Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Readings in Philippine History Midterm Examination
Readings in Philippine History Midterm Examination
Readings in Philippine History Midterm Examination
Instructions:
1.Create a group composed of five to seven members.
2.Choose one among the following themes of Philippine History. You may create your own specific topic as
long as these belongs to the suggested themes below.
3.Look for primary sources that can be used as evidence of your chosen theme: written document; photo;
artifact; editorial cartoon/caricature; video
4.Read and research about each primary source using the competencies of historical literacy; and its relevance
to Philippine History.
5. Identify and elaborate at least five secondary sources of your chosen topic (comprehensive summary;
relevance to your chosen topic/theme).
6. Provide a comprehensive summary; and significance or relevance to Philippine History and to the Filipino
Nation of your chosen theme/topic
7. Answer the five Primary Sources Analysis Worksheets provided below.
8. Answer the integrating guide questions which will serve as the synthesis of the five Primary Sources Analysis
Worksheets.
9. Rate the participation of the group members according to the criteria provided at last part of this
examination.
Comprehensive Description:
Duterte served as the mayor of Davao City for twenty years. In this period, he practiced his harsh
crime-fighting tactics and earned his name as “The Punisher”. As he ran for the presidential seat, one of
his major platforms was to put an end to crime; specifically, to wage war against which he did as soon
as he took office as President of the Philippines on June 30, 2016. Although the war on drugs had
positive effects to the Philippines such as the rise of rehabilitation facilities, rooting out corruption and
decreasing crime rate, the heavier consequence that affected every Filipino, especially the poor sector,
is the controversial Oplan Tokhang and the alleged extra judicial killings associated with it. The war on
drugs has led to the death of many Filipinos, mostly urban poor, which earned its “anti-poor” branding
and which caught the attention of human rights advocacy groups from different parts of the world.
Secondary Sources
B. Comprehensive Summary
In the article, he questions if EJK is “OK”, he questions about the state of EJK during 2017.
The article also shows how Filipinos believe that there is nothing wrong with summary
executions.
The article emphasizes on whether EJK is acceptable. The author shares his thoughts on
current events on EJK and if it has been effectively reducing the number of illegal drug users
in the country. The article also highlights how the Philippine National Police (PNP) have been
given so much power and how they are also able to manipulate failed operations during EJK.
The article also mentions a survey about EJK and shows that people prefer solving these
crimes the legal and ethical way.
EJK has been applied ever since President Rodrigo Duterte assumed his position. The
current War on Drugs has been controversial ever since it was implemented for it unethical
and goes against Human Rights. This was intended to instill fear on drug users, pushers and
lords in the hopes that they would stop illegally distributing and using drugs. This took a turn
for the worse when innocent people have been wrongly accused and killed for the use of
drugs. The case of Kian delos Santos can be a strong example for this one. The President
admitted that Kian’s death was not justifiable thus making his War on Drugs questionable.
The efficiency of EJK on the eradication of illegal drug use and distribution is still
debatable. Although extreme measures have been done, there are still illegal drug activities
going on and lives have been compromised for this sake.
B. Comprehensive Summary
War on drugs has not and will not succeed. No president will put an end to the menace of
the Philippine society: illegal drugs. The promise of ending the lives of all those who are
involved in illegal drugs within six months was the start of a propaganda. Some of the reasons
why such a war will never be won by the Duterte are the following: (1) Drug trade is not a
local business; (2) Except for the few drug-trade linked politicians who were killed, no big fish
from the business sector has been killed so far. Although the president’s supporters would
say that crimes are connected to illegal drugs, there are those criminals who are not involved
in drugs. The most puzzling question is, “Why did the president only focus on war on drugs?
Why is not a war against crime? The president is nearing half of his term but within the three
years, what we have are dead bodies. There is still no hard evidence that could prove that the
country is getting better and safer.
B. Comprehensive Summary
The author speaks about the good, the bad and ugly side of President Duterte’s war on
drugs. The good would be highlighting the drug problem which former presidents have
turned a blind eye. Duterte has also courageously and rightfully identified the involvement of
politicians in the drug trade. His attention on drugs has also challenged health officials to
offer rehabilitation services and even consider targeted and sustained community-based
interventions. However, it has its bad aspects like the way Duterte repeatedly conflates all
kinds of drug users - pushers, dependents, occasional users - lumping all of them together as
perpetrators of violence, despite evidence that just a small fraction of drug use is
problematic. He has also made no secret of wanting to see suspects killed rather than jailed,
sometimes with very little supporting evidence of their involvement in the drug trade. The
ugly would be the extrajudicial killings. While the Philippine National Police reports over
3,000 killed in legitimate police operations, human rights groups claim the number is much
larger, given that the police also report several thousand “deaths under investigation”.
B. Comprehensive Summary
Franz Sabalones, who was a self confessed drug lord was gunned down by unidentified
men. The shooting took place along Timog Avenue, Quezon City, Manila on April 18, 2019.
It was confirmed to the Cebu Daily News via text message from the Police Colonel Manuel
Abrugena, chief of the Cebu Provincial Police Office. Since his public admission in 2016 that
he's been part of a big time illegal drug supply
in Central Visayas region the police have been looking at his whereabouts.
Prior to Franz Sabalones' death, several of his cohorts has been gunned down both from
police operations and unidentified assailants.
B. Comprehensive Summary
The article focuses on the positive side of President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs. It is
stated here that there has been a large reduction of crime rates as of May 2019 compared to
May 2018. 42,500 crimes have been registered as of May 2018 and 38,000 crimes have been
recorded in May 2019. This is accredited to Duterte’s war on drugs which reduced crime rates
by 58% for the first three years he sat as president.
Due to the focus on illegal drugs, criminals are forced to either hide or commit lesser
crimes. Increased presence of the Philippine National Police (PNP) on the streets have also
contributed to the reduction of crimes.
Overall, total crime numbers have been reduced. Murder and rape have gone down
57.68% since Duterte assumed his position. Duterte’s war on drugs have had good results
reducing not only crimes involving illegal drugs, but all crimes in general.
I. Sourcing:
What is the author’s perspective or The author is against the War on Drugs.
position in the historical event?
hy was it written?
W It was written to inform the people of the wrongly accused
victims of the War on Drugs and to inform the people of their
actions towards the President.
The following guidelines should be answered vis-à-vis with its effect on the content of the
document you are studying.
Significant events in history that were “Duterte: 2 Generals still play with Drugs.” On October
happening when the document was 4, 2019, President Rodrigo Duterte while in his visit to
created (should be related to the Russia, stated that 2 generals in the Philippines still play
document) with drugs.The generals’ names were not mentioned.
Author’s Background and Motivation The author aims to inform the Filipino people about
current events happening in the Philippines.
Intended Audience Background The intended audience for the primary source is Filipino
people and families that have been affected by the War
on Drugs.
Information/Insights that were The Filipino people continue to fight for their relatives
emphasized who were victims of the war on drugs and they seek to
find justice by charging the President with Human Rights
violations.
Other significant information and insights The Philippine National Police should be more
about contextualization. transparent with their data records.
III. Corroboration
Other historical sources which can give “Philippines’ Duterte hit by new ICC complaint over
more description or elaboration of the deadly drug war.”
phenomenon or personalities described in
the document (title; and short This was the first complaint filed by the families against
description). Duterte
Other significant information and insights Several families have filed an ICC complaint against
about corroboration. President Duterte.
What are the significant points/arguments The author emphasized that families are still not at rest
which the author emphasized? What could and will continue to fight for the justice that they
have been the author’s reason for doing so? deserve. The reason behind this may be because the
author supports the actions made by the families
involved.
Did the author intentionally or The author did not include Duterte’s response to the
unintentionally left out certain charges. This could be because this is not the first time
arguments/insights/information? What Duterte has been charged with these accusations and
could have been the author’s reason for has already provided a statement before.
doing so?
How do evidence from other sources Other articles and primary sources complement the
complement or contradict the claims of the article. More families are outraged due to the killing of
document? innocent Filipinos, especially children.
The author was objective in her way of delivering the
What language (words, phrases, images, message. She did not have any opinions on the matter
symbols) did the author use in order to and only focused on the families affected.
communicate and persuade its audience?
What are other significant peculiarities of The inconsistency of the PNP regarding the death
the document which implicitly or explicitly records show abuse of power and manipulation of
connotes meaning? data.
Other significant information and insights Anyone can fall victim to these events.
about close reading.
Conclusions:
The War on Drugs has led to more negative than bad. Innocent lives have been sacrificed and yet
the distribution and use of illegal drugs remain. This shows the inefficiency of the War on Drugs and the
violations of our Human Rights. Killing without enough evidence or even a proper trial will always be
unethical and inhumane.
The manipulation of the death records by the Philippine National Police shows clear abuse of the
power given to them by President Rodrigo Duterte. The inconsistency of the records may have been
done to cover up the failed operations.
Justice is what the families are looking for. They want the PNP and the president to be
responsible for the damage they have caused. With this method, the Philippines has much more to lose
than gain.
Realizations:
No matter the social status of an individual, there is no assurance of safety. Numerous families
have been affected by wrong accusations and are scarred for life. Also, if the government itself is not
transparent with data, then who can we trust? This makes it obvious that we have questionable leaders.
Based on the results of the War on Drugs for half of Duterte’s term, we can conclude that
violence is not the answer. So far, it has only caused more problems and its has made people feel
vulnerable rather than safe. This has also resulted to more vigilante activity since distributors fear being
betrayed by other pushers or dealers; this has led to more deaths unanticipated by the PNP and has only
contributed more problems.
Photo Analysis Worksheet
Photo:
Comprehensive description:
The multitude of Quezon City Jail inmates in the photo are mostly composed of drug dealers and
users who surrendered to the police. They take turns to sleep like sardines, head to head and toe to toe,
on the cement floor with barely any mats to sleep on, in an open-air basketball court. Although the court
is open-air, most men are shirtless because basing on the number of men occupying it, there is poor
ventilation. It must be very humid there. Moreover, this photo shows overpopulation of the jail and the
incapability of the Quezon city jail to cater to the surge of the number of inmates.
I. Sourcing:
Noel Celis
Who took the photo?
II. Contextualization:
III. Corroboration
Conclusions:
Jail overpopulation is a direct effect of war on drugs and the government is showing its
incompetence by failing to anticipate and efficiently prepare for this consequence. The people who were
associated with drug-trade surrendered because they saw the jails as a “safe haven”. However, from
their living conditions, they would have been saved from bullets, but they might be killed by illness,
hunger and suffocation.
Realizations:
Although the surrender of the drug-trade associates is a good thing, it caused a very big problem
that also gambles with the lives of the inmates. It is not at all a safe haven. Moreover, the government
was aware of the condition of the jails in the Philippines, but they did not do any concrete changes to it
before they started with the war on drugs. People in power should always consider the possible
consequences of their actions before setting them into motion and they should always be accountable
to whatever consequences their actions might have.
Artifact Analysis Worksheet
Comprehensive description:
The Northern Mindanao Wellness and Reintegration Center (NMWRC) is a 5 hectare
rehabilitation center located at Barangay Casisang, Malaybalay City in the Province of Bukidnon. A
modern rehabilitation center with no bars or detention walls, the NMWRC is equipped with modern
sports facilities and equipment including a gymnasium, with wide rooms, halls, and landscaped gardens
and accommodate close to 600 patients on a six-month treatment cycle.
The facility combines the process of detoxification, rehabilitation, sports and recreation,
education, and skills training to its patients who are victims of illegal drugs use. Medical, therapeutic,
and social interventions are made to patients. It has training facilities to help patients reintegrate into
mainstream society by the provision of skills training and technical-vocational education which they
could devise once they are discharged from the rehabilitation center. The drug rehabilitation center
includes dormitories (three for patients and one for the center's staff), a training center, a medical
service building, a visitor’s building, and a central supply building. It also has facilities for recreation such
as a gymnasium, separate basketball courts, a mini amphitheater, courtyards and gardens.
I. Sourcing:
II. Contextualization:
III. Corroboration
Other significant information and insights The P500-million drug rehabilitation center is a
about close reading. donation from a group of Chinese businessmen
Conclusions:
The rising number of drug related cases in the country led to the creation of the biggest
rehabilitation center in the Philippines. The goal in creating the facility is to cater the demand for
rehabilitation of drug dependent individuals in the country. Though the number of rehabilitation centers
in the country was increased, it was just not enough to cater the number of surrenderees in such a short
span of time. Many of the surrenderees have not undergone rehabilitation and based on the current
pace that is happening now, it will take time to fully complete the rehabilitation of the drug dependent
individuals in the country.
Realizations:
● The need of facility for rehabilitation led to the creation of one of the largest
rehabilitation center in the country.
● The rehabilitation of drug-dependent individuals in the country is still an on-going process
and is far from finished.
● One can not say that the rehabilitation of the surrenderees is a failure because of the fact
that it is still an on-going process.
● Not all of the reformists lived to become better versions of themselves, some still went
back into using and selling drugs
● The lack of funding and facilities slowed the pace of the rehabilitation.
Editorial Cartoon/Caricature Analysis Worksheet
Comprehensive description:
The cartoon depicts an unsettling scene portraying two PNP officers threatening a seemingly
clueless and/or innocent man with a gun and an Oplan Tokhang warrant, asking whether or not he has
drugs or money on him. The cops are implied as being corrupt, coercing the man into either giving them
money or being accused of possession of drugs.
I. Sourcing:
II. Contextualization:
III. Corroboration
Source:
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa35/
0578/2019/en/
Source:
http://pdea.gov.ph/our-accomplishments/annual
-reports
Source:
https://businessmirror.com.ph/2017/03/04/opla
n-tokhang-reboot-bloody-antidrugs-campaign-ma
kes-a-comeback/
People:
Information/Insights that were emphasized PNP Officers were emphasized as being
corrupt/abusive
Objects:
The gun behind the Tokhang warrant emphasized
coercion concealed behind a guise of “official”
police work.
Activities:
T hreatening the citizen with a gun shows how
the suspect doesn’t really have a choice.
Phrases/Words:
T he cops’ words ”May drugs ka dyan, no? May
pera ka dyan, no?” imply that they are
threatening the man with an arrest even without
substantial evidence.
1) The gun protruding behind the Oplan Tokhang
Inference: warrant symbolizes how police authorities
1. Identify and elaborate the symbolisms threaten people to admit to having drugs or else
and representations emphasized in the pay them a bribe. This further represents the
editorial cartoon/caricature systematic oppression of the poor by the police
2. What could be the possible message or under the guise of the War on Drugs.
meaning of the editorial
cartoon/caricature? 2) The cartoon is trying to say that the war on
3. Base from your observation what can you drugs has allowed police oppression to go
infer or conclude about the editorial unnoticed and even disguised as authentic police
cartoon/caricature’s implication. operations, and police officers are now abusing
4. What questions/ideas does this editorial this by coercing innocent citizens to either give
cartoon/caricature project to its money or be arrested as a drug personality.
audience/observer?
3) Since the time this cartoon was published, the
war on drugs has only lead to more victims. A
particularly big example was Kian delos Santos,
who was accused of having fought against police
despite having no record as a drug personality
and witnesses stating that he was surrendering
before police shot him dead. One can infer that
the situation is, in fact, happening for real.
Conclusions:
The War on Drugs has had unforeseen consequences on Philippine society, opening the door for
police officers who want to abuse their power and oppress the powerless they are supposed to be
protecting. Oplan Tokhang has given these corrupt servicemen a valid, government-sanctioned excuse
to target poor sectors (which are more likely to hold drug personalities) and allow them to threaten
them for money. This cartoon clearly and concisely exposes this modus operandi, and shows us the part
of the police force that the government doesn’t want us to see.
Realizations:
This just goes to show that the drug war only creates more problems than it solves, and is a
waste of government resources at the end of the day, since drugs still manage to permeate through the
government’s defenses anyway. As long as the ones in the government who are supposed to serve us
choose to serve themselves instead, our country will never prosper.
Video Analysis Worksheet
Comprehensive description:
A one minute and thirty-three second video was circulated online last July 02, 2018. It was during
the city’s weekly flag raising ceremony in front of the city hall. In the first few seconds of the video it is
shown that the slain Mayor Halili was standing alongside the other government officials of Tanauan,
Batangas moments before he was shot. It was supposed to be a routine ceremony but it had a gruesome
ending. A gunshot sound was heard mid-way through the Philippine National Anthem and then the
mayor tried to run but fell on the ground. There was a commotion in the area, the public immediately
dispersed while the mayor’s bodyguards looked for the assailant who fired. Several gunshots followed.
This war on drugs became a pressing issue not only to the Filipino nation but also in the
international scene. It caught the eyes of many for the reason that there was an alarming rise of extra
judicial killings linking to drug related cases. Looking into the motive why the mayor was shot dead was
that he may be involved in to drugs despite being so vocal of his support to the war on drugs initiative.
Who is/are its intended audience? The constituents of the city of Tanauan, Batangas.
II. Contextualization:
People:
Information/Insights that were emphasized Mayor Antonio Halili, his bodyguards, and other
civil servants.
Objects:
Guns, Philippine Flag
Activities:
Routinal Flag Ceremony, Shooting
Phrases/Words:
“Patay na si Mayor”
No matter what position in life you may have, one
Inference: is not immune to fortuitous events in life.
1. What could be the possible message or
meaning of the video? The world is not safe. You may have a lot of
2. Base from your observation what can you protection at your back, you may have thought
infer or conclude about the video’s that today is just another routine day, but you
implication. can never run from the possibilities that today
3. What questions/ideas do this the video may be your last one. That power you have is just
projects to its audience/observer? temporary and that it could be taken away from
4. Does this video appeal to the emotion or you with just one bullet away.
reason of its viewers? How do you think
its creators wanted the audience to Mainly the question asked was who was the
respond or react? assailant, what was the reason for the
assassination. Was the mayor really involved in
drugs?
What language (words, phrases, images, The assassination of Mayor Halili in broad
symbols) did the creator use in order to daylight may serve as a warning for other gov’t
communicate and persuade its audience?
official to keep clean and stay away from the
illegal drug trade.
How do evidences from other sources Mayor Halili one of the 186 gov’t officials who
complement or contradict what is/are shown in were stripped off of police powers due to the
the video? proliferation of illegal drugs in his city.
What are significant peculiarities of the video Even after the mayor fell, there were still several
which implicitly or explicitly connotes meaning? gunshot sounds heard.
Other significant information and insights about Mayor Halili’s bodyguards were seen, in the
close reading. video, raising, pointing, and shooting their guns
without really aiming them at anything. What is
the implication of this? Weren’t they concerned
that they might have hit innocent people by doing
so?
Conclusions:
Mayor Halili was controversial for being notorious on parading suspected illegal drug pushers,
traders, etc. He seemed so keen on getting rid of the illegal drug trade in his city. On the contrary,
Mayor Halili was allegedly on the narcolist of the president. This makes him the 11th government official
killed in this war on drugs.
Realizations:
Duterte’s war on drugs implies that power is exercised through the human body in a spectacle of
violence - eliminating life to devoid its value. Under his administration, the lives of those who are
allegedly involved in the illegal drug trade has no means whatsoever. Criminals are killed in the spectacle
of violence - which humiliates, and politicizes their lives, sending a message to intimidate others. He
explicitly pointed out that there is no redeeming qualities of being a criminal. But how could one
possibly defend his innocence if one is not given the right to do so. With just a mere assumption of the
police anyone could be gunned down even with no reason at all.
Primary Sources Analysis Worksheets: A Synthesis
The Drug War in the Philippines aims to eradicate criminals that participate in the illegal drugs
trade because aside from the Philippines being known as a notorious center for drug trade, it is assumed
that drugs are the breeding ground of criminals such as rapists and thieves. The reduction of the drug
trade is aimed for the benefit of the whole country- to make it a safer and better place to live in.
However, thorough research suggests that the overall positive effect of the Philippine Drug War is
overshadowed by its negative effects.
The Philippine National Police (PNP) has been given so much power that they are able to
manipulate the data that gets released into the public in a way that doesn’t destroy the image of the
police. The surrender of the drug dealers and pushers have overpopulated jails that lead to the
inhabitable conditions. The Oplan Tokhang has given these corrupt servicemen a valid,
government-sanctioned excuse to target poor sectors by threatening them for money. Not only the
police but also the drug personalities are involved, especially when it comes to killing other drug
personalities to prevent the spread of information and identities that might threaten their business.
The integrity of the police is compromised which resulted in the distrust of the public due to the
Extra-Judicial Killings (EJK). Filipinos tend to ignore the big picture and only focus on its center of
attraction, in the case of the drug war, the EJK. The drug war may prove ineffective when they only focus
on the bottom of the drug hierarchy and not the drug lords. But because of corruption, it is hard to
determine the whereabouts of a high-ranking drug lord when they are usually being helped by the police
with the hiding.
The drug war had many more effects, both good and bad, to the Filipino community that weren’t
popular because it was under the shadows of EJK that was popularized by the media as a form of revolt
against the government for suspicious motives such as their failure to comply with tax regulations. A
praise-worthy positive effect of the drug was is the rise of rehabilitation facilities around the Philippines
especially the building of the largest rehabilitation center in the Philippines. The drug war has reportedly
reduced crime rates and rooted out corrupt government officials. It will also help decrease the number
of drug addicts when the drug war is successful. One suggestion was to implement the drug law of
Portugal, which was the first country to decriminalize the consumption of drugs.
Because of the ongoing drug war, an ordinary Filipino citizen would get accustomed to left and
right killings, even in broad daylight. He or she would also live in fear for his or her life because anyone
can be a victim of EJK, either as a target or as collateral damage. He or she wouldn’t also feel the positive
effects of the drug war because the media is focused on the death toll. This highly defeats the purpose
of the war on drugs which is to make the country a better and safer place to live in.
It is usually the people in the poverty line that engages in drug dealing, where one does not need
to be knowledgeable or skilled to get a high income. And a man arrested for a drug-related crime is likely
to have children who will grow up without a father, and this may have a bad effect on the child that they
may end up in the same situation as their father. The information gathered strongly confirms that
although the intention and purpose of the drug war were to improve the quality of life of Filipinos by
reducing the crime rate, the negative effects are greater than the positive effects. And contradicts what
we see in popular media about the drug war we are all facing to this day. But the negative effects may
have the same quantity as the positive effects. They differ on the quality in which the negative would
precede over the positive.
Peer Evaluation
Instructions:
Evaluate the contribution and participation of each member using the metrics indicated below. Rate
each member in the scale of 1-10; with 10 as highest and 1 as lowest. Get the total score of each and
sum up total scores from all the members. Obtain the average by getting the dividing the number of
members to the accumulated total score.
Member I:____________________________________________________________________________
Attendance
TOTAL