Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Debate Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Oszyjane94
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating students participating in a debate for their culminating activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences strand. The rubric contains 5 criteria for evaluation: preparation, organization, strength and relevance of supporting arguments, use of facts and examples, and speaking voice. Each criterion is scored from 3 to 10, with higher scores indicating more effective demonstration of the criterion such as well-prepared arguments, clear organization of viewpoints, use of convincing and relevant arguments supported by facts and examples, and a well-modulated speaking voice that emphasizes the arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Debate Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Oszyjane94
    10 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating students participating in a debate for their culminating activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences strand. The rubric contains 5 criteria for evaluation: preparation, organization, strength and relevance of supporting arguments, use of facts and examples, and speaking voice. Each criterion is scored from 3 to 10, with higher scores indicating more effective demonstration of the criterion such as well-prepared arguments, clear organization of viewpoints, use of convincing and relevant arguments supported by facts and examples, and a well-modulated speaking voice that emphasizes the arguments.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    DEBATE RUBRICS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating students participating in a debate for their culminating activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences strand. The rubric contains 5 criteria for evaluation: preparation, organization, strength and relevance of supporting arguments, use of facts and examples, and speaking voice. Each criterion is scored from 3 to 10, with higher scores indicating more effective demonstration of the criterion such as well-prepared arguments, clear organization of viewpoints, use of convincing and relevant arguments supported by facts and examples, and a well-modulated speaking voice that emphasizes the arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views1 page

    Debate Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    Oszyjane94
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating students participating in a debate for their culminating activity in the Humanities and Social Sciences strand. The rubric contains 5 criteria for evaluation: preparation, organization, strength and relevance of supporting arguments, use of facts and examples, and speaking voice. Each criterion is scored from 3 to 10, with higher scores indicating more effective demonstration of the criterion such as well-prepared arguments, clear organization of viewpoints, use of convincing and relevant arguments supported by facts and examples, and a well-modulated speaking voice that emphasizes the arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    MOUNT CARMEL COLLEGE OF ESCALANTE, INC

    Escalante City, Negros Occidental


    Basic Education (Senior High School)
    S.Y. 2019-2020 2nd Semester

    Culminating Activity (HUMSS FUSION)


    DEBATE RUBRICS

    Topic and Side : __________________________________________________________ Grade level, Strand, and Section: _________________Date: ______________

    Criteria 3 5 8 10 Score

    Students are
    Students need more
    Preparation unprepared to defend Students in preparation Students are well prepared
    preparation
    the argument

    Viewpoints are unclear Some of the viewpoints Most of the viewpoints The viewpoints are clear
    Organization
    and disorganized are clear and organized are clear and organized and organized

    Arguments are not Only some arguments Most arguments are All arguments are strong,
    Strength and relevance convincing or relevant  are convincing or convincing or relevant   convincing or relevant 
    of supporting relevant  
    arguments

    Arguments lack factual Only some arguments Most arguments are All arguments are
    Use of facts and support. are supported with facts supported with facts supported with facts and
    examples and examples and examples examples

    Voice cannot be heard Voice is difficult to hear  Voice is heard most of Voice is well-modulated and
    Speaking Voice or unintelligible  the time  emphasizes the arguments
    well

    Total Score:

    You might also like