Mythbusters Iii: The Final Reckoning: Name: Company: Tim Stronge & Alan Mauldin Telegeography

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 84

Mythbusters III:

The Final Reckoning

Name: Tim Stronge & Alan Mauldin


Company: TeleGeography
Alan and Tim do research things at TeleGeography.

They are trained mythbusters. Do NOT attempt to test


any of these dangerous myths at home.

Email: amauldin@telegeography.com
Email: tstronge@telegeography.com

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 2


What is Mythbusting?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 3


Industry Myths to be Tested

•  70 percent of the world’s internet traffic flows through Northern Virginia


•  The industry’s current practices will be enough to accommodate future
capacity requirements
•  New submarine cables are avoiding landing in the U.K. because of the
Brexit vote in 2016
•  Content providers are the biggest investors in new submarine cables
•  Eventually bandwidth prices will be the same on all routes
•  New satellites will end the dominance of submarine cables
•  Fiber pairs will become the new “coin of the realm”
•  Humans’ 5 senses provide the ultimate ceiling on per-user bandwidth

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 4


Northern Virginia Myth

•  The Myth: 70 percent of the world’s internet traffic flows through


Northern Virginia
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 5


Northern Virginia Myth
This one has been around for a while

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 6


Northern Virginia Myth
This one has been around for a while

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 7


Northern Virginia Myth
This one has been around for a while

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 8


Northern Virginia Myth
This one has been around for a while

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 9


Northern Virginia Myth
This one has been around for a while

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 10


Northern Virginia Myth
Washington D.C. Metro Area as % of U.S. …

(We need
to be in this
area)

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 11


Northern Virginia Myth
U.S. as % of World…

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 12


Northern Virginia Myth
Connections to U.S. over time: not much change

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 13


Northern Virginia Myth

•  The Myth: 70 percent of the world’s internet traffic flows through


Northern Virginia
•  Conclusion: Not even close
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 14


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth

•  The Myth: The industry’s current practices will be enough to


accommodate future capacity requirements
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 15


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
How much capacity do we need across the Atlantic?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 16


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
That seems like an awful lot … but it’s a big slowdown

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 17


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Let’s make some generous assumptions

•  Demand: content providers will curtail their tremendous growth by early/


mid 2020s
•  Supply: 640 Tbps cables by 2023
-  32 FP x 20 Tbps, maybe?
•  Supply: 1 Pbps systems by 2025
-  50 FP x 20 Tbps, maybe?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 18


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Trans-Atlantic: planned and existing cables

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 19


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Trans-Atlantic: new cables required

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 20


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Okay, so what are our options?

•  Spend more on cables


•  Build more data centers
•  Hope for a breakthrough on submarine cable tech or content provider
network optimization
•  Allow user experience to degrade

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 21


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Let’s keep this in perspective

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 22


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Let’s keep this in perspective

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 23


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth
Let’s keep this in perspective

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 24


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth

•  The Myth: The industry’s current practices will be enough to


accommodate future capacity requirements
•  Conclusion: No. Something’s gotta give.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 25


Brexit Myth

•  The Myth: new cables are avoiding landing in the U.K. because of the
Brexit vote in 2016.
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 26


Brexit Myth
Is the sun setting on the British empire?
Existing and Planned Trans-Atlantic Cable Spans by RFS

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 27


Brexit Myth
Warning signs?

Let’s examine changes since the Brexit


vote to some data sets for the U.K:
•  International internet bandwidth
•  Internet exchange traffic
•  Data center space
•  Non-trans-Atlantic cable investment

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 28


Brexit Myth
1. International internet bandwidth
International Internet Bandwidth, 2015-2018

Germany
Uh-oh, France takes the lead!

France
U.K.
Netherlands

Sweden
Italy

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 29


Brexit Myth
2. Internet exchange traffic
London Internet Exchange (LINX) Traffic Since Brexit Vote

Traffic
continues to
rise

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: LINX Slide 30


Brexit Myth
3. Data center space
Gross Retail Colocation Floor Space (m.sq.ft.)

London

Frankfurt

Amsterdam
Paris

Dublin

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 31


Brexit Myth
4. Non-trans-Atlantic cable investment

Two New U.K.-Connected Cables Entering Service in 2019

North Sea Connect CeltixConnect-2

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 32


Brexit Myth
Why have recent trans-Atlantic cables avoided the U.K.?

•  Enhanced route diversity was needed


-  AEConnect-1 -> first direct Ireland-USA cable
-  MAREA -> first Spain-USA cable since Columbus-III (1999)
-  Havfrue/AEC-2 -> first Denmark-USA cable since TAT-14 (2001)
-  Dunant -> first France-USA cable since Apollo (2003)

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 33


Brexit Myth
Why have recent trans-Atlantic cables avoided the U.K.?
Content Provider Data Center Locations

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 34


Brexit Myth
Why have recent trans-Atlantic cables avoided the U.K.?

•  Planning cycles are long


-  Plans for AEConnect-1, MAREA, and perhaps others were well underway
before the Brexit vote

•  The U.K. did get a new trans-Atlantic cable recently


-  GTT Express – September 2015

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 35


Brexit Myth

•  The Myth: new cables are avoiding landing in the U.K. because of the
Brexit vote in 2016.
•  Conclusion: no evidence Brexit has played a role.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 36


Content Provider Investment Myth

•  The Myth: content providers are the biggest investors in new submarine
cables.
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 37


Content Provider Investment Myth

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 38


Content Provider Investment Myth
Investment in new cables is soaring
New Cable Investment Based on RFS

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 39


Content Provider Investment Myth
..content providers’ share is modest
New Cable Investment Based on RFS

Content providers

Traditional Carriers +
New Carriers’
Carriers (e.g. Aqua
Comms, Hawaiki,
RTI, Seaborn
Networks

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 40


Content Provider Investment Myth
...but where are content providers investing?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 41


Content Provider Investment Myth
Only a majority in the Atlantic
Content Providers’ Share of Investment in New Cables by Route

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 42


Content Provider Investment Myth
Beyond new cables
Share of Used Bandwidth by Category, 2018
•  Content providers account for a
large share of demand on many
routes
•  So they are investing far more
than just in new builds:
-  SLTE on pairs they own/lease
-  Purchases of fiber pairs,
spectrum and managed
bandwidth
•  No public data exists for these
investments

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 43


Content Provider Investment Myth

•  The Myth: content providers are the biggest investors in new submarine
cables.
•  Conclusion: not for new cable construction yet, but are likely the largest
when factoring in SLTE and other capacity purchases.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 44


Price Parity Myth

•  The Myth: eventually bandwidth prices will be the same on all routes.
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 45


Price Parity Myth
Price compression is real
10 Gbps Wavelength Price Erosion

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 46


Price Parity Myth
Price compression is real
10 Gbps Wavelength Price Multiples over London-New York, 2013 vs 2018

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 47


Price Parity Myth
Why do prices vary across routes?

•  Length – longer routes require more fiber and repeaters, use more
power, and have higher maintenance costs
•  Topology – not all cables serving a route are designed the same –
different landings, routing, and availability of express fiber pairs.
•  Demand – higher capacity cables have lower unit costs for O&M and
capacity upgrades, enabling lower prices.
•  Competition – more cables on a route should lead to lower prices.

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 48


Price Parity Myth
Changes in length

•  Lengths are
changing, but not
becoming similar
and not very
quickly.

Source: USGS

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 49


Price Parity Myth
Changes in topology

Pacific Light Cable Network (PLCN)


•  More direct routes are
increasingly feasible, which will
help to narrow prices.

Hong Kong-Americas (HKA) Bay to Bay Express (BtoBE)

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 50


Price Parity Myth
Changes in demand
Lit Capacity, 2013 vs. 2018
•  Demand is
increasing,
lowering unit
costs.
•  Demand per cable
would need to be
similar across
routes for unit
costs to align.

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 51


Price Parity Myth
Changes in competition
Number of U.S.-Brazil Cables versus 10 Gbps Lease Prices
80% increase in
number of cables

88%
decrease in
price

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 52


Price Parity Myth
Is parity possible?

•  Length – can’t equalize distances across routes.

•  Topology – can’t link every city pair directly.

•  Demand – cables will never have comparable volumes across all routes.

•  Competition – possible to boost competition on some routes still.

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 53


Price Parity Myth

•  The Myth: eventually bandwidth prices will be the same on all routes.
•  Conclusion: prices will continue to narrow, but global price parity is not
possible.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 54


Satellite Myth

•  The Myth: new satellites will end the dominance of submarine cables.
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 55


Satellite Myth
From sea to space?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 56


Satellite Myth
Space man

•  “We’re really talking about


something which is, in the long
term, like rebuilding the Internet
in space. The goal will be to have
the majority of long distance
Internet traffic to go over this
network” – Elon Musk

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 57


Satellite Myth
So what is “half of long-distance traffic”?
Demand roughly
doubles every 2
years

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 58


Satellite Myth
Deferring to MIT to assess satellite bandwidth

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 59


Satellite Myth
Mega-constellations

Many new LEO mega-constellations are planned, but this study looked at
the 3 major projects:

•  OneWeb – 720 satellites


•  Telesat – 117 satellites
•  SpaceX (Elon Musk) – 4,425 satellites

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: MIT Slide 60


Satellite Myth

Maximum Bandwidth per Satellite

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: MIT Slide 61


Satellite Myth

Maximum Bandwidth per System

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: MIT Slide 62


Satellite Myth

Maximum Bandwidth per System

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: MIT Slide 63


Satellite Myth

Maximum Bandwidth per System versus “Half of Long-Distance Traffic”

“I say something then it


usually happens. Maybe
not on schedule, but it
usually happens”

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: MIT, TeleGeography Slide 64


Satellite Myth

•  The Myth: new satellites will end the dominance of submarine cables.
•  Conclusion: no, but they will boost bandwidth and reduce latency to
underserved areas.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 65


Fiber Pairs Myth

•  The Myth: Fiber pairs will become the new “coin of the realm.”
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 66


Fiber Pairs Myth
How we’ll test

•  Are fiber pairs a …


-  primary unit for measuring supply and
demand?
-  primary unit of purchase?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 67


Fiber Pairs Myth
On some routes, FPs are best measure of scarcity
Trans-Atlantic Fiber Pairs (Each Rectangle = 1)

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 68


Fiber Pairs Myth
IRU prices over time: bigger capacity but similar $$

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 69


Fiber Pairs Myth
Why buy a fiber pair?

•  Pros
-  Economies of scale
-  Control / security
•  Cons
-  Big capacity requirement needed to make it work
•  Buying one won’t do; you need FPs on multiple systems for redundancy
-  Current scarcity
-  Opaque market
•  Will we soon see emergence of FP-only wholesale operator?

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 70


Sustainable Capacity Growth Myth

•  The Myth: Fiber pairs will become the new “coin of the realm.”
•  Conclusion: Already are for understanding supply/demand. Likely will
soon be for big transactions.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 71


Five Senses Myth

•  The Myth: Humans’ 5 senses provide the ultimate ceiling on per-user


bandwidth
•  Conclusion: ???
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 72


Five Senses Myth
A viewer-submitted myth!

(Our hero)

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 73


Five Senses Myth
Let’s test our vision first

•  Eye -> brain traffic = 8.6 Mbps


•  But we must recreate panorama
-  Single eye field of vision ~ 135º H, 135º V
-  Humans can perceive 200 pixels per º
-  1,500 megapixels per eye pair

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source for traffic: “How Much the Eye Tells the Brain”, Current Biology 16, 1428–1434, July 25, 2006 Slide 74
Source for pixels per degree: http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/eye-resolution.html
Five Senses Myth
TV to the rescue!

•  8K video = 48 megapixels
•  8K displays required for 1 eye pair = 46
•  Bandwidth (uncompressed) per 8K
display = 48 Gbps
•  Markup to reach 500 frames per second
= 4.2
•  Total bandwidth required = 9 Tbps

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 75


Five Senses Myth
Putting it all together

•  Bandwidth required for vision = 9 Tbps


•  Markup to account for all senses = 3x
•  Total bandwidth per user = 27 Tbps
•  Users per household = 3.6
•  Total household bandwidth required =
99.1 Tbps

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 76


25
years

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 77


Five Senses Myth

•  The Myth: humans’ 5 senses provide the ultimate ceiling on per-user


bandwidth
•  Conclusion: There is a theoretical maximum to our input. But getting
there will take time and money.
•  Status:

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 78


Five Senses Myth
That’s a lot of cables, right?

•  Bandwidth required = 3.9x million


present day
•  Present sub cable infrastructure = 1.2
million km
•  Replacement cost = $25 billion

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: TeleGeography Slide 79


$95,607,382,804,334,700
subsea CAPEX

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 80


Five Senses Myth
Don’t be too proud of this technological terror you’ve constructed

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.09054 Slide 81


Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 82
THE END ? of the Mythbusters

Copyright © SubOptic2019 Slide 83


Please remember to complete the session
survey in the conference mobile app

You might also like