Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanical Low Back Pain
Mechanical Low Back Pain
Low back pain is usually nonspecific or mechanical. Mechanical low back pain arises intrinsically from the spine, interverte-
bral disks, or surrounding soft tissues. Clinical clues, or red flags, may help identify cases of nonmechanical low back pain
and prompt further evaluation or imaging. Red flags include progressive motor or sensory loss, new urinary retention or
overflow incontinence, history of cancer, recent invasive spinal procedure, and significant trauma relative to age. Imaging
on initial presentation should be reserved for when there is suspicion for cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, fracture,
or infection. Plain radiography of the lumbar spine is appropriate to assess for
fracture and bony abnormality, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is better
for identifying the source of neurologic or soft tissue abnormalities. There are
multiple treatment modalities for mechanical low back pain, but strong evidence
of benefit is often lacking. Moderate evidence supports the use of nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and topiramate in the short-term treatment of
mechanical low back pain. There is little or no evidence of benefit for acetamin-
ophen, antidepressants (except duloxetine), skeletal muscle relaxants, lidocaine
patches, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of
chronic low back pain. There is strong evidence for short-term effectiveness and
moderate-quality evidence for long-term effectiveness of yoga in the treatment
of chronic low back pain. Various spinal manipulative techniques (osteopathic
Mechanical low back pain refers to back pain that arises on to have recurrent episodes. Chronic low back pain affects
intrinsically from the spine, intervertebral disks, or sur- up to 23% of the population worldwide, with an estimated
rounding soft tissues. This includes lumbosacral muscle 24% to 80% of patients having a recurrence at one year.2,3
strain, disk herniation, lumbar spondylosis, spondylolis- Medicare expenditures for patients with low back pain
thesis, spondylolysis, vertebral compression fractures, and have increased dramatically, with large increases in spend-
acute or chronic traumatic injury.1 Repetitive trauma and ing on epidural corticosteroid injections and opiate pre-
overuse are common causes of chronic mechanical low back scriptions (629% and 423% increases, respectively), as well
pain, which is often secondary to workplace injury. Most as increased use of magnetic resonance imaging and spinal
patients who experience activity-limiting low back pain go fusion surgery, without any significant improvement in
patient outcomes or disability rates.4 This article proposes a
more judicious use of imaging, with use of evidence-based
CME This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for
continuing medical education (CME). See CME Quiz on
treatments to decrease cost, decrease disability, and improve
page 417. overall outcomes.
Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.
Evaluation
Patient information: A handout on this topic is available at
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2018/1001/p421-s1.html. The history and physical examination, with appropriate use
of imaging, can point toward a specific etiology. However,
Avoid imaging studies (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or radiography) American Society of
for acute low back pain without specific indications. Anesthesiologists
Avoid lumbar spine imaging in the emergency department for adults with nontraumatic back American College of Emergency
pain unless the patient has severe or progressive neurologic deficits or is suspected of having Physicians
a serious underlying condition (such as vertebral infection, cauda equina syndrome, or cancer
with bony metastasis).
Do not perform imaging for low back pain in the first six weeks unless red flags are present. American Academy of Family
Red flags include, but are not limited to, severe or progressive neurologic deficits or suspected Physicians and American College of
serious underlying conditions such as osteomyelitis. Physicians
Do not recommend advanced imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging) of the spine within North American Spine Society
the first six weeks in patients with nonspecific acute low back pain in the absence of red flags.
Do not prescribe opiates for acute disabling low back pain before evaluation and a trial of American Academy of Physical
alternatives is considered. Medicine and Rehabilitation
Source: For more information on the Choosing Wisely Campaign, see http://w ww.choosingwisely.org. For supporting citations and to search
Choosing Wisely recommendations relevant to primary care, see https://w ww.aafp.org/afp/recommendations/search.htm.
the complexity and biomechanics of the spine make it dif- pain location, severity, timing, aggravating/relieving fac-
ficult to identify a specific anatomic lesion, with a precise tors, and radiation. Body mass index, physical activity,
diagnosis made in only 20% of cases.5 and occupational hazards should be used to assess risk of
mechanical low back pain. Patients with psychosocial defi-
HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION cits or disabilities are more likely to develop chronic back
Evaluation of low back pain should begin with a history and pain and are more likely to be disabled by their symptoms.1
physical examination, the results of which dictate further Physical examination should include evaluation of
evaluation or treatment. The presence of red flags that sug- strength, sensation, and reflexes of the lower extremities.
gest systemic disease or urgent problems warrants additional Inspection, palpation, and range-of-motion testing of the
evaluation before empiric treatment (Table 13,5-7). A system- lumbosacral musculature are helpful for identifying point
atic review showed a higher
likelihood of fracture with
TABLE 1
the presence of one or more
red flags for trauma (older Red Flag Findings in Patients with Low Back Pain
age, prolonged corticoste-
roid use, significant trauma Possible Examination findings
etiology Historic findings (strength of evidence) (strength of evidence)
relative to age, contusions
or abrasions). History of Cauda Progressive motor or sensory loss, new Saddle anesthesia, loss of anal
malignancy had the high- equina urinary retention or overflow incontinence, sphincter tone, significant motor
syndrome new fecal incontinence (strong) deficits encompassing multiple
est posttest probability for nerve roots (strong)
detection of spinal malig-
nancy.6 Other important red Fracture Significant trauma relative to age (strong) Contusions or abrasions
(intermediate)
flags include constitutional Prolonged corticosteroid use (intermediate)
symptoms for malignancy Age older than 70 years, osteoporosis (weak)
or infection, loss of bowel Infection Spinal procedure in the past 12 months Fever, wound in the spinal region
or bladder function and (strong) (strong)
progressive motor or sen- Intravenous drug use, immunosuppression, Localized pain and tenderness
sory loss for cauda equina distant lumbar spine surgery (intermediate) (weak)
syndrome, and history of a
Malignancy History of metastatic cancer (strong) Focal tenderness and localized pain
spinal procedure or intrave- in the setting of risk factors (weak)
Unexplained weight loss (intermediate)
nous drug use for infection.
The history should Information from references 3, and 5 through 7.
include an assessment of
422 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 7 ◆ October 1, 2018
MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN
tenderness, restriction, and spasm. The straight leg raise test likelihood ratio = 0.72).7 Patients with psychosocial symp-
is performed by the examiner raising the patient’s straight toms or risk factors may be assessed for nonorganic or inap-
leg to an angle of 30 to 70 degrees. Ipsilateral leg pain at propriate physical signs.
less than 60 degrees is positive for lumbar disk herniation
(sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.40;positive likelihood IMAGING
ratio = 2.0, negative likelihood ratio = 0.5). Reproduction Imaging is not recommended for most patients with nonspe-
of contralateral pain using the crossed straight leg raise test cific mechanical low back pain in the absence of red flags.5,6
is positive for lumbar disk herniation (sensitivity = 0.35, The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Cri-
specificity = 0.90;positive likelihood ratio = 3.5, negative teria for low back pain recommends imaging only if there
is no improvement after six weeks of
conservative medical and physical
TABLE 2 therapies, or there is high suspicion for
cauda equina syndrome, malignancy,
Differential Diagnosis of Mechanical Low Back Pain fracture, or infection.8 The presence
Diagnosis (percent- of radiculopathy with low back pain is
age of patients with not an indication for early imaging.8,9
low back pain) Key characteristics and clinical clues
Early imaging with plain radiogra-
Lumbosacral Often following isolated traumatic incidents or repetitive over- phy is associated with worse over-
muscle strains/ use;pain worse with movement, relieved by rest;examination all outcomes and is likely to identify
sprains (70%) may reveal restricted range of motion, muscle tenderness, or
minor abnormalities in asymptomatic
trigger points
patients.8 Plain radiography of the
Lumbar spondylo- More common in persons older than 40 years;pain may be lumbar spine is appropriate to assess
sis (10%) present in or radiate from the hips;pain is worse with activity; for fracture and bony abnormality,
pain may worsen with lumbar spine extension or rotation;
neurologic examination is usually normal whereas magnetic resonance imaging
is better for identifying the source of
Disk herniation (5% Most often involves the L5 or S1 nerve root, at L4-L5 or L5-S1 neurologic or soft tissue abnormalities.
to 10%) in 90% to 95% of cases;symptoms may include pain, paresthe-
sia, sensory change, loss of strength or reflexes depending on
A randomized trial showed that early
affected nerve root routine use of magnetic resonance
imaging increases lumbar spinal sur-
Spondylolysis (less Common in young athletes;symptoms often develop insidi-
than 5%*) ously;pain with activities involving lumbar extension;imaging
geries without reciprocal benefits in
is diagnostic, but early imaging in the absence of red flags is pain or function.10 It is appropriate
typically not necessary;usually occurs in a lower lumbar verte- to begin symptomatic therapy with-
bra, most often L5 out imaging in adults younger than
Vertebral compres- Fracture may occur slowly over time or acutely with mild 50 years and in those older than 50
sion fracture (4%) trauma;acute episodes usually resolve in four to six weeks, but years if there is not concern for sys-
abnormal healing or additional fractures may result in chronic temic disease.11
pain and functional impairment;presents as localized back
pain that is worse with flexion and often point tenderness on
palpation;risk factors include increased age, history of trauma, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
chronic steroid use, and osteoporosis;plain radiography The diagnosis of mechanical low back
should be obtained to confirm diagnosis pain should be made when systemic
Spondylolisthesis Pain often radiates into the buttocks or posterior thigh;leg disease and referred pain have been
(3% to 4%) pain may be worse than back pain;often presents as paresthe- ruled out, and no red flags have been
sias, numbness, or weakness;occurs at L5 in 90% of cases identified. The differential diagnosis is
Spinal stenosis (3%) Presents as back pain, sometimes with sensory loss or weak- summarized in (Table 2).1-3,5-7,11
ness in the legs;calf pain with ambulation that is relieved with
rest/sitting (pseudoclaudication);neurologic examination Treatment
findings are normal;imaging is diagnostic
Multiple treatments may be employed
*—Occurs in less than 5% of the general population but in up to 50% of preadolescent and for acute or chronic mechanical low
adolescent athletes. back pain, although strong evidence
Information from references 1 through 3, 5 through 7, and 11. for their benefit is lacking.5 Once non-
mechanical causes of low back pain are
Adapted with permission from Casazza BA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(4):346.
424 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 7 ◆ October 1, 2018
MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN
426 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 7 ◆ October 1, 2018
MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN
TABLE 5
Derangement Internal articular displacement causing a disturbance in Rapid and lasting changes in pain intensity and loca-
syndrome the joint, which produces pain and impairment tion occurring for a few minutes to a few days;often
accompanied by mechanical improvements;symptom
centralization/peripheralization may be present
Dysfunction Pain resulting from deformation of structurally impaired Pain is felt consistently when the abnormal tissue is
syndrome soft tissue surrounding or within the spine resulting from loaded at the end range of motion and abates when the
previous trauma, degeneration, or development of an loading is released;range of motion is restricted;no
imperfect repair;examples include contraction, scarring, rapid change in pain is seen
adherence, and adaptive shortening
Posture Mechanical deformation of normal soft tissues arising Local mechanical pain occurs only after prolonged
syndrome from prolonged postural stresses that lead to pain;local positioning at joint end range (e.g., sitting slouched);
mechanical pain occurs after prolonged positioning at and abates when position changes;range of motion is
joint end range (e.g., sitting slouched) full and repeated motions have no effect
Other Does not fit criteria for derangement, dysfunction, or No lasting change in pain location or intensity in
posture syndrome response to therapeutic loading strategies
physical therapists with training have been clinically proven 2. Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back
pain. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):482-491.
to demonstrate good pain and function outcomes for patients 3. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back
with low back pain.23 Training in the McKenzie method pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):769-781.
consists of two levels of certification and multiple compo- 4. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Martin BI. Overtreating chronic back
nents. Information on education, credentialing, and locating pain:time to back off? J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(1):62-68.
5. Casazza BA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain. Am Fam
trained clinicians, go to http://mckenzieinstituteusa.org. Physician. 2012;85(4):3 43-350.
Data Sources: We searched PubMed for the key term low back 6. Downie A, Williams CM, Henschke N, et al. Red flags to screen for malig-
pain, with mechanical, McKenzie, MDT, physical therapy, red flags, nancy and fracture in patients with low back pain:systematic review [pub-
differential diagnosis, manipulation, treatment, NSAIDs, muscle lished correction appears in BMJ. 2014;348:g7]. BMJ. 2013;347:f 7095.
relaxants, steroids, acetaminophen, exercise, disability. We also 7. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical exam-
searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Clinical ination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992;268(6):760-765.
Evidence, Essential Evidence Plus, and the National Guideline 8. Patel ND, Broderick DF, Burns J, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria low
Clearinghouse. Search dates:March to May 2017, and May 2018. back pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;1 3(9):1069-1078.
9. Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK, et al.;Clinical Guidelines Committee
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private of the American College of Physicians. Diagnostic imaging for low back
views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as pain:advice for high-value health care from the American College of
reflecting the views of the U.S. Army Medical Department or the Physicians [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1
U.S. Army Service at large. pt 1):71]. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):181-189.
10. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance plinary rehabilitation for low back pain:an evidence-based clinical prac-
imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain:a randomized tice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289(21):2810-2818. 2009;3 4(10):1066-1077.
1 1. Jarvik JG, Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with empha- 30. Staal JB, de Bie R, de Vet HC, Hildebrandt J, Nelemans P. Injection
sis on imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002;1 37(7):586-597. therapy for subacute and chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database
1 2. Saragiotto BT, Machado GC, Ferreira ML, Pinheiro MB, Abdel Shaheed Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD001824.
C, Maher CG. Paracetamol for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst 31. Dagenais S, Yelland MJ, Del Mar C, Schoene ML. Prolotherapy injec-
Rev. 2016;(6):CD012230. tions for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):
13. Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, Koes BW, Scholten RJ, van Tulder MW. Non- CD004059.
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain. Cochrane Data- 32. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. Effect of mindfulness-
base Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD000396. based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care
14. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, et al. Benefits and safety of on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back
gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain:a systematic review and meta- pain:a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(12):1 240-1249.
analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2017;14(8): 33. Buchmuller A, Navez M, Milletre-Bernardin M, et al.;Lombotens Trial
e1002369. Group. Value of TENS for relief of chronic low back pain with or without
15. Muehlbacher M, Nickel MK, Kettler C, et al. Topiramate in treatment radicular pain. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(5):656-665.
of patients with chronic low back pain:a randomized, double-blind, 3 4.
Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G. A systematic review and
placebo-controlled study. Clin J Pain. 2006;22(6):526-531. meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(5):
16. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW. 450-460.
Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain. Cochrane Data- 35. Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary bio
base Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD008880. psychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain:Cochrane sys-
17. Smith BE, Littlewood C, May S. An update of stabilisation exercises for tematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.
low back pain:a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Musculo- 36. Engers A, Jellema P, Wensing M, van der Windt DA, Grol R, van Tulder
skelet Disord. 2014;15:416. MW. Individual patient education for low back pain. Cochrane Database
18. van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, Solway S, Bouter LM. Muscle relax- Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD004057.
ants for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 37. Goldberg H, Firtch W, Tyburski M, et al. Oral steroids for acute radic-
(2):CD004252. ulopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk:a randomized clinical trial.
19. Friedman BW, Dym AA, Davitt M, et al. Naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, JAMA. 2015;313(19):1915-1923.
oxycodone/acetaminophen, or placebo for treating acute low back 38. Rubinstein SM, Terwee CB, Assendelft WJ, de Boer MR, van Tulder MW.
pain. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1572-1580. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain. Cochrane Data-
20. Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for base Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD008880.
nonspecific low back pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC 39. Smith BE, Littlewood C, May S. An update of stabilisation exercises for
Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:286. low back pain:a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Musculo-
21. Eskin B, Shih RD, Fiesseler FW, et al. Prednisone for emergency depart- skelet Disord. 2014;15:416.
ment low back pain:a randomized controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2014; 40. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy
47(1):65-70. for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst
22. Urquhart DM, Hoving JL, Assendelft WW, Roland M, van Tulder MW. Rev. 2005;(3):CD000335.
Antidepressants for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database 41. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, et al. Implications of early and guideline
Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD001703. adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs
23. McKenzie R, May S. The Human Extremities Mechanical Diagnosis and [published correction appears in BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):4 44].
Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand:Spinal Publications;2000. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:150.
24. Rosedale R, Rastogi R, May S, et al. Efficacy of exercise intervention 42. Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Yoo RI, et al. Surgical options for lumbar spi-
as determined by the Mckenzie system of mechanical diagnosis and nal stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(11):CD012421.
therapy for knee osteoarthritis:a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop 43. Hedlund R, Johansson C, Hägg O, Fritzell P, Tullberg T;Swedish Lumbar
Sports Phys Ther. 2014;4 4(3):173-181. Spine Study Group. The long-term outcome of lumbar fusion in the
25. Dunsford A, Kumar S, Clarke S. Integrating evidence into practice:use Swedish lumbar spine study. Spine J. 2016;16(5):579-587.
of McKenzie-based treatment for mechanical low back pain. J Multidis- 4 4. McKenzie RA, May S. The Lumbar Spine. Mechanical Diagnosis and
cip Healthc. 2011;4:393-402. Therapy. Waikanae, New Zealand:Spinal Publications;2003.
26. Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for 45. Long A, May S, Fung T. The comparative prognostic value of directional
nonspecific low back pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC preference and centralization. A useful tool for front-line clinicians? J
Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:286. Man Manip Ther. 2018;16(4):248-254.
27.
Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, et al. Acupuncture and 46. Aina A, May S, Clare H, The centralization phenomenon of spinal
dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1): symptoms—a systematic review. Man Ther. 2004;9(3):1 34-143.
CD001351. 47. Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG. Reliability of McKenzie classification of
28. Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, Irvin E, Imamura M. Massage for low- patients with cervical or lumbar pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;
back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(9):CD001929. 28(2):1 22-127.
29. Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, et al.;American Pain Society Low Back 48. Fairbank J, Gwilym SE, France JC, et al. The role of classification of
Pain Guideline Panel. Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisci- chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 suppl):S19-S42.
428 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 98, Number 7 ◆ October 1, 2018