Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Midterm Exam Consti I
Midterm Exam Consti I
Midterm Exam Consti I
COLLEGE OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF CALOOCAN CITY
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Prepared By: Prof. Ma. Nerissa T. Azurin
INSTRUCTIONS
1. This Questionnaire contains THIRTEEN (13) pages including this page. Check the
number of pages and their proper sequencing.
2. Do NOT write your names. Write only your student numbers on every paper.
Marking of your papers with your name or other identifying signs or symbols
extraneous to the subject matter of the questions may be considered as cheating,
and may disqualify you for the whole examinations. Strictly avoid erasures.
3. This Questionnaire is divided into two (2) parts: Part I and Part II.
3.A Part I consists of essay questions. Answer each essay question on separate one
– half (1/2) crosswise yellow papers. An answer to a sub-question under the
same number set may be written continuously on the same paper. Do NOT
rewrite the questions.
3.B Part II consists of multiple choice questions. All answers thereto should be
written on one paper only with the same size.
4. Do NOT write at the back page of your papers. Do NOT leave unanswered
questions. Read each question carefully and note the points allocated for each
question.
5. In sending your papers online, follow the sequence and the numbering system used
in the Questionnaire. Send all photos collectively to atty.azurin@gmail.com. You
may only submit ONCE.
6. Your answers should demonstrate your ability to analyze the facts, apply the
pertinent laws and jurisprudence, and arrive at sound and logical conclusions.
Always support your answers with the pertinent laws, rules, and/or jurisprudence.
A mere "yes" or "no" answer without any corresponding explanation or discussion
may not be given full credit.
I.
II.
Margie has been in the judiciary for a long time, starting from the
lowest court. Twenty (20) years from her first year in the judiciary, she
was nominated as a Justice in the Court of Appeals. Margie also happens
to be a first-degree cousin of the President. The Judicial and Bar Council
included her in the short-list submitted to the President whose term of
office was about to end – it was a month before the next presidential
elections.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
(b) Can BBB run as President in the next presidential election? (5%;
2008 Bar Examination)
VIII.
May CCC validly sit in the Cabinet? (10%; 2008 Bar Examination)
PART II
(B) Yes, since the power to appoint in the government, if not lodged
elsewhere, belongs to the President as Chief Executive.
(C) Yes, since the power to fill up all government positions mentioned
in the Constitution has been lodged in the President.
(D) No, the incumbent President must yield to the choice of the next
President
(C) Yes, convictions in two different fora for the same acts, are too
harsh that they are not beyond the reach of the President’s pardoning
power.
(A) voidable.
(B) valid.
(C) invalid.
(D) unenforceable.
(A) Yes, his immunity covers his interactions with his official family,
including the deceased adviser.
(D) No, his immunity does not cover crimes involving moral
turpitude.
12) When the President orders the Chief of the Philippine National
Police to suspend the issuance of permits to carry firearms outside the
residence, the President exercises
(B) a body of rules and maxims in accordance with which the powers
of sovereignty are habitually exercised;
(C) a body of rules and edicts emanating from the rulings of courts
and written guidelines of the executive and the legislature by
which government is governed;
15) Which of the following best exemplifies how the system of checks
and balances is carried out:
(A) the legislature passes a law that prohibits the president from
commuting a judiciary imposed sentence, as a check of the
president;
(B) the President pardons a convict as a way to set aside or modify
a judgment of the judiciary;
16) The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended
except in cases of:
(C) clear and present danger of invasion or rebellion when the public
safety requires it;
17) In Oposa vs. Factoran, Jr., G.R. No. 101083, July 30, 1993, the
Supreme Court held that the personality of the petitioners to sue is based
on the concept of:
(B) treason, bribery, graft and corruption and other high crimes;
(B) Senate;
(A) the State funds a road project whose effect is to make a church
more accessible to its adherents
(A) civil servants must first qualify before they could be appointed to
office
(B) all employees in the government are merely agents of the people
(C) the acts of subordinates presumptively of those of the heads of
offices disapproves them
(D) members of the Cabinet must have the absolute trust and
confidence of the President
(D) none
(D) none