Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-To-Energy Technologies: Theoretical Analysis and Case Study of Commercial Plants
for comparative testing: Minimum Explosion Concentrations
A. Float Dust, South Central Utility A 100 B. Mid-Sulfur, Eastern B 40 C. Low Sulfur, Southern C 60 D. Float Dust, South Eastern Utility 62 D E. Dust Collector, South Eastern Utility E 40 F. Bituminous & Sub-bituminous Blend G. Float Dust, Midwest Utility F 60 H. Dust Collector, Midwest Utility G 80 I. Northern PRB Mine H 63 I 55 Explosions are a constant threat at coal-fired power plants. Coal Dust Maximum Explosion Pressures Understanding Equipment A 109 the Hazards: B 108 Power plant equipment most likely ● fuel C 112 to experience explosions and require D 108 ● ignition Explosion Protection are: E 106 • Pulverizers ● equipment F 107 • Dust Collectors G 108 • Cyclones Fuel H 114 • Electrostatic Precipitators I 110 • Storage Bins and Silos Explosion characteristics may vary • Transport Pipes and Ducts Explosion Severity Index widely due to the specific coal being used. The following graphs provide A 89 practical comparisons of data collected B 172 through ASTM testing of various C 135 coals. D 119 E 77 Ignition F 173 G 148 Coal processing, conveyance and storage typically produce the hazard- H 200 ous conditions. All that is needed to I 95 produce an explosion is a sufficient source of ignition, which could be Minimum Auto Ignition Temperatures provided by: A 1125 • Tramp Metal and Railroad B 1185 Spikes fed into the pulverizer C 1145 • Pyrites in the pulverizer D 1165 • Static Electricity E 1165 • Hot Surfaces F 1165 • Smoldering nests G 1135 H 1015 Coal Samples used I 1165
for comparative testing: Minimum Explosion Concentrations
Life Cycle Assessment of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Incineration Waste-To-Energy Technologies: Theoretical Analysis and Case Study of Commercial Plants