Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chest Training 101
Chest Training 101
Chest Training 101
Introduction
Let’s face it, guys tend to train chest and arms more than any other body part. Even with this
ambitious enthusiasm, it’s important to keep in mind that training frequency is not the only key to
development. It comes down to fully understanding how a muscle operates so that you can target it
effectively with your training. In this article I am going to break down chest development into the
most commonly asked questions.
Chest Anatomy
The chest muscles are made up of the pectoralis major and minor. The major is the larger and more
superficial muscle, but the minor still makes up a part of the overall mass. The pectoralis major can
be divided into upper and lower regions. The upper chest attaches to the clavicle (collar bone), thus it
is known as the clavicular head. The lower attaches to your sternum, so it is called the sternal head
(note that sometimes the lower head is divided into sternal and costal portions, or simply called the
sternocostal head in general). The mass of the sternal head is about 70-80 percent of the pecs, while
the other 20 to 30% is made up of the upper or clavicular head (Barberini, 2014). Therefore,
developing a huge chest will likely be dependent on the lower head, but for a complete balanced
look, you should focus on both!
Upper Chest (Clavicular Head) Movements &
Training
The upper chest is controlled by a different nerve than the lower chest (the lateral pectoral nerve).
There are two primary avenues that research has looked at when it comes to increasing the activation
of this region.
1. Grip width
2. Pressing angle
When selecting hand placement, you can use shoulder width, normal width (about 25% wider than
shoulder width), and wide (> 150 % shoulder width). In one study, Barnett et al. (1995) found that a
shoulder-width grip caused the greatest upper chest activation. The reason for this finding is that
pressing a barbell or dumbbell with this grip width causes you to have much greater shoulder flexion
than a wider grip. Remember, the upper chest has a better mechanical advantage than the lower chest
for flexion, making shoulder-width or even close grip optimal for upper chest development. You can
increase shoulder flexion demands on exercises like cable crossers by placing the cables lower, thus
forcing you to raise the handles while crossing over.
When it comes to pressing angle in the bench, research shows that a moderate incline bench press
maximizes upper chest activation. This occurs anywhere between 30 degrees (low incline) and 50
degrees (moderate incline) (Barnett et al., 1995, Lauver et al., 2015, Trebs et al., 2010, Luczak et al.,
2013). Anything above this will place the load away from the upper chest and primarily onto the
shoulder muscles. Lower inclines might be more suitable for those with previous shoulder injury or
currently experiencing shoulder discomfort – this can still help develop the upper pecs without
worsening symptoms of pain.
High level
bodybuilders have known for a long time that you need to train multiple pressing angles to optimize
pec growth. Does this stand up to the science? Yes! In fact, Dr. Fung and colleagues
(2009) performed a study where they took cadavers and created a 3D image of the chest muscles.
They found that it could be divided into 8 functional segments. Specifically, the upper chest was
treated as one, and the lower as seven!
Earlier I suggested that, in general, incline bench is ideal for the upper pecs and flat and/or decline
for the lower chest. In reality, you should still hit at least one unique angle in between during every
training session! I especially like angles of low incline or low decline – instead of changing the angle
on the bench, I might just place a bumper plate under one end of the bench to give about 10-15
degrees of incline or decline. These variations also feel great and trying slightly different angles
keeps training interesting.
The pectoralis
major is made up of a higher proportion of type II muscle fibers (57-65 % fast twitch in the literature
(Srinivasan et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 1973). Fast twitch muscle fibers are worked ideally with
heavier loads. Research using EMG has assessed muscle activation using loads from 60% of 1RM to
maximal. In doing so it was found that muscle activation was near maximal at 80% 1RM (Sundstrup
et al., 2012). As such, relatively heavier loads (>60%) and lifting at a speed you can control the
weight may be ideal. I say this with one caveat, remember that once pec growth slows you may need
to start adopting some very high repetition sets if you are to maximize pec growth. Slow twitch
muscle fibers grow ideally under very high rep loading schemes (50% 1RM until failure)
(Schoenfeld et al., 2013).
We’ve all heard the stories of athletes like Bo Jackson and Herschel Walker getting a huge chest by
doing pushups every day. More recently, Tampa Bay Rays break out star, Randy Arozarena, also
credited his significant muscle gain during a COVID-19 quarantine to performing 300 push-ups
every day. Are push-ups enough to develop massive pecs?
The previous examples are, of course, all phenomenal athletes. However, copying the training
programs of the top .01% is useless for the other 99.99% of us. Based on the research, bodyweight
pushups, unless you are not well trained, will not provide a great enough load to maximize chest
development. In fact, in a trained population you may only get 30% maximal activation of your
pecs (Lehman et al. 2006). Thus, while push-ups may serve a solid role for hypertrophy in the slow
twitch muscle fibers, you will likely need a loading mechanism to use them for maximal growth.
Fortunately, studies show that when you do heavier banded pushups that you can activate the pecs
similar to movements like the bench press (Calatayud et al., 2015)!
Lastly, since the pecs are primarily fast twitch, this means that they’ll probably take longer to recover
from hard training. Indeed, research shows that the pecs are actually the slowest muscle group to
recover from a hard workout (Chen et al., 2019). This means that you should probably plan on at
least 3-days of rest between hard chest workouts to ensure appropriate recovery before getting back
under the bar. In my experience, chest is one of the few muscle groups I can still consistently get sore
after 20+ years of training. Give your pecs time to recover!
Practical Applications
This article sought to assist you in building the best chest possible. We covered several questions and
I believe can summarize them with the following practical applications
1. Training the upper chest requires using a shoulder width grip and a moderate incline of 30 to
50 degrees on pressing movements. If performing flyes, select a similar incline range. You can
also train the upper pecs using low cable flyes.
2. Training the lower pecs requires selecting a wider grip on the bench or keeping your hands
wider when using dumbbells. Flat and particularly decline angles target the lower pecs to a greater
degree.
3. Machine and isolation movements can build the chest just as much as compound and free
weights. We recommend using these on hypertrophy and recovery days to reduce any impairments
in recovery – in fact, I’d probably have a free weight day and a machine day for chest each week
to keep training and recovery balanced.
4. The chest can be divided into at least 8 segments. Thus, while incline, flat and decline angles
are great for development, using all the angles in between will likely result in complete pectoral
development.
5. The muscle fiber makeup of the chest is primarily fast twitch (about 60%). Thus, the majority
of your lifting (at least 60%) should be performed at greater than 60% of your 1RM. However,
don’t ignore the slow twitch fibers. Performing super high rep sets (12-30 reps, giant sets, or super
sets) can and still be beneficial. This also means that the pecs take longer to recover than other
muscles, so I wouldn’t plan on training the pecs more than twice a week.
6. Pushups are a convenient movement, particularly when you are traveling or have little access
to major pieces of equipment. However, if you are well-trained, they will likely do very little for
muscle growth if not loaded. Fortunately doing banded push-ups can make up for this. Therefore,
pack these if you are traveling and don’t have access to a gym!
Conclusions
The chest is a complex muscle group. As with any muscle group they will require an equally
complex strategy to optimize growth. While your program should center around the basics, you will
likely optimize growth by using multiple angles, and a combination of free weights, machines,
isolation movements and rep ranges! Remember, as discussed in other articles, you will need to
intelligently periodize these strategies!
References
1. Barberini, F. (2014). The clavicular part of the pectoralis major: a true entity of the upper
limb on anatomical, phylogenetic, ontogenetic, functional and clinical bases. Case report and
review of the literature. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, 119(1), 49-59.
2. Barnett, C., Kippers, V., & Turner, P. (1995). Effects of Variations of the Bench Press
Exercise on the EMG Activity of Five Shoulder Muscles. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning
Research, 9(4), 222-227.
3. Calatayud, J., Borreani, S., Colado, J. C., Martin, F., Tella, V., & Andersen, L. L. (2015).
Bench press and push-up at comparable levels of muscle activity results in similar strength gains.
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(1), 246-253.
4. Chen, T. C., Yang, T. J., Huang, M. J., Wang, H. S., Tseng, K. W., Chen, H. L., & Nosaka,
K. (2019). Damage and the repeated bout effect of arm, leg, and trunk muscles induced by
eccentric resistance exercises. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 29(5), 725-
735.
5. Fung, L., Wong, B., Ravichandiran, K., Agur, A., Rindlisbacher, T., & Elmaraghy, A.
(2009). Three‐dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture. Clinical
Anatomy, 22(4), 500-508.
6. Johnson, M., Polgar, J., Weightman, D., & Appleton, D. (1973). Data on the distribution of
fibre types in thirty-six human muscles: an autopsy study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences,
18(1), 111-129
7. Lauver, J. D., Cayot, T. E., & Scheuermann, B. W. (2015). Influence of bench angle on upper
extremity muscular activation during bench press exercise. European Journal of Sport Science, 1-
8.
8. Lehman, G. J., MacMillan, B., MacIntyre, I., Chivers, M., & Fluter, M. (2006). Shoulder
muscle EMG activity during push up variations on and off a Swiss ball. Dynamic Medicine, 5(1),
7.
9. Luczak, J., Bosak, A., & Riemann, B. L. (2013). Shoulder muscle activation of novice and
resistance trained women during variations of dumbbell press exercises. Journal of Sports
Medicine, 2013.
10. Ogasawara, R., Thiebaud, R. S., Loenneke, J. P., Loftin, M., & Abe, T. (2012). Time course
for arm and chest muscle thickness changes following bench press training. Interventional
Medicine and Applied Science, 4(4), 217-220.
11. Schoenfeld, B. J. (2013). Is there a minimum intensity threshold for resistance training-
induced hypertrophic adaptations? Sports Medicine, 43(12), 1279-1288.
12. Srinivasan, R. C., Lungren, M. P., Langenderfer, J. E., & Hughes, R. E. (2007). Fiber type
composition and maximum shortening velocity of muscles crossing the human shoulder. Clinical
Anatomy, 20(2), 144-149.
13. Sundstrup, E., Jakobsen, M. D., Andersen, C. H., Zebis, M. K., Mortensen, O. S., &
Andersen, L. L. (2012). Muscle activation strategies during strength training with heavy loading
vs. repetitions to failure. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(7), 1897-1903.
14. Trebs, A. A., Brandenburg, J. P., & Pitney, W. A. (2010). An electromyography analysis of 3
muscles surrounding the shoulder joint during the performance of a chest press exercise at several
angles. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 24(7), 1925-1930.
15. Welsch, E. A., Bird, M., & Mayhew, J. L. (2005). Electromyographic activity of the
pectoralis major and anterior deltoid muscles during three upper-body lifts. The Journal of
Strength & Conditioning Research, 19(2), 449-452.