Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chen2020 Article ElectrochemicalAnalysisOfCondu
Chen2020 Article ElectrochemicalAnalysisOfCondu
Chen2020 Article ElectrochemicalAnalysisOfCondu
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03204-1
Received: 2 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published online: 10 March 2020
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Supercapacitor is a promising electrochemical energy-storage device, which has the advantage of good cycle stability, short
charging time, and high power density, so it has broad application prospects. Electrode as a core component has an important
influence on the specific capacitance and performance of the supercapacitor. In this study, a series of reduced graphene oxide/
polyaniline/polyvinyl alcohol (RGO/PANI/PVA) nanofibers with different RGO concentrations were synthesized by electro-
spinning method and then studied as electrode materials for supercapacitors. The experimental result reveals that the PANI/
PVA nanofiber shows the pseudocapacitance properties, while the RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers exhibit the electrochemical
properties of the double-layer capacitor. In addition, the RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers have a uniform diameter distribution
of 119.8 nm without beads and droplets sticking when the concentration of RGO is 0.2%. This morphology contributes to
a large specific surface area of fibers and provides sufficient channels for the transport of ions. RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers
exhibit better specific capacitance of 174 F/g when compared with the PANI/PVA (105 F/g). The research indicates that
RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with high specific capacitance can provide a promising application as supercapacitor electrodes.
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965 5959
the most promising candidates for engineering tissue scaf- 2.3 Preparation of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA
folds, filtration, sensors, release control, wound healing, and emulsions
energy-storage applications [15–17]. Rose et al. [18] pre-
pared GO/PANI/PVA nanofibers by using electrospinning. Even though PANI is a conducting polymer, it’s difficult for
The results show the GO/PANI/PVA nanofibers as super- it to form a fiber mat by using electrospinning. Polyvinyl
capacitor electrodes have higher specific capacitance than alcohol (PVA) is a good film former, therefore combining
PANI nanofibers. Sudeshna et al. [19] found the capacitance the PANI with PVA can effectively solve this problem, and
retention of PANI-NFs web prepared by electrospinning is PANI can homogeneously disperse in PVA due to the for-
higher than PANI; the result indicated the feasibility of elec- mation of hydrogen bond between them [20]. In this study,
trospun PANI-NFs web can be used as superior electrode PVA particles with a concentration of 4.3% were dispersed
materials for supercapacitors. in 30 ml deionized water and kept ultrasonic stirring at 90 °C
In this study, a series of RGO/PANI/PVA composite until a completely dissolved PVA aqueous solution was
nanofibers with different RGO concentrations were pre- obtained. Then, the solution was cooled to room tempera-
pared by electrospinning method and then studied as elec- ture to obtain solution A. Solution B was prepared by adding
trode materials for supercapacitors. The surface morphology, RGO with different concentrations (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%,
chemical structure, and electrochemical properties of the and 1.0%) into solution A and sheared at high speed for
PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with different 30 min. Solution A and solution B were, respectively, mixed
RGO concentrations were studied. The results reveal that the with 2.38 g DBSA at 0 °C in an ice-water bath and stirred at
RGO/PANI/PVA composite nanofiber is a promising candi- 1500 rmp for 20 min. After that, aniline solution was added
date for electrode material in supercapacitors. into the mixed solutions. The solutions changed into milky
white floc as the stirring speed increased to 2000 rmp and
then kept stirring for 4 h. APS solution was prepared by dis-
2 Experimental solving the APS into 10 ml deionized water. Then, the APS
solution was added into the white emulsions at a rate of 6
2.1 Materials drops/5 min. This blend was then further poured into PVA
aqueous solution and stirred for 6 h to prepare the spinning
Hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O, concentration: 80 wt%) and solution with dark green color.
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, MW~1799 g/mol) were purchased
from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd. (China). Aniline (An,
≥ 99 wt%), dodecylbenzne sulfonic acid (DBSA, 90 wt%), 2.4 Preparation of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA
ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8, APS, 98 wt%), hydro- nanofibers
chloric acid (HCl, mass fraction: 36 wt%), and polytetra-
fluoroethylene (PTFE, 40 wt%) were purchased from Sin- The preparation of RGO/PANI/PVA emulsions and the rele-
opharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Graphite oxide (GO, vant nanofibers is shown in Fig. 1. The PANI/PVA nanofiber
SE2430W, mass fraction: 42.78 wt%) was provided by The was also prepared without the addition of RGO. As depicted
Sixth Element (Changzhou) Materials Technology Co., in the figure, the nanofibers were fabricated by electrospin-
Ltd. Transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) glass (resistance ning method. 5 ml of the viscous solution was loaded into
6–8 Ω/sq, 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm in size) used as a substrate were a syringe and fed at a rate of 6 ml/min with an applied volt-
obtained from Foshan Meijingyuan Glass Technology Co., age of 23 kV. Distance from the spinneret to collector was
Ltd, (China). Deionized water was used throughout the 16 cm. The electrospinning was carried out with a constant
experiment. All chemicals are analytical reagents and used temperature at 27 °C and constant humidity of 60%.
as received unless otherwise specified.
100 mg GO was dispersed in 100 ml deionized water by Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests were performed
using ultrasonic wave until a uniform solution was obtained. on a scanning electron microscope (SEM; JEOL JSM-840,
After the dispersion, 1 ml N 2H4·H2O was added to convert Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were
the GO into RGO with ultrasonic treatment at 90 °C for 1 h. obtained with a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
During the reduction, the color of the solution changed from (FTIR; Spectrum Two, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD)
yellow brown to black. RGO sheets can be obtained after measurements were conducted using D2 PHASER X-ray dif-
washing with deionized water for 5 times and subsequently fractometer (Bruker AXS, Germany). Electrochemical meas-
drying in an oven at 60 °C for 12 h. urements were recorded using a CHI660E electrochemical
13
5960 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965
work station (CHI, Shanghai, China) with three-electrode increased with the raising concentration of RGO. The forma-
cell. The nanofibers, a calomel electrode, and a platinum tion of the beads is probably due to the capillary instability
wire were used as the work electrode, reference electrode, of the liquid jet caused by surface tension on the spinning
and counter electrode, respectively, in 1.0 mol/l HCl electro- solution [22]. As the concentration of RGO increases, the
lyte. The weight of RGO/PANI/PVA nanofiber used in cyclic viscosity of the spinning solution increases. At the same
voltammetry (CV) measurements was 0.0015 mg. The sub- voltage, the electric field force is not sufficient to provide
strate is ITO glass, and the binder is polytetrafluoroethylene the surface tension to form the fiber. In addition, large slabs
solution (PTFE). The potential window of CV measurements of solution are thrown down on the fiber mat when the RGO
is between − 0.6 and + 1.0 V at scanning rate of 5, 10, 20, 50 concentration is high at 0.8–1.0%. From the above results,
,and 100 mV/s. The frequency range used for electrochemi- it can be concluded that 0.2%-RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers
cal impedance spectroscopy is from 10 MHz to 100 kHz. have the good fiber morphology and the fiber diameter is
about 119.8 nm.
The diameter variations of the nanofibers (shown in
3 Results and discussion Fig. 3) can be obtained based on the results in Fig. 2. The
average diameter of all the RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers is
3.1 Surface morphology larger than that of PANI/PVA nanofibers. Obviously, the
average diameter of RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers increased
SEM images of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with the increasing concentration of RGO.
with different RGO concentrations are shown in Fig. 2. It is
clear from Fig. 2a, PANI/PVA nanofibers exhibit smooth 3.2 Crystallization behavior
surface and have a uniform diameter distribution of about
117 nm. For the RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers as shown in XRD patterns of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofib-
Fig. 2b–f, it can be observed that the fiber diameter is grad- ers with different RGO concentrations are shown in Fig. 4. It
ually increased as the RGO concentration increased from is obvious that the XRD patterns show three peaks at 19.6°,
0.2 to 1.0%, and some beads with an increasing diameter 29.3° and 41°, which correspond to (010), (110), and (100)
are also found in the nanofibers. Fahimeh et al. [21] also crystal faces, respectively. In the XRD patterns, the sharp
reported the similar result that the diameter of the nanofiber peak at 19.6° can be attributed to the diffraction of PVA and
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965 5961
Fig. 2 SEM images of a PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with different RGO concentrations: b 0.2%, c 0.4%, d 0.6%, e 0.8%, and f
1.0%
PANI. This overlapped peak indicates the good compatibil- 3.4 Cyclic voltammetric behavior
ity between PVA and PANI. Obviously, the peak at 19.6°
became sharp after the addition of RGO and it is becoming To confirm the influence of RGO on the ion transport of
increasingly sharp as the raising concentration of RGO. The PANI, CV studies were carried out. Figure 6 presents the
result revealed that RGO can act as nucleation sites for the CV curves of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers
growth of PANI resulting in a contribution to the improve- from − 0.6 to + 1.0 V, and performed in 1 mol/l HCl solution
ment of the crystallinity of the composite nanofibers. at a scanning rate of 50 mV/s. The CV curves exhibit all the
nanofibers have the redox peaks at − 0.6 and + 1.0 V, which
3.3 Chemical structure can be attributed to proton insertion into and extraction out
from the host lattice, respectively [23]. As demonstrated in
Figure 5 shows FTIR spectra of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/ the figure, an obvious anodic peak as marked in the CV
PVA nanofibers with different RGO concentrations. As curve of PANI/PVA nanofiber indicates its pseudocapaci-
shown in the figure, the spectra shape and peak positions of tance properties, which are relative to the basic electrochem-
RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers are similar with that of PANI/ ical performance of PANI. This is because reversible Fara-
PVA. The result indicates that the addition of RGO would day reaction occurred on the electrode surface resulting in
not influence the functional groups of PANI/PVA. The peak charge transfer and then to form the capacitance. However,
positions corresponding to the functional groups of PANI the marked peak was inhibited after the addition of RGO
and PVA are illustrated in Table 1. Based on the recorded and the RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers exhibit the predominant
functional groups, the absorption peak at 1418 cm−1 and electrochemical properties of the double-layer capacitor. In
the stretching peak at 1644 cm−1 are the main characteristic this process, the formation of capacitance can be attributed
peaks of PANI, which are corresponding to its conductivity to the charge accumulation at the electrode–electrolyte
properties. interface.
13
5962 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965
40 40
(a) Dmean=117.4±3.33nm (b) Dmean=119.8±2.88nm
35 35
30 30
25 25
Frequency
Frequency
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
50 90 130 170 210 250 290 330 370 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Diameter(nm) Diameter(nm)
35 35
(c) Dmean=120.9±3.44nm (d) Dmean=125.7±3.07nm
30 30
25 25
Frequency
Frequency
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Diameter(nm) Diameter(nm)
35 30
(e) Dmean=147.5±5.75nm (f) Dmean=162.8±4.2nm
30 25
25
20
Frequency
Frequency
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0 0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Diameter(nm) Diameter(nm)
Fig. 3 Diameter distribution of a PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with different RGO concentrations: b 0.2%, c 0.4%, d 0.6%, e
0.8%, and f 1.0%
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965 5963
0.0%
CV curves of the 0.2%-RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers at
(110)
0.2% different scanning rates were presented in Fig. 7 to fur-
(010)
(100)
0.4% ther analyze the capability of the nanofibers to be used as
0.6%
0.8% electrode materials for supercapacitor. The area enclosed
1.0% in the CV curves increases with the increasing scanning
rate from 5 to 100 mV/s. The peak current responses pro-
Intensity(a.u)
10 20 30 40 50
2θ(degree) 3.5 Specific capacitance
Fig. 4 XRD patterns of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers The developed RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers can be the
with different RGO concentrations promising materials for the preparation of electrode, and
the specific capacitance is one of the important properties
of electrode for supercapacitor application. In this study,
105
the specific capacitance of the PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/
2912
3306
1418
1324
∫
Transmittance(a.u.)
1.0 %
60
high electrical conductivity of RGO. Obviously, the high-
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 est capacitance occurs when the RGO concentration is
Wavenumber(cm-1) 0.2%. This is because the diameter distribution of 0.2%-
RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers is relatively uniform and the
Fig. 5 FTIR spectra of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers surface of the nanofibers is in good shape which have no
with different RGO concentrations
13
5964 Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965
2
×10-5
200
174 171
1
162
160 154
145
Specific capacitance(F/g)
0
-1
120
105
Current/A
-2
-3 0.0% 80
0.2%
-4
0.4%
0.6% 40
-5
0.8%
-6 1.0%
0
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Potential/V RGO concentration(%)
Fig. 6 CV curves of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers Fig. 8 Specific capacitance of PANI/PVA and RGO/PANI/PVA
with different RGO concentrations (the scanning rate is 50 mV/s) nanofibers with different RGO concentrations (the scanning rate is
50 mV/s)
×10-5
1
0.0 %
0 12
×10
4 0.2 %
0.4 %
-1 10 0.6 %
0.8 %
Current/A
-2
8 1.0 %
Z''(ohm)
-3 ×10
4
1.0
6
-4 5mV/s
10mV/s
4 Z''(ohm)
-5 20mV/s 0.5
50mV/s
100mV/s 2
-6
0.0 4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5×10
Z'(ohm)
-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0 4
×10
Potential/V 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Z'(ohm)
Fig. 7 CV curves of 0.2%-RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers at different
scanning rates Fig. 9 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of PANI/PVA and
RGO/PANI/PVA nanofibers with different RGO concentrations
13
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020) 31:5958–5965 5965
13