Caselet-1

Dr.Permanand, Secretary of managing committee of a school, sent his letter of

resignation on 9/08/2009 requesting managing committee to accept the same . He sent
another letter 10/08/2009 to withdraw his resignation. The managing committee which
met on the 20/08/2009 has accepted the resignation.

Que-1 Is the management committee’s decision valid?

Que-2 What are the concepts available under the Indian contract act 1872 with reference
to the above case?

Caselet-2
The Madhya Pradesh Government invited tenders from those desirous of purchasing the
leaves. The petitioners submitted his tender for the purchase of the leaves for the season
ending 31st december2006.His tender was accepted.
In the agreement signed by both the parties, a provision for the renewal of the agreement
is also there for the next season. The agreement stipulated that the government may in its
discretion renew this agreement for a further period of one year only, provided that
certain conditions are satisfied. One of the conditions was that purchases have to submit
the application for the renewal in the September month.
The agreement also provides that the purchaser that the purchases who submitted his
application is bound by his offer and also by the terms and condition of the agreement,
till orders of the government of accepting or rejecting.
It was further stipulated that breach of this condition shall entail forfeiture of the security
deposits , make the purchase liable to blacklisted and the purchaser will also have to pay
damage for the lost suffered by the government ?
The Petitioners who was given contract for the purpose of the contract has applied for the
renewal but after few days applied for the with drawl before government’s action?

Que-1 On the basis of which provision under Indian contract act He applied for
withdrawal?
Que-2 As per your understanding of the Indian contract act can he do so?

Case let -3
In this case the plantiff parked his car at an automatic car parking. when he approached
for the parking .A ticket came out of the machine ,then a barrier rose and he could get it
park his Car .It was printed on the ticket that it was being issued subject to the conditions
displayed in the parking place . One of the conditions displayed in the parking premises
exempted the defendants from the liability of injury to their customers. when the plaintiff
came back injured due to negligence of the defendant’s part .

Que-1 Does liability of defendants arises in this situation?

Que-2 If yes then what could be the ground?