This is a checklist of issues for an attorney to consider because they may be raised at a Pretrial Conference under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is a checklist of issues for an attorney to consider because they may be raised at a Pretrial Conference under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is a checklist of issues for an attorney to consider because they may be raised at a Pretrial Conference under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The pretrial order must limit the time to – Motions
disposing of pending motions join other parties, determining the appropriateness of summary amend the pleadings, adjudication under Rule 56 complete discovery, and directing that before moving for an order file motions. relating to discovery, the movant must At pretrial conference, the court may act on request a conference with the court anything to facilitate “the just, speedy, and Trial Management inexpensive disposition of the action” such as referring matters to a magistrate judge or a Calendaring master determining the timing of summary ordering a separate trial under Rule 42(b) of adjudication under Rule 56 a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, third- setting dates for pretrial conferences party claim, or particular issue scheduling the filing and exchange of avoiding unnecessary proof and cumulative witness and exhibit lists for trial, evidence scheduling the filing and exchange of any limiting the use of expert testimony pretrial briefs limiting the time allowed to present setting date for trial evidence Narrowing Scope of Issues ordering the presentation of evidence early formulating and simplifying the issues in the trial on a manageable issue that might, on the evidence, be the basis for a judgment eliminating frivolous claims or defenses as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) or a amending the pleadings judgment on partial findings under Rule obtaining admissions and stipulations about 52(c) facts and documents to avoid unnecessary Complex and Difficult Cases proof, and ruling in advance on the adopting special procedures for managing admissibility of evidence potentially difficult or protracted actions Discovery involving complex issues, multiple parties, modifying the timing of disclosures difficult legal questions, or unusual proof under Rules 26(a) and 26(e)(1) problems modifying the extent of discovery ADR providing for disclosure, discovery, or using special procedures to assist in preservation of electronically stored resolving the dispute information including agreements the parties may reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material after information is produced, including agreements reached under FRE 502 controlling and scheduling discovery, including orders affecting disclosures and discovery under Rule 26 and Rules 29 through 37
Puente - Arizona - Et - Al - v. - Arpai RESPONSE To Motion Re MOTION For Summary Judgment County Defendants' Joint Response in Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment
Defendant Scott Nago's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Partial Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment, Democratic Party of Hawaii v. Nago, No. CV13-00301 JMS/KSC (Sep. 16, 2013)