nif theory of international politics was due to lack of theoreti comparison to steady theoretical progress in the natural sciences, Waltz ook this reinterpretation of classical realism to make political re ould pursue p al politics, Nerealists therefore propose general laws somic channels. uch moderate defensive pos plain events: they simplify explanations of behavior in antikpaton of being ng to dangerous levels of mistrust among sta ee able to explain and predic ren real ch importance to the char cut fear of unintended or uncontrolled escalation to ey While traditio P acter fe give precedence in their analyses Sends in eptrion enbarcerent ter. The eel rerests by making them bel t best. Neorealism thus advances two normative arguments and one theoretical “The first normative argument is that we need th cs (and that prior to the publication of Wi heory, neorealism, explai peace and war in an anarchic ion of power, descr hhow can we explain long periods of peace?” Waltz argued thatthe distribution of power int cfc fo acquire weapons of mas destruct costs of the war against Iraq were at leas ibyas change of re the eatin teeta States (most powerful matter most) the United gee, Palo congue, o che credible threat of conqu . Insecure, sefish, power seeking Unitary actors rational power seeking Neorealism Anarchle (implies perpetual threat of wa) Realism, as a general + #8 «general perspective, encompasses af share common assumptions and premise, # selaned iy of pti pe ERY peed eet (Sine wasters me eteon eee 3 Among the vs is not itself a single, u : referred to as “classi Thucydides, Saint Augustine, Hobbes, Morgenthau, Waltz, ictural realism), as delineated in Lipari iia idan ct* Reasoning that lack of progress int 78% CHAPTER W wreewaniy Re THEORI co . INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ‘ES Scanned with CamScanner