Faculty of Business and Management Studies Undergraduate Business Programme ACADEMIC YEAR: 2020 - 2021, 1st Semester

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES

UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS PROGRAMME


ACADEMIC YEAR : 2020 - 2021, 1st Semester

WRIT2

Programme Title: BMS


Module Title: Human Resource Management in Context
Module Code: GHL5000
Assessment Method: Assignment
Level: 5 Block: 2
Module Credits: 20 Weighting: 50%
Due Date: ,
Word Count: 2000
09:00PM
Examiner(s): DR. ROLAND GETARUELAS

Version: 2
Gulf College – Faculty of Business and Management Studies – In academic

Affiliation with CARDIFF SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT

A. Written work

 A signed declaration that the work is your own (apart from otherwise referenced
acknowledgements) must be included after the reference page of your assignment
 Each page must be numbered.
 Where appropriate, a contents page, a list of tables/figures and a list of abbreviations should
precede your work.
 All referencing must adhere to School/Institutional requirements.
 A word count must be stated at the end of your work.
 Appendices should be kept to the minimum and be of direct relevance to the content of
your work.
 All tables and figures must be correctly numbered and labelled.

B. Other types of coursework/assignments

 Where coursework involves oral presentations, discussions, poster presentations, etc.,


specific instructions will be provided by your module leader/team.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rewrite below part just after the References of your assignment.

WORK DECLARATION

I, [Name of Student], hereby declare that the uploaded Assignment through Turnitin is my own work.
I affirm that this has been researched and completed in accordance with the college rules and
regulations on plagiarism.

I acknowledge the advice given by the module tutors on proper referencing to avoid plagiarism and
the rules on the academic unfair practice.

I acknowledge that I read and understand the plagiarism guide written at the end of this
assessment. Any academic misconduct will be handled according to the rules and regulations of the
university.

[Name of Student]

General instructions

Pg. 2 Version 2
Assignment must be submitted online through Turnitin before . An acknowledgement
will be given to you by your teacher upon presentation of the finance clearance. This is your
receipt, keep it.

The only circumstance in which assignments can be uploaded late via Turnitin is if a Mitigating
Circumstances (MC) form is submitted at the same time. In these circumstances work may be
submitted within five (5) working days. Make sure to secure MC form and submit the same to the
concerned staff.

Write the number of words used, excluding references, at the end of your assignment. Provide the
list of sources you used at the last page of your assignment with proper label ‘References’. You may
include diagrams, figures etc. without word penalty. The number of words will be + or – 10% of the
total words allowed.

A work declaration must be included just after the reference page of your assignment. This ensures
that you prepare your work in good faith. Any form of collusion and/or academic unfair practice will
be dealt with according to the pertinent rules and regulations of the partner university. Please read
carefully the plagiarism guide.

Assessment Details
This Assignment comprises 50% of the total assessments marks. These will develop the following
skills:

 Problem solving and analytical ability – able to use information in a range of media and
apply logical and critical thinking to a range of problems and to consider multiple perspectives
as they apply to both practical and theoretical challenges.
 Creativity Skills – Often, analysing requires a creative eye to spot trends in the data that
others may not find. Creativity is also important when it comes to problem-solving. Student
often must think outside of the box to come up with effective solutions to big problems.
 Critical thinking is necessary for having strong analytical skills. Critical thinking refers to
evaluating information and then making a decision based on your findings. Critical thinking
is what helps student to make decisions and solve problems.

This assessment will test the following learning outcomes:

 Compare and scrutinise relevant and appropriate HR data sources for the purposes of carrying
out business and environment planning.
 Analyse key models, theories and concepts of HRM and explore the contribution of HR to
issues of business ethics, governance and accountability.
 Consider the contribution of the HR function in identifying and responding to change in the
business and external context and promoting good management practice.

Assessment Task:
Write an assignment of 2000 words based on the instruction given.

In order for strategic human resource management to be effective, human resources (HR)
must play a vital role as a strategic partner when company policies are created and
implemented. Also Performance indicators show that effective teams will almost always
outperform people working individually, particularly in high-pressure situations or when
multiple skillsets are needed.

Do all the tasks given below: (2,000 words)

1. Describe employee champion and analyse how this can support to increase productivity
in the organisation? (650 words)

2. Describe change agent and evaluate how this can support to increase productivity in the
organisation? (650 words)

3. Discuss composition and identify how it will support to the effectiveness in creating a
team in the organisation? ( 700 words)

***END OF EXAM PAPER***


Assignment Guidelines:
Please read the following ten points carefully before you start your portfolio:
1. You must provide analysis for all three tasks.
2. Task 1 should be 650 required words, task 2 should be 650 words and task 3 comprises of
700 words.
3. Total number of words required for the three tasks is 2000 words respectively. (+ or – 10%)
that go over the word count will have marks deducted.

1. Ensure to follow and write the specific task given accordingly and do not mix the sequence,
always follow the order of the task.
2. Relevant theories and citations, must be included in every task.
3. Make sure to organize your thoughts, words and analyses, proper spelling in British English
must be observed.
4. The assignment must be submitted to the Turnitin.
5. A minimum of 10 academic references must use within this assignment
6. You must acknowledge all your source(s) and all work should be correctly referenced using
the standard Harvard referencing style adopted by the college, with a complete reference
list at the end of the assignment. There is a guide on Moodle.
7. You should illustrate your answer with real life examples as this highlights your
understanding of academic theory and your ability to apply practice to theory and theory to
practice.
8. If you only research using just the recommended text from the reading list and/or base your
essays on the lecture material alone, you will not gain high marks.
9. If you wish to gain higher marks you will need to engage in further reading using not just
textbooks and but also articles, and you should read around the topics.
10. Write total word count just before the reference page.
11. Please upload your work in MS Word, no other file formats are allowed.

***End of Assignment Task***


GHL5000 - Human Resource Management in Context
AY: : 2020 - 2021 / 1st Semester

Marking Scheme

Criteria Descriptions Mark

 Description of employee champion. (13 marks)


 Analysis of employee champion on how it can help
the productivity of the organisation. (20 marks) 100
Tasks  Description of change agent. (13 marks)
 Analysis of change agent on how it can help to
increase the productivity of organisation. (20 marks)
 Description of composition. (13 marks)
 Analysis of composition on how it can support the
effectiveness in creating a team. (21 marks)

Total 100
Plagiarism

1. Plagiarism, which can be defined as using without acknowledgement another person’s words or
ideas and submitting them for assessment as though it were one’s own work, for instance by
copying, translating from one language to another or unacknowledged paraphrasing. Further
examples of plagiarism are given below:

Use of any quotation(s) from the published or unpublished work of other persons, whether
published in textbooks, articles, the Web, or in any other format, which quotations have not been
clearly identified as such by being placed in quotation marks and acknowledged.

Use of another person’s words or ideas that have been slightly changed or paraphrased to make it
look different from the original.

Summarising another person’s ideas, judgments, diagrams, figures, or computer programmes


without reference to that person in the text and the source in a bibliography or reference list.

Use of services of essay banks and/or any other agencies.

Use of unacknowledged material downloaded from the Internet.

Re-use of one’s own material except as authorised by the department.

2. Collusion, which can be defined as when work that has been undertaken by or with others is
submitted and passed off as solely as the work of one person. This also applies where the work of
one candidate is submitted in the name of another. Where this is done with the knowledge of the
originator both parties can be considered to be at fault.

3. Fabrication of data, making false claims to have carried out experiments, observations, interviews or
other forms of data collection and analysis, or acting dishonestly in any other way.

Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS)

As part of its commitment to quality and the maintenance of academic standards, the University reserves
the right to use Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), including Turnitin. Such software makes no judgment as
to whether a piece of work has been plagiarised; it simply highlights sections of text that have been found in
other sources.

The use of plagiarism detection software fulfills two functions. The first is to enhance student learning (i.e. as
a developmental tool); the second is to guard against and identify unfair practice in assessment.

Further information and guidance can be found in the University’s policy on the Use of Plagiarism Detection
Software.
GHL5000 - Human Resource Management in Context
AY: : 2020 - 2021 / 1st Semester
Marking Rubrics
:
X

BELOW IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE


INSTRUCTION JUST IGNORE
IV2

CARDIFF SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT : VERIFICATION OF INTERNAL MODERATION OF ASSESSMENT

Module Number: GHL5000 Module Name: Human Resource Management in Module Leader: DR. ROLAND Year/Term: : 2020 - 2021 / 1st Semester
Context GETARUELAS
MODULE ASSESSMENT STRATEGY BRIEFING INCLUDES: X IV’s COMMENTS / RECOMMENDATIONS MODULE LEADER’S ACTION TAKEN

Description of  . No actions taken


Assignment 50% ☒
Task/Problem/Topic

Coursework 50% Hand in Details ☐

Guidance Notes ☒
Learning Outcomes ☒

Total 100 Assessment Criteria ☒

ASSESSMENT DETAILS Mark Criteria ☒

Title: Marking Scheme ☒


WRIT2
Feedback Sheet ☐

Assessment type: Referencing



Assignment Requirements Given
Nominated IV: Date:
IV Signature:
Dr. Nasrin Sulthana
CARDIFF METROPOLITAN LINK TUTOR COMMENTS: 26/10 CSMCP Assessments - EE approved revised paper via email
This is a reasonable replacement for the examination., Approved

X Please check appropriate box below X Please check appropriate box below
☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am ☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am
happy to approve the content. happy to approve the content.
Assessment can now be forwarded to the External Examiner for approval. Assessment can now be released to the students.

☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am ☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and I am
happy to approve the content subject to the above amendments. happy to approve the content subject to the above amendments.
Assessment can be forwarded to the External Examiner once these changes Assessment can be released to students once these changes have been
have been implemented and verified. implemented and verified.

☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and ☐ I confirm that I have considered the above draft assignment/exam and
suggest the above amendments. suggest the above amendments.
I would like to see the final amended version before I confirm approval. I would like to see the final amended version before I confirm approval.

Cardiff Metropolitan Link Tutor: Link tutor signature: Date: External Examiner: EE Signature: Date:

Mike Flynn MJFLYNN 3/10/2 Marilena Antoniadou 17.10.2020

You might also like