Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bahasa Inggris Hukum
Bahasa Inggris Hukum
NIM : 2014101082
KELAS :1C
SEMESTER : 1 (SATU)
1. Please read the article carefully and find of these aspect based on article :
1.1 Analysis introduction that contains: (1) highlighting problem, (2) scientific
gap and (3) research objectives.
Mencakup: (1) menekankan pada masalah, (2) kesenjangan ilmiah dan (3)
tujuan penelitian
1.2 Analysis the method that describes : (1) types of research/research design,
(2) variables/data, (3) data collection techniques and (4) data analysis
techniques.
Menguraikan: (1) jenis penelitan, (2) variable/data, (3) teknik pengumpulan
data dan (4) teknik analisis data.
1.3 Result and Discusion includes: (1) presentation of data systematically, and
(2) comparison with the results/theories/findings of previous studies.
Mencakup: (1) penyajian data hasil olahan secara bersistem, dan (2)
komparasi dengan hasil/teori/temuan kajian sebelumnya.
1.4 Conclusion consist of : (1) a description of the most significant results and
recommendations.
Terdiri dari: (1) satu paragraf utuh, (2) uraian hasil yang paling signifikan
dan (3) rekomendasi.
2. Choose only 2 of 4 from the following article.
3. If there is no aspect according to the terms above, at least you can find 2 or 3
aspects that contains from the whole article.
4. Write your answer in the microsoft word format and to prevent the damage you
can use the .pdf format.
5. Make sure to write your identity first before make the answer.
6. The final exam have to complete 2 days the latest after you receive the article.
The Supremacy of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM)
under the World Trade Organization (WTO)
PRELIMINARY
The existence of inequality and poverty in some countries doubted the
contribution of the WTO. The overwhelming spirit of national interest through the
imposition of discriminatory and protective measures has deteriorated the WTO. Given
its role for enforcing trade commitments, the dispute settlement mechanism is crucial to
save the future of WTO. This mechanism shows its supremacy by limiting the capacity
of the WTO member states to impose discriminatory and protective measures,
particularly related to public morals exception and cultural concern.
ANALYSIS METHOD
The research method used in writing this article is the This paper is normative
legal research, which based on primary on international agreement related to the dispute
settlement mechanism and the decision of the Panel and Appellate Body, secondary one
included references from books, journal articles, internet resource such as news and
other documents having correlation with the paper issues. This paper use legal
interpretation to analysis the data.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. The dispute settlement mechanism under the GATT
Initially, contracting parties could start the process of dispute settlement
through submitting consultation. Contracting parties could undertake
consultation with or without the presence of a mediator or working party. If the
consultations was unsuccessful to settle disputes, the working party that covered
representatives from all related parties, mostly the parties to the dispute, had to
‘promptly investigate’ and submitted a report with recommendations, for
adoption by the contracting parties.
B. The Dispute Settlement Mechanism under WTO
The primary goal of the WTO DSM is to promptly resolve the WTO
members’ disputes concerning the particular rights and obligations of the WTO
members. The current mechanism of the DSM WTO consists four stages:
consultations, panel report, Appellate Body report (AB report), and DSB
adoption. The DSM WTO is commenced when a member proposes
consultations with the other member states.
C. Indonesia’s Participation Under the DSM WTO,
Since 1998, Indonesia has been involving in the WTO dispute as a respondent
for 10 disputes, a complainant for 10 disputes and a third party for around 17
disputes. For instance, in US — Clove Cigarettes, promoting what it called as
national interest, Indonesia filled a lawsuit, protesting the US’s ban on clove
cigarettes from Indonesia, but permitting the local cigarettes’ production and
sale. The AB then upheld this complaint, ruling the ban deviated of national
treatment principle under the agreement of Technical Barriers to Trade (‘TBT’).
CONCLUSION
PRELIMINARY
ANALYSIS METHOD
The research method used in writing this article is the This paper is empirical
legal research using non probability sampling in the form of Purposive sampling. Since
this study involves data it is automatically becomes an empirical legal research (M.
Hadjon, 2005: 5). This empirical legal research aims to examine legal issues specifically
related to legal protection and empowerment of Disabled Community in Buleleng
Regency. The research is conducted in Buleleng Regency, the reason for determining
Buleleng as a research location is based on important considerations, based on
preliminary observations, that the Buleleng regency is well-known as an educational
city in Bali Province, yet it still has problems related to legal protection and
empowerment of people with disabilities.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Legal protection as an effort to protect human rights especially for persons with
disabilities in Buleleng Regency is an effort to meet the needs of things that can be
detrimental to persons with disabilities. In Buleleng Regency, the Social Service as a
regional agency that has the main duties and functions in the field of social welfare
including providing basic social services, namely social rehabilitation services for
people with disabilities as well as strategic steps in handling Social Welfare Problems
(PMKS) in carrying out social welfare in Buleleng Regency. In addition, there is also a
program of assistance given to persons with disabilities in Buleleng Regency, which is
ASDP (Social Assistance for Persons with Disabilities), which is only given to persons
with severe disabilities, in the form of Rp300,000 / month. In addition to the rules in
national law, Buleleng Regency has also submitted a draft for regional regulation on the
Protection and Fulfillment of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which regulates
rights such as: equal treatment before the law, recognized as legal subjects, owning and
inheriting movable or immovable property, and protection of intellectual property
rights. The empowerment of persons with disabilities is an effort to improve the abilities
of persons with disabilities through various implementation of educational programs,
training, counseling, assistance in various aspects such as economic, social, cultural,
educational, and so on in order to achieve the level of social functioning within and
have the authority to make decisions related to their life problems. The empowerment of
persons with disabilities in this case is carried out by the Government of the Regency of
Buleleng by the Social Service by providing job training which is also one of the rights
stipulated in the Regional Regulation of the Regency of Buleleng concerning Protection
and Fulfillment of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In addition, persons with
disabilities will also be included in non-governmental organizations or organizations for
persons with disabilities as well as associations concerned with disabilities, especially in
Buleleng Regency. The empowerment is done to increase the ability and independence
of the persons with disabilities.