Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Y) Pseudo-Second Order Model For Sorption Processes
(Y) Pseudo-Second Order Model For Sorption Processes
(Y) Pseudo-Second Order Model For Sorption Processes
Received 2 October 1997; received in revised form 10 August 1998; accepted 16 August 1998
Abstract
A literature review of the use of sorbents and biosorbents to treat polluted aqueous effluents containing dyes/organics or metal
ions has been conducted. Over 70 systems have been reported since 1984 and over 43 of these reported the mechanism as being
a pseudo-first order kinetic mechanism. Three sorption kinetic models are presented in this paper and have been used to test 11
of the literature systems previously reported as first order kinetics and one system previously reported as a second order process.
In all 12 systems, the highest correlation coefficients were obtained for the pseudo-second order kinetic model. © 1999 Elsevier
Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction reaction equation. The rate law has three primary re-
quirements [1]:
The sorption of pollutants from aqueous solution A knowledge of all the molecular details of the
plays an important role in wastewater treatment since it reaction including the energetics and stereo-
eliminates the need for huge sludge-handling processes. chemistry.
Well-designed sorption processes have high efficiency Interatomic distances and angles throughout the
resulting in a high-quality effluent after treatment course of the reaction.
which can be recycled. Furthermore, if low-cost sor- The individual molecular steps involved in the
bents or sorbent regeneration is feasible then the sor- mechanism.
bent material cost can be kept low. It is therefore
understandable that the study of sorption kinetics in 1.1. Simple sorption kinetic systems
wastewater treatment is significant as it provides valu-
able insights into the reaction pathways and into the Numerous sorption systems have been investigated
mechanism of sorption reactions. In addition, the kinet- particularly during the past 15 years. Most of these
ics describe the solute uptake rate which in turn con- have been reported as first order kinetic processes.
trols the residence time of sorbate uptake at the Bhattacharya and Venkobachar [2] presented a simple
solid –solution interface. Therefore, it is important to first order reversible kinetic model, based on solution
be able to predict the rate at which pollutant is re- concentration for the sorption of cadmium(II) from
moved from aqueous solutions in order to design ap- liquid phase onto both Giridih coal and crushed co-
propriate sorption treatment plants. To develop conut shell, as a reversible reaction with an equilibrium
sorption kinetics, a knowledge of the rate law describ- being established between two liquid and solid phases.
ing the sorption system is required. The rate law is This model has been applied to several other sorption
determined by experimentation and it cannot be in- systems (Table 1).
ferred by more examination of the overall chemical The pseudo-first order rate equation of Lagergren [3]
has long been widely applied. In 1947, Boyd et al. [4]
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +852-2358-7130; Fax: + 852-2358- developed a rate equation which considered rates of
0054. ion-exchange adsorption in the exchange adsorption of
0032-9592/99/$ - see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 0 3 2 - 9 5 9 2 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 1 1 2 - 5
452 Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465
ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites. In a second order rate equation and the kinetics of sorp-
the cases of diffusion through a boundary liquid film tion should correspond to a reversible second order
and adsorption kinetics as a chemical phenomenon, reaction at low sorbate/sorbent ratios (first order at
the authors concluded that a mass action rate equa- very low ratios), and two competitive reversible sec-
tion for adsorption kinetics as a chemical phe- ond order reactions at higher sorbate/sorbent ratios.
nomenon and a diffusion equation for diffusion
through a boundary liquid film are the same as the 1.2. Complex sorption kinetic systems
pseudo-first order rate equation of Lagergren. They
also concluded that if film diffusion is rate con- Singh et al. [21] reported that the sorption of mer-
trolling, the constant of the equation will vary in- cury(II) by kaolinite obeyed multiple first order kinet-
versely with the particle size and the film thickness; if ics. Varshney et al. [22] proposed that the kinetics of
the exchange is chemically rate controlled, the con- sorption of the pesticide phosphamidon on beads of
stant of the equation will be independent of particle antimony(V) phosphate cation exchanger followed
diameter and flow rate and will depend only on the second order kinetics during the first 15 min, but af-
concentrations of the ions in solution and the temper- terwards, up to 180 min, it is a first order reaction.
ature. The earlier application of the pseudo-first order Sarkar and Chattoraj [23] have shown that the sorp-
rate equation of Lagergren to the sorption of cellu- tion of proteins such as lysozyme, b-lactoglobulin
lose triacetate from chloroform on calcium silicate and hemoglobin from aqueous solution to the surface
was undertaken by Trivedi et al. [5]. Numerous stud- of silica powder follow first order Lagergren kinetics
ies report pseudo-first order Lagergren kinetics for with two kinetic constants. Atun and Sismanoglu [24]
the sorption of metals, such as the sorption of arsen- found that the sorption of 4,4%-isopropylidene diphe-
ite(III) from aqueous solutions by haematite [6] and nol (Bis-phenol A) and diphenylolpropane-4,4%-diosy-
the sorption of nickel(II) from aqueous solutions by acetic acid (Bis acid A2) on kaolinite-type clay
wollastonite and china clay [7,8]. Several other metal follows a first order process. However, at low concen-
sorption examples are listed in Table 1. The same trations of Bis-phenol A the mechanism follows a
first pseudo-order model was used for the sorption of first order rate expression with two kinetic steps.
dyes, such as the sorption of Omega Chrome Red Comber et al. [25] reported a complex multi-step pro-
ME (OCRME) using a 1:1 ratio of fly ash and coal cesses, with equilibration times varying from minutes
[9], and the sorption of Methylene Blue on water to weeks, for the sorption of cadmium(II), copper(II)
hyacinth roots [10]. Table 1 shows a number of other and zinc(II) onto natural suspended particulate matter
pseudo-first order dye sorption systems. in the Humber estuary. It is often incorrect to apply
In addition, Seki and Suzuki [11] reported that the simple kinetic models such as first- or second-order
kinetics of lead(II) sorption on a composite biopoly- rate equations to a sorption with solid surfaces which
mer sorbent of alginic acid and humic acid can be are rarely homogeneous and because the effects of
approximated to a pseudo-first order reaction with transport phenomena and chemical reactions are often
the Lagergren expression based on metal complexa- experimentally inseparable [26].
tion. Salim et al. [27] reported that the sorption of cad-
Research work has been conducted using pseudo- mium(II) on beech leaves is a first order reaction
second order kinetics for sorption reactions; for in- based on the solution concentration with respect to
stance, Gosset et al. [12] reported batch metal cadmium(II). Salim et al. [28] reported that the inter-
removal by peat. Sharma and Forster [13 – 15] re- action between lead(II) and cypress leaves followed a
ported that the kinetics of the sorption of chromi- fractional order of 0.7 based on the solution concen-
um(VI) using peat, leaf mould and granular activated tration with respect to lead(II). In the case of column
carbon follow a pseudo-second order reaction rate. studies the kinetics of copper(II) and lead(II) sorption
Ho et al. [16–18] reported that sorption of copper(II) onto polysulfone and algae complex follow the first
and nickel(II) using peat in single- and bi-solute sys- order rate law based on the sorption capacity of the
tems follows a similar second order reaction mecha- solid [29], and the kinetics of isoproturon sorption
nism. Other examples for metal ions and dyes are onto soil follow a reversible first order process hence-
given in Table 1. forward described as the distance-from-equilibrium
Moreale and Van Bladel [19] developed an empiri- rate law [30]. Locke et al. [31] reported that the ki-
cal model for the sorption of p-chloroaniline using netics of acifluorfen sorption onto soil follow a first
Soignies and Heverlee I soils. The order of the reac- order process. Chien and Clayton [32] reported that
tion was calculated to be 1.92 and 1.93 for Soignies the Elovich equation may be used to describe the
and Heverlee I soils respectively. Dzombak and kinetics of phosphate sorption in soils. Taylor et al.
Morel [20] found that the kinetics of cadmium(II) [33] reported that zinc sorption kinetics by 12 Ala-
sorption on hydrous ferric oxide can be described by bama soils was best described by the Elovich equa-
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 453
Table 1
Comparison of mechanisms of sorption from the literature
s
Giridih coal and Coconut shell Cd(II) 1st order Bhattacharya and
Venkobachar [2]
Fly ash/Wollastonite Cr(VI) 1st order Panday et al. [42]
Fly ash Cu(II) 1st order Panday et al. [43]
Peat Cu(II), Cd(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) 2nd order Gosset et al. [12]
Hydrous ferric oxide Cd(II) 2nd order Dzombak and Morel
[20]
Fly ash Victoria Blue 1st order Khare et al. [34]
Peat Pb(II) 2nd order Ho and McKay [44]
Wollastonite Fe(II) 1st order Singh et al. [35]
s
Fly ash OCRME 1st order Gupta et al. [45]
1:1 Fly ash and coal OCRME 1st order Gupta et al. [45]
Fly ash Floride 1st order Chaturvedi et al. [46]
Peat CN− 2nd order Cancela et al. [47]
Wollastonite Ni(II) 1st order Sharma et al. [7]
China clay Ni(II) 1st order Sharma et al. [8]
s
Groundnut husk carbon Cr(VI) 1st order Periasamy et al. [48]
Banana pith Acid violet 1st order Namasivayam and
Kanchana [49]
Beech leaves Cd(II) *1st order Salim et al. [27]
s
Coconut shell carbons Cr(VI) 1st order Rao et al. [50]
Biogas residual slurry Congo Red 1st order Namasivayam and Ya-
muna [51]
Biogas residual slurry Rhodamine-B 1st order Namasivayam and Ya-
muna [52]
Biogas residual slurry Acid Brilliant Blue 1st order Yamuna and Namasi-
vayam [53]
Peanut hull carbon Hg(II) 1st order Namasivayam and Peri-
asamy [54]
s
Waste tea, Turkish coffee, Exhausted coffee, Cr(VI), Cd(II), Al(III) 1st order Orhan and Büyükgün-
Nut shell and Walnut shell gör [55]
Peat Cr(VI) 2nd order Sharma and Forster
[13]
Silica Lysozyme. b-Lactoglobulin and Hemoglobin m
1st order Sarkar and Chattoraj
[23]
Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide Cr(VI) 1st order Namasivayam and Ran-
ganathan [56]
Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide Paraquat 1st order Namasivayam et al. [57]
Fly ash and Impregnated fly ash Phenol, o-Cresol, m-Cresol, p-Cresol, o-Nitro- 1st order Singh and Rawat [38]
phenol, m-Nitrophenol and p-Nitrophenol
Bi2O3 Cr(VI) 1st order Bhutani and Kumari
[39]
Peanut hull carbon Cd(II) 1st order Periasamy and Namasi-
vayam [58]
Leaf mould Cr(VI) 2nd order Sharma and Forster
[14]
Cypress leaves Pb(II) 0.7 order Salim et al. [28]
Peat Cu(II) 2nd order Ho et al. [16]
Peanut hull carbon Pb(II) 1st order Periasamy and Namasi-
vayam [59]
Peanut hull carbon Ni(II) 1st order Periasamy and Namasi-
vayam [60]
Peat Ni(II) 2nd order Ho et al. [17]
Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide Cd(II) 1st order Namasivayam and Ran-
ganathan [61]
Water hyacinth roots Merthylene Blue 1st order Low et al. [10]
Moss and Copper-coated moss Cr(III) and Cr(VI) 1st order Lee et al. [62]
Algae Lauryl benzyl sulphonate 2nd order Fernadez et al. [63]
Biogas residual slurry Direct red 12 B 1st order Namasivayam and Ya-
muna [64]
Biogas residual slurry Cr(VI) 1st order Namasivayam and Ya-
muna [65]
454 Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465
Table 1 (Continued)
s
1st Order: a first order rate expression based on solution concentration.
m
1st Order: multiple first order kinetics.
* 1st Order: a first order rate expression based on solid.
+
1st Order: distance-from-equilibrium rate law.
tion when six models were tested, namely, zero-, first-, sorption mechanisms has been made with the mecha-
second-, third-order, parabolic diffusion and Elovich. nisms proposed in the literature.
These data are summarized in Table 1.
In the present work, a correlative kinetic analysis
approach to the sorption process has been adopted and 2. Materials and methods
various sorption parameters such as the equilibrium
sorption capacity, percent metal ion removal, rate con- The experimental data discussed and analysed by the
stants and initial sorption rate, can be calculated from pseudo-second order kinetic mechanism, proposed in
the experimental data by the pseudo-second order rate this paper, have been reported previously in the litera-
low. A pseudo-second order kinetic model is presented ture. The experimental data analysed are the sorption
and discussed. Furthermore, data from the literature of Victoria Blue dye onto fly ash by Khare et al. [34],
have been analysed and a comparison of the best fit the sorption of Fe(II) onto wollastonite by Sinjgh et al.
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 455
Table 2
Comparison of the mechanisms of sorption for literature and pseudo-second order model
Fly ash Victoria Blue Pseudo 2nd order Pseudo 1st order
Wollastonite Ni(II) Pseudo 2nd order Pseudo 1st order
Bi2O3 Cr(VI) Pseudo 2nd order Pseudo 1st order
Peat Cu(II) Pseudo 2nd order 2nd order
Fly ash OCL and PNP Pseudo 2nd order Pseudo 1st order
PHC and GAC Cu(II) Pseudo 2nd order Pseudo 1st order
Beech leaves Cd(II) Pseudo 2nd order *1st Order
Cypress leaves Pb(II) Pseudo 2nd order *0.7 Order
s
Fly ash OCRME Pseudo 2nd order 1st order
Bottom ash Cu(II) and Pb(II) Pseudo 2nd order None
TNSAC Phosphate Pseudo 2nd order Diffusion
Reed leaves Cd(II) Pseudo 2nd order None
* 1st Order: a first order rate expression based on solid with t 0.5.
s
1st Order: a first order rate expression based on solution concentration.
kS1 is the rate constant of first order sorption (1/ CB is the concentration of sorbate on the
min), sorbent at any time,
q1 is the amount of solute sorbed at equilibrium CA is the concentration of sorbate in solu-
(mg/g), tion at any time.
qt is amount of solute sorbed on the surface of the CA* and are the initial concentrations of sorbate
sorbent at any time t (mg/g). CB* on the sorbent and in solution,
A reversible first order rate expression based on respectively,
solution concentration may be represented [2] by Eq. XA is the fractional conversion of soluted
(3): sorbate,
k1 and k2 are the first order rate constants.
dCB dC dXA
= − A = CA* = k1CA −k2CB
dt dt dt At equilibrium conditions
dCB dCA
= =0 (4)
= k1(CA* −CA*XA)− k2(CB* −CA*XA) (3) dt dt
Since CB =CB*XB = −CA*XA where and
Fig. 4. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of Victoria Blue onto Fig. 5. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of nickel(II) onto
fly ash at various initial concentrations. wollastonite at various initial concentrations.
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 457
CB* CB*
Kc − + XAc
CA* CA*
XAc = (5) Kc = (6)
Kc + 1 1− XAc
Fig. 7. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of p-nitrophenol onto Fig. 9. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of p-nitrophenol onto
fly ash at various initial concentrations. fly ash at various temperatures.
458 Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465
centrations.
The rate equation in terms of equilibrium conversion
can be obtained from Eqs. (3), (5) and (6) as follows: CB* CB*
− k1 − X + XA − XAXAc
1. substituting for k2 =k1/kc in Eq. (3); dXA CA* CA* AE
= (8)
2. substituting Kc by Eq. (6). dt CB*
+ XAc
Now, Eq. (3) becomes: CA*
CB* C X
k1 + XAc − B* A −XAXAc By elimination and factorization, Eq. (8) reduces to:
CA* CA*
CB*
+ 1 (XAc − XA)
dXA C
=k1 A* (9)
dt CB*
+ XAc
CA*
Integration of Eq. (9) gives:
CB*
+ 1 k1t
X CA*
− ln 1− A = (10)
XAc CB*
+ XAc
CA*
Therefore a plot of −ln(1-XA/XAc) versus time will give
a straight line and from the gradient k1 can be ob-
tained. In effect, Eq. (10) may be regarded as a pseudo-
first order irreversible reaction and in this respect is
analogous to Eq. (2).
In order to derive the rate constant for the pseudo-
second order sorption mechanism:
The peat-copper reaction may be represented in two
ways [41]:
2P − + Cu2 + UCuP2 (11)
or
2HP+ Cu2 + UCuP2 + 2H + (12)
Fig. 11. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of copper(II) onto
peanut hull carbon (PHC) at various initial concentrations. where P − and HP are polar sites on the peat surface.
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 459
Fig. 14. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of lead(II) onto cy- Fig. 16. Pseudo-second order sorption kinetics of Omega Chrome
press leaves at various initial concentrations. Red ME on fly ash at various temperatures.
460 Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465
follows:
qt is amount of soluted sorbate on the surface of the
dqt sorbent at any time t (mg/g).
=k(qc −qt )2 (15)
dt
Separating the variables in Eq. (14) gives:
where
dqt
= k dt (16)
k is the rate constant of sorption (g/mg min), (qc − qt )2
qc is the amount of soluted sorbate sorbed at equi- Integrating this for the boundary conditions t=0 to
librium (mg/g), t= t and qt = 0 to qt = qt, gives:
Fig. 18. Plot of sorbed capacity versus time for effect of metal ions on Fig. 20. Plot of sorbed capacity versus time for effect of unrinsed and
the sorption kinetics of copper(II) and lead(II) onto bottom ash. rinsed TNSAC on the sorption kinetics of phosphate onto TNSAC.
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 461
copper(II) on peat and bottom ash, bicarbonate-treated [17] Ho YS, Wase DAJ, Forster CF. Batch nickel removal from
aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. Water Res
peanut hulls (PHC) and activated carbon (GAC), of
1995;29:1327 – 32.
nickel(II) on wollastonite, of chromium(VI) on Bi2O3, [18] Ho YS, Wase DAJ, Forster CF. Kinetic studies of competitive
of cadmium(II) on beech and reed leaves, of lead(II) on heavy metal adsorption by sphagnum moss peat. Environ
cypress leaves and bottom ash and phosphate on Technol 1996;17:71 – 7.
tamarind nut shell activated carbon (TNSAC) were [19] Moreale A, Van Bladel R. Soil interactions of herbicide-
derivated aniline residue: a thermodynamic approach. Soil Sci
analysed on the basis of the pseudo-second order rate 1979;127:1 – 9.
mechanism. For all of the systems studied, chemical [20] Dzombak DA, Morel FMM. Sorption of cadmium on hy-
reaction seems significant in the rate-controlling step drous ferric oxide at high sorbate/sorbent ratios: equilibrium,
and the pseudo-second order chemical reaction kinetics kinetics and modelling. J Colloid Interface Sci 1986;112:588–
98.
provide the best correlation of the experimental data, [21] Singh J, Huang PM, Hammer UT, Liaw WK. Influence of
whereas the pseudo-first order model proposed fits the citric acid and glycine on the adsorption of mercury(II) by
experimental data well for an initial period of the first kaolinite under various pH conditions. Clays Clay Miner
reaction step only. However, over a long period the 1996;44:41 – 8.
[22] Varshney KG, Khan AA, Gupta U, Maheshwari SM. Kinetics
pseudo-second order model provides the best correla-
of adsorption of phosphamidon on antimony(V) phosphate
tion for all of the systems studied. cation-exchange– evaluation of the order of reaction and some
physical parameters. Physicochem Eng Aspects 1996;113:19–
23.
[23] Sarkar D, Chattoraj DK. Activation parameters for kinetics of
References
protein adsorption at silicawater interface. J Colloid Interface
Sci 1993;157:219 – 26.
[1] Sparks DL. Kinetics of reaction in pure and mixed systems. [24] Atun G, Sismanoglu T. Adsorption of 4,4%-isopropylidene
In: Sparks DL, editor. Soil Physical Chemistry. Boca Raton, diphenol and diphenylolpropane 4,4%-dioxyacetic acid from
Florida: CRC Press, 1986:83–145. aqueous solution on kaolinite. J Environ Sci Health Part A
[2] Bhattacharya AK, Venkobachar C. Removal of cadmium(II) Environ Sci Eng 1996;31:2055 – 69.
by low cost adsorption. J Env Eng ASCE 1984;110:110– 22. [25] Comber SDW, Gardner MJ, Gunn AM, Whalley C. Kinetics
[3] Lagergren S. Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster of trace metal sorption to estuarine suspended particulate mat-
stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens. Handlingar ter. Chemosphere 1996;33:1027 – 40.
1898;24(4):1 – 39. [26] Sparks DL. Kinetics of Soil Chemical Processes. New York:
[4] Boyd GE, Adamson AW, Myers LS. The exchange adsorption Academic Press, 1989.
of ions from aqueous solutions by organic zeolites II. Kinetics. [27] Salim R, Al-Subu MM, Sahrhage E. Uptake of cadmium from
J Am Chem Soc 1947;69:2836–48. water by beech leaves. J Environ Sci Health Part A Environ
[5] Trivedi HC, Patel VM, Patel RD. Adsorption of cellulose tri- Sci Eng 1992;27:603 – 27.
acetate on calcium silicate. Eur Polym J 1973;9:525–31. [28] Salim R, Al-Subu MM, Qashoa S. Removal of lead from
[6] Singh DB, Prasad G, Rupainwar DC, Singh VN. As(III) re- polluted water using decaying leaves. J Environ Sci Health
moval from aqueous solution by adsorption. Wat Air Soil Part A Environ Sci Eng 1994;29:2087 – 114.
Pollut 1988;42:373 – 86. [29] Ramelow US, Guidry CN, Fisk SD. A kinetic study of metal
[7] Sharma YC, Gupta GS, Prasad G, Rupainwar DC. Use of ion binding by biomass immobilized in polymers. J Hazard
wollastonite in the removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solutions. Mater 1996;46:37 – 55.
Wat Air Soil Pollut 1990;49:69–79. [30] Worrall F, Parker A, Rae JE, Johnson. AC. A study of the
[8] Sharma YC, Prasad G, Rupainwar DC. Removal of Ni(II) adsorption kinetics of isoproturon on soil and subsoil. Chemo-
from aqueous solutions by sorption. Intern J Environmental sphere 1997;34:71 – 86.
Studies 1991;37:183 –91. [31] Locke MA, Gaston LA, Zablotowicz RM. Acifluorfen sorp-
tion and sorption kinetics in soil. J Agric Food Chem
[9] Gupta GS, Prasad G, Singh VN. Removal of chrome dye
1997;45:286 – 93.
from aqueous solutions by mixed adsorbents: fly ash and coal.
[32] Chien SH, Clayton WR. Application of Elovich equation to
Water Res 1990;24:45–50.
the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Sci
[10] Low KS, Lee CK, Tan KK. Biosorption of basic dyes by
Soc Am J 1980;44:265 – 8.
water hyacinth roots. Bioresource Technology 1995;52:79 – 83.
[33] Taylor RW, Hassan K, Mehadi AA, Shuford JW. Kinetics of
[11] Seki H, Suzuki A. Adsorption of lead ions on composite bio-
zinc sorption by soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal
polymer adsorbent. Ind Eng Chem Res 1996;35:1378–82. 1995;26:1761 – 71.
[12] Gosset T, Trancart JL, Thevenot DR. Batch metal removal by [34] Khare SK, Panday KK, Srivastava RM, Singh VN. Removal
peat kinetics and thermodynamics. Water Res 1986;20:21 – 6. of Victoria Blue from aqueous solution by fly ash. J Chem
[13] Sharma DC, Forster CF. Removal of hexavalent chromium Technol Biotechnol A — Chem Technol 1987;38:99 – 104.
using sphagnum moss peat. Water Res 1993;27:1201–8. [35] Singh AK, Singh DP, Panday KK, Singh VN. Wollastonite as
[14] Sharma DC, Forster CF. The treatment of chromium wastew- adsorbent for removal of Fe(II) from water. J Chem Technol
aters using the sorptive potential of leaf mold. Bioresource Biotechnol 1998;42:39 – 49.
Technol 1994;49:31 –40. [36] Kaur A, Malik AK, Verma N, Rao ALJ. Removal of copper
[15] Sharma. DC, Forster CF. Removal of hexavalent chromium and lead from wastewater by adsorption on bottom ash. In-
from aqueous solutions by granular activated carbon. Water dian J Environ Prot 1991;11:433 – 5.
SA 1996;22:153 – 60. [37] Bhargava DS, Sheldarkar SB. Use of TNSAC in phosphate
[16] Ho. YS, Wase DAJ, Forster CF. The adsorption of divalent adsorption studies and relationships. Literature, experimental
copper ions from aqueous solution by sphagnum moss peat. methodology, justification and effects of process variables. Wa-
Trans IChemE Part B 1994;17:185–94. ter Res 1993;27:303 – 12.
464 Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465
[38] Singh BK, Rawat NS. Comparative sorption kinetic studies of [59] Periasamy K, Namasivayam C. Adsorption of Pb(II) by
phenolic compounds on fly ash and impregnated fly ash. J peanut hull carbon from aqueous solution. Sep Sci Technol
Chem Tech Biotech 1994;61:57–65. 1995;30:2223 – 37.
[39] Bhutani MM, Kumari R. Adsorption of low level 51Cr(VI) [60] Periasamy K, Namasivayam C. Removal of nickel(II) from
from aqueous solution by bismuth trioxide: kinetic and IR aqueous solution and nickel plating industry wastewater using
study. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 1994;180:145–53. an agricultural waste: peanut hulls. Waste Manage
[40] Sayrafi O, Salim R, Sayrafi SA. Removal of cadmium from 1995;15:63 – 8.
polluted water using decaying leaves—effects of type of leaves. [61] Namasivayam C, Ranganathan K. Removal of Cd(II) from
J Environ Sci Health Part A Environ Sci Eng 1996;31:2503 – wastewater by adsorption on ‘waste’ Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide.
13. Water Res 1995;29:1737 – 44.
[41] Coleman NT, McClung AC, Moore DP. Formation constants [62] Lee CK, Low KS, Kek KL. Removal of chromium from
for Cu(II) – peat complexes. Science 1956;123:330–1. aqueous solution. Bioresource Technol 1995;54:183 – 9.
[42] Panday KK, Prasad G, Singh VN. Removal of Cr(VI) from [63] Fernadez NA, Chacin E, Gutierrez E, Alastre N, Llamoza B,
aqueous solution by adsorption on fly ash wollastonite. J Forster CF. Adsorption of lauryl benzyl sulfonate on algae.
Chem Techol Biotechnol A—Chemical Technology Bioresource Technol 1995;54:111 – 5.
1984;34:367 – 74. [64] Namasivayam C, Yamuna RT. Adsorption of Direct red 12 B
[43] Panday KK, Prasad G, Singh VN. Copper(II) removal from by biogas residual slurry: equilibrium and rate processes. Envir
aqueous solution by fly ash. Water Res 1985;19:869–73. Pollu 1995;89:1 – 7.
[44] Ho. YS, McKay G. Kinetic model for lead (II) sorption onto [65] Namasivayam. C, Yamuna RT. Adsorption of chromium(VI)
peat. Ads Sci Technol 1998;16:943–55. by a low-cost adsorbent: biogas residual slurry. Chemosphere
[45] Gupta GS, Prasad G, Panday KK, Singh VN. Removal of 1995;30:561 – 78.
chrome dye from dye aqueous solutions by fly ash. Wat Air [66] Namasivayam C, Yamuna RT. Waste biogas residual slurry as
Soil Pollut 1988;37:13–24. an adsorbent for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution
[46] Chaturvedi AK, Yadava K, Pathak KC, Singh VN. Defluori- and radiator manufacturing industry wastewater. Bioresource
dation of water by adsorption on fly ash. Wat Air Soil Pollut Technol 1995;52:125 – 31.
1990;49:51 – 61. [67] Van Deventer JSJ, Van der Merwe PF. Kinetic model for the
[47] Cancela. GD, Taboada ER, Sanchezrasero. F. Adsorption of decomposition of cyanide during the elution of gold from acti-
cyanazine on peat and montmorillonite clay surfaces. Soil Sci
vated carbon. Sep Sci Technol 1995;30:883 – 98.
1990;150:836 – 43.
[68] Mishra SP, Singh VK. Efficient removal of cadmium ions
[48] Periasamy K, Srinivasan K, Murugan PK. Studies on chromi-
from aqueous solutions by hydrous ceric oxide: a radiotracer
um(VI) removal by activated groundnut husk carbon. Indian J
study. Radiochim Acta 1995;68:251 – 6.
Environ Health 1991;33:433–9.
[69] Mishra SP, Singh VK, Tiwari D. Radiotracer technique in
[49] Namasivayam C, Kanchana N. Waste banana pith as adsor-
adsorption study: Part XIV. Efficient removal of mercury from
bent for color removal from wastewaters. Chemosphere
aqueous solutions by hydrous zirconium oxide. Appl Radiat
1992;25:1691 – 705.
Isot 1996;47:15 – 21.
[50] Rao PS, Mise SR, Manjunatha GS. Kinetic studies on adsorp-
[70] Orumwense FFO. Removal of lead from water by adsorption
tion of chromium by coconut shell carbons from synthetic
on a kaolinitic clay. J Chem Tech Biotech 1996;65:363–9.
effluents. J Environ Sci Health Part A Environ Sci Eng
[71] Singh DB, Prasad G, Rupainwar DC. Adsorption technique
1992;27:2227 – 41.
for the treatment of As(V)-rich effluents. Physicochem Eng
[51] Namasivayam C, Yamuna RT. Removal of Congo Red from
Aspects 1996;111:49 – 56.
aqueous solution by biogas waste slurry. J Chem Tech Biotech
1992;53:153 – 7. [72] Dasmahapatra GP, Pal TK, Bhadra AK, Bhattacharya B.
[52] Namasivayam C, Yamuna RT. Removal of Rhodamine-B by Studies on separation characteristics of hexavalent chromium
biogas waste slurry from aqueous solution. Wat Air Soil Pol- from aqueous solution by fly ash. Sep Sci Technol
lut 1992;65:101 – 9. 1996;31:2001 – 9.
[53] Yamuna RT, Namasivayam C. Color removal from aqueous [73] Periasamy K, Namasivayam C. Removal of copper(II) by ad-
solution by biogas residual slurry. Toxicol Environ Chem sorption onto peanut hull carbon from water and copper plat-
1993;38:131 – 43. ing industry wastewater. Chemosphere 1996;32:769 – 89.
[54] Namasivayam C, Periasamy K. Bicarbonate-treated peanut [74] Wasay SA, Haron MdJ, Tokunaga S. Adsorption of fluoride,
hull carbon for mercury(II) removal from aqueous solution. phosphate, and arsenate ions on lanthanum-impregnated silica
Water Res 1993;27:1663–8. gel. Water Environ Res 1996;68:295 – 300.
[55] Orhan Y, Büyükgüngör H. The removal of heavy metals by [75] Wasay SA, Haron MdJ, Uchiumi A, Tokunaga S. Removal of
using agricultural wastes. Wat Sci Tech 1993;28:247–55. arsenite and arsenate ions from aqueous-solution by basic yt-
[56] Namasivayam C, Ranganathan K. Waste Fe(III)/Cr(III) hy- trium carbonate. Water Res 1996;30:1143 – 8.
droxide as adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous [76] Mittal AK, Gupta SK. Biosorption of cationic dyes by dead
solution and chromium plating industry wastewater. Envir macro fungus Fomitopsis carnes: batch studies. Wat Sci Tech
Pollu 1993;82:255 – 61. 1996;34:81 – 7.
[57] Namasivayam C, Thamaraiselvi K, Yamuna RT. Removal of [77] Namasivayam C, Muniasamy N, Gayatri K, Rani. M, Ran-
paraquat by adsorption on ‘waste’ Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide: ganathan K. Removal of dyes from aqueous solutions by cel-
adsorption rates and equilibrium studies. Pestic Sci 1994;41:7 – lulosic waste orange peel. Bioresource Technol 1996;57:37–43.
12. [78] Lee. CK, Low KS, Chow SW. Chrome sludge as an adsorbent
[58] Periasamy K, Namasivayam C. Process development for re- for colour removal. Environ Technol 1996;17:1023 – 8.
moval and recovery of cadmium from wastewater by a low- [79] Namasivayam C, Senthilkumar S. Recycling of industrial solid
cost adsorbent: adsorption rates and equilibrium studies. Ind waste for the removal of mercury(II) by adsorption process.
Eng Chem Res 1994;33:317–20. . Chemosphere 1997;34:357 – 75.
Y.S. Ho, G. McKay / Process Biochemistry 34 (1999) 451–465 465
[80] Namasivayam C, Kadirvelu K. Agricultural solid wastes for the Technol 1997;31:496 – 503.
removal of heavy metals: Adsorption of Cu(II) by coirpith [83] Kim CY, Choi HM, Cho HT. Effect of deacetylation on sorp-
carbon. Chemosphere 1997;34:377–99. tion of dyes and chromium on chitin. J Appl Polym Sci
[81] Namasivayam C, Arasi DJSE. Removal of Congo red from 1997;63:725 – 36.
wastewater by adsorption onto waste red mud. Chemosphere [84] Banerjee K, Cheremisinoff PN, Cheng SL. Adsorption
1997;34:401 – 17. kinetics of o-xylene by fly ash. Water Res 1997;31: 249–61.
[82] Yin YJ, Allen HE, Huang CP, Sparks DL, Sanders PF. Kinetics [85] Lockhart NC. Electrical properties and the surface characteristic
of mercury(II) adsorption and desorption on soil. Environ Sci and structure of clays. J Colloid Interface Sci 1980;74:520–9.