Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Calculate The Weight Loss of Aluminum in A 0.5 M Sodium Sulphate Solution As Per NACE-TM-0169/ASTM G31
Calculate The Weight Loss of Aluminum in A 0.5 M Sodium Sulphate Solution As Per NACE-TM-0169/ASTM G31
Calculate The Weight Loss of Aluminum in A 0.5 M Sodium Sulphate Solution As Per NACE-TM-0169/ASTM G31
Experiment No. 1
Calculate the weight loss of Aluminum in a 0.5 M Sodium Sulphate solution as per NACE-
TM-0169/ASTM G31
Objective
Objective of this experiment is to find out the Weight loss rate/ Degradation rate (decrease in
the metal weight with time in a specific electrolyte) of the aluminum sample in a 0.5 M
sodium sulphate and also observe the change in physical & chemical parameters due to metal
and electrolyte interact with the passage of specific time interval.
Principle
Dissolution takes place as metal atoms are ionized and pass into solution, leaving their
electrons within the original metal surface. Whereas free electrons within the metal are taken
up by chemical species such as O2 and H2O in reduction reactions.
Other parameters like Conductivity & Temperature increase with increase in ion formation.
pH decreases with increasing temperature i.e. acidic.
Background
When metal/ alloy is dipped in an electrolyte, corrosion takes place by;
1. Chemical reaction
2. Electrochemical reaction
3. Physical reaction (Mechanical Reaction)
Components of corrosion process includes;
1. Anode
2. Cathode
3. Electrolyte
4. Metallic path
If any of the component is missing, corrosion will not occur.
Parameters like pH, temperature and conductivity will help determining ions presence in
solution. As ion formation is directly related to corrosion process.
Standard for experiment
NACE-TM0169-2000
ASTM G31
Figure 4- Measuring Conductivity and temperature on pH/mV/EC/TDS & Temperature
Meter AD8000, Adwa instrument, Hungry
Sr Time Thickness Length Widt Surface Densit Initial Final Weight Corrosion
. (hours) (cm) (cm) h Area y weigh Weight Loss rate
No (cm) (cm2) (g.cm-3) t (g) (mg)
(g)
(gmd (mpy)
)
1. 0 0.262 4.987 3.760 19.052 2.75 12.89
pH of electrolyte = 6
Conductivity of electrolyte = 63.3 mS
Temperature = 29.6 ℃
Color of electrolyte = colorless
After 1 week
Figure 5: Photograph of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution in which aluminum sample is
immersed (after 1 week)
Sr. Time Thickness Length Width Surface Density Initial Final Weight Corrosion
No (days) (cm) (cm) (cm) Area (g/cm3) weight Weight Loss rate
2
(cm ) (g) (g) (mg)
(gmd) (mpy)
1. 0 0.262 4.987 3.760 41.852 2.75 12.89 -- -- -- --
2. 7 0.26 4.993 3.792 42.202 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
After 2 week
After 3 week
Figure 10: Photograph of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution in which aluminum sample is
immersed (after 21 days)
Procedure
1. After 21 days, Photograph of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution in which aluminum
sample was immersed, was taken, as shown in figure 1.
2. Again, photograph of aluminum sample when taken out of 0.5 M sodium sulphate
solution, was taken as shown in figure 2.
3. The pH, Conductivity, Temperature and color of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution was
observed & noted as shown in figure 3 & 4.
4. Aluminum sample was cleaned with 70% nitric acid (HNO3) for 2-3 min. followed by
light scrub using cotton at room temperature.
5. Sample was dried using dryer (Dryer, JB-4, Conversion). Photograph of aluminum
sample was taken as shown in figure 5.
6. Weight and dimensions (Length, width & thickness) of aluminum sample was
measured to calculate surface area and corrosion rate.
7. Again, aluminum sample was immersed in 0.5 M sodium sulphate for further
observations. (figure 6)
Figure 13: Shows Conductivity & Temperature measurement of electrolyte after 21 days
Discussion
After 21 days, again little ions deposition over the surface of Al sample immersed in 0.5 M
Na2SO4 solution is observed, visible in the form of white matter (aluminum oxide), see figure
6. Including, our sample contain a crack, which was not quite visible early but propagates
deeper with the passage of time and became visible. This is because of the reason that
electrolyte being little acidic, etched the sample and reveal the structure. But still this has no
effect on weight and surface area of overall Al sample. Variation in thickness, length & width
(From table 1) is just a human error. Therefore, we can call it just surface imperfections, not
corrosion.
Conductivity and temperature of 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte changed a bit in this time duration.
Conductivity decreases indicating ions precipitation and settling at the bottom of flask and on
the surface of Al sample. Decrease in temperature of 0.5 M Na 2SO4 electrolyte indicate the
same factor i.e. decrease in solubility of ions in solution.
Figure 15: Precepted ions visible on surface.
Sr. Time Thickness Length Width Surface Density Initial Final Weight Corrosion
No (days) (cm) (cm) (cm) Area (g/cm3) weight Weight Loss rate
(cm2) (g) (g) (mg)
(gmd) (mpy)
1. 0 0.262 4.987 3.760 41.852 2.75 12.89 -- -- -- --
2. 7 0.26 4.993 3.792 42.202 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
3. 14 0.259 4.988 3.791 42.134 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
4. 21 0.257 4.987 3.785 42.03 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
After 4 week
Figure 16: Photograph of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution in which aluminum sample is
immersed (after 28 days)
Figure 17: Photograph of Aluminum sample before cleaning (after 28 days)
Procedure
1. After 28 days, Photograph of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution in which aluminum
sample was immersed, was taken, as shown in figure 1.
2. Again, photograph of aluminum sample when taken out of 0.5 M sodium sulphate
solution, was taken as shown in figure 2.
3. The Conductivity & Temperature of 0.5 M sodium sulphate solution was measured
using pH/mV/EC/TDS & Temperature Meter AD8000, Adwa instrument, Hungry as
shown in figure 4. pH by pH meter and color was noted as shown in figure 3.
4. Aluminum sample was cleaned with 70% nitric acid (HNO 3) for 2-3 min., followed
by light scrub using cotton at room temperature. And was rinsed then, by tap water.
5. Sample was dried using dryer (Dryer, JB-4, Conversion). Photograph of dried
aluminum sample was taken as shown in figure 5.
6. Weight and dimensions (Length, width & thickness) of aluminum sample was
measured using weighing balance and Vernier caliper respectively, to calculate
surface area and corrosion rate.
7. Again, aluminum sample was immersed in 0.5 M sodium sulphate for 7 day for
further observations. (figure 6)
Discussion
It is a property of aluminum that it has good corrosion resistance. This is due to the formation
of passive thin oxide film on the surface of aluminum. This is the reason that even after 28
days no change in weight and surface area of overall Al sample is observed, little ions
deposition/ oxide layer over the surface of Al sample immersed in 0.5 M Na 2SO4 solution is
observed, visible in the form of white matter, see figure 6. Already present cracks are also in
their place, without any variation. Variation in thickness, length & width (From table 1) is
just a human error.
Conductivity and temperature of 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte changed a bit in this time duration.
Conductivity decreases indicating ions precipitation and settling at the bottom of flask, and
on the surface of Al sample as shown in figure 6. Decrease in temperature of 0.5 M Na 2SO4
electrolyte indicate the same factor i.e. decrease in solubility of ions in solution.
Figure 21: Precepted ions visible on the surface of sample and at the bottom of flask.
Results & Calculation
Specimen: Aluminum metal Cleaning Solution: 70 % HNO3
Solution: 0.5 M Na2SO4 Radius of Holes: 0.192 cm
Sr. Time Thickness Length Width Surface Density Initial Final Weight Corrosion
No (days) (cm) (cm) (cm) Area (g/cm3) weight Weight Loss rate
(cm2) (g) (g) (mg)
(gmd) (mpy)
1. 0 0.262 4.987 3.760 41.852 2.75 12.89 -- -- -- --
2. 7 0.26 4.993 3.792 42.202 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
3. 14 0.259 4.988 3.791 42.134 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
4. 21 0.257 4.987 3.785 42.03 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0
5. 28 0.260 4.994 3.786 42.146 2.75 12.89 12.89 0 0 0