Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hot Topics - Issue 65 - Human Rights - Legal Information Access ...
Hot Topics - Issue 65 - Human Rights - Legal Information Access ...
HOT L e g a L i s s u e s i n p L a i n L a n g u a g e
Human Rights This is the sixty-fifth in the series Hot Topics: legal issues
1 origins and sources of human rights law in plain language, published by the Legal Information
Pre-twentieth century – twentieth century – United Nations Charter. Access Centre (LIAC). Hot Topics aims to give an
accessible introduction to an area of law that is the
3 Modern human rights law subject of change or public debate.
International law – human rights in international law – international
treaties, covenants and conventions – process of making a treaty – state Library of nsW
human rights in customary international law – human rights in UN cataloguing-in-publication data
declarations and resolutions – an international bill of rights – Author: Jane Stratton
international bill of rights as customary law – other international human Title: Human rights/[Jane Stratton; edited
rights treaties – major human rights treaties – regional rights by Cathy Hammer]
frameworks – content of state obligation in international human rights Publisher : Sydney, N.S.W.: Legal Information
law – enforcing international human rights law – creation of the UN Access Centre, 2008
Human rights Council – reporting – state complaints – independent Subjects: Human rights
inquiry – individual complaints – case studies – international criminal Human rights – Australia
mechanisms. Notes: Based on Hot topics 35 and 17:
16 universal Declaration of human Rights Human rights
Other Authors/
19 operation of international human rights law in australia Contributors: Cathy Hammer
The effect of treaties in Australia – relationship between state and Legal Information Access Centre
federal governments – treaty making process in Australia – Series: Hot topics (Sydney, N.S.W.); no. 65
implementing treaties in Australian law – Federal Government’s position
Dewey Numbers: 341.48
on human rights – formal human rights protection in Australia – 342.94085
human rights in Australian courts – human rights in administration &
credits
policy development – human rights in state law.
PHOTOS: Newspix – cover image, pp 10, 18, 23 & 26;
27 current human rights issues AAP pp 2, 8 & 15; Fairfax Photo Library – pp 28 & 30.
Counter terrorism and human rights – Indigenous Australians and
The publisher would like to thank Simon Rice for
human rights – refugees and human rights – mandatory detention – reading and commenting on the text.
homelessness in Australia.
31 Further information
Hot Topics is intended as an introductory guide only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. Whilst every effort is made to provide the most
accurate and up-to-date information, the Legal Information Access Centre does not assume responsibility for any errors or omissions. If you are
looking for more information on an area of the law, the Legal Information Access Centre can help – see back cover for contact details. If you want
specific legal advice, you will need to consult a lawyer.
Copyright in Hot Topics is owned by the State Library of New South Wales. Material contained herein may be copied for the non-commercial purpose
of study or research, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).
Origins and sources of
the origins of human rights law can be traced These political developments reflected contemporary
back hundreds of years through developments political and philosophical thought, both for and against
in the legal history of many Western countries. what were then termed ‘natural rights’, including the
these developments progressively recognised 17th century work of Hugo Grotius and John Locke;
that human rights are not created or granted, Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke in the 18th century;
but are grounded in the basic dignity and and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Jeremy Bentham and John
equality of each person. Stuart Mill in the 19th century.
Reichsmarshal Hermann Goering stands in the prisoner's dock at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial in Germany,
21 November 1945.
AP Photo.
The outcome of negotiations is generally the adoption > uniform and consistent state practice over time, and
of the text of the treaty in an international forum. Once > the belief that such practice is obligatory.
4. See www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
Table adapted from Australian International Law: cases and materials edited by Harry Reicher (LBC Information Services, 1995) Chapter 9:
Human Rights by Hilary Charlesworth pp 629-630 with additional information taken from Australian Treaty List, found at http://www.austlii.
edu.au/dfat and supplied by the Treaties Secretariat, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
Notes:
*** The Rudd Government signalled in early 2008 that it intended to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment that would allow visits to places of detention to monitor the treatment of people
detained by the Government.
*** The Commonwealth Attorney-General, the Honourable Robert McClelland MP, signalled in May 2008 that he has requested that the
ratification of the Convention be ‘fast-tracked’. He noted that a National Interest Assessment has been prepared and he has written to the
Chair of JSCOT to request expeditious consideration of the Convention.
*** Similarly, the Attorney-General announced in May 2008 that consultations in relation to signing and ratifying the Optional Protocol to the
Convention would ‘commence … shortly’.
7. See www.echr.coe.int
8. See www.cidh.oas.org
9. See www.corteidh.or.cr/index.cfm
10. See www.africa-union.org
11. See www.ictr.org
12. See www.sc-sl.org
There remains no regional human rights treaty covering International law generally suffers from the lack of a
the Asia and Pacific regions. However, there has been central enforcement mechanism, and human rights law is
recent progress towards establishing a regional human no exception. The international human rights conventions
rights mechanism. The Association of South-East Asian are the product of multilateral negotiation – it is left
Nations (ASEAN) (Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, open to each state that ratifies a convention to bring
Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, the standards to life in its domestic context. However,
Thailand and Vietnam) adopted the ASEAN Charter the treaty bodies that monitor each convention produce
in 2007 (not yet in force). Article 14 of the Charter ‘General Comments’ as authoritative interpretations of
commits ASEAN to developing an ‘ASEAN human human rights standards to guide states.
rights body’. In 2008, the first meeting of a High The international community is made up of states that
Level Panel was convened to establish terms of are protective of their independence and sovereignty,
reference for the human rights body. The High and have never agreed to establish effective procedures
Level Panel is (at the time of publication) working to for the enforcement of international law. A permanent
produce an interim report for a Ministerial Meeting in court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ)14, sits
September 2008. in The Hague in the Netherlands. The powers of
Another regional human rights organisation is the Asia the Court are however quite limited: it can only hear
Pacific Forum on National Human Rights Institutions cases involving countries, rather than individuals, and
(APF)13. Members include the national human rights countries must agree voluntarily to submit disputes to
commissions of Afghanistan, Australia, India, Indonesia, the Court. There is no international police force to help
Jordan, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Philippines, in implementing international law. Since 2002, however,
Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor Leste. the world has had a new criminal court: see International
In order to belong to the APF, a national human rights Criminal Mechanisms on page 15.
institution must comply with the UN ‘Paris Principles’, Nonetheless, it remains true that many rules of
a set of principles that safeguard the independence and international law are very difficult to enforce. To varying
mandate of national human rights institutions. Other degrees, most countries tend to respect or at least wish
countries in the region that are currently considering to be seen to respect the principles of international law
the establishment of national human rights institutions because they do not want to be criticised or, in extreme
include Bangladesh and Papua New Guinea. cases, ostracised, by the international community.
In relation to human rights treaties, there is provision
cOnTenT Of sTaTe OBliGaTiOn in for the supervision of implementation by state parties of
inTernaTiOnal HuMan riGHTs law their obligations, in the following principal ways:
The long list of international treaties, including the > UN Human Rights Council’s special procedures
human rights treaties, which Australia has committed > reporting procedures
itself to can be seen on page 7. But what does it mean for > state versus state complaints, and
a state to ratify or to accede to an international human
> individual complaints against states; and
rights treaty?
> criminal proceedings in the International Criminal
There are two aspects to this question – the first depends Court.
on the constitution of the state, that is, whether the
treaty obligation becomes domestic law upon ratification Some of the human rights treaties are implemented
(monist) or if a domestic law must first be passed through reporting procedures alone, and others use state
(dualist). In Australia, domestic laws must be passed to and/or individual complaints mechanisms.
incorporate treaty obligations into our law. See The effect
of treaties in Australia on page 18.
Mr a
In 1993, Mr A, a Cambodian asylum seeker, complained to the HRC that his lengthy detention was in breach of Article 9 of the
ICCPR. In 1997 the HRC said that in its view the communication established a violation of Article 9: unwarranted detention
and no means of challenging it. On this occasion the Australian Government rejected the Committee’s view, saying it disagreed
with its legal basis. An explicit rejection by a party to the ICCPR, rather than a mere failure to act on the Committee’s view,
is extremely rare. In its subsequent concluding observations on Australia’s periodic report under the ICCPR, the Committee
expressed its concern at Australia’s response.
elmi
In November 1998 Mr Elmi complained to the Committee Against Torture. He had been kept in an Australian detention centre
since arriving in Australia from Somalia in October 1997, seeking asylum. He was unsuccessful in his application for asylum,
and took the claim, ultimately, to the High Court. Mr Elmi complained that his forced return to Somalia by Australia would
be a violation of Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture: not to expel or return (refouler – French for ‘turn back’) a person
if it is likely they will be subjected to torture. In May 1999 the CAT Committee published its view that Mr Elmi’s expulsion
would constitute a violation by Australia of article 3. The Australian Government allowed Mr Elmi the opportunity to pursue his
claim over again, from the beginning. Rather than remain in detention for a further unknown period, with an unknown future,
Mr Elmi left voluntarily to a different country.
Young
In August 2003, Mr Young was successful in his communication to the Human Rights Committee alleging discrimination
on the basis of sexual orientation against the Australian Government, in violation of the ICCPR. Mr Young was in a same
sex relationship with a veteran. Due to his sexual orientation, upon his partner’s death, Mr Young was denied a pension
benefit. The Human Rights Committee found that the denial of the pension violated Mr Young’s right to equal treatment
before the law and was contrary to Article 26 of the ICCPR. The former Howard Government refused to amend the relevant
legislation. In 2006, the Commonwealth Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) conducted a review
of the Commonwealth laws that discriminate against same-sex couples and their children. It identified at least 58 instances
of discrimination. The Rudd Government was elected on a platform of removing those discriminatory laws, and announced
measures to amend the discriminatory laws identified by HREOC (now known as the ‘Australian Human Rights Commission’)
in addition to over 40 further instances identified by the Government. The amending measures are expected to be implemented
by mid-2009;
Brough
In March 2006, Mr Corey Brough was successful in his communication to the Human Rights Committee. Mr Brough was
an Indigenous youth who was an inmate at a juvenile justice centre. He participated in a riot and was transferred to an adult
correctional centre where he was held for prolonged periods, alone, in a so-called ‘safe cell’. The Committee said that Mr Brough’s
‘extended confinement to an isolated cell without any possibility of communication, combined with his exposure to artificial light
for prolonged periods and the removal of his clothes and blanket, was not commensurate with his status as a juvenile person in
a particularly vulnerable position because of his disability and his status as an Aboriginal’. The Committee found a breach of
Articles 10 & 24 of the ICCPR, and emphasised Mr Brough’s right to an effective remedy. No such remedy was granted by either
the NSW or the Australian Governments.
Bosnian Muslim women gathered at the offices of the Srebrenica Mothers Association in Sarajevo to watch a live
broadcast of the Hague tribunal’s indictment reading for Radovan Karadzic in Sarajevo, 31 July 2008. The walls of the
association's office are filled with the photographs of their husbands and sons killed in Srebrenica in July 1995.
The wartime Bosnian Serb leader, Karadzic, stands indicted for genocide and crimes against humanity during Bosnia's
1992-1995 war, after nearly 13 years on the run.
Photo: Hidajet Delic, AP Photo.
Forensic experts from the International War Crimes Tribunal in the Hague work on a pile of partly decomposed bodies,
found in a mass grave in the village of Pilica some 55 km northeast of Tuzla (Bosnia), 24 July 1996. The victims are said
to be some of the 7000 men from Srebrenica who were killed in July 1995.
Staton R Winter.
international
in Australia
Mal Brough (then Federal Minister for Aboriginal Affairs) confronted by angry protesters as he opens a new Police
station, on a visit Mutitjulu community next to Uluru, Northern Territory, 30 June 2007. The Mutitjulu community was at
the centre of the Howard Government’s Northern Territory intervention.
Photo: Lyndon Mechielsen, The Daily Telegraph © Newspix/News Ltd.
22. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Ah Hin Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 available at www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/
HCA/1995/20.html
23. Commonwealth Attorney-General, The Honourable Robert McClelland MP, Address at the Australia and International Human Rights
Seminar: Coming in From the Cold, Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission, 23 May 2008, paras 40–42, available at http://www.
humanrights.gov.au/legal/seminars/speeches/robert_mcclelland_may08.html.
24. See www.hrc.act.gov.au
25. See www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au
in Australia
A catering company run by refugees and asylum seekers in North Fitzroy. From left: Sadu (Guinea), Chit (Burma), Edriass
(Sudan), Matthew Smith (mentor/trainer chef), Caroline Sturzaker (catering co-ordinator), 19 June 2007.
Photo: Rodger Cummins, The Age (Melbourne).
28. Senator the Honourable Chris Evans, Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, ‘New Directions on Detention – Restoring Integrity to
Australia’s Immigration System’ (Speech, Australian National University, Canberra, 29 July 2008).
29. Census analysis provided by the Commonwealth Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs at
http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/housing/homelessness_newapproach.htm#6 (accessed 21 July, 2008).
30. Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission Media Release, ‘Homelessness is a human rights issue: White Paper a good first step’,
30 January 2008. Accessed at http://www.humanrights.gov.au/about/media/media_releases/2008/6_08.html on 21 July, 2008.
31. See http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/housing/homelessness_newapproach.htm#6 (accessed 21 July, 2008).
The Legal information access centre (Liac) The no-nonsense guide to human rights, O Ball
can help if you need more information about the law, & P Gready, New Internationalist, 2006.
including cases and legislation. The service is free and # These books are part of the Law books for libraries
confidential. Contact details on back cover. collection available in some public libraries – check the
Find Legal Answers website www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.
BOOks gov.au for details
The law handbook, 10th ed, R Barry (ed), Redfern
Legal Centre Publishing, 2007. See Chapter 19: jOurnals
Discrimination and Chapter 30: Human rights Australian journal of human rights
complaints to the United Nations. Available in all NSW University of New South Wales, Human Rights Centre,
public libraries in the Find Legal Answers tool kit; also 1994.
available online at the State Library and public libraries.
The human rights defender
#Discrimination toolkit: your guide to making a Amnesty International 2000.
discrimination complaint, T Balgi, M Osborne & F
Pace, Legal Aid Commission NSW, 2007. Human rights defender
University of New South Wales, Human Rights Centre
#Finding a way: case studies in discrimination 1992.
law, NSW Disability Discrimination Legal Centre,
2007.
inTerneT siTes
#Human rights in Australia: treaties statutes
United Nations
and cases, M Flynn, LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003.
www.un.org
#International law, B Clarke, Lawbook Co Nutshell
This is the main website for the United Nations. Web
series, Lawbook co, 2003.
addresses for other relevant UN bodies are also listed
#Protecting human rights in Australia: a below:
community education kit, A Pettitt and P Ranald, > United Nations Human Rights
Public Interest Advocacy Centre, 2004. Also available http://www.un.org/rights/
online at www.piac.asn.au/publications/hrkit.html
> United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
#Retreat from injustice: human rights law in http://www.unicef.org
Australia, 2nd ed, N O’Neill, S Rice & R Douglas, > United Nations Development Fund for Women
Federation Press, 2004. (UNIFEM)
#Using disability discrimination law in New http://www.unifem.org
South Wales, 2nd ed, NSW Disability Discrimination > International Service for Human Rights
Legal Centre, 2007. http://www.ishr.ch/
Australian anti-discrimination law: text cases United Nations Office of the High Commissioner
and materials, N Rees, K Lindsay & S Rice, of Human Rights
Federation Press, 2008. www.ohchr.org
The laws of Australia, loose-leaf service – Title 21: > United Nations Office of the High Commissioner of
Human rights, P Baily (original editor), Thomson Human Rights International Law section
Lawbook co. www2.ohchr.org/english/law/index.htm
Protecting rights without a Bill of Rights: > For the official texts of international human rights
institutional performance and reform in treaties
Australia, T Campbell, J Goldsworthy & A Stone, www2.ohchr.org/english/law/index.htm#intruments
Ashgate, 2006.
Textbook on international human rights, 2nd ed,
Rhona Smith, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Further information 31
For a compilation of many relevant declarations, Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law
resolutions statements and other instruments: University of NSW
> United Nations Treaty Bodies www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/
www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/ Castan Centre for Human Rights Law
HumanRightsBodies.aspx Monash University
> Human Rights Issues www.law.monash.edu.au/castancentre/
www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/ListofIssues.aspx ACT Human Rights Act Research Project
Australian Human Rights Commission http://acthra.anu.edu.au/
www.humanrights.gov.au Australian Human Rights Centre
ACT Human Rights Commission University of New South Wales
www.hrc.act.gov.au/ http://www.ahrcentre.org/
Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Centre for Citizenship and Human Rights
Commission Deakin University
www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au/Home.asp www.deakin.edu.au/arts-ed/cchr/publication.php
Australian Treaties Database Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies
www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat University of Melbourne
http://cccs.law.unimelb.edu.au/
Includes the ‘Australia and International Treaty Making
Information Kit’ in the Treaty Law Resources section of Regulatory Institutions Network
the site Australian National University
http://regnet.anu.edu.au/
Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department
www.ag.gov.au Human Rights Watch
http://www.hrw.org
Commonwealth Department of Foreign Affairs
& Trade Amnesty International
www.dfat.gov.au http://www.amnesty.org
> Department of Foreign Affairs Human Rights Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions
www.dfat.gov.au/hr/ http://www.cohre.org/
Contains general information about Australia’s Centre for Economic & Social Rights
human rights policy, UN Delegation Statements, http://www.cesr.org/
reports to Parliament and UN bodies on human
rights, key human rights treaties and links to other
human rights agencies
Australian Parliamentary Library
www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/LAW/civlaw.htm
ACT Bill of Rights Unit, Department of Justice &
Community Safety
www.jcs.act.gov.au/HumanRightsAct/indexbor.html
Human Rights Unit Victorian Department of
Justice
http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/humanrights/
Human Rights Law Resource Centre
www.hrlrc.org.au
NSW Charter Group
http://www.nswcharterofhumanrights.org/
Human Rights Coalition
www.humanrightscoalition.org.au/index.php
A Human Rights Act for Australia
www.humanrightsact.com.au/2008/