Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Its Not A Stork
Its Not A Stork
Its Not A Stork
Abstract
This paper will explore the topic of sexual education in schools, including the differences
between comprehensive sex education, and abstinence-only programs and their effects on
precedent case will be presented. Both sides of sexual education will be explored, and the
differences made clear by the author. The analysis of both forms of education will show the
many effects on students that both programs have, including lower or higher teen pregnancy
and STI rates based on what is taught in each program. The author will end the analysis with a
As children, the old-as-time saying of the ‘stork bringing home a baby’ is thought to be
perfectly reasonable. How else would a baby come home? As these same children grow older,
they enter school-age and ask themself, “Was it a stork?” The questions that come from the
curiosity of a child. This curiosity, through education, can grow and help the child, or be shot
down as quickly as the question came up. The topic of sexual education and comprehensive
knowledge of sex in schools is not one taken lightly. For decades, abstinence was and still is
taught as the only way to go. This one-way path down a multiple-lane road is one that can hurt
Sexual education, or family life education as it's more often referred to, is defined as,
the teaching to school-age students the basic knowledge of their bodies, relationships,
emotions, and many more essential topics. In the Virginia Department of Education’s Standard
of Learning for Family Life Education, sexual education is defined as “instruction as appropriate
for the age of the student in family living and community relationships; the benefits, challenges,
responsibilities, and value of marriage for men, women, children, and communities; the value
of family relationships; abstinence education; the value of postponing sexual activity…” (VDOE,
2020)
Abstinence-ONLY
programs.” These high school programs teach abstinence as the only safe and morally
acceptable way to keep students safe from unwanted pregnancies and STIs, while completely
neglecting to teach about different forms of contraception. Historically, the federal government
IT'S NOT A STORK 4
has given funding to strictly abstinence-only programs who adhere to the 8-point definition,
A-H definition. Programs qualified for funding must ensure that (Social Security Act, 1935):
A.) has as it's exclusive purpose, teaching the social, psychological, and health
B.) teaches abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected
C.) teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid
health problems;
E.) teaches that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have
G.) teaches young people how to reject sexual advances and how alcohol and
activity.
Abstinence-Plus
IT'S NOT A STORK 5
learning about a broad variety of topics related to sex and sexuality, exploring values and
beliefs about those topics and gaining the skills that are needed to navigate relationships and
manages one’s sexual health” (What Is Sex Education? n.d.). Similarly to abstinence education,
comprehensive sexual education has a list of standards of learning for their curriculum,
Sexuality, 2011):
1.) Students will comprehend concepts related to health promotion and disease prevention
to enhance health.
2.) Students will analyze the influence of family, peers, culture, media, technology, and
3.) Students will demonstrate the ability to access valid information and products and
4.) Students will demonstrate the ability to use interpersonal communication skills to
5.) Students will demonstrate the ability to use decision-making skills to enhance health.
6.) Students will demonstrate the ability to use goal-setting skills to enhance health.
7.) Students will demonstrate the ability to practice health-enhancing behaviors and avoid
8.) Students will demonstrate the ability to advocate for personal, family, and community
health.
IT'S NOT A STORK 6
Through comprehensive sexual education, students are given medically accurate, and age-
appropriate information about refraining from sexual activity, but they are also educated and
given resources about contraceptive options, and sex-safe practices. Instruction on topics such
as reducing unplanned pregnancies and preventing STI’s are provided through these programs,
A mere 22 states in America require that, if taught, sex education must be medically, or
“technically correct.” Many states define their medically accurate information by the standards
of the Department of Health’s review, to ensure accuracy. Other states allow the information to
be based on information from published authorities, whom medical professionals can rely on.
comprehensive sex education were 60% less likely to report unplanned pregnancy compared to
According to the National Library of Medicine, the United States has one of the highest
A report in the Journal of Adolescent Health, done in 2008, showed that comprehensive
sex education, with the information given about the forms of contraception, lead to teens
having lower percentages of unplanned pregnancies, as compared to those who were given an
abstinence-only education, or not sexual education at all. Students were provided with options
and information that helped them to be more prepared as teenagers, and as adults. They were
given an in-depth education that will allow them to be adequately informed about their options
Legal Aspects
District, the Gay-Straight Alliance of CUSD, several parents and the American Academy of
Pediatrics filed a lawsuit against the school district for providing students with only abstinence
education and giving their students misinformation about sexual health and forms of
contraception. This case set a precedent as the first of it's kind and allowed for laws in
California that made “medically accurate, science-based and bias-free” comprehensive sexual
In 1998, federal funding was provided for abstinence-only education programs, those
same programs that followed the A-H definition. This funding was part of Section 510, or Title
V, and gave $50 million of annual funding to these programs. The funding of these programs
will show that the federal government will not support comprehensive sexual education
programs, and instead supports the teachings of abstinence and that out-of-wedlock sexual
activity will have many harmful effects on students later in life. This shows the favoritism
towards abstinence-only programs and disregards the agenda of combating teen pregnancy
and STI’s.
In Virginia
Students in Virginia are provided with an abstinence-only curriculum in school. Students are
taught to refrain from sexual activity until marriage, and as teenagers age, this will be proven to
Sexual education is not something that is normally and widely spoken about. Many
people tend to push the importance of these programs to the back burner and miss entirely the
issues presented with a “closed” form of sexual education. Allowing students access to
important information and education is helping to prepare them for a safe and healthy life, well
into adulthood. Limiting these students to a curriculum that doesn’t give them the proper,
medically accurate, unbiased, and comprehensive information regarding their sexual health,
emotional health, and many other topics sets them up for a future that will be consequently,
detrimental for them. All students, no matter what school or what state they live in, should
have access to a sexual education program that sets their future up for success. It's time that
students be given the comprehensive education they need, and it's finally time for students,
References
America's sex education: How we are failing our students. (n.d.). USC University of South
education/
Impacts of four title v, section 510 abstinence education programs. title v, section 510 funding.
https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/impacts-four-title-v-section-510-abstinence-education-
programs/title-v-section-510-funding#:~:text=Beginning%20in%20fiscal%20year
%201998,standard%20for%20school%2Dage%20children.
Leung, H., Shek, D. T., Leung, E., & Shek, E. Y. (2019, February 16). Development of Contextually-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6406865/
https://advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/josh-fose-standards-
web.pdf
Planned parenthood glossary. (n.d.). Planned Parenthood. Retrieved October 28, 2020, from
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/glossary
State personal responsibility education program. (2020, October 6). Family and Youth Services
Bureau. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/fysb/resource/prep-fact-sheet#:~:text=Through
%20the%20State%20Personal%20Responsibility,)%2C%20including%20HIV%2FAIDS.
IT'S NOT A STORK 10
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-policies-on-sex-education-in-schools.aspx
https://opa.hhs.gov/grant-programs/teen-pregnancy-prevention-program-tpp
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/for-educators/what-sex-education