The Court ruled that the Military erred in relying on a handwritten note from Proclamation No. 2476 that was not published. For a law to take effect, it must be published in its entirety. Here, the handwritten addendum declaring part of the land alienable and disposable was not included in the publication. As such, it did not have legal force and the land remained part of the military reservation. The Court applied these principles in denying the petition to reclassify areas in Western Bicutan as alienable, as the addendum removing it from the reservation was not validly published.
The Court ruled that the Military erred in relying on a handwritten note from Proclamation No. 2476 that was not published. For a law to take effect, it must be published in its entirety. Here, the handwritten addendum declaring part of the land alienable and disposable was not included in the publication. As such, it did not have legal force and the land remained part of the military reservation. The Court applied these principles in denying the petition to reclassify areas in Western Bicutan as alienable, as the addendum removing it from the reservation was not validly published.
The Court ruled that the Military erred in relying on a handwritten note from Proclamation No. 2476 that was not published. For a law to take effect, it must be published in its entirety. Here, the handwritten addendum declaring part of the land alienable and disposable was not included in the publication. As such, it did not have legal force and the land remained part of the military reservation. The Court applied these principles in denying the petition to reclassify areas in Western Bicutan as alienable, as the addendum removing it from the reservation was not validly published.
The Court ruled that the Military erred in relying on a handwritten note from Proclamation No. 2476 that was not published. For a law to take effect, it must be published in its entirety. Here, the handwritten addendum declaring part of the land alienable and disposable was not included in the publication. As such, it did not have legal force and the land remained part of the military reservation. The Court applied these principles in denying the petition to reclassify areas in Western Bicutan as alienable, as the addendum removing it from the reservation was not validly published.
Topic: On 12 July 1957, by virtue of Proclamation 423,
Adoption and Former President Carlos P. Garcia reserved parcels Effectivity of of land in the Municipalities of Pasig, Taguig, W O N the Court Applying the foregoing ruling to the instant case, this Court cannot rely on a handwritten note that was not part of the Present Paranaque, Province of Rizal and Pasay City for of Appeals erred Proclamation No. 2476 as published. Without publication, the note never had any legal force and effect. We agree Constitution: military reservation. in ruling that the that the publication must be in full or it is no publication at all since its purpose is to inform the public of the contents of Compare with subject lots were the laws. In relation thereto, Article 2 of the Civil Code expressly provides: the Effectivity On 28 May 1967, President Ferdinand E. Marcos not alienable and of Laws issued Proclamation No. 208, amending disposable by Art. 2. Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication in the Official Gazette, Proclamation No. 423, which exluded a certain area virtue of unless it is otherwise provided. This Code shall take effect one year after such publication. Under the provision, the of Fort Bonifacio and reserved it for a national shrine. Proclamation No. requirement of publication is indispensable to give effect to the law, unless the law itself has otherwise provided. 2476 on the Again, on 7 January 1986President Marcos issued ground that the In the case at bar, though Proclamation No. 2476 was published in an Official Gazette, the handwritten addendum of Proclamation No. 2476 that further amended the handwritten President Marcos declaring the Western Bicutan as alienable and disposable was not included. proclamation that excluded the barangays of Lower addendum of Bicutan, Upper Bicutan and Signal Village and a President Marcos Nagkakaisang handwritten addendum which includes Western was not included Maralita Bicutan for the disposition of the area. in the publication of the said law. On 3 February 1986, The proclamation was vs. published in the Official Gazette without the handwritten addendum.
Military Demolition of illegal structures existed to prevent the
area from the increasing number of informal settlers.
G.R. No. Members of petitioner Nagkakaisang Maralita ng
187654 Sitio Masigasig, Inc. (NMSMI) and Western Bicutan Lot Owners Association, Inc. (WBLOAI) filed for a Petition with Commission on Settlement of Land Problems (COSLAP) praying for the reclassification June 5, 2013 of the areas they are occupying as is already alienable and disposable.