Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report On Insurance Code, First Part
Report On Insurance Code, First Part
FIRST PART
(Ronald Arvin C. Cusi)
A. Concept of Insurance -
Insurance is an agreement whereby one undertakes for a consideration to
indemnify another against the loss, damage or liability arising from an unknown
or contingent event. (Sec. 2[1], Insurance Code)
Note: A contract of insurance is still a contract, thus it must have all the essential
elements of a valid contract as enumerated in Art. 1318 of the New Civil Code
4. Assumption of Risk – The insurer assumes that risk of loss for a consideration.
5. Risk of loss – The insured is subject to a risk of loss through the destruction or
impairment of that interest by the happening of designated peril.
7. Personal – Each party having in view the character, credit and conduct of the
other.
9. Risk distributing device – Insurance serves to distribute the risk of economic loss
among as many as possible of those who are subject to the same kind of loss.
D. Classes
1. Marine
Insurance against risks connected with navigation, to which a ship, cargo,
freightage, profits or other insurable interest in movable property, may be
exposed during a certain voyage or fixed period of time.
Those used, or at least, intended for navigation. E.g., one for shipping,
chartering, voyage and the like. Vessels which are used as museums or those
that are stationary are not entitled to be insured under this a marine insurance.
Measure of indemnity:
a. Valued policy – the parties are bound by the valuation, if the insured had
some interest at risk and there is no fraud (Sec. 156)
b. Open policy – the following rules shall apply in estimating a loss:
i. value of the ship - value at the beginning of the risk
ii. value of the cargo - me and place of lading
iii. value of freightage - gross freightage exclusive of primage
iv. cost of insurance - in each case to be added to the
estimated value (Sec. 161)
The general rule on risk insured against in marine insurance is only perils of the
sea is insured against.
However, the exemption is unless perils of the ship are covered by an all ‐risks
policy.
2. Fire
It is a contract of indemnity by which the insurer, for a consideration, agrees to
indemnify the insured against loss of or damage by fire, lightning, windstorm,
tornado or earthquake and other allied risks, when such risks are covered by
extension to fire insurance policies or under separate policies. (Sec. 167)
Note: The liability of an insurer is to pay for direct loss only. The insurer may be
liable to pay for consequential losses if covered by extension to such fire policies
or insured under separate policy
In order that the insurer may rescind a contract of fire insurance for any alteration
made in the use or condition of the thing insured, the following requisites must be
present:
a) The use or condition of the thing is specially limited or stipulated in the
policy;
d) The alteration is made by means within the control of the insured; and
Note: A contract of fire insurance is not affected by any act of the insured
subsequent to the execution of the policy, which does not violate its provisions
even though it increases the risk and is the cause of the loss. (Sec. 170)
Note: The insured is not a co‐insurer under fire policies in the absence of
stipulation.
Fall of building clause - It is that which provides, in a fire insurance policy, that if
the building or any part thereof falls, except as a result of fire, all insurance by the
policy shall immediately cease.
Option to rebuild clause - It gives the insurer the option to rebuild the destroyed
property instead of paying the indemnity. This clause serves to protect the
insurer against unfair appraisals friendly to the insured. (Sec. 172)
3. Casualty
Casualty insurance is that which covers loss or liability arising from accident or
mishap, excluding those falling under types of insurance as fire or marine.
The injured person have the right to sue insurer of the party at fault when:
a) Indemnity against third party liability – injured third party can directly sue
the insurer.
Purpose: To protect injured person against the insolvency of the insured who
causes such injury.
Note: The insurer is not solidarily liable with the insured. The insurer’s
liability is based on contract; that of the insured is based on torts.
Furthermore, the insurer’s liability is limited by the amount of the insurance
coverage.
Note: A “no action” clause must yield to the provisions of the Rules of Court
regarding multiplicity of suits. (Shafter v. RTC, G.R. No. 78848, Nov. 14, 1988)
4. Suretyship
b) The contract of suretyship or bonding shall not be valid and binding unless
and until the premium therefore has been paid
c) Where the obligee has accepted the bond, it shall be valid and
enforceable notwithstanding that the premium has not been paid;
(Philippine Pryce Assurance Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 107062, Feb. 21,
1994)
d) If the contract of suretyship or bond is not accepted by, or filed with the
obligee, the surety shall collect only a reasonable amount;
f) In the case of continuing bond (for a term longer than one year or with no
fixed expiration date), the obligor shall pay the subsequent annual
premium as it falls due until the contract is cancelled. (Sec. 177)
c) Fidelity bonds – They pay an employer for loss growing out of a dishonest
act of his employee.
d) Judicial bonds – They are those which are required in connection with
judicial proceedings.
6. Life
The effect if the beneficiary will fully bring about the death of the insured are:
d) The insurer is not liable if it can show that the policy was obtained with the
intention to commit suicide even in the absence of any suicide exclusion in
the policy.
No fault indemnity clause is a clause where the insurer is required to pay a third
party injured or killed in an accident without the necessity of proving fault or
negligence on the part of the insured. There is a stipulated maximum amount to
be recovered. (1994 Bar Question)
Note: The claimant is not free to choose from which insurer he will claim the
"no fault indemnity," as the law, by using the word "shall”, makes it mandatory
that the claim be made against the insurer of the vehicle in which the
occupant is riding, mounting or dismounting from. That said vehicle might not
be the one that caused the accident is of no moment since the law itself
provides that the party paying may recover against the owner of the vehicle
responsible for the accident. (Perla Compania de Seguros, Inc. v. Ancheta,
G.R. No. L-49599, Aug. 8, 1988)
This no-fault claim does not apply to property damage. If the total indemnity
claim exceeds P15, 000 and there is controversy in respect thereto, the
finding of fault may be availed of by the insurer only as to the excess. The first
P15, 000 shall be paid without regard to the fault.
The authorized driver clause indemnifies the insured owner against loss or
damage to the car but limits the use of the insured vehicle to:
a) The insured himself; or
b) Any person who drives on his order or with his permission. (Villacorta v.
Insurance Commissioner, G.R. No. 54171, Oct. 28, 1980)
The main purpose of an authorized driver clause is to require a person other than
the insured, who drives the car on the insured’s order, such as, his regular driver,
or with his permission, such as a friend or member of the family or the employees
of a car service or repair shop to be duly licensed drivers and have no
disqualification to drive a motor vehicle. (Villacorta v. Insurance Commission,
G.R. No. L-54171, Oct. 28, 1980)
The theft clause includes theft as among the risks insured against. Where a
car is unlawfully and wrongfully taken without the knowledge and consent of
the owner, such taking constitutes “theft” and it is the theft clause, not the
authorized driver clause which should apply. (Palermo v. Pyramid Inc., G.R.
No. L-36480, May 31, 1988)
Cooperation clause is that which provides that the insured shall give all such
information and assistance as the insurer may require, usually including
attendance at trials or hearings.
E. Insurable Interest
The general rule is a person is deemed to have an insurable interest in the
subject matter insured where he has a relation or connection with or concern in it
that he will derive pecuniary benefit or advantage from its preservation and will
suffer pecuniary loss from its destruction or injury by the happening of the event
insured against.
However, the exemption is that the term has a somewhat broader meaning in
connection with life insurance. To have an insurable interest in the life of a
person, the expectation of benefit from the continued life of that person need not
necessarily be of pecuniary nature.
Insurable interest in life exists when there is reasonable ground founded on the
relation of the parties, either pecuniary or contractual or by blood or affinity, to
expect some benefit or advantage from the continuance of the life of the insured.
On the other hand, every interest in property, whether real or personal, or any
relation thereto, or liability in respect thereof, of such nature that a contemplated
peril might directly damnify the insured. (Sec. 13)
1. In Life/Health
The two general classes of life policies:
a) Insurance upon one’s life – are those taken out by the insured upon his
own life (Section 10[a]) for the benefit of himself, or of his estate, in case it
matures only at his death, for the benefit of third person who may be
designated as beneficiary.
Note: An application for insurance on one’s own life does not usually
present an insurable interest question.
b) Insurance upon life of another – are those taken out by the insured upon
the life of another. (Sec. 10 [a], [b], [c] and [d])
b) Property Insurance – When the insurance takes effect and when the loss
occurs, but need not exist in the meantime. (Sec. 19)
2. In Property
Double insurance exists where the same person is insured by several insurers
separately, in respect to the same subject and interest. (Sec. 93)
Double insurance is not prohibited by law. A person may procure two or more
insurances to cover his property. What is prohibited by law is over insurance.
The rules where the insured is over-insured by double insurance are as follows:
a) The insured, unless the policy otherwise provides, may claim payment from
the insurers in such order as he may select, up to the amount which the
insurers are severally liable under their respective contracts.
b) Where the policy under which the insured claims is a valued policy, the
insured must give credit as against the valuation for any sum received by him
under any other policy without regard to the actual value of the subject matter
insured.
c) Where the policy under which the insured claims is an unvalued policy he
must give credit, as against the full insurable value, for any sum received by
him under any policy.
d) Where the insured receives any sum in excess of the valuation in the case of
valued policies, or of the insurable value in the case of unvalued policies, he
must hold such sum in trust for the insurers, according to their right of
contribution among themselves.
e) Each insurer and the other insurers, to contribute ratably to the loss in
proportion to the amount for which he is liable under his contract. (Sec. 94)
b) Mortgagee – To the extent of the debt. Such interest continues until the
mortgage debt is extinguished. The property relied on as mortgaged is
only a security. In insuring the property, he is not insuring the property
itself but his interest or lien thereon.
Note: In case of an insurance taken by the mortgagee alone and for his
benefit, the mortgagee, after recovery from the insurer, is not allowed to
retain his claim against the mortgagor but it passes by subrogation to the
insurer to the extent of the insurance money paid.