Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practice Problem No. 1
Practice Problem No. 1
Novmeber 2020
Example 1.6 – 3
Problem : Determine the following: length of a and b, and the area of clear sight
triangle that should be cleared from any of the obstruction.
Solution :
Geometric Design Vertical Alignment
Novmeber 2020
INSTRUCTION: Problem Nos. 2.1 and 2.2 illustrate the use of Figure 2.1 to determine the
critical length of grade. Problem No. 3.3 illustrates how to use both Figures 2.1 and 2.2. In
the examples, the use of subscripts 1, 2, etc., indicate the successive gradients and
lengths of grade on the roadway segment.
Solution: Figure 3.1 yields a critical length of grade of 350 m for a 15 km/h speed
reduction. The length of grade (L) exceeds this value. Therefore, either flatten
the grade, if practical, or evaluate the need for a truck-climbing lane.
Problem: Determine if the critical length of grade is exceeded for the combination of grades
G1 and G2.
Solution: From Figure 3.1, G1 yields a truck speed reduction of approximately 10 km/h. G2
yields a speed reduction of approximately 2 km/h. The total of 12 km/h is less
than the maximum 15 km/h speed reduction. Therefore, the critical length of
grade is not exceeded.
Geometric Design Vertical Alignment
Novmeber 2020
Given: Figure 2.4 illustrates the vertical alignment on a low-volume, two-lane rural
collector roadway with no large trucks.
Problem: Determine if the critical length of grade is exceeded for G 2 or for the combination
upgrade G3 and G4.
Step 1. Determine the length of grade using the criteria in Figure 2.2. For this example,
the following calculations are used:
Step 2. Determine the critical length of grade for the roadway in both directions.
Geometric Design Vertical Alignment
Novmeber 2020
Notes:
1. Typically, the 15 km/h curve will be used.
2. This figure is based on a 120 kg/kW truck with initial speed of 110 km/h. However, it may be used
for any design or posted speed.
Notes:
2. For vertical curves where the two tangent grades are in the same direction (both upgrades
or both downgrades), 50% of the curve length will be part of the length of grade.
3. For vertical curves where the two tangent grades are in opposite directions (one grade
up and one grade down), 25% of the curve length will be part of the length of grade.
VERTICAL CURVES
INSTRUCTION: Problem Nos. 2.4 and 2.5 illustrate the use of Figures 2.5 and 2.6 to
determine the minimum length of vertical curve. Sketch the problem with known information.
Problem : Using L=KA determine if the design length of vertical curve (134m) will
satisfy the stopping sight distance.
Problem : Using L=KA determine the minimum length of vertical curve taking into
consideration the stopping sight distance.
30 35 5.1 6
40 50 8.5 9
50 65 12.2 13
60 85 17.3 18
70 105 22.6 23
80 130 29.4 30
90 160 37.6 38
Overview
Sight obstructions on the inside of a horizontal curve are obstacles of considerable length
that interfere with the line of sight on a continuous basis. These include roadside barriers,
walls, cut slopes and buildings. In general, point obstacles (e.g. traffic signs, utility poles) are not
considered sight obstructions on the inside of horizontal curves.
Equations
Where the length of curve (L) is greater than the sight distance (S) used for design (i.e.
stopping sight distance, decision sight distance, passing sight distance), the needed
clearance on the inside of the horizontal curve is calculated using the following equation:
𝟐𝟐𝟐𝟐. 𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔
𝑯𝑯𝑯𝑯𝑯𝑯 = 𝑹𝑹(𝟏𝟏 − 𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄𝒄 � �)
𝑹𝑹
where: HSO = Middle ordinate or horizontal sightline offset from the center of the
inside travel lane to the obstruction, m
R = Radius of curve, m
S = Sight distance, m
*********************
𝑽𝑽𝟐𝟐
𝑹𝑹𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎 =
𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏(𝒆𝒆 + 𝒇𝒇)
𝒆𝒆𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵
𝑳𝑳𝒕𝒕 = (𝑳𝑳 )
𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒅 𝒔𝒔
Equation 3.3: Length of tangent runout
where: Lt = length of tangent runout, m
LS = length of spiral, m
ed = design superelevation rate, percent
eNC = normal cross slope rate, percent
Tangent runout
The tangent runout distance is calculated as follows: The superelevation runoff lengths are
calculated as follows:
𝒆𝒆𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵
𝑳𝑳𝒕𝒕 = (𝑳𝑳 )
𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒅 𝒓𝒓
Equation 3.4: Superelevation runoff
where: Lt = Tangent runout distance, m
eNC = Normal travel lane cross slope on tangent (typically, 0.02 m/m)
The relative longitudinal gradient for the tangent runout will be same as the relative
longitudinal gradient for the superelevation runoff.
Geometric Design Horizontal Alignment
Novmeber 2020
*********************
C. For a two (2) lane road (3.35m per lane), with a normal
corss-slope of 1.50%, design speed of 100 km/h, and
maximum superelevation rate of 4.0%. Find superelevation
runoff length and tangent runout length?
Geometric Design Horizontal Alignment
Novmeber 2020
CURVE WIDENING
The amount of widening of the travelled way on a horizontal curve is the difference between
the width needed on the curve and the width used on a tangent.
𝒘𝒘 = 𝑾𝑾𝒄𝒄 − 𝑾𝑾𝒏𝒏
The travelled way width needed on a curve (W c) has several components related to
operation on curves, including: the track width of each vehicle meeting or passing (U)
Equation 3.7, the lateral clearance for each vehicle (C); width of front overhang of the
vehicle occupying the inner lane or lanes (FA) Equation 3.8, and a width allowance for the
difficulty of driving on curves (Z) Equation 3.9. These components are illustrated in Figure
3.1.
𝑼𝑼 = 𝒖𝒖 + 𝑹𝑹 − �𝑹𝑹𝟐𝟐 − � 𝑳𝑳𝟐𝟐𝒊𝒊
Equation 3.7
𝑽𝑽
𝒁𝒁 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟏𝟏( )
√𝑹𝑹
Equation 3.9
where: U = track width of design vehicle (out-to-out tires) on curves, m
µ = track width on tangent (out-to-out tires), m
R = radius of curve or turn, m
Li = wheelbase of design vehicle between c onsecutive axles (or sets of
Geometric Design Horizontal Alignment
Novmeber 2020
The lateral clearance, C, provides clearance between the edge of the travelled way and
nearest wheel path and for clearances between vehicles passing or meeting. For design,
Geometric Design Horizontal Alignment
Novmeber 2020
assume C = 0.9 m.
Table 3.1: Calculated and design values for horizontal curve widening
Vehicle
DesVeh u Σ Li² A L
front
track width overhang Wheelbase
P 1.83 11.2225 0.91 3.35
SU 2.44 37.21 1.22 6.1
BUS-12 2.59 62.17323 1.83 7.32
BUS-14 2.59 75.5161 1.83 8.08
CITY-
BUS 2.59 58.0644 2.13 7.62
S-BUS-
11 2.44 42.1201 0.76 6.49
S-BUS-
12 2.44 37.21 2.13 6.1
A-BUS 2.59 57.6124 2.62 6.71
WB-12 2.44 74.889 0.91 3.81
WB-15 2.59 131.5885 0.91 4.45
WB-19 2.59 187.6781 1.22 6.58
WB-20 2.59 211.2301 1.22 6.58
WB-
20D 2.59 113.2115 0.71 3.35
WB-30T 2.59 166.0379 0.71 3.35
WB-
33D 2.59 325.7184 0.71 4.36
MH 2.44 37.21 1.22 6.1
P/T 2.44 37.8565 0.91 3.35
P/B 2.44 29.797 0.91 3.35
MH/B 2.44 54.746 1.22 6.1
Table 3.2: Guidelines for the values of C (lateral clearance) and f (side friction)
Given: For a two (2) lane highway (3.60 m per lane) with a design speed
of 40 km/h, and radius of 50 m.
Problem: Find widening along the curve using Single-Unit Truck (SU-9)
design vehicle type.
Note:
Refer to tables above for the values of the following:
• A = front overhang of inner-lane vehicle, m
• L = wheelbase of a single unit or tractor, m
• u = track width on tangent, m
• Li = wheelbase of design vehicle between c onsecutive axles
(or sets of tandem axles) and articulation points, m
Solution:
Step 1: Using Equation 3.9, compute for the extra width
allowance, m
𝑉𝑉
𝑍𝑍 = 0.1 � �
√𝑅𝑅
𝑈𝑈 = 𝑢𝑢 + 𝑅𝑅 − �𝑅𝑅2 − ∑ 𝐿𝐿2𝑖𝑖
𝑤𝑤 = 𝑊𝑊𝑐𝑐 − 𝑊𝑊𝑛𝑛