The court ruled that John's biological mother is entitled to death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family, because John was a minor when his adopter died. When an adoptee's parent dies while they are a minor, parental rights revert to the biological parents. The court applied laws allowing rescission of adoption if the adoptee is a minor, restoring the biological parents' rights. Therefore, John's biological mother retains rights of succession over his estate and qualifies as his primary beneficiary for death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family.
The court ruled that John's biological mother is entitled to death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family, because John was a minor when his adopter died. When an adoptee's parent dies while they are a minor, parental rights revert to the biological parents. The court applied laws allowing rescission of adoption if the adoptee is a minor, restoring the biological parents' rights. Therefore, John's biological mother retains rights of succession over his estate and qualifies as his primary beneficiary for death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family.
The court ruled that John's biological mother is entitled to death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family, because John was a minor when his adopter died. When an adoptee's parent dies while they are a minor, parental rights revert to the biological parents. The court applied laws allowing rescission of adoption if the adoptee is a minor, restoring the biological parents' rights. Therefore, John's biological mother retains rights of succession over his estate and qualifies as his primary beneficiary for death benefits, not his deceased adopter's family.
BARTOLOME, petitioner - The Court ruled that John’s minority
v at the time of his adopter’s death is a SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM and significant factor in the case at bar. SCANMAR MARITIME SERVICES, INC., - Under such circumstances, parental respondents authority should be deemed to have reverted in favor of the biological parents. FACTS: - The Court also applied by analogy, - John Colcol was employed as insofar as the restoration of custody electrician by Scanmar Maritime is concerned, the provisions of law Services, Inc. on rescission of adoption wherein if - He was enrolled under the said petition is granted, the parental government’s Employees’ authority of the adoptee’s biological Compensation Program (ECP). He parents shall be restored if the died due to an accident while on adoptee is still a minor or board the vessel. incapacitated. - John was, at the time of his death, - From the foregoing, it is apparent childless and unmarried. that the biological parents retain - Thus, petitioner Bernardina P. their rights of succession to the Bartolome, John’s biological mother estate of their child who was the and, allegedly, sole remaining subject of adoption. beneficiary, filed a claim for death - While the benefits arising from the benefits. death of an SSS covered employees - SSS denied the claim on the ground do not form part of the estate of the that Bernardina was no longer adopted child, the pertinent considered as the parent of John provision on legal or intestate since the latter was legally adopted succession at least reveals the policy by Cornelio Colcol. on the rights of the biological - As such, it is Cornelio who qualifies parents and those by adoption vis-à- as John’s primary beneficiary, not vis the right to receive benefits from petitioner. the adopted. - According to the records, Cornelio - In the same way that certain rights died during John’s minority. still attach by virtue of the blood relation, so too should certain ISSUES: obligations, which, the Court ruled, - W/N the death of the adopter during include the exercise of parental the adoptee’s minority results to the authority, in the event of the restoration of parental authority to untimely passing of their minor the biological parents of the latter. offspring’s adoptive parent.