Constitution and of Section 461 not approved by Sangguniang Panlalawigan. TC – SB’s decision is void. of the LGC. RTC – ordinance is void Issue: W/N the Sangguniang Bayan may remove Martinez, an elective local official, from office. CA – ordinance is valid and deemed approved upon PIMENTEL VS. AGUIRRE failure of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan to declare Held: the same invalid within 30days after its submission. FACTS: No. As the law stands, Section 61 of the Local Held: Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of A.O. No. Government Code provides for the procedure for 372, alleging that in issuing the said order was in effect the filing of an administrative case against an Section 56 of the Local Government Code provides of exercising the power of control over LGU. The erring elective barangay official before the that: Constitution vests in the President, however, only the Sangguniang Panlungsod or Sangguniang Bayan. (c) If the Sangguniang Panlalawigan finds that such power of general supervision over LGUs, consistent However, the Sangguniang Panlungsod or an ordinance or resolution is beyond the power with the principle of local autonomy. Sangguniang Bayan cannot order the removal of conferred upon the Sangguniang Panlungsod or an erring elective barangay official from office, as Sangguniang Bayan concerned, it shall declare such Held: the courts are exclusively vested with this power ordinance or resolution invalid in whole or in part. under Section 60 of the Local Government Code. Under our present system of government, executive The Sangguniang Panlalawigan shall enter its action power is vested in the President. The members of the in the minutes and shall advise the corresponding Cabinet and other executive officials are merely alter city or municipal authorities of the action it has egos. As such, they are subject to the power of control taken. of the President, at whose will and behest they can be (d) If no action has been taken by the Sangguniang removed from office; or their actions and decisions Panlalawigan within thirty (30) days after submission changed, suspended or reversed. of such an ordinance or resolution, the same shall be presumed consistent with law and therefore valid. In contrast, the heads of political subdivisions are elected by the people. Their sovereign powers emanate from the electorate, to whom they are directly accountable. By constitutional fiat, they are subject to the President's supervision only, not control, so long as their acts are exercised within the sphere of their legitimate powers. By the same token, the President may not withhold or alter any authority or power given them by the Constitution and the law.