Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study-Impatient Parents
Case Study-Impatient Parents
Michelle A. Kuby
Case Analysis
In the case of Impatient Parents, the assistant principal is tasked with handling a situation
involving an upset parent who is not following the proper procedures set by the school. The
parent, Ms. Lemming, walks in visibly upset and asks the secretary to meet with the principal
and states she does not have much time. Her daughter has been dealing with harassment from
another student in her geometry class, and has not received a response from the teacher, even
though she only contacted them the previous night. Ms. Lemming has not scheduled an
appointment and unfortunately the principal is out of the building for meetings. The secretary
asks if Ms. Lemming would like to meet with the assistant principal instead. During the meeting
of the assistant principal and Ms. Lemming, the assistant principal asked to meet with Ms.
Lemming, her daughter, and the geometry teacher, who had been contacted by Ms. Lemming and
whose class the harassment has been occurring in. Ms. Lemming stated that this was not
There are a few issues that need to be resolved by the assistant principal. The first is to
make sure that the parent feels heard and knows that the situation will be addressed. Another
issue is the harassment report that the student is dealing with. These issues include several
stakeholders. The geometry teacher is a stakeholder because the harassment is taking place in
their class and has been contacted by the parent. Ms. Lemming and her daughter are also
stakeholders, because their complaints are the reason for this interaction. The assistant principal
is a stakeholder due to the fact that they were the administrator in charge while the principal was
out of the building. Although the principal was not present for this interaction, they are still
zone. The Assistant Principal is required to create a bullying report form, discuss the rights the
victim of bullying has, and notify parents. [ CITATION Pol21 \l 1033 ] After the situation has
This could be something as minor as changing classes to separate the parties involved, or
something as drastic as expulsion if the report proves necessary. The state of Illinois has created
code 105 ILCS 5/27-23.7 to discuss the description of harassment/bullying and the repercussions
associated with such actions. It is important that all schools handle harassment issues
responsibly. A great example is the case L.W. v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of
Education. According to Education Law Center, “… a school district can be sued for damages
under the Law Against Discrimination for failing to respond to bias-based student bullying and
Although there are several issues in this case study, the solution suggested could resolve
both issues. The assistant principal stated the appropriate next steps on how to handle the
situation, and that was to meet with Ms. Lemming, her daughter, and the geometry teacher. This
requires a bit of flexibility from the mother, as she stated that she won’t have time to meet due to
her job. If the mother cannot schedule a time to meet, the assistant principal should still meet
with the geometry teacher and the student to assess the situation. After this meeting, the assistant
principal should meet with the student who is the harasser to get all information necessary. Once
all information has been gathered, and all stakeholders have been addressed, the assistant
principal needs to follow the district policy guidelines on harassment, if her assessment does in
Rationale
4
Case Study: Impatient Parents
If I were the assistant principal in the case of the Impatient Parent, I would have
approached the situation in the same manner the assistant principal did initially. Providing a safe
space for the parent to express their frustration and concern without feeling attacked is very
important for and educational leader to do. It would be imperative to have a meeting with the
mother, daughter and the geometry teacher together, so scheduling a time to do so would be my
next priority. Due to the fact that Ms. Lemming stated she does not have any time, I would try to
be respectful but firm about the importance of having this meeting before any further steps of
action can occur. I would suggest that even if she could not physically be there, she could call in
to the meeting so that her voice is heard, and she has the opportunity to discuss the problem with
the geometry teacher in a safe space. Although I do not believe Ms. Lemming approached the
I would then conduct a meeting with the other student who is involved to hear both
parties’ sides and gather as much information as necessary. It is important to stay impartial in all
situations as the assistant principal. If I have preconceived notions about a student, or I do not
hear all sides of the story, including the teachers, then I have not been fair in my assessment and
actions.
Before making a decision, I would meet with the geometry teacher independently.
Although they were in the meeting with Ms. Lemming and her daughter, this does not provide an
appropriate space for the teacher to discuss the actions occurring without feeling pressure from
the parent. Once I have met with all stakeholders involved in the situation, I would sit down with
the principal to review the situation and analyze the decision. Due to the fact that I do not know
the severity of the harassment, only the words described by the mother, I cannot make a
References
https://edlawcenter.org/issues/bullying.html
https://www.peoriapublicschools.org/Page/24430