Joanna Waszczuk

Essay
1993

One of my most vividly remembered experiences which has

also affected me greatly is when my father went to prison.

I was nine years old, living in Poland which was undergoing

political upheaval struggling for democracy. I knew that my
father was involved with some sort of underground and that he
was being followed as well. One night, a man came to our home
at two o'clock in the morning and just took my father away, only
allowing him to put on his boots and jacket over his pajamas.
Two weeks after that night, my family learned that my father
was taken by a secret government agent to a prison for political
activism trying to overthrow communism. After a few more
weeks, my father was allowed to write letters, but they were
censored to the point that half the words were cut out with a
razor or completely blacked out. After five months, as I later
found out, of being guarded by attack dogs, guards armed with
machine guns, being brainwashed, having been fed rotten food
and having had no rights, my father was released on the
condition that he either leave the country quickly or go back to
prison risking never being able to get a good job again. So,
within two weeks my parents, brother and I received passports,
sold or gave away everything and came to the United States.
 Although I was angry with my father for bringing our
family into this country and severing ties with the only type of
life I had known, coming here has also taught me that with hard
work, challenges can be overcome, and that being able to
express oneself is very important. I especially had the latter
instilled in me, because for the first six months in the United
States, due to a language barrier, I could barely express myself
or not at all.

I am now inspired by my father's standing up for his cause as I am

by Freud, Darwin and Pasteur, because despite challenges, hardships and
the opposition of society, they all struggled for their causes and beliefs
for the benefit of humanity.

This is why I enjoy biology. To me, not only is it fascinating and

challenging, but it also benefits others. What actually started my interest
in biology were my biology classes in high school. It was as if a whole
new world opened up to me. I was also lucky to have excellent teachers
who enjoyed their work and also made class interesting. Mr. Webb, my
first biology teacher, not only made the class interesting with his zeal for
the subject, but also having biology 'jeopardy" and encouraging people
to eat and drink in class ( "as long as you bring enough for everyone").
And one thing Mr. Webb was famous for were his pancake breakfasts.
Annually, Mr. Webb would provide a pancake breakfast for his ;biology
students. This event occurred at his house at five o'clock in the morning.
Then, there was Mrs. Bredberg who had a flair for dissecting anything as
well as for taxonomy. One day she surprised the class by rolling in a
cart with a slightly dried up coyote carcass which she just picked up on
the way to school.

So, thanks to the wonderful biology teachers I've had, my

fascination for biology has grown. And because of inspirations from the
present and the past and my belief in perseverance, hard work and being
challenged, I feel biology is the field to which I want to dedicate my
effort.
Joanna graduated from the UC Santa Cruz as a Molecular Biologist
in 1996
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 70 -

IRS WBO was lodged by TIGTA as Complaint No. TRN–1901–0171 on

January 29, 2019

https://www.scribd.com/document/476793270/UTC-20190128-Treasury-

Inspector-General-for-Tax-Administration-TIGTA-Response

On June 4, 2020, the Petitioner was served with a U.S. Tax Court Memorandum

Opinion and Order and Decision, Waszczuk v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2020–75

(U.S.T.C. June 4, 2020), granting the Respondent's Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment, without having an administrative record on file, and sustaining the October

24, 2018 IRS WBO’s decision, which denied the whistleblower award to the

Petitioner(Docket Nos. 0043 and 0044)

https://www.scribd.com/document/476773839/UTC-20200604-

MEMEORANDUM-AND-ORDER-Motion-for-Partial-Summary-Judgment

CHAPTER THREE-CALIFORNIA ELECTRICITY MARKET

DEREGULATION OF 1996-2003

I. ARSON IN THE PETITIONER’S DAUGHTER’S APARTMENT AT 351

TORINO, SAN CARLOS, SAN MATEO COUNTY

In March 1997 Petitioner was interviewed with Lodi News-Sentinel about his

former employer, Destec Energy Inc., based in Houston, Texas, In that interview, the
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 71 -

Petitioner disclosed the $240,000,000 fraud committed by Destec Energy Inc. against

Public Utilities company San Francisco-based Pacific Gas and Electric Company

(PG&E), PG&E’s ratepayers, and California taxpayers due to a violation of FERC’s

regulations and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA).

Additionally, Destec Energy Inc. defrauded the Petitioner of $27,000 of overtime wages

and 119 other employees of a total amount exceeding $3,000,000.

In looking back at that interview, the Petitioner recalled more specifically what

had happened to him. On April 1, 2007, based on the Petitioner’s disclosure, PG&E

filed a lawsuit against Destec Energy Inc. in the San Francisco County Superior

Court and promised to pay a whistleblower award to the Petitioner from the

damages recovered from Destec. Initially, PG&E estimated the damages to be

approximately $1,000,000 and paying the whistleblower award from that amount

was not a problem. However, the calculated recovery amounted to $240,000,000

and 25 % whistleblower award from $ 240,000,000 became a problem for PG&E .

On top of this Destec faced closure of its 9 plants in the State of California. This

meant that PG&E would be lose their inexpensive power from Destec under the 30-

year contract that allowed them to resell the energy with big profit margins, due to

the ongoing deregulation of the California electricity market, known as the

California Electricity Restructuring Act (Assembly Bill B 1890), which was signed
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 72 -

into law in September 1996, by Governor Pete Wilson. From January 1996 to May

2000, the Petitioner did not know anything about the ongoing deregulation of the

electricity market in California and had no understanding of what he was facing,

finding himself between two giant corporations ready to compete in an open power

market.

After Destec Energy Inc., which became Dynegy Inc. terminated the

Petitioner’s employment ,he found a job as a utility operator at the Genentech

Corporation, a pharmaceutical company located in South San Francisco, 90 miles

from Lodi, CA, where the Petitioner had resided since 1989. Due to the distance

between Lodi and San Francisco, the Petitioner occasionally slept at his daughter’s

apartment in San Carlos, near San Francisco. The Petitioner’s daughter worked in

the San Francisco area as a researcher for a pharmaceutical company after she

graduated from the University of California.

The Petitioner’s adversaries, competitors in the power market, did not welcome

the Petitioner’s requests for the full whistleblowing award and compensation for

wrongful termination and did not appreciate his interference with their business. The

stakes were too high to let the Petitioner continue his demands.
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 73 -

On February 5, 1999, at 2 a.m., unidentified perpetrators set fire to Petitioner’s 27-

year-old daughter, Joanna's, apartment at 351 Torino, San Carlos, San Mateo County,

near San Francisco, in an attempt to kill the Petitioner and his daughter. The Petitioner

was not there. The perpetrators disabled the fire alarm to create maximum devastation.

It was by luck that the Petitioner’s daughter and many other residents in the apartment

complex survived, because the Petitioner’s daughter’s pet birds screeched before they

died, alerting her, so she was able to wake the other residents, who were then able to

escape, some jumping from windows. On the next day, February 6, 1999, after the

Petitioner’s traumatized daughter lost everything in this undoubted arson, the

Petitioner sent a letter, incorrectly dated February 6, 1998, instead of February 6, 1999,

about the crime, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Field Office in

Sacramento. Nobody ever responded to the Petitioner’s inquiry.

https://www.scribd.com/document/476807173/UTC-February-5-1999-San-Carlos-

Fire-Letter-to-FBI

Shortly after the fire in Petitioner’s daughter apartment the Littler Mendelson P.C.

law corporation from San Francisco https://www.littler.com/ representing Dynegy

Inc. against Petitioner in wrongful termination lawsuit aggressively for some reason
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 74 -

questioned Petitioner about the fire in the Petitioner’s daughter, Joanna's, apartment,

in which the Petitioner’s daughter almost died.

Littler Mendelson P.C. represented Dynegy against the Petitioner in his wrongful

termination lawsuit, filed on April 29, 1998 (San Joaquin County Superior Court Case

No. CV 04940, Jaroslaw Waszczuk v. Destec/NGC). In this lawsuit, Kerosky and

Bradley Law Firm of San Francisco represented the Petitioner. In 2004, Christopher

Kerosky resurfaced as an honorary consul for the Republic of Poland, representing and

advising Polish consulate staff from Los Angeles. Kerosky is also a member of the San

Francisco Consular Corps.

The attorney representing the Petitioner did not disclose to him that he had a

conflict of interest since his law firm also represented PG&E. He failed to secure

written agreement with PG&E for 25 percent of the whistleblower award, which had

been verbally promised to the Petitioner by PG&E’s representative at the meeting were

PG&E between Petitioner , Petitioner Attorney and PG&E Executives . Due to gross

attorney misrepresentation, the Petitioner and his attorney lost 25 percent of

$100,000,000, which PG&E recovered from Destec in a settlement. Instead of

$25,000,000, the Petitioner later received $100,000 from PG&E, due to a lawsuit

against them, which was settled out of court in May 2000

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 75 -

https://www.scribd.com/document/468927857/April-8-1999-PG-E-Application-of-

Termination-for-Power-Purchase-Agreement-with-the-Dynegy-Inc

At the same time in February 1999, future FBI Director Mueller was in charge

of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California with his assistant,

Melinda Haag and their U.S Attorney Office has jurisdiction over the San Carlos ,

nearby San Francisco where Petitioner’s daughter almost died due to arson in her

apartment .

Haag resurfaced in August 2010, as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of

California; she was recommended for this job by U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer and

appointed by President Barak Obama and again

II. THE PETITIONER’S CLOSER LOOK AT THE STATE OF

EMERGENCY, DECLARED ON JANUARY 17, 2001 BY CALIFORNIA
GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS IN RELATION TO 9/11 TERRORIST
ATTACK

After Petitioner submitted his petition to the U.S. Tax Court in November 2018 ,

he took a closer look at some known and unknown facts and events related to his

claims submitted to the Whistleblower Office in 2016 and 2018.

Before taking office as Governor of California in January 1999, Gray Davis

served as the state’s Lieutenant Governor under Pete Wilson. By law, the Lt. Governor
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 76 -

is also a member of the UC Board of Regents. As a member of the UC Board of

Regents, Davis was one of the regents responsible for the decision to construct three

cogeneration power plants in UC Davis , UC Berkeley and UC San Diego between

1995 and 1998 at the price of approximately 200,000,000 dollars. The UCDMC plant

where Petitioner was employed had the total capacity of 37 megawatts (MW) of

electric power. Petitioner was intrigued by the presence of five Caterpillar Emergency

Diesel Generators, sized 2 MW each, at the UCDMC plant, where demand for power

was less than 5MW/h.

In May 2000, the cyber-attack on the California and Western States Power Grid

began and this sophisticated attack and scheme of the California Energy Crisis causing

$40 billion in losses for California ratepayers and taxpayers almost caused the collapse

of the power grid.

At the same time in May 2000, a group of foreigner terrorists arrived in San

Diego, and their lifestyle and who was supporting them for over one year until they

delivered the most deadly attack on American soil are not very well known. However,

Petitioner found by accident that “uninvited” guests from the Middle East converted

their Camaros and Firebirds to Hot Rods in San Diego shop to cruise freely for one

year around UC San Diego and in Arizona, which is the home state of Janet
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 77 -

Napolitano, until they delivered their terrorist attack killing over 3,000 innocent people

on September 11, 2001.

The former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, who had the

highest security clearance during her tenure in President Obama’s administration,

most likely knows more than anybody else about the ownership of the three

cogeneration plants on UC campuses, the cyber-attack on California and Western

States Power Grid from May 2000 to September 2001 by the sophisticated equipment

and software produced by Perot System Corporation, and these Camaros and Firebirds

converted to Hot Rods in a San Diego Shop by group of foreigners from the Middle

East .

On February 14, 2001 in middle of cyber-attack on the Western States Power

Grid , California Governor Davis toured the UC Davis Medical Center 27 MW

cogeneration plant where Petitioner was employed as an operator .In 1995 Davis as as

Lt Governor and UC regents approved to be built the UCDMC 27 MW plant to

illegally produce and sell power worth tens of millions of tax free dollars due planned

fraud scheme, and cyber-attack on California’s power grid. The plant tour took place

shortly after Gray Davis declared a State of Emergency. Please note the wording of

the State of Emergency EXECUTIVE ORDER D-40-01 issued on January 17, 2001:
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 78 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that during the time a power plant

is operating under any of the above conditions, the facility shall not
be subject to any provision limiting its hours of operation or
generation capability, or imposing conditions or penalties related to
its additional hours of operation or power generation, whether
imposed by the California Health and Safety Code, the California
Code of Regulations, a local air pollution control or air quality
management district rule or regulation, or any permit.
Petitioner as a UC Davis Medical Center (UCDMC) 27 MW cogeneration plant

operator in 2001-2003 he was a direct witness how the above part of the Gov. Davis’

Executive Order was executed .

FULL FEXECUTIVE ORDER D-40-01

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2001, I proclaimed a State of

Emergency to exist due to the energy shortage in the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, there is a high probability that the electricity supply
shortage will continue through at least October 31, 2001, causing
rolling blackouts throughout California, which endanger public
health and safety, threaten property, the environment and economic
disruption, and affect millions of Californians;
WHEREAS, during this period, all reasonable conservation,
allocation and service restriction measures will not alleviate this
energy supply emergency; and
WHEREAS, to alleviate this energy supply emergency, power
generators must be encouraged to utilize their maximum generation
capacity.
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 79 -

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GRAY DAVIS, Governor of the State of

California, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the
Constitution and statutes of the State of California, including the
Emergency Services Act, do hereby issue this order to become
effective immediately:
IT IS ORDERED that, in order to avoid blackouts and minimize
operation of backup diesel-fired generators, local air districts are
directed to allow natural gas-fired power plants to operate in excess
of their hourly, daily, quarterly and/or annual emission limitations
if operated: (a) to sell power to the California Department of Water
Resources or to a utility located in California; (b) to serve an
operating utility's own load; or (c) as dispatched by the California
Independent System Operator (ISO). The term "utility" includes
investor owned utilities,
municipally owned utilities and municipal utility districts.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hours operated under such
conditions shall not be counted toward the hourly, daily, quarterly
and/or annual operating limits or hourly, daily, quarterly and/or
annual emission limits of the plant’s permit for this or any other
year if the plant's operator pays mitigation fees to the local air
pollution control district or air quality management district of $7.50
per pound of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and $1.10 per pound of
carbon monoxide emitted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that during the time a power plant
is operating under any of the above conditions, the facility shall not
be subject to any provision limiting its hours of operation or
generation capability, or imposing conditions or penalties related to
its additional hours of operation or power generation, whether
imposed by the California Health and Safety Code, the California
Code of Regulations, a local air pollution control or air quality
management district rule or regulation, or any permit.
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 80 -

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that emissions resulting from the

operation of a power plant in accordance with this order shall not
be considered in determining whether the facility has exceeded its
daily, quarterly or annual emissions allocation in this or any other
year, to the extent any such limit applies.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the California Air Resources
Board is directed to work with USEPA to ensure that power plants
desirous of operating under this order obtain the necessary
approvals from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall expire on
October 31, 2001, unless revoked, modified or extended by further
executive order responding to the continued need for emergency
action to deal with the electricity emergency or unless terminated
by proclamation of the Governor or concurrent resolution of the
Legislature that the state of emergency has ended.
The activities herein are authorized to be carried out pursuant to the
Emergency Services Act, Government Code section 8550 et seq., as
necessary to mitigate the effects of the emergency

How did Governor Gray Davis know that artificially created energy shortages

and blackouts would end in October 2001? It is exactly what happened, and UCDMC

cogeneration plant owners got richer by approximately 130,000,000 tax-free dollars

from illegal and extremely gouged megawatt prices. California’s economy lost 40

billion dollars due this sophisticated scheme of 40 billion fraud.

CHAPTER FOUR - 9/11 THEORY

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 81 -

I. THE PETITIONER’S THEORY ABOUT THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

TERRORIST ATTACK

The shortage of electricity and seemingly never ending blackouts magically and

miraculously disappeared in California in October 2001 just after Robert Swan Mueller

III was appointed as the FBI Director by President George W. Bush and just after

the Al-Qaeda terrorist groups finished their training in San Diego, California, and in

Florida to deliver their most deadly attacks on U.S. soil which killed over 3000

innocent people , triggering costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, taking innumerable

lives in the name of freedom and democracy.

Just a few days before September 11, 2001, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern

District of California Robert Swan Mueller III was appointed FBI . In September 2011,

Rahim Reed also arrived in California from the University of Florida where he held the

position of Director of the Center for the Study of Race and Race Relations.

The declared State of Emergency by Gov. Gray Davis should end in October

2001 just after three weeks after September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. However, the

State of Emergency last until November 2003 and Davis left office in November 2003

just before California Governor Gray Davis was recalled from office with the help of

U.S. San Diego Congressman Darrell Issa’s 1.7 million dollars from his private
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 82 -

account. In 2017, Petitioner sent an inquiry to Senator Issa asking why he bailed out

Gray Davis with his private money, knowing that Gray Davis was one of the “smartest

guys in the room,” together with Enron’s CEO Kenneth Lay.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room

Petitioner sent an inquiry to Senator Issa because he was from San Diego where,

in May 2000, a terrorist group arrived in San Diego where also the University of

California San Diego campus is located and because Senator Issa was accused by

Jewish extremists of collaborating with Hezbollah branded by American Government

as a terrorist organization . Furthermore, the senator’s office was targeted by an

aborted bombing plot orchestrated by a Jewish defense league leader in 2001 for his

alleged collaboration with Hezbollah .

One month after the 9/11 terrorist attack, FBI director Robert Swan Mueller III

ordered in October 2001 to frame and prosecute Hamid Hayat—a completely innocent

19-year-old Lodi resident and U.S. citizen of Pakistani descent who was wrongly

accused that he was an Al-Qaeda terrorist. The FBI paid 250,000 dollars to assign an

informer to help frame Hamid Hayat.

https://www.scribd.com/document/476776215/UTC-20190730-HAMID-HAYAT-

JUDGMENT
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 83 -

However, Mueller did not bother to find out who was behind the 40-billion-

dollar fraud scheme titled California Energy Crisis . Enron was used as bait in the

cyber-attack on California’s power grid, and shortly after collapsed as it was

anticipated by conspirators in the fraud. Hamid Hayat was prosecuted by U.S. Attorney

MacGregor Scott from Sacramento, a friend of UC President Janet Napolitano. Hamid

Hayat was sentenced to 24 years in federal prison in 2007 and after spending 14 years

in prison, he was found innocent by the same federal judge that sentenced him in the

first place. (See United States v. Hayat, No. 2:05-cr-0240 GEB DB [E.D. Cal. Jan. 10,

2019]

https://youtu.be/O9sUJ0TkPPw

Petitioner made this YouTube slideshow about Hamid Hayat’s arrest in 2005).

Why the FBI Director Robert Mueller pick Lodi, California, where Petitioner

lived with his family since 1989? Why not for example Dearborn, Michigan densely

populated by people from Middle East by or San Diego, California, where Al-Qaeda

terrorists were trained themselves to fly jumbo jets in preparation for their evil mission

and 2001 terror attacks?

By reviewing the DOJ Office of Inspector General reports related to September

2011 terrorist attack FBI’s Investigation , Petitioner found in the June 2003 Review
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 84 -

of the Treatment of Aliens Held on Immigration Charges in Connection with the

Investigation of the September 11 Attacks within the DOJ Inspector General Reports

on 9/11, which showed that FBI Director Robert Mueller ordered to round up 762

immigrants, classified as September 11 detainees, to be arrested by the FBI in New

York City and New Jersey

Nobody was arrested in San Diego or in California in September or October

2001 where terrorists were able to perfectly synchronize their attack with sophisticated

billion-dollar-fraud scheme, titled by white collar criminals as “California’s Energy

Crisis” and State of Emergency in California declared on January 17, 2001 by

Governor Gray Davis . The fraud scheme coordinated with 9/11 terrorists attack almost

led to the collapse of the entire Western State Power Grid. Such a scenario would have

unimaginable consequences for the whole United States, even worse than those of the

9/11 terrorist attack.

The Petitioner is not theorizing or speculating about the deadly terrorist attack on

September 11, 2001. However, the Petitioner became the subject of a vicious witch

hunt by two of his two former employers, Destec Energy, Inc., based in Houston,

Texas, which changed its name to Dynegy Inc. in 1998, and the University of

California (UC). At both locations, the Petitioner was employed in similar facilities as
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 85 -

a cogeneration plant operator. The Petitioner worked for Destec Energy/Dynegy, a

rival of the Enron Corporation, as an operator in the 50-MW natural gas fired plant in

Lathrop, California, from January 1989–February 1998. He then worked at the UC

Davis Medical Center (UCDMC) 27-MW cogeneration plant in Sacramento,

California, first as an operator from June 1999–February 2009, and then as an

associate development engineer from February 2009–December 2012. Owners of the

UC Davis Medical Center 27 MW whoever they are sacrificed approximate $

250,000,000 to witch hunt and destroy Petitioner’s life . 250 million dollars is a lot of

money to witch hunt power plant operator.

Both of the Petitioner’s employers, Dynegy Inc. and the UC, unlawfully

built and operated cogeneration plants in California in violation of the Federal

Energy Commission Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulations, 18 C.F.R. §

292.20; the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824d(a); California Public Utilities

Code (CPUC), Section 218.5; the State of California Unfair Business

Competition Law, Business and Professions Code, § 17200; the California

Commodity Law of 1990 (CCL), Corporation Code, § 29500 et seq.; and 7

U.S. Code § 6 (b), in gross violation of section 50l(c)(3) of the Internal

Revenue Code of 1954 and the State of California Revenue and Taxation

Code. These plants also violated state and federal every possible
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 86 -

environmental law applicable to cogeneration power plant facilities. Both of

the Petitioner’s former employers willfully participated in the sophisticated $40-

billion fraud scheme fraud of 2001–2003, entitled the "California energy crisis,"

to misled California ratepayers and tax payers by implying that it was a crisis.

All facts lead Petitioner to the conclusion that the 2001–2003 sophisticated fraud

scheme was precisely coordinated with the attacks carried out by Al-Qaeda’s

terrorists, who, without any obstruction, trained themselves in the San Diego area

to kill over 3,000 people in New York City, Washington, D.C., and other places,

on September 11, 2001.

The mentioned Dynegy's witch hunt of 1996–1998 resulted in a confidential

financial settlement for the Petitioner in October 1999, after unknown perpetrators

attempted to kill him and his 27-year-old daughter by setting her apartment on

February 5, 1999, at 2:00 a.m., in San Carlos, San Mateo County, near San

Francisco.

II. THE PHILIP JAY BERG’S 9/11 THEORY.

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 87 -

An attorney from Pennsylvania, Philip Jay Berg, presented a more serious theory

regarding President George W. Bush's involvement in the September 11, 2001 terrorist

attacks. According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip J. Berg).

“In October 2004, Berg filed Rodriguez v. Bush, accusing the President of the
United States and 155 other parties of complicity in the September 11 attacks.
This 237-page civil lawsuit included allegations pursuant to
the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) against the
United States, the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
the Department of Homeland Security, George H. W. Bush, George W.
Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and numerous others, totaling 156
defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
This lawsuit made hundreds of allegations including allegations that the Twin
Towers were destroyed by means of 'controlled demolitions;' that members of
the FDNY were ordered, on instructions of the CIA, not to talk about it; that
the FDNY conspired with Larry Silverstein to deliberately destroy 7WTC;
that projectiles were fired at the Twin Towers from 'pods' affixed to the
underside of the planes that struck them; that FEMA is working with the US
government to create 'American Gulag' concentration camps which FEMA will
run once the federal government's plan to impose martial law is in place; that
phone calls made by some of the victims, as reported by their family members,
were not actually made but were 'faked' by the government using 'voice
morphing' technology; that a missile, not American Airlines Flight 77, struck
the Pentagon; that United Airlines Flight 93 was shot down by the U.S.
military; that the defendants had foreknowledge of the attacks and actively
conspired to bring them about; that the defendants engaged in kidnapping,
arson, murder, treason, conspiracy, trafficking in narcotics, embezzlement,
securities fraud, insider trading, identity and credit card theft, blackmail,
trafficking in humans, and the abduction and sale of women and children for
sex.
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 88 -

The matter was transferred to the Southern District of New York on May 2,
2005. On June 26, 2006, the court dismissed the claims against the US, DHS,
and FEMA, and gave the plaintiff until July 7, 2006, to show cause why his
lawsuit should not be dismissed with respect to the other 153 defendants.
The plaintiff failed to do so, and the court dismissed all of the claims against all
of the remaining 153 defendants on July 17, 2006.”

William Rodriguez was a janitor in the North Tower of the World Trade Center

for 19 years, until it was destroyed on September 11, 2001. He was present in the

North Tower on the morning of September 11 and is alleged to have saved the lives of

15 people by assisting in their evacuation from the tower. The Rodriguez's complaints

(Rodriguez v. Bush, 367 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Pa. 2005) and Rodriguez v. Bush, 05

CIV. 5402 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2006)), detail a dramatic conspiracy between

President George W. Bush and other high-level government officials to bring about the

September 11 attacks. The conspiracy included a plan to have the Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA) take control of the economy and infrastructure of the

United States after the President made a declaration of martial law.

At approximately the same time as Berg sued President George W. Bush on

Rodriguez's behalf for conspiracy in the September 11 terrorist attacks, in California,

the mayor of La Mesa, Art Madrid, sued Perot Systems Corporation, California

Independent System Operator (CAISO), and Perot System Corporation's software

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 89 -

engineer, Paul Gribik, who invented sophisticated software for the key players in the

2000-2001 $40-billion fraud scheme involving CAISO, Duke Energy , Reliant Energy,

Dynegy Inc., Mirant, and Williams/AES, which almost collapsed the Western Power

Grid in 2001 (June 6, 2002 San Diego County Superior Court complaint Art Madrid v.

Perot System Corporation et al., Case No. GIC790009; Superior Court of Sacramento

County Case No. 03AS04763; The Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District Case

(3DCA) No. C046683).

In his complaint's introduction (Madrid v. Perot Systems Corp., 130 Cal.App.4th 440

(Cal. Ct. App. 2005)), Madrid alleged:

"This action is brought under California's criminal antitrust and unfair

competition laws. It seeks recovery of damages, and other monetary, equitable
and injunctive relief arising from [Perot's] aiding and abetting in the
manipulation, distortion, and corruption of California's electricity market
including derivatives. Defendants' unfair and unlawful business practices
include conspiring to establish phony strategies designed to 'game' the
California markets. Those strategies [130 Cal.App.4th 446] were designed by
PEROT and sold [fn. 3] to various market participants for the purpose of
cheating Californians out of billions of dollars. It is estimated that defendants'
anti-competitive conduct and illegal, unfair and deceptive business practices
exploited the general public and caused damage well in excess of $10 billion."

Due to lack of access to the San Diego and Sacramento Superior Court files in

Madrid’s complaint against Perot System Corporation and CAISO, the Petitioner could

not determine how, in 2002, Madrid and his legal team found details that CAISO and
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 90 -

its employees acquiesced and facilitated Perot's wrongful conduct by combining with

other market participants to manipulate and destabilize the electricity market.

Perot Systems Corporation was a software firm that, in 2000-2003, was owned

by Dallas millionaire Ross Perot. They designed the computer software for CAISO and

for California Power Exchange (CalAPX), both of which controlled the flow of

electricity through California’s enormous power grid in the. In 2002, one of CAISO's

collaborators in the California energy crisis fraud, Reliant Energy, provided the

California Energy Senate Committee with a 44-page step-by-step guide, crafted by

Perot Systems Corporation ., to destabilize the California electricity market and the

Western States Power Grid.

Somehow Madrid’s lawsuit against the Perot System Corporation and CAISO

found its way from the San Diego County Superior Court to the Sacramento County

Superior Court and the Court of Appeal , Third Appellate District 3DCA staffed with

corrupt officials from the California attorney general's office and the California

governor's office who were appointed as a judges and justices. Thus, Madrid’s lawsuit

was quickly taken care of and ended in same manner as the Petitioner’s 2016–2018

whistleblower complaint in the IRS WBO - IRS Claims Nos. 2016–

00748,https://www.scribd.com/document/476776874/UTC-20160323-IRS-
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 91 -

WHISTLEBLOWER-Claim-No-2016-00748 2018–012118, 2018–012139, and

2018–012141, in U.S. Tax Court, Waszczuk v. Commissioner, Memo. 2020-75 (U.S

June 4, 2020) The Petitioner addressed Madrid's 2002–2005 lawsuit against Perot

System Corporation and CAISO in his August 3, 2018 IRS Application for Award for

Original Application Form 211

https://www.scribd.com/document/476787351/20180803-UTC-20180803-IRS-

New-Application-for-Award-WBO-Claim-No-2018-012118-full-document

Also at the same time that Berg was suing President George W. Bush and the

Bush administration on Twin Towers janitor Rodriguez's behalf for conspiracy in

relation to the September 11 terrorist attacks, in January 2004, the UCOP recruited

John Lohse, former Special Agent, Associate Division Counsel, and Chief Division

Counsel for the FBI’s San Francisco division. Lohse was Napolitano’s old friend from

Arizona, where he served as a criminal prosecutor with the Maricopa County

Attorney’s Office in Phoenix. He was recruited as Director of Investigation for the

UCOP of Ethics, Compliance, and Audit Services to keep eye on the adversaries of the

extremely corrupt UCOP executives, especially the raising star in California

legislature, Member of California Assembly, Yee, a democrat from San Francisco who

was elected on December 2, 2002, and who became arch enemy for the corrupt
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 92 -

UCOP establishment

(http://www.smartvoter.org/2010/11/02/ca/state/vote/yee l/bio.html).

While Berg was suing President Bush on Rodriguez's behalf and Madrid was

suing Perot System Corporation and CAISO, Napolitano, Scott, and Mueller were

waiting for framed Hamid Hayat, a 19-year old cherry picker and resident of Lodi,

California. In 2003, Hayat had traveled to Pakistan to get married and to visit his

family; upon his return to the U.S. in May 2005, was arrested with his father, Umer

Hayat. Hayat had been framed by Mueller's October 2001 order; he was arrested and

prosecuted by U.S. Attorney Scott from the Eastern District of California. Scott was

brought to Sacramento from northern California's rural Shasta County and by

somebody's recommendation was appointed to the post of U.S. Attorney for Eastern

District of California by President George W. Bush in 2003. The completely innocent

Hayat was prosecuted U.S Attorney McGregor Scott and tried by U.S District Court

Judge in t Soviet Union Stalin-era style prosecution. He was sentenced to 24 years in

federal prison but was released from the prison after 14 years, in August 2019

https://www.scribd.com/document/476776215/UTC-20190730-HAMID-HAYAT-

JUDGMENT
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 93 -

As all this was happening, the Petitioner was not aware that his employer,

University of California since 2001 was the subject of a complaint with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (FERC Docket Nos. EL00–95–000 and

EL00–98–000). On August 2, 2000, the San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDGE),

in a joint venture with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E); the Southern

California Edison Company; the people of the State of California; Bill Lockyer,

Attorney General; the California Electricity Oversight Board; and the California Public

Utilities Commission, known collectively as the "California Parties,” filed a complaint

with FERC against the Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services Into Markets

Operated, CAISO, and Cal-APX (FERC Docket Nos. EL00–95–000 and EL00–98–

000). SDGE’s complaint against the major energy sellers, producers, and ancillary

services included the UC Davis Medical Center's (UCDMC) 27-MW cogeneration

plant, located in Sacramento, California, which was created in 1996 by California

Legislature Assembly Bill 1890 and which was undoubtedly used to commit state and

federal tax fraud amounting to multiple millions of dollars through the illegal

generation and sale of electrical energy, in conjunction with CAISO and CalAPX. The

complaint made by SDGE also alleged that UCDMC’s 27-MW cogeneration plant,

among other sellers, power producers, and ancillary services, charged, collected, and
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 94 -

were paid unjust, unreasonable, or otherwise unlawful rates, terms, or conditions for

energy, ancillary services, transmission, or congestion in western electricity markets.

Before the 2008 presidential election Philp Jay Berg also sued Barack Obama ,

the Democratic National Committee, and the Federal Election Commission, among

others, alleging that Obama was ineligible to run for and serve as President because he

was born in Kenya and therefore is not a "natural born citizen" within the meaning of

Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution. Berg sought, in

relevant part, a declaratory judgment that Obama was ineligible, an injunction

barring Obama from running for that office, and an injunction barring the Democratic

National Committee from nominating him. Berg v. Obama, 586 F.3d 234 (3d Cir.

2009)

III. PETITIONER’S 2018 INQUIRY WITH FBI SPECIAL AGENT IN

CHARGE SEAN RAGAN , SACRAMENTO’S FBI FIELD OFFICE

The Petitioner’s attorney, Schlein, left the Petitioner in panic in August 2018, after he

and IRS WBO in Ogden, Utah, unexpectedly received the Petitioner’s August 3, 2018

Update of the March 23, 2016 IRS Whistleblower Claim, Form 211, which included a

158-page Addendum of Claim 2016–007481, with a cover letter and 65 exhibits. The
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 95 -

IRS WBO and the Petitioner’s attorney received that update on August 6, 2018. After

Schlein read the Petitioner’s update, which also included a draft of the Petitioner’s

inquiry addressed to Sean Ragan, FBI Special Agent in Charge from the Sacramento

office, he realized that the claim was part of more a broader issue than just tax fraud

and evasion . Schlein knew that if it had only been a tax evasion crime, then it would

have been quickly resolved on way or another by the IRS WBO in Ogden Utah or

would be referred to Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Criminal

Investigation Department.”

The Petitioner learned that Ragan was appointed in 2017 to FBI Sacramento office

by Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe. President Trump fired McCabe two days

before his eligibility for retirement. FBI Special Agent in Charge Ragan began his

career in the FBI San Francisco Division in 1996; as a result, he most likely

remembers the California electricity market deregulation of 1966–1998 and the

California energy crisis of 2000–2001. Ragan also most likely remembers the rolling

blackouts in the San Francisco area from 2000–2001. These events destabilized

California’s electricity market and cost the California economy and California

ratepayers and taxpayers approximately $40 billion that was never recovered.

Petitioner in his August 2018 inquiry with FBI Special Agent in Charge Ragan

pointed that in December 2000 working in UC Davis Medical Center as an

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 96 -

cogeneration operator in 27 MW cogeneration plant Petitioner found himself in the

middle of something which was rather unthinkable to happen in the United States of

America or California . Rolling blackouts and shortage of electricity was a total havoc

associated like a war hysteria. As a plant crew member, Petitioner was informed by

CAISO via computers about all ongoing crisis and rolling blackouts. Petitioner had his

own past experiences with the rolling blackouts and shortages of power as well as

shortages of other good in his native country of Poland—when it was ruled by a

communist government. Petitioner remember December 2000 because of his own

experiences after the mass protests in Poland in December 1970, August 1980 -

December 1981 against the communist dictatorship government. After communism

fell Poland was under transition from communist economy to free market economy.

This was a much more difficult transition than electricity market deregulation in the

State of California was. During the difficult transition Poland and other post-

communist countries liberated from Soviet domination no longer experienced rolling

blackouts or electricity shortages. This fact is the best evidence that the California

energy crisis was fruit of the uncontrolled corruption in the California legislature and

government as well as in state agencies and their “deep state” shadow the University of

California Office of the President and UC Regents office with their Headquarters in

Oakland California connected by Bay Bridge with San Francisco.

Docket No. 23105-18 W - 97 -

Petitioner wrote to Ragan in 2018 that the sophisticated scheme 40 billion fraud

perhaps was sophisticated act of terror to destabilize the country by collapsing the

large Western States Power Grid by utilizing California electricity marked

deregulation by USA enemies and adversaries.

In December 2000, Petitioner listened to the TV news about the situation in

California, and he thought that Governor Gray Davis would declare a State of

Emergency and will send the National Guard to take over all power plants on the

California power grid. This did not happen.

It is still unknow today and it is still a puzzle whether 2000-2003 sophisticated

scheme of fraud and deception which was labeled “California Energy Crisis” and

which caused California economy 40 billion dollars losses was deliberate sabotage by

greedy power corporations to make billions of dollar by laundering megawatts or

whether man made” “energy crisis was coordinated act of terror synchronized with

September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on US soil with intensified terrorists attacks against

United States abroad during the time of the California electricity deregulations and

cyber-attack on the California Power Grid by greedy power corporation which used

Perot Corporation software to make sophisticate scheme 40 billion dollars fraud works.
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 98 -

Whether foreigner terrorist network or foreign power penetrated or infiltrated the

California Independent System Operator (CAISO ) California Power Exchange

(CalPX), University of California and California government during the process

California electricity market deregulation of 1996-1998 to destabilize the California

and US economy by manipulating the electricity market in Western states power grid

is the question which should be asked and answered by FBI . The attack on the

California power grid never was never investigated by FBI which was led by Director

Robert Swan Mueller III in his tenure with FBI of September 2001- September 2013.

A 40 billion dollars loss by California economy and California rate payers and

taxpayers is not a small change but enormous amount of money which were

disappeared and were never recovered.

It is hard to find out whether the CAISO personnel which was given to maintain

75 % of the California electric grid went through the criminal background check in

1996-1998.

If the FBI would read my Application for Award with IRS than will find out

that the artificially created “California Energy Crisis “ became a ‘Gold mine “ for

California Attorney General staff “ for over two decades, so far for AG Bill Lockyer ,

Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris and today Xavier Becerra . Millions of dollars of
Docket No. 23105-18 W - 99 -

kickbacks tax free were funneled to nobody knows where and who got the money

from settlements which were signed by California Parties with California Attorney

General in charge of the money .When in 1997 during the labor dispute about unpaid

overtime Petitioner reported the Destec Energy Inc. $240, 000, 0000 fraud against

PG&E ratepayers and California taxpayers , PG&E no needed AG Bill Lockyer’s

Energy Task Force to recover millions of dollars from the Destec Energy .

From the Petitioner’s update of his IRS whistleblower claim , attached exhibits,

and the draft of the inquiry to FBI Special Agent in Charge Ragan , Petitioner’s

attorney from https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/ Mark Schlein most likely

quickly figured out that the State of Emergency declared on January 17, 2001

California Governor Gray Davis and which last almost three full years was

closely linked with the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, launched by terrorists

who had been harbored in the San Diego area in California since May 2000. In

May 2000 Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) the largest public utilities

company in California signed with Petitioner confidential Settlement -Agreement

which was breached by PG&E shortly after was executed . PG & E was a key

player in the sophisticated scheme 40 billion dollars fraud of 2001-2003 and

thereafter as part of extorsion money group led by California Attorneys General ,

 Docket No. 23105-18 W - 100 -

Bill Lockyer , Jerry Brow, Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra . The group was

named “California Parties “

CHAPTER FIVE

FROM THE SOPHISTICATED SCHEME OF FORTY BILLION FRAUD

TITLED ‘CALIFORNIA ENERGY CRISIS OF 2001-2003”, WITCH HUNT AND
PROSECUTION OF LODI RESIDENT HAMID HAYAT AND THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA SENATOR LELAND YEE TO WITCH HUNT AND THE
IMPEACHEMENT OF THE 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA DONALD JOHN TRUMP

I. WITCH HUNT, PROSECUTION AND INCARCARATION OF LODI

RESIDENT HAMID HAYAT
Lodi resident 19-year-old Hamid Hayat is the most severe case in this chain of

events beside the Raymond Chow from San Francisco who was not a target but a

collateral damage in political prosecution of Senator Leland Yee. Raymond Chow was

sentenced to life in prison due to conspiracy between Robert Mueller , U.S Attorney

from Northern District of California Melinda Haag and U.S District Court Judge from

San Francisco , Charles Breyer who is brother of U.S Supreme Court Justice Stephen

Breyer . United States Of America v. Kwok Cheung Chow, A.K.A. Raymond Chow,

A.K.A. Shrimp Boy, A.K.A. Ha Jai., Case No. 3:14–Cr–00196–CRB.